Cited by 55Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignUndergraduate Neuroscience Education and Research

Carbon fiber on polyimide ultra-microelectrodes

Open access
Gillis, Winthrop F, Lissandrello, Charles A, Shen, Jun, Pearre, Ben W, Mertiri, Alket, Deku, Felix, Cogan, Stuart, Holinski, Bradley J +4 more·2018·Journal of Neural Engineering

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Objective . Most preparations for making neural recordings degrade over time and eventually fail due to insertion trauma and reactive tissue response. The magnitudes of these responses are thought to be related to the electrode size (specifically, the cross-sectional area), the relative stiffness of the electrode, and the degree of tissue tolerance for the material. Flexible carbon fiber ultra-microelectrodes have a much smaller cross-section than traditional electrodes and low tissue reactivity, and thus may enable improved longevity of neural recordings in the central and peripheral nervous systems. Only two carbon fiber array designs have been described previously, each with limited channel densities due to limitations of the fabrication processes or interconnect strategies. Here, we describe a method for assembling carbon fiber electrodes on a flexible polyimide substrate that is expected to facilitate the construction of high-density recording and stimulating arrays. Approach . Individual carbon fibers were aligned using an alignment tool that was 3D-printed with sub-micron resolution using direct laser writing. Indium deposition on the carbon fibers, followed by low-temperature microsoldering, provided a robust and reliable method of electrical connection to the polyimide interconnect. Main results . Spontaneous multiunit activity and stimulation-evoked compound responses with SNR >10 and >120, respectively, were recorded from a small (125 µ m) peripheral nerve. We also improved the typically poor charge injection capacity of small diameter carbon fibers by electrodepositing 100 nm-thick iridium oxide films, making the carbon fiber arrays usable for electrical stimulation as well as recording. Significance . Our innovations in fabrication technique pave the way for further miniaturization of carbon fiber ultra-microelectrode arrays. We believe these advances to be key steps to enable a shift from labor intensive, manual assembly to a more automated manufacturing process.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1741-2552/aa8c88

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Combining hydrogels and conductive polymers is a hot research area because hydrogels have nerve-like mechanical properties and provide a hydrophilic interface that reduces non-specific protein adhesion.

    “In addition, the combination of hydrogels and conductive polymers is a hot area of research since the former has mechanical properties similar to those of nerves and can provide a hydrophilic interface that reduces the adhesion of non-specific proteins.[58,539–542]”

    From Flexible Electronics and Devices as Human–Machine Interfaces for Medical Robotics (2022) · cites this paper as [541]

    The Introduction describes carbon-fiber arrays on polyimide, and the Discussion and Conclusion addresses their use as nerve electrodes. Searches for hydrogels, conductive polymers, hydrophilic interfaces, and non-specific protein adhesion found no passage addressing the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 55

Authors
Gillis, W. F., Lissandrello, C. A., Shen, J., Pearre, B. W., Mertiri, A., Deku, F., Cogan, S., Holinski, B. J., Chew, D. J., White, A. E., Otchy, T. M., & Gardner, T. J.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Boston University
  • The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
  • GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Otchy, Timothy M
Venue
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2018-01-08
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
016010
ISSN
  • 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2560
OpenAlex
W2950120187
Cited by
55
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • OpenBU (Boston University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • NIH (U01NS090454-01)
  • GlaxoSmithKline
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Undergraduate Neuroscience Education and Research
Keywords
polyimide substrate, direct laser writing, indium deposition, charge injection capacity, peripheral nerve recording, electrical stimulation, electrode-tissue interface
MeSH terms
Carbon Fiber, Animals, Electrodes, Implanted, Female, Hypoglossal Nerve, Male, Microelectrodes, Resins, Synthetic, Finches

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review