Cited by 522EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesTactile and Sensory InteractionsSpeech Recognition and Synthesis

A high-performance neuroprosthesis for speech decoding and avatar control

Open access
Metzger, Sean L., Littlejohn, Kaylo T., Silva, Alexander B., Moses, David A., Seaton, Margaret P., Wang, Ran, Dougherty, Maximilian E., Liu, Jessie R. +7 more·2023·Nature

Abstract

Speech neuroprostheses have the potential to restore communication to people living with paralysis, but naturalistic speed and expressivity are elusive 1. Here we use high-density surface recordings of the speech cortex in a clinical-trial participant with severe limb and vocal paralysis to achieve high-performance real-time decoding across three complementary speech-related output modalities: text, speech audio and facial-avatar animation. We trained and evaluated deep-learning models using neural data collected as the participant attempted to silently speak sentences. For text, we demonstrate accurate and rapid large-vocabulary decoding with a median rate of 78 words per minute and median word error rate of 25%. For speech audio, we demonstrate intelligible and rapid speech synthesis and personalization to the participant's pre-injury voice. For facial-avatar animation, we demonstrate the control of virtual orofacial movements for speech and non-speech communicative gestures. The decoders reached high performance with less than two weeks of training. Our findings introduce a multimodal speech-neuroprosthetic approach that has substantial promise to restore full, embodied communication to people living with severe paralysis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41586-023-06443-4

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

34 of 53 cited sources checked · 17 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    In healthy speakers, neural representations in the sensorimotor cortex encode articulatory movements of the orofacial musculature.

    “In healthy speakers, neural representations in the SMC (comprising the precentral and postcentral gyri) encode articulatory movements of the orofacial musculature22,24,30.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [22] source

      The Discussion reports that sensorimotor cortical activity encodes movements of the vocal-tract articulators, and the STAR Methods locate the analyzed electrodes on the precentral and postcentral gyri. However, the Participants section says the five speakers were undergoing clinical treatment for epilepsy. The study therefore does not establish the claim specifically for healthy speakers. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [24] source
      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [30] source
      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Initial attempts to decode text from brain activity in a person with anarthria during attempted speech had limitations such as slow decoding rates and small vocabulary sizes.

    “Initial efforts to decode text from the brain activity ofa person with anarthria during attempted speech had various limitations, including slow decoding rates and small vocabulary sizes1,3.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [1] source
    • cites [3] source

      The paper’s introductory passage (labeled Abstract in our copy; page unavailable) describes an earlier attempt to decode full words from cortical activity during attempted speech in a person with anarthria and identifies its preliminary 50-word vocabulary as a limitation. It calls that approach’s decoding speed “promising,” however, and does not characterize its decoding rate as slow. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Being able to use evolving technology to communicate with family and friends, participate in community and work, and engage in virtual social contexts can greatly expand access to meaningful interpersonal interactions and improve quality of life.

    “The ability to interface with evolving technology to communicate with family and friends, facilitate community involvement and occupational participation, and engage in virtual, Internet-based social contexts (such as social media and metaverses) can vastly expand a person’s access to meaningful interpersonal interactions and ultimately improve their quality of life2,39.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [2] source

      The Results report that potential BCI users wanted face-to-face communication, email, and social networking; the Discussion links assistive technology to social interaction and employment and describes improved communication and quality of life as clinical goals. The paper concerns people with disabilities, however, and does not address metaverses or establish that these technologies vastly expand interpersonal interactions or improve quality of life. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [39] source
  • Findingcitation

    During 14 days of data collection shortly after implantation, text decoding performance exceeded previous BCIs' communication speeds by a factor of 4 or more.

