A high-performance neuroprosthesis for speech decoding and avatar control
Open accessAbstract
Speech neuroprostheses have the potential to restore communication to people living with paralysis, but naturalistic speed and expressivity are elusive 1. Here we use high-density surface recordings of the speech cortex in a clinical-trial participant with severe limb and vocal paralysis to achieve high-performance real-time decoding across three complementary speech-related output modalities: text, speech audio and facial-avatar animation. We trained and evaluated deep-learning models using neural data collected as the participant attempted to silently speak sentences. For text, we demonstrate accurate and rapid large-vocabulary decoding with a median rate of 78 words per minute and median word error rate of 25%. For speech audio, we demonstrate intelligible and rapid speech synthesis and personalization to the participant's pre-injury voice. For facial-avatar animation, we demonstrate the control of virtual orofacial movements for speech and non-speech communicative gestures. The decoders reached high performance with less than two weeks of training. Our findings introduce a multimodal speech-neuroprosthetic approach that has substantial promise to restore full, embodied communication to people living with severe paralysis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
34 of 53 cited sources checked · 17 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
In healthy speakers, neural representations in the sensorimotor cortex encode articulatory movements of the orofacial musculature.
“In healthy speakers, neural representations in the SMC (comprising the precentral and postcentral gyri) encode articulatory movements of the orofacial musculature22,24,30.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [22] source
The Discussion reports that sensorimotor cortical activity encodes movements of the vocal-tract articulators, and the STAR Methods locate the analyzed electrodes on the precentral and postcentral gyri. However, the Participants section says the five speakers were undergoing clinical treatment for epilepsy. The study therefore does not establish the claim specifically for healthy speakers. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [24] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
- cites [30] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Initial attempts to decode text from brain activity in a person with anarthria during attempted speech had limitations such as slow decoding rates and small vocabulary sizes.
“Initial efforts to decode text from the brain activity ofa person with anarthria during attempted speech had various limitations, including slow decoding rates and small vocabulary sizes1,3.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [1] source
- cites [3] source
The paper’s introductory passage (labeled Abstract in our copy; page unavailable) describes an earlier attempt to decode full words from cortical activity during attempted speech in a person with anarthria and identifies its preliminary 50-word vocabulary as a limitation. It calls that approach’s decoding speed “promising,” however, and does not characterize its decoding rate as slow. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Being able to use evolving technology to communicate with family and friends, participate in community and work, and engage in virtual social contexts can greatly expand access to meaningful interpersonal interactions and improve quality of life.
“The ability to interface with evolving technology to communicate with family and friends, facilitate community involvement and occupational participation, and engage in virtual, Internet-based social contexts (such as social media and metaverses) can vastly expand a person’s access to meaningful interpersonal interactions and ultimately improve their quality of life2,39.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [2] source
The Results report that potential BCI users wanted face-to-face communication, email, and social networking; the Discussion links assistive technology to social interaction and employment and describes improved communication and quality of life as clinical goals. The paper concerns people with disabilities, however, and does not address metaverses or establish that these technologies vastly expand interpersonal interactions or improve quality of life. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [39] source
- Findingcitation
During 14 days of data collection shortly after implantation, text decoding performance exceeded previous BCIs' communication speeds by a factor of 4 or more.
“During 14 days of data collection shortly after device implantation, we achieved high-performance text decoding, exceeding communication speeds of previous BCIs by a factor of 4 or more1,3,9”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [1] source
The Results (Sentence Decoding; page unavailable) report real-time decoding at a median 15.2 words per minute, supporting the text-decoding portion of the claim. The Methods (Word and Sentence Task Design; page unavailable) describe 50 sessions over 81 weeks, not 14 days shortly after implantation. Our copy does not report a fourfold speed advantage over previous BCIs. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [3] source
The Decoding performance section reports real-time text decoding, but the passages do not support 14 days of data collection shortly after implantation or a speed advantage of at least fourfold over previous BCIs. The Discussion instead notes that a previous spelling BCI achieved 90 characters per minute. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [9] source
The Discussion reports high-performance text decoding at 90 characters per minute, exceeding previously reported BCI speeds. But it also reports prior speeds of 40 characters per minute for intracortical point-and-click typing and 60 for a visually evoked EEG speller, so it does not support a fourfold advantage over previous BCIs generally. The Daily decoder retraining section says the copy-typing data spanned 28 days, while the Discussion refers to functionality more than 1,000 days after implantation, not data collection shortly after implantation. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Rests on an assumption: The participant's silent-speech attempts engage the same articulatory representations as natural speech production.
