The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Developing a hippocampal neural prosthetic to facilitate human memory encoding and recall
Open accessAbstract
Objective . We demonstrate here the first successful implementation in humans of a proof-of-concept system for restoring and improving memory function via facilitation of memory encoding using the patient’s own hippocampal spatiotemporal neural codes for memory. Memory in humans is subject to disruption by drugs, disease and brain injury, yet previous attempts to restore or rescue memory function in humans typically involved only nonspecific, modulation of brain areas and neural systems related to memory retrieval. Approach . We have constructed a model of processes by which the hippocampus encodes memory items via spatiotemporal firing of neural ensembles that underlie the successful encoding of short-term memory. A nonlinear multi-input, multi-output (MIMO) model of hippocampal CA3 and CA1 neural firing is computed that predicts activation patterns of CA1 neurons during the encoding (sample) phase of a delayed match-to-sample (DMS) human short-term memory task. Main results . MIMO model-derived electrical stimulation delivered to the same CA1 locations during the sample phase of DMS trials facilitated short-term/working memory by 37% during the task. Longer term memory retention was also tested in the same human subjects with a delayed recognition (DR) task that utilized images from the DMS task, along with images that were not from the task. Across the subjects, the stimulated trials exhibited significant improvement (35%) in both short-term and long-term retention of visual information. Significance . These results demonstrate the facilitation of memory encoding which is an important feature for the construction of an implantable neural prosthetic to improve human memory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“To that end, it is now feasible to measure cognition (as read out by standard laboratory cognitive tasks) in real time, and to adjust stimulation in response to cognitive changes (Widge et al. 2017, Ezzyat et al. 2018, Hampson et al. 2018, Yousefi et al. 2019).”
From Deep brain stimulation for psychiatric disorders: From focal brain targets to cognitive networks (2021) · cites this paper as Hampson et al. 2018
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LOSS OF RECENT MEMORY AFTER BILATERAL HIPPOCAMPAL LESIONS
Scoville, W. B., & Milner, B. (1957) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.20.1.11 · Cited by 7,322
Zola-Morgan, S., Squire, L., & Amaral, D. (1986) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.06-10-02950.1986 · Cited by 1,997
Organization of the entorhinal—hippocampal system: A review of current anatomical data
Witter, M. P. (1993) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.1993.4500030707 · Cited by 534
Memory Enhancement and Deep-Brain Stimulation of the Entorhinal Area
Suthana, N., Haneef, Z., Stern, J. M., Mukamel, R., Behnke, E., Knowlton, B. J., & Fried, I. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1107212 · Cited by 491
A cortical neural prosthesis for restoring and enhancing memory
Berger, T. W., Hampson, R. E., Song, D. B., Goonawardena, A. V., Marmarelis, V. Z., & Deadwyler, S. A. (2011) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/8/4/046017 · Cited by 316
Self-citationDistribution of spatial and nonspatial information in dorsal hippocampus
Hampson, R. E., Simeral, J. D., & Deadwyler, S. A. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/45154 · Cited by 306
Self-citationDirect Electrical Stimulation of the Human Entorhinal Region and Hippocampus Impairs Memory
Jacobs, J., Miller, J. F., Lee, S. A., Coffey, T., Watrous, A. J., Sperling, M. R., Sharan, A. D., Worrell, G. A., Berry, B. M., Lega, B. C., et al. (2016) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.10.062 · Cited by 251
Direct Brain Stimulation Modulates Encoding States and Memory Performance in Humans
Ezzyat, Y., Kragel, J. E., Burke, J. F., Levy, D. F., Lyalenko, A., Wanda, P. A., O’Sullivan, L., Hurley, K. B., Busygin, S., Pedisich, I., et al. (2017) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2017.03.028 · Cited by 242
Retinal Prostheses: Current Clinical Results and Future Needs
Weiland, J. D., Cho, A. K., & Humayun, M. S. (2011) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.08.042 · Cited by 196
Synaptic Plasticity, Dementia and Alzheimer Disease
Skaper, S. D., Facci, L., Zusso, M., & Giusti, P. (2017) · CNS & Neurological Disorders - Drug Targets · doi:10.2174/1871527316666170113120853 · Cited by 192
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Wicks, 2016, Human hippocampal recording and stimulation: validation of depth electrode placement through combined high-resolution imaging and electrophysiologic recordings, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 2016
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Transcranial alternating current stimulation entrains single-neuron activity in the primate brain
Krause, M. R., Vieira, P. G., Csorba, B. A., Pilly, P. K., & Pack, C. C. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1815958116 · Cited by 341
Neurohybrid Memristive CMOS-Integrated Systems for Biosensors and Neuroprosthetics
Mikhaylov, A. N., Pimashkin, A. S., Pigareva, Y., Gerasimova, S. A., Gryaznov, E. G., Shchanikov, S., Zuev, A. D., Talanov, M. O., Lavrov, I. A., Demin, V. A., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2020.00358 · Cited by 189
Neurotechnologies for Human Cognitive Augmentation: Current State of the Art and Future Prospects
Cinel, C., Valeriani, D., & Poli, R. (2019) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2019.00013 · Cited by 193
Hacking the Brain: Dimensions of Cognitive Enhancement
Dresler, M., Sandberg, A., Bublitz, C., Ohla, K., Trenado, C., Mroczko-Wąsowicz, A., Kühn, S., & Repantis, D. (2018) · ACS Chemical Neuroscience · doi:10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00571 · Cited by 175
Neuropsychological tests of the future: How do we get there from here?
Bilder, R. M., & Reise, S. P. (2018) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1080/13854046.2018.1521993 · Cited by 160
Metadata
- Authors
- Hampson, R. E., Song, D., Robinson, B. S., Fetterhoff, D., Dakos, A. S., Roeder, B. M., She, X., Wicks, R. T., Witcher, M. R., Couture, D. E., Laxton, A. W., Munger-Clary, H., Popli, G., Sollman, M. J., Whitlow, C. T., Marmarelis, V. Z., Berger, T. W., & Deadwyler, S. A.
- Affiliations
- Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist (US)
- University of Southern California (US)
- University of Southern California
- Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center
- Corresponding author
- Hampson, Robert E
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Neural Engineering
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2018-03-28
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 036014
- ISSN
- 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-2560
- PMC
- PMC6576290
- OpenAlex
- W2795210532
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 12
- FWCI
- 17.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (N66001-14-C-4016)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- memory encoding, memory retrieval, short-term memory, working memory, long-term memory retention, CA1, CA3, neuronal ensembles, electrical brain stimulation, delayed matching-to-sample, memory enhancement
- MeSH terms
- Electrodes, Implanted, Hippocampus, Humans, Memory, Short-Term, Psychomotor Performance, Mental Recall, Neural Prostheses
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