    “During 14 days of data collection shortly after device implantation, we achieved high-performance text decoding, exceeding communication speeds of previous BCIs by a factor of 4 or more1,3,9”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [1] source

      The Results (Sentence Decoding; page unavailable) report real-time decoding at a median 15.2 words per minute, supporting the text-decoding portion of the claim. The Methods (Word and Sentence Task Design; page unavailable) describe 50 sessions over 81 weeks, not 14 days shortly after implantation. Our copy does not report a fourfold speed advantage over previous BCIs. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [3] source

      The Decoding performance section reports real-time text decoding, but the passages do not support 14 days of data collection shortly after implantation or a speed advantage of at least fourfold over previous BCIs. The Discussion instead notes that a previous spelling BCI achieved 90 characters per minute. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [9] source

      The Discussion reports high-performance text decoding at 90 characters per minute, exceeding previously reported BCI speeds. But it also reports prior speeds of 40 characters per minute for intracortical point-and-click typing and 60 for a visually evoked EEG speller, so it does not support a fourfold advantage over previous BCIs generally. The Daily decoder retraining section says the copy-typing data spanned 28 days, while the Discussion refers to functionality more than 1,000 days after implantation, not data collection shortly after implantation. (LLM, conf=0.89)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • Rests on an assumption: The participant's silent-speech attempts engage the same articulatory representations as natural speech production.
  • Findingcitation

    The vocabulary size was expanded by a factor of 20 relative to the previous direct-speech BCI.

    “expanding the vocabulary size of our previous direct-speech BCI by a factor of 20 (ref. 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1] source

      The Methods (Word and Sentence Task Design; page unavailable) identify the cited direct-speech BCI as using a 50-word set. The paper does not report a subsequent vocabulary expansion or establish the claimed factor of 20. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • Rests on an assumption: The participant's silent-speech attempts engage the same articulatory representations as natural speech production.
  • May combine two claims. 47
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 27
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Speech neuroprostheses could restore communication for people with paralysis, but naturalistic speed and expressivity have not yet been achieved.

    “Speech neuroprostheses have the potential to restore communication to people living with paralysis, but naturalistic speed and expressivity are elusive1.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1] source

      The Background says decoding words and sentences from cortical activity could restore communication for paralyzed people who cannot speak. The Results report a median decoding rate of 15.2 words per minute, and the Methods describe a restricted 50-word set, supporting the point that this system had not achieved naturalistic communication. The paper does not assess speech expressivity or establish that expressivity remains elusive across speech neuroprostheses. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Prior work has decoded speech from the brain activity of a person with paralysis, but only as text and with limited speed and vocabulary.

    “Previous demonstrations have shown that it is possible to decode speech from the brain activity of a person with paralysis, but only in the form of text and with limited speed and vocabulary1,3.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The median real-time text-decoding rate exceeded the participant's typical assistive-device communication rate of 14.2 words per minute and was closer to naturalistic speaking rates than previously reported communication neuroprostheses.

    “This decoding rate exceeds our participant’s typical communication rate using her assistive device (14.2 WPM; Supplementary Note 2) and is closer to naturalistic speaking rates than has been previously reported with communication neuroprostheses1,3,7–9.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim5 of 5 sources checked
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The mel-cepstral distortion values are comparable to those of text-to-speech synthesizers and better than those in previous neural-decoding work with participants who could speak naturally.

    “Furthermore, these MCDs are comparable to those observed with text-to-speech synthesizers16 and better than those in previous neural-decoding work with participants that were able to speak naturally11.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Functional speech-decoding performance can be achieved after a relatively short period of data collection compared with previous work and is likely to improve with more data.

    “These results show that functional speech-decoding performance can be achieved after a relatively short period of data collection compared to that of our previous work1,3 and is likely to continue to improve with more data.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [1] source
    • cites [3] source

      The Decoding performance section reports real-time sentence decoding, and the Discussion describes the system as viable for general-purpose assistive communication. But the passages found do not establish that this performance followed a shorter data-collection period than the citing authors’ previous work or that it would improve with more data. The latter is the citing authors’ prediction, not a finding established by this source. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Animating a facial avatar to accompany synthesized speech is a promising route to naturalistic communication and may be achievable by decoding articulatory and orofacial representations in speech-motor cortex.

    “Therefore, animation of a facial avatar to accompany synthesized speech and further embody the user is a promising means towards naturalistic communication, and it may be possible via decoding of articulatory and orofacial representations in the speech-motor cortex22–25.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [22] source
    • cites [23] source

      The Abstract and Discussion (page unavailable) report articulator and orofacial representations in ventral sensorimotor cortex during speech, supporting the proposed neural target. The paper does not report decoding those representations to animate a facial avatar or establish that this application is feasible; that remains the citing authors’ proposal. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [24] source

      The Abstract (page unavailable) reports neural representations of vocal-tract parameters during speech imitation, including in somatomotor regions. That supports the premise that articulatory information is represented in speech-motor cortex, but the paper does not address decoding those representations to animate a facial avatar or accompany synthesized speech. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [25]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Prior work has synthesized intelligible speech from neural activity during vocalized or mimed speech in speakers with intact speech, but not in a paralysed person.