- Findingcitation
The vocabulary size was expanded by a factor of 20 relative to the previous direct-speech BCI.
“expanding the vocabulary size of our previous direct-speech BCI by a factor of 20 (ref. 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] source
The Methods (Word and Sentence Task Design; page unavailable) identify the cited direct-speech BCI as using a 50-word set. The paper does not report a subsequent vocabulary expansion or establish the claimed factor of 20. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Rests on an assumption: The participant's silent-speech attempts engage the same articulatory representations as natural speech production.
- Interpretationown data
These results align with accumulating evidence for motor-movement encoding in the postcentral gyrus.
“These results are in line with growing evidence for motor-movement encoding in the postcentral gyrus33–35”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
People who have lost speech after severe paralysis rank faster, more accurate, and more natural communication among their most desired needs.
“Faster, more accurate, and more natural communication are among the most desired needs of people who have lost the ability to speak after severe paralysis2,38–40.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 4 sources checked- cites [2] source
The Results (page unavailable) identify slow communication as the most common complaint among interviewees using AAC; participants also sought conversation at a natural pace and raised accuracy concerns. The Methods (page unavailable) describe people with severe speech and/or physical impairments, not specifically people who lost speech after severe paralysis. The paper does not rank all three qualities among that population’s most desired needs. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [38] source
The Discussion (page not provided) says that restrictive yes-no communication was associated with lower quality of life and that electronic devices enable real dialogue for people with locked-in syndrome. It does not report patients ranking faster, more accurate, or more natural communication among their most desired needs. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [39] source
- cites [40] source
- Findingown data
Peak-activation times did not differ significantly between precentral and postcentral gyrus electrodes during silent speech attempts (P > 0.01, two-sided Mann-Whitney U-test).
“an analysis of peak-activation times that revealed no significant difference between electrodes in the precentral versus postcentral gyrus during silent attempts to speak (Supplementary Fig. 15; P > 0.01 two-sided Mann–Whitney U-test)33–35.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [33] source
The Results section on simultaneous recording compares M1 and S1 activity during a reaching-and-grasping task in monkeys, not silent speech attempts. Searches for precentral versus postcentral peak-activation times and the stated Mann–Whitney result found no passage addressing that comparison in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.77)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [34] source
- cites [35] source
- Findingown data
Using high-density surface recordings of speech cortex in a participant with severe limb and vocal paralysis, the study achieved high-performance real-time decoding across text, speech audio and facial-avatar animation.
“Here we use high-density surface recordings of the speech cortex in a clinical-trial participant with severe limb and vocal paralysis to achieve high-performance real-time decoding across three complementary speech-related output modalities: text, speech audio and facial-avatar animation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Spoken communication carries prosodic, expressive and identity-related information that can improve embodied communication beyond what text alone can convey.
- Findingown data
The decoders reached high performance with less than two weeks of training data.
“The decoders reached high performance with less than two weeks of training.”
- Also stated in: § Text decoding · plain
“We observed steadily declining error rates over the course of 13 days of training-data collection (Fig. 2f), during which we collected 9,506 sentence trials corresponding to about 1.6 h of training data per day.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Text decoding · plain
- Findingown data
For the 1024-word-General text-decoding task, the median real-time decoding rate was about 78 words per minute.
“For text, we demonstrate accurate and rapid large-vocabulary decoding with a median rate of 78 words per minute and median word error rate of 25%.”
- Also stated in: § Text decoding · plain
“We observed a median real-time decoding rate of 78.3 WPM (99% CI [75.5, 79.4]; Fig. 2f).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Text decoding · plain
- Findingown data
For the 1024-word-General text-decoding task, the median word error rate was about 25%.
“For text, we demonstrate accurate and rapid large-vocabulary decoding with a median rate of 78 words per minute and median word error rate of 25%.”
