Cited by 227Speech Recognition and SynthesisSpeech and Audio ProcessingEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Speech synthesis from ECoG using densely connected 3D convolutional neural networks

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Objective . Direct synthesis of speech from neural signals could provide a fast and natural way of communication to people with neurological diseases. Invasively-measured brain activity (electrocorticography; ECoG) supplies the necessary temporal and spatial resolution to decode fast and complex processes such as speech production. A number of impressive advances in speech decoding using neural signals have been achieved in recent years, but the complex dynamics are still not fully understood. However, it is unlikely that simple linear models can capture the relation between neural activity and continuous spoken speech. Approach . Here we show that deep neural networks can be used to map ECoG from speech production areas onto an intermediate representation of speech (logMel spectrogram). The proposed method uses a densely connected convolutional neural network topology which is well-suited to work with the small amount of data available from each participant. Main results . In a study with six participants, we achieved correlations up to r = 0.69 between the reconstructed and original logMel spectrograms. We transfered our prediction back into an audible waveform by applying a Wavenet vocoder. The vocoder was conditioned on logMel features that harnessed a much larger, pre-existing data corpus to provide the most natural acoustic output. Significance . To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that high-quality speech has been reconstructed from neural recordings during speech production using deep neural networks.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1741-2552/ab0c59

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 76 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 227

Metadata

Authors
Angrick, M., Herff, C., Mugler, E., Tate, M. C., Slutzky, M. W., Krusienski, D. J., & Schultz, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Bremen (DE)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Angrick, Miguel
  • Herff, Christian
Venue
Journal of Neural Engineering
Published
2019-04-16
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
036019
ISSN
  • 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2560
OpenAlex
W2952609044
Cited by
225
References
76
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 15
FWCI
12.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1608140)
  • National Institutes of Health (F32DC015708)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1TR000150)
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01GQ1602)
  • Doris Duke Charitable Foundation (2011039)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Keywords
speech synthesis, electrocorticography, neural speech decoding, 3D convolutional neural networks, speech production, brain-computer interface, augmentative and alternative communication
MeSH terms
Electrocorticography, Cerebral Cortex, Communication Aids for Disabled, Communication Devices for People with Disabilities, Humans, Photic Stimulation, Speech, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review