    “Previous work in speakers with intact speech has demonstrated that intelligible speech can be synthesized from neural activity during vocalized or mimed speech10,11, but this has not been shown with someone who is paralysed.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [10] source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) says the study reconstructed high-quality speech from neural recordings during overt speech in motor-intact participants and that speech representations in paralysed patients need further research. The Results (page unavailable) say intelligibility was evaluated with STOI, but the available text does not establish that the synthesized speech was intelligible. This paper studied vocalized speech, not mimed speech. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [11] source

      The Abstract reports intelligible neurally synthesized speech from participants who spoke aloud, and the Methods identify them as people undergoing epilepsy monitoring rather than people with paralysis. The “Synthesizing mimed speech” section reports synthesis from silent mime, but assesses spectral similarity rather than listener intelligibility; the claim’s intelligibility qualifier is therefore not established for mimed speech. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    HuBERT is a speech-representation learning model that predicts acoustic k-means-cluster identities for masked time points from unlabelled input waveforms.

    “HuBERT is a speech-representation learning model that is trained to predict acoustic k-means-cluster identities corresponding to masked time points from unlabelled input waveforms.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The sequence over time of discrete speech units derived by HuBERT captures the content of the original speech waveform.

    “We refer to these cluster identities as discrete speech units, and the temporal sequence of these speech units represents the content of the original waveform.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Those temporal-lobe electrodes may record activity from the sub-central gyrus or from production-specific sites within the temporal lobe.

    “suggesting that they may record cortical activity from the sub-central gyrus36 or production-specific sites within the temporal lobe37.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [36] source

      The Introduction says the subcentral gyrus is involved in speech-related movements, and the Discussion reports subcentral activity during vocalization. Those passages support the proposed source of cortical activity, but the paper does not examine whether temporal-lobe electrodes record it. The separate claim about production-specific temporal-lobe sites is attached to citation 37, not this source. (LLM, conf=0.79)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [37] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The study demonstrated intelligible and rapid speech synthesis and personalization to the participant's pre-injury voice.

    “For speech audio, we demonstrate intelligible and rapid speech synthesis and personalization to the participant’s pre-injury voice.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Mel-cepstral distortion performance on the participant's personalized voice was similar to that on the non-personalized voice.

    “We observed similar MCD performance on the participant’s personalized voice (Extended Data Fig. 5 and Supplementary Table 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Error rates steadily declined over 13 days of training-data collection, during which 9,506 sentence trials were collected, corresponding to about 1.6 hours of training data per day.

    “We observed steadily declining error rates over the course of 13 days of training-data collection (Fig. 2f), during which we collected 9,506 sentence trials corresponding to about 1.6 h of training data per day.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Most electrodes were selective for either lip or tongue movements, while some responded to both.

    “Although most electrodes were selective to either lip or tongue movements, others were activated by both (Fig. 5i).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The participant's silent-speech attempts engage the same articulatory representations as natural speech production.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Correlations for both the avatar-healthy speaker and healthy speaker-healthy speaker distributions were significantly above chance.

    “Correlations for both distributions were significantly above chance, which was calculated by temporally shuffling the human trajectories and then recomputing correlations with dynamic time warping (all P < 0.0001, two-sided Mann–Whitney U-test with nine-way Holm–Bonferroni correction; Supplementary Table 3).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In qualitative task blocks, the participant could control the avatar BCI to portray articulatory movements and strong-intensity emotional expressions.

    “In separate, qualitative task blocks, we showed that the participant could control the avatar BCI to portray the articulatory movements (Supplementary Video 8) and strong-intensity emotional expressions (Supplementary Video 9)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Speech-synthesis performance improved as the number of unique words and sentences in the set decreased, and was always better than chance.