- Also stated in: § Text decoding · plain
“We achieved a median PER of 18.5% (99% confidence interval (CI) [14.1, 28.5]; Fig. 2b), a median WER of 25.5% (99% CI [19.3, 34.5]; Fig. 2c) and a median CER of 19.9% (99% CI [15.0, 30.1]; Fig. 2d; see Table 1 for example decodes; see Extended Data Fig. 1 for the relationship between decoded PER and WER).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Text decoding · plain
- Findingown data
The study demonstrated control of virtual orofacial movements for speech and non-speech communicative gestures.
“For facial-avatar animation, we demonstrate the control of virtual orofacial movements for speech and non-speech communicative gestures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Performance degraded in an offline simulation of low-density electrode sampling.
“We also observed degraded performance during an offline simulation of low-density sampling (Supplementary Figs. 10 and 11 and Supplementary Table 8)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The direct avatar-animation approach produced articulatory gestures that were strongly correlated with reference articulatory gestures across all datasets.
“We found that the direct approach produced articulatory gestures that were strongly correlated with reference articulatory gestures across all datasets (Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2 and Supplementary Table 4)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was a large degree of overlap between the distributions of avatar-healthy speaker correlations and healthy speaker-healthy speaker correlations.
“there was a large degree of overlap between the two distributions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For real-time text decoding on the 1024-word-General set, the median phone error rate was 18.5% (99% CI 14.1 to 28.5).
“We achieved a median PER of 18.5% (99% confidence interval (CI) [14.1, 28.5]; Fig. 2b)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Classification accuracy remained high after a 61-day hiatus in recording.
“Accuracy remained high after a 61-day hiatus in recording for the participant to travel.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Avatar and healthy-speaker jaw-opening trajectories were correlated with a median value of 0.733 (99% CI 0.711 to 0.748).
“We found that the jaw opening, lip aperture and mouth width of the avatar and healthy speakers were well correlated with median values of 0.733 (99% CI [0.711, 0.748]), 0.690 (99% CI [0.663, 0.714]) and 0.446 (99% CI [0.417, 0.470]), respectively (Fig. 4c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The articulatory trajectories recorded from healthy speakers represent the expected natural articulatory trajectories.
- Findingown data
Median classification accuracy for six articulatory movements was 87.8% (99% CI 85.1% to 90.5%) across 10 cross-validation folds.
“We observed a median classification accuracy of 87.8% (99% CI [85.1, 90.5]; across n = 10 cross-validation folds; Fig. 4d) when classifying between the six articulatory movements.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For the 529-phrase-AAC set, mean mel-cepstral distortion was 4.49 dB (99% CI 4.07 to 4.67).
“We achieved mean MCDs of 3.45 (99% CI [3.25, 3.82]), 4.49 (99% CI [4.07, 4.67]) and 5.21 (99% CI [4.74, 5.51]) dB for the 50-phrase-AAC, 529-phrase-AAC and 1024-word-General sets, respectively (Fig. 3c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Many electrodes that were important for decoding were located next to one another.
“We noted that many important electrodes were adjacent”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Labial phonetic tuning was positively correlated with HGA magnitude during attempts to pucker the lips (P < 0.0001, r = 0.89, ordinary least-squares regression).
“We also observed a positive correlation between labial phonetic tuning and HGA magnitude during attempts to pucker the lips (P < 0.0001, r = 0.89, ordinary least-squares regression; Fig. 5h).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The participant's silent-speech attempts engage the same articulatory representations as natural speech production.
- Findingown data
For real-time text decoding on the 1024-word-General set, the median character error rate was 19.9% (99% CI 15.0 to 30.1).
“a median CER of 19.9% (99% CI [15.0, 30.1]; Fig. 2d”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
With the 50-phrase-AAC set, the median decoding speed was 101 words per minute (99% CI 95.6 to 103).
“with median decoding speeds of 101 WPM (99% CI [95.6, 103])”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For the 50-phrase-AAC set, median forced-choice perceptual accuracy of the avatar was 85.7% (99% CI 79.0% to 92.0%).
