The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Atomic weights of the elements 2013 (IUPAC Technical Report)
Open accessAbstract
The biennial review of atomic-weight determinations and other cognate data has resulted in changes for the standard atomic weights of 19 elements. The standard atomic weights of four elements have been revised based on recent determinations of isotopic abundances in natural terrestrial materials: cadmium to 112.414(4) from 112.411(8), molybdenum to 95.95(1) from 95.96(2), selenium to 78.971(8) from 78.96(3), and thorium to 232.0377(4) from 232.038 06(2). The Commission on Isotopic Abundances and Atomic Weights (ciaaw.org) also revised the standard atomic weights of fifteen elements based on the 2012 Atomic Mass Evaluation: aluminium (aluminum) to 26.981 5385(7) from 26.981 5386(8), arsenic to 74.921 595(6) from 74.921 60(2), beryllium to 9.012 1831(5) from 9.012 182(3), caesium (cesium) to 132.905 451 96(6) from 132.905 4519(2), cobalt to 58.933 194(4) from 58.933 195(5), fluorine to 18.998 403 163(6) from 18.998 4032(5), gold to 196.966 569(5) from 196.966 569(4), holmium to 164.930 33(2) from 164.930 32(2), manganese to 54.938 044(3) from 54.938 045(5), niobium to 92.906 37(2) from 92.906 38(2), phosphorus to 30.973 761 998(5) from 30.973 762(2), praseodymium to 140.907 66(2) from 140.907 65(2), scandium to 44.955 908(5) from 44.955 912(6), thulium to 168.934 22(2) from 168.934 21(2), and yttrium to 88.905 84(2) from 88.905 85(2). The Commission also recommends the standard value for the natural terrestrial uranium isotope ratio, N(238 U)/N(235 U)=137.8(1).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coplen, T. B. (2011) · Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/rcm.5129 · Cited by 1,831
Self-citationAssessment of international reference materials for isotope-ratio analysis (IUPAC Technical Report)
Brand, W. A., Coplen, T. B., Vogl, J., Rosner, M., & Prohaska, T. (2014) · Pure and Applied Chemistry · doi:10.1515/pac-2013-1023 · Cited by 704
Self-citationAtomic weights of the elements 2007 (IUPAC Technical Report)
Wieser, M. E., & Berglund, M. (2009) · Pure and Applied Chemistry · doi:10.1351/pac-rep-09-08-03 · Cited by 220
Self-citation
Cited by
Manganese oxide shuttling in pre-GOE oceans – evidence from molybdenum and iron isotopes
Kurzweil, F., Wille, M., Gantert, N., Beukes, N. J., & Schoenberg, R. (2016) · Earth and Planetary Science Letters · doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2016.07.013 · Cited by 90
Lengfelder, F., Grupe, G., Stallauer, A., Huth, R., & Söllner, F. (2019) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.014 · Cited by 56
DeltaMS: a tool to track isotopologues in GC- and LC-MS data
Baumeister, T. U. H., Ueberschaar, N., Schmidt-Heck, W., Mohr, J. F., Deicke, M., Wichard, T., Guthke, R., & Pohnert, G. (2018) · Metabolomics · doi:10.1007/s11306-018-1336-x · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Meija, J., Coplen, T. B., Berglund, M., Brand, W. A., De Bièvre, P., Gröning, M., Holden, N. E., Irrgeher, J., Loss, R. D., Walczyk, T., & Prohaska, T.
- Venue
- Pure and Applied Chemistry
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2016-02-24
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 265-291
- ISSN
- 0033-4545 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3075
- OpenAlex
- W2304702132
- Cited by
- 747
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 46.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Atomic weights of the elements 2013 (IUPAC Technical Report). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1515/pac-2015-0305
- The paper
- Meija, J., Coplen, T. B., Berglund, M., Brand, W. A., De Bièvre, P., Gröning, M., Holden, N. E., Irrgeher, J., Loss, R. D., Walczyk, T., & Prohaska, T. (2016). Atomic weights of the elements 2013 (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure and Applied Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1515/pac-2015-0305
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