    “Performance increased as the number of unique words and sentences in the sentence set decreased but was always better than chance (all P < 0.0001, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum tests with 19-way Holm–Bonferroni correction; chance MCDs were measured using waveforms generated by passing temporally shuffled ECoG features through the synthesis pipeline).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The implanted array was positioned over cortical areas relevant for orofacial movements, and simple movement tasks showed differentiable activations for attempted movements of the lips, tongue and jaw.

    “The array was positioned over cortical areas relevant for orofacial movements, and simple movement tasks demonstrated differentiable activations associated with attempted movements of the lips, tongue and jaw (Fig. 1d).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Many of the highest-contributing electrodes also showed substantial articulatory-feature encoding and were similarly important across all three decoding modalities.

    “many of the highest-contributing electrodes also exhibited substantial articulatory-feature encoding defined in Fig. 5 (Supplementary Figs. 12 and 13) and were similarly important for all three modalities (Extended Data Fig. 7e–g).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Electrodes showed a variety of phonetic tunings, with some tuned to a single place-of-articulation category and others to multiple categories.

    “We observed a variety of tunings across the electrodes, with some electrodes exhibiting tuning to single POA categories and others to multiple categories (such as both front-tongue and back-tongue phones or both labial and vocalic phones; Fig. 5c and Supplementary”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Visualizing phonetic tunings in two dimensions revealed separability between labial and non-labial consonants and between lip-rounded and non-lip-rounded vowels.

    “We visualized the phonetic tunings in a 2D space, revealing separability between labial and non-labial consonants (Fig. 5d) and between lip-rounded and non-lip-rounded vowels (Fig. 5e).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Across 19 sessions after freezing the classifier, mean classification accuracy for NATO code words was 96.8% (99% CI 94.5 to 98.6), with 100% accuracy on eight sessions.

    “Across 19 sessions after freezing the classifier, we observed a mean classification accuracy of 96.8% (99% CI [94.5, 98.6]), with accuracies of 100% obtained on eight of these sessions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The participant can vocalize a small set of monosyllabic sounds but cannot articulate intelligible words.

    “She can vocalize a small set of monosyllabic sounds, such as ‘ah’ or ‘ooh’, but she is unable to articulate intelligible words (Supplementary Note 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The participant's feedback describes how a multimodal BCI would improve her daily life by increasing expressivity, independence, and productivity.

    “This is further supported by our participant’s feedback on the technology, in which she describes how a multimodal BCI would improve her daily life by increasing expressivity, independence and productivity (Supplementary Table 9).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    At enrolment evaluation, the participant scored 29/30 on the Mini Mental State Exam and missed the final point only because paralysis prevented her from drawing a figure.

    “During enrolment evaluation, she scored 29/30 on the Mini Mental State Exam and was unable to achieve the final point only because she could not physically draw a figure due to her paralysis.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    A visual-speech-recognition model gave a median WER of 95.8% for the participant's silently attempted speech, much higher than the 50.0% median WER from healthy speakers' videos.

    “We found a median WER of 95.8% (99% CI [90.0, 125.0]) for silently attempted speech, which was far higher than the median WER from videos of volunteer healthy speakers, which was 50.0% (99% CI [37.5, 62.5]; Supplementary Fig. 17).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    A speech-language pathologist measured the participant's intelligibility as 5% for prompted words, 0% for prompted sentences, and 0% for open-ended responses.

    “the speech–language pathologist measured her intelligibility to be 5% for the prompted words, 0% for the prompted sentences and 0% for the open-ended responses.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The participant had a large pontine infarct with left vertebral artery dissection and basilar artery occlusion.

    “She was found to have a large pontine infarct with left vertebral artery dissection and basilar artery occlusion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Functionally, the participant cannot use speech to communicate and instead relies on a transparent letter board and a Tobii Dynavox.

    “Functionally, she cannot use speech to communicate. Instead, she relies on a transparent letter board and a Tobii Dynavox for communication (Supplementary Note 2).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Recordings from non-penetrating cortical-surface electrodes were highly stable, allowing training and testing across days and weeks without retraining on the test day.

    “highly stable recordings from non-penetrating cortical-surface electrodes, enabling training and testing across days and weeks without requiring retraining on the day of testing”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The participant was 47 years old at enrolment and had been diagnosed with quadriplegia and anarthria by neurologists and a speech-language pathologist.