“We obtained median accuracies of 85.7% (99% CI [79.0, 92.0]), 87.7% (99% CI [79.7, 93.7]) and 74.3% (99% CI [66.7, 80.8]) across the 50-phrase-AAC, 529-phrase-AAC and 1024-word-General sets”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For the 1024-word-General set, median forced-choice perceptual accuracy of the avatar was 74.3% (99% CI 66.7% to 80.8%).
“We obtained median accuracies of 85.7% (99% CI [79.0, 92.0]), 87.7% (99% CI [79.7, 93.7]) and 74.3% (99% CI [66.7, 80.8]) across the 50-phrase-AAC, 529-phrase-AAC and 1024-word-General sets”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Using only the RNN neural-decoding model without a language model or constrained vocabulary, the median phone error rate was 29.4% (99% CI 26.2 to 32.8).
“This yielded a median PER of 29.4% (99% CI [26.2, 32.8]; Fig. 2b)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Kernel density estimates showed a somatotopic map in which hand-movement attempts, labial phones, and front-tongue phones were arranged along a dorsal-ventral axis.
“Kernel density estimates revealed a somatotopic map with encoding of attempted hand movements, labial phones and front-tongue phones organized along a dorsal–ventral axis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The participant's attempted hand movements, despite severe paralysis, produce neural activity that reflects intended hand movements.
- Findingown data
For the 1024-word-General set, the median perceptual word error rate of synthesized speech was 54.4% (99% CI 50.5% to 65.2%).
“We achieved median WERs of 8.20% (99% CI [3.28, 14.5]), 28.2% (99% CI [18.6, 38.5]) and 54.4% (99% CI [50.5 65.2])”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Text-decoding performance remained robust as vocabulary size increased from 1,506 to 39,378 words.
“We observed robust decoding performance as vocabulary size grew (Fig. 2g; see Extended Data Fig. 2 for CER and PER).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
With the 529-phrase-AAC set, the median word error rate was 17.1% (99% CI 8.89% to 28.9%).
“With the 529-phrase-AAC set, we observed a median WER of 17.1% across sentences (99% CI [8.89%, 28.9%])”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For the 529-phrase-AAC set, the median perceptual word error rate of synthesized speech was 28.2% (99% CI 18.6% to 38.5%).
“We achieved median WERs of 8.20% (99% CI [3.28, 14.5]), 28.2% (99% CI [18.6, 38.5]) and 54.4% (99% CI [50.5 65.2])”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Brain areas with the strongest POA encoding, especially the SMC, were the most critical to decoding performance in leave-one-area-out offline analyses.
“the brain areas that most strongly encoded POA, notably the SMC, were the most critical to decoding performance in leave-one-area-out offline analyses (Extended Data Fig. 8, Supplementary Fig. 14 and Supplementary Table 8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For the 50-phrase-AAC set, the median perceptual word error rate of synthesized speech was 8.20% (99% CI 3.28% to 14.5%).
“We achieved median WERs of 8.20% (99% CI [3.28, 14.5]), 28.2% (99% CI [18.6, 38.5]) and 54.4% (99% CI [50.5 65.2])”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For the 50-phrase-AAC set, the median perceptual character error rate of synthesized speech was 6.64% (99% CI 2.71% to 10.6%).
“and median CERs of 6.64% (99% CI [2.71, 10.6]), 26.3% (99% CI [15.9, 29.7]) and 45.7% (99% CI [39.2, 51.6]) across test trials for the 50-phrase-AAC, 529-phrase-AAC and 1024-word-General sets, respectively”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Median classification accuracy for nine emotional expressions was 74.0% (99% CI 70.8% to 77.1%) across 15 cross-validation folds.
“We observed a median classification accuracy of 74.0% (99% CI [70.8, 77.1]; across n = 15 cross-validation folds; Fig. 4e) when classifying between the nine possible expressions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Correlations among pairs of healthy speakers were higher than correlations between the avatar and healthy speakers (P < 0.0001).
“Although correlations among pairs of healthy speakers were higher than between the avatar and healthy speakers (all P < 0.0001, two-sided Mann–Whitney U-test with nine-way Holm–Bonferroni correction; Supplementary Table 3)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Hierarchical clustering of phones revealed grouping by place of articulation (P < 0.0001 compared with chance).