    “The participant, who was 47 years old at time of enrolment into the study, was diagnosed with quadriplegia and anarthria by neurologists and a speech–language pathologist.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The participant cannot speak or vocalize speech sounds because of severe orofacial and vocal muscle weakness, and cannot type because of arm and hand weakness.

    “our 47-year-old participant cannot speak or vocalize speech sounds given the severe weakness of her orofacial and vocal muscles (anarthria; see Supplementary Note 1) and cannot type given the weakness in her arms and hands (quadriplegia).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Supplementary Note 1

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Because the average word error rate is below the 30% threshold at which speech-recognition applications generally become useful and the vocabulary exceeds 1,000 words, the approach may be viable in clinical applications.

    “The average WER passes the 30% threshold below which speech-recognition applications generally become useful6 while providing access to a large vocabulary of over 1,000 words, indicating that our approach may be viable in clinical applications.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [6] source
    • Rests on an assumption: A vocabulary of 1,024 words is large enough to support general-purpose communication.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The system achieved extremely rapid and accurate decoding for finite, predefined sentences that could be used frequently by users.

    “These results illustrate extremely rapid and accurate decoding for finite, predefined sentences that could be used frequently by users.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The speech-synthesis neural decoder performed strongly with the speech-to-gesture rendering system, but the acoustic approach cannot generate meaningful facial gestures without a decoded speech waveform.

    “These findings emphasize the strong performance of the speech-synthesis neural decoder when used with the speech-to-gesture rendering system, although this approach cannot be used to generate meaningful facial gestures in the absence of a decoded speech waveform.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Human-transcription assessments are a standard method for quantifying the perceptual accuracy of synthesized speech.

    “Human-transcription assessments are a standard method to quantify the perceptual accuracy of synthesized speech17.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [17]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    After 18 years of paralysis, the participant's SMC retains general-purpose articulatory encoding that is not specific to speech and includes representations of non-verbal emotional expressions and articulatory movements.

    “Together, these findings suggest that, after 18 years of paralysis, our participant’s SMC maintains general-purpose articulatory encoding that is not speech specific and contains representations of non-verbal emotional expressions and articulatory movements (see Fig. 4).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The participant's silent-speech attempts engage the same articulatory representations as natural speech production.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Non-verbal facial gestures often account for a substantial portion of a speaker's perceived feeling and attitude, and face-to-face communication enhances social connectivity and intelligibility.

    “Previous studies show that non-verbal facial gestures often account for a substantial portion of the perceived feeling and attitude of a speaker18,19 and that face-to-face communication enhances social connectivity20 and intelligibility21.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [18]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [19]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [20] source
    • cites [21] source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Connectionist temporal classification loss is commonly used in automatic speech recognition to infer sub-word unit sequences from speech waveforms when precise time alignment is unknown.

    “which is commonly used in automatic speech recognition to infer sequences of sub-word units (such as phones or letters) from speech waveforms when precise time alignment between the units and the waveforms is unknown5.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [5] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The cortical-surface neural interface was stable without recalibration, and high performance can be achieved with relatively few training trials.

    “These results illustrate the stability of the cortical-surface neural interface without requiring recalibration and demonstrate that high performance can be achieved with relatively few training trials.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The 249 final test sentences for text decoding were randomly selected from the 1024-word-General set, and no training data used these sentences as targets.

    “We randomly selected 249 sentences from the 1024-word-General set to use as the final test sentences for text decoding (Method 1 in Supplementary Methods). We did not collect training data with these sentences as targets.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The expression classifier was assessed with 15-fold cross-validation; inside each training fold, ten separate models were trained and their predictions were ensembled on the held-out test set.

    “We evaluated the expression classifier using 15-fold cross-validation.”
    • Also stated in: § Avatar · plain
      “Within the training set of each cross-validation fold, we fitted ten unique models to ensemble predictions on the held-out test set.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Electrodes lacking significant modulation during silent-speech attempts were removed from the articulatory-encoding analysis; significance was assessed with one-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank tests at an alpha of 0.00001 following a 253-way Holm-Bonferroni correction.

    “If an electrode did not have significantly increased HGA after the go cue compared to before, it was excluded from the remainder of this analysis (significant modulation determined using one-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with an alpha level of 0.00001 after applying 253-way Holm–Bonferroni correction).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The device was implanted in September 2022 at UCSF Medical Center without surgical complications.

    “The device was implanted in September 2022 at UCSF Medical Center with no surgical complications.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    For the perceptual evaluation of decoded speech, every trial received ratings from 12 evaluators (with 3 of 500 trials having 11), and the median word and character error rates across evaluators served as the final accuracy measure to mitigate outlier evaluator behavior.

    “each test trial was assessed by 12 evaluators (except for 3 of the 500 trials, in which only 11 workers completed their evaluations).”
    • Also stated in: § Speech synthesis · plain
      “To control for outlier evaluator performance, for each trial, we used the median WER and CER across evaluators as the final accuracy metric for the decoded waveform.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    For audio-visual synthesis and avatar evaluation, 200 sentences were randomly selected that were not used in training and were not among the 249 text-decoding test sentences.

    “For evaluation of audio-visual synthesis and the avatar, we randomly selected 200 sentences that were not used during training and were not included in the 249 sentences used for text-decoding evaluation (Method 1 in Supplementary Methods).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Ten of the 200 1024-word-General avatar videos were withheld from final evaluation because they had been used to tune parameters for automatic trimming of dlib traces to speech onset and offset.

    “We held out 10 of 200 1024-word-General avatar videos from final evaluation as they were used to select parameters to automatically trim the dlib traces to speech onset and offset.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The data presented here are part of an ongoing exploratory clinical trial and do not contribute to conclusions about the trial's primary safety endpoints.

    “All data presented here are part of the ongoing exploratory clinical trial and do not contribute towards any conclusions regarding the primary safety endpoints of the trial.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    NATO code-word classification accuracy was computed exclusively from trials whose target was a NATO code word; a code-word attempt that was misclassified as a hand-motor attempt was treated as incorrect.

    “here we measured performance only on trials in which the target was a NATO code word, and we deemed incorrect any such trial in which a code-word attempt was misclassified as a hand-motor attempt.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    For model training, 95% of the data was used for training and 5% was held out to evaluate performance and choose hyperparameters before real-time testing.

    “We used 95% of this data to train the models and 5% as a held-out development set to evaluate performance and choose hyperparameters before real-time testing.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The linear receptive-field encoding model was fitted with tenfold cross-validation; a held-out tuning set comprising 10% of the data was used to choose the optimal ridge-regression alpha, after which another tenfold cross-validation on the remaining 90% evaluated performance.

    “We used tenfold cross-validation to select the optimal alpha ridge-regression parameter by sweeping over the values [1 × 10−1, 1 × 100, 1 × 101, … 1 × 105], using 10% of our total data as a held-out tuning set.”
    • Also stated in: § Articulatory-encoding assessments · plain
      “We then conducted another round of tenfold cross-validation on the remaining 90% of our total data to evaluate performance with the optimized alpha parameter.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Sentences employed in the 1024-word-General evaluations were omitted from VQ-VAE training.

    “We excluded from VQ-VAE training any sentence that was used during the evaluations with the 1024-word-General set.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    For comparisons where the underlying neural data were not independent, the Holm-Bonferroni method corrected for multiple comparisons.

    “When the underlying neural data were not independent across comparisons, we used the Holm–Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    For the speech-related animation assessment, six distinct evaluators rated each decoded animation, and the median evaluator accuracy was taken as the trial's accuracy.

    “Each decoded animation was assessed by six unique evaluators.”
    • Also stated in: § Avatar · plain
      “We computed the median accuracy of the evaluations across evaluators for each sentence and treated that as the accuracy for a given trial”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Electrodes whose encoding values (r) were 0.2 or lower were excluded from the articulatory-encoding analysis.

    “We then applied a second pruning step to exclude any electrodes that had encoding values (r) less than or equal to 0.2”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The participant gave informed consent after multiple conversations in which study enrolment details and device risks were thoroughly explained.

    “The participant gave her informed consent to participate in this trial following multiple conversations with study investigators in which the details of study enrolment, including risks related to the study device, were thoroughly explained to her.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The study was conducted within the BCI Restoration of Arm and Voice clinical trial (NCT03698149).

    “This study was completed within the BCI Restoration of Arm and Voice clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03698149).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The participant used her transparent letter board to give informed consent and to permit her image in demonstration videos.