“Hierarchical clustering of phones revealed grouping by POA (P < 0.0001 compared to chance, one-tailed permutation test; Fig. 5b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For the 1024-word-General set, the median perceptual character error rate of synthesized speech was 45.7% (99% CI 39.2% to 51.6%).
“and median CERs of 6.64% (99% CI [2.71, 10.6]), 26.3% (99% CI [15.9, 29.7]) and 45.7% (99% CI [39.2, 51.6]) across test trials for the 50-phrase-AAC, 529-phrase-AAC and 1024-word-General sets, respectively”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For the 1024-word-General set, mean mel-cepstral distortion was 5.21 dB (99% CI 4.74 to 5.51).
“We achieved mean MCDs of 3.45 (99% CI [3.25, 3.82]), 4.49 (99% CI [4.07, 4.67]) and 5.21 (99% CI [4.74, 5.51]) dB for the 50-phrase-AAC, 529-phrase-AAC and 1024-word-General sets, respectively (Fig. 3c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
With the 50-phrase-AAC set, the median word error rate was 4.92% (99% CI 3.18% to 14.04%).
“With the 50-phrase-AAC set, we observed a median WER of 4.92% (99% CI [3.18, 14.04])”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
With a 39,378-word vocabulary, the median offline word error rate was 27.6% (99% CI 20.0 to 34.7).
“With a vocabulary of 39,378 words, we achieved a median offline WER of 27.6% (99% CI [20.0 34.7]).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Median classification accuracy for strong-intensity versions of the three expression types was 96.9% (99% CI 93.8% to 100%).
“and a median classification accuracy of 96.9% (99% CI [93.8,100]) when considering the classifier’s outputs for only the strong-intensity versions of the three expression types (Supplementary Fig. 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
With the 529-phrase-AAC set, the median decoding rate was 89.9 words per minute (99% CI 83.6 to 93.3).
“with a median decoding rate of 89.9 WPM (99% CI [83.6, 93.3])”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Spectrograms decoded in real time shared fine-grained and broad timescale information with corresponding reference spectrograms.
“We qualitatively observed that spectrograms decoded in real time shared both fine-grained and broad timescale information with corresponding reference spectrograms (Fig. 3b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the NATO-motor task, electrodes encoding attempted finger flexions were largely orthogonal to electrodes encoding NATO code words.
“During the NATO-motor task, electrodes encoding attempted finger flexions were largely orthogonal to those encoding NATO code words”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The participant's attempted hand movements, despite severe paralysis, produce neural activity that reflects intended hand movements.
- Findingown data
Perceptual word and character error rates improved as the number of unique words and sentences in the set decreased.
“As for the MCD results, WERs and CERs improved as the number of unique words and sentences in the sentence set decreased (all P < 0.0001, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum tests with 19-way Holm–Bonferroni correction; chance measured by shuffling the mapping between the transcriptions and the ground-truth sentence texts).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
For all text-decoding metrics, performance was better than chance computed with temporally shuffled neural data (P < 0.0001 for all three comparisons).
“For all metrics, performance was better than chance, which we computed by re-evaluating performance after using temporally shuffled neural data as the input to our decoding pipeline (P < 0.0001 for all three comparisons, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum tests with five-way Holm–Bonferroni correction).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Avatar and healthy-speaker mouth-width trajectories were correlated with a median value of 0.446 (99% CI 0.417 to 0.470).
“We found that the jaw opening, lip aperture and mouth width of the avatar and healthy speakers were well correlated with median values of 0.733 (99% CI [0.711, 0.748]), 0.690 (99% CI [0.663, 0.714]) and 0.446 (99% CI [0.417, 0.470]), respectively (Fig. 4c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The articulatory trajectories recorded from healthy speakers represent the expected natural articulatory trajectories.
- Findingown data
The model correctly classified 569 of 570 test trials as either finger flexion or silent speech.
“the model correctly classified 569 out of 570 test trials as either finger flexion or silent speech; Supplementary Fig. 9”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The participant's attempted hand movements, despite severe paralysis, produce neural activity that reflects intended hand movements.
- Findingcitation
The participant has used commercial head-tracking assistive technology to communicate at up to 14 words per minute.