    “She used her transparent letter board to provide informed consent to participate in this study and to allow her image to appear in demonstration videos.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The avatar-movement classifier was assessed with tenfold cross-validation.

    “We evaluated the network using tenfold cross-validation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study protocol was approved by the University of California, San Francisco Institutional Review Board.

    “the study protocol was approved by the University of California, San Francisco Institutional Review Board.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
60 of 60
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Spoken communication carries prosodic, expressive and identity-related information that can improve embodied communication beyond what text alone can convey.

    “Although text outputs are good for basic messages, speaking has rich prosody, expressiveness and identity that can enhance embodied communication beyond what can be conveyed in text alone.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Text-based communication is an important modality for messaging and interaction with technology.

    “Text-based communication is an important modality for facilitating messaging and interaction with technology.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A vocabulary of 1,024 words is large enough to support general-purpose communication.

    “with a vocabulary size large enough to facilitate general-purpose communication”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The articulatory trajectories recorded from healthy speakers represent the expected natural articulatory trajectories.

    “illustrating that the avatar reasonably approximated the expected articulatory trajectories relative to natural variances between healthy”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The participant's attempted silent speech engaged her articulators to the best of her ability despite her orofacial weakness.

    “she was trying to engage her articulators to the best of her ability, although substantial orofacial weakness prevents her from naturally mouthing words.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The participant's attempted hand movements, despite severe paralysis, produce neural activity that reflects intended hand movements.

    “We instructed the participant to attempt to carry out the hand-motor movements to the best of her ability despite her severe paralysis.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The participant's silent-speech attempts engage the same articulatory representations as natural speech production.

    “After the final dot disappeared, the text turned green to indicate the go cue, and the participant attempted to silently say that target or carry out the corresponding action.”
7 of 7

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior speech neuroprosthesis studies required approximately 17 hours of recording to collect sufficient training data to obtain that level of performance.

    “and required approximately 17 hours of recording to collect sufficient training data to obtain that level of performance.”

    From An Accurate and Rapidly Calibrating Speech Neuroprosthesis (2024) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Text decoding section reports about 1.6 hours of training data per day over 13 days—approximately 21 hours for this study—and describes that as a shorter collection period than its previous work. It does not support the claim that prior studies required approximately 17 hours; its comparison points in the opposite direction. Page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.81)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • When an individual with anarthria silently attempted to speak, select neural populations in the STG contributed to decoding performance.

    “Furthermore, when an individual with anarthria silently attempted to speak — that is, was asked to attempt to ‘mime’ with no audible output from that attempt — select neural populations in the STG contributed to decoding performance14.”

    From The speech neuroprosthesis (2024) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Overview of multimodal speech-decoding system says the participant had anarthria, silently attempted speech without vocalizing, and had electrodes over the superior temporal gyrus (STG). Articulatory representations drive decoding says temporal-lobe electrodes contributed to decoding, but cautions that they may have recorded activity from the sub-central gyrus rather than temporal-lobe sites. It therefore does not establish that neural populations in the STG itself contributed. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Using CTC loss, recent work has achieved large-vocabulary decoding while keeping decoding speeds closer to natural speech.

    “Recent works have achieved large-vocabulary decoding while maintaining decoding speeds closer to natural speech, by using CTC loss.”

    From The speech neuroprosthesis (2024) · cites this paper as Metzger et al. 2023

    The Overview and Methods > Text decoding describe training the decoders with CTC loss, and Text decoding reports real-time decoding with a 1,024-word vocabulary. However, the 39,378-word result was evaluated offline, while the reported rates of 89.9 and 101 words per minute were for smaller, predefined phrase sets. The passages do not establish that the largest-vocabulary decoding maintained speeds close to natural speech. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Metzger et al. demonstrated that decoded articulatory features can animate a digital avatar face personalized to resemble the individual.

    “Metzger et al. demonstrated that it is possible to use these decoded articulatory features to animate a digital avatar face, which was personalized to resemble the likeness of the individual14 (Fig. 3d).”

    From The speech neuroprosthesis (2024) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Facial-avatar decoding section says decoded articulatory gestures were used to animate the avatar face, and the Discussion calls it a personalized avatar. However, our copy does not say the avatar’s face was personalized to resemble the participant; the explicit resemblance claim in Methods > Speech synthesis concerns her synthetic voice. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • This aligns with previous speech BCI studies in which the middle precentral gyrus and most ventral precentral gyrus demonstrated the greatest signal contributions to speech decoding.

    “This aligns with previous speech BCI studies in which the middle precentral gyrus3 and most ventral precentral gyrus1,2 demonstrated the greatest signal contributions to speech decoding.”

    From Inner speech in motor cortex and implications for speech neuroprostheses (2025) · cites this paper as [3]

    In “Articulatory representations drive decoding” (page unavailable), the paper reports that the sensorimotor cortex, which includes the precentral and postcentral gyri, was most critical to decoding in leave-one-area-out analyses. It does not identify the most ventral precentral gyrus specifically as making the greatest signal contribution—the part of the citing sentence to which this citation is attached. (LLM, conf=0.80)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • The stated low-frequency range conflicts with its processing description

    Major

    The overview specifies low-frequency signals between 0.3 and 17 Hz, whereas the methods say these signals receive only a 100-Hz low-pass filter before downsampling. That procedure does not establish the stated frequency range.

  • A 500-phrase set appears in place of the defined 529-phrase set

    Minor

    The methods name a 500-phrase-AAC set for this simulation, but the paper defines and reports results for a 529-phrase-AAC set, not a 500-phrase set.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Wolters, M. K., Isaac, K. B. & Renals, S. Evaluating speech synthesis intelligibility using Amazon Mechanical Turk. In Proc. 7th ISCA Workshop Speech Synth. SSW-7 (eds Sagisaka, Y. & Tokuda, K.) 136–141 (2010).
  2. Jia, J., Wang, X., Wu, Z., Cai, L. & Meng, H. Modeling the correlation between modality semantics and facial expressions. In Proc. 2012 Asia Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (eds Lin, W. et al.) 1–10 (2012).
  3. van den Oord, A., Vinyals, O. & Kavukcuoglu, K. Neural discrete representation learning. In Proc. 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 6309–6318 (Curran Associates, 2017).
  4. King, D. E. Dlib-ml: a machine learning toolkit. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 10, 1755–1758 (2009).
  5. Simonyan, K., Vedaldi, A. & Zisserman, A. Deep inside convolutional networks: visualising image classification models and saliency maps. In Proc. Workshop at International Conference on Learning Representations (eds. Bengio, Y. & LeCun, Y.) (2014).
  6. Shi, B., Hsu, W.-N., Lakhotia, K. & Mohamed, A. Learning audio-visual speech representation by masked multimodal cluster prediction. In Proc. International Conference on Learning Representations (2022).
  7. Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C. & Lee, L. Chameleons in imagined conversations: a new approach to understanding coordination of linguistic style in dialogs. In Proc. 2nd Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics (eds. Hovy, D. et al.) 76–87 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2011).
  8. Jurafsky, D. & Martin, J. H. Speech and Language Processing: an Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition (Pearson Education, 2009).
  9. Hanzo, L.) 181-184 (IEEE, 1995).
  10. Heafield, K. KenLM: Faster and smaller language model queries. In Proc. Sixth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, 187–197 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2011).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Metzger, S. L., Littlejohn, K. T., Silva, A. B., Moses, D. A., Seaton, M. P., Wang, R., Dougherty, M. E., Liu, J. R., Wu, P., Berger, M. A., Zhuravleva, I., Tu-Chan, A., Ganguly, K., Anumanchipalli, G. K., & Chang, E. F.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Chang, Edward F.
Venue
Nature
Published
2023-08-23
Volume
620
Issue
7976
Pages
1037-1046
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W4386100600
Cited by
522
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 160 · 2025: 196 · 2024: 145 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 1
FWCI
77.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, public-domain)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (T32GM007618)
  • Noyce Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (U01DC018671)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007618)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
Keywords
brain-computer interface, speech decoding, text generation, speech synthesis, avatar control, facial animation, orofacial movements, limb paralysis, deep learning, real-time decoding, communication restoration
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Cerebral Cortex, Clinical Trials as Topic, Communication, Face, Gestures, Humans, Movement, Paralysis, Speech, Vocabulary, Voice, Neural Prostheses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review