“she has used commercial head-tracking assistive technology to communicate slowly to select letters at up to 14 words per minute (WPM; Supplementary Note 2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Supplementary Note 2
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
The system remained functional in a freeform setting where the participant spontaneously attempted to silently say unprompted sentences, with neural data aligned to speech onsets detected from neural features rather than go cues.
“We verified that our system remained functional in a freeform setting in which the participant volitionally and spontaneously attempted to silently say unprompted sentences, with the neural data aligned to speech onsets detected directly from the neural features instead of to go cues (Method 2 in Supplementary Methods and Supplementary Video 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
For the 529-phrase-AAC set, the median perceptual character error rate of synthesized speech was 26.3% (99% CI 15.9% to 29.7%).
“and median CERs of 6.64% (99% CI [2.71, 10.6]), 26.3% (99% CI [15.9, 29.7]) and 45.7% (99% CI [39.2, 51.6]) across test trials for the 50-phrase-AAC, 529-phrase-AAC and 1024-word-General sets, respectively”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Avatar and healthy-speaker lip-aperture trajectories were correlated with a median value of 0.690 (99% CI 0.663 to 0.714).
“We found that the jaw opening, lip aperture and mouth width of the avatar and healthy speakers were well correlated with median values of 0.733 (99% CI [0.711, 0.748]), 0.690 (99% CI [0.663, 0.714]) and 0.446 (99% CI [0.417, 0.470]), respectively (Fig. 4c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The articulatory trajectories recorded from healthy speakers represent the expected natural articulatory trajectories.
- Findingown data
For the 50-phrase-AAC set, mean mel-cepstral distortion was 3.45 dB (99% CI 3.25 to 3.82).
“We achieved mean MCDs of 3.45 (99% CI [3.25, 3.82]), 4.49 (99% CI [4.07, 4.67]) and 5.21 (99% CI [4.74, 5.51]) dB for the 50-phrase-AAC, 529-phrase-AAC and 1024-word-General sets, respectively (Fig. 3c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Front-tongue phonetic encoding was positively correlated with HGA magnitude during attempts to raise the tongue (P < 0.0001, r = 0.84, ordinary least-squares regression).
“we found a positive correlation between front-tongue phonetic encoding and HGA magnitude during attempts to raise the tongue (P < 0.0001, r = 0.84, ordinary least-squares regression; Fig. 5g).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The participant's silent-speech attempts engage the same articulatory representations as natural speech production.
- Findingown data
For the 529-phrase-AAC set, median forced-choice perceptual accuracy of the avatar was 87.7% (99% CI 79.7% to 93.7%).
“We obtained median accuracies of 85.7% (99% CI [79.0, 92.0]), 87.7% (99% CI [79.7, 93.7]) and 74.3% (99% CI [66.7, 80.8]) across the 50-phrase-AAC, 529-phrase-AAC and 1024-word-General sets”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A new BCI control modality was introduced as a digital talking face: a personalized avatar capable of dynamic, realistic, and interpretable speech and non-verbal facial gestures.
“Finally, we introduced a modality of BCI control in the form of a digital ‘talking face’—a personalized avatar capable of dynamic, realistic and interpretable speech and non-verbal facial gestures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The participant's silent-speech attempts engage the same articulatory representations as natural speech production.
- Findingnone given
Discrete speech units derived from self-supervised learning served as effective intermediate representations for intelligible speech synthesis.
“self-supervised learning-derived discrete speech units, serving as effective intermediate representations for intelligible speech synthesis”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Advances in the neural interface provided denser and broader sampling of distributed orofacial and vocal-tract representations across the lateral SMC.
“advances in the neural interface, providing denser and broader sampling of the distributed orofacial and vocal-tract representations across the lateral SMC”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Custom sequence-learning neural-decoding models enabled training without aligning neural activity to output features.
“custom sequence-learning neural-decoding models, facilitating training without alignment of neural activity and output features”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
A virtual face was controlled from brain activity to accompany synthesized speech and convey facial expressions.
“control of a virtual face from brain activity to accompany synthesized speech and convey facial expressions”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The participant's SMC contained hand and orofacial-motor somatotopy organized along a dorsal-ventral axis.
“including hand and orofacial-motor somatotopy organized along a dorsal–ventral axis”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The participant's attempted hand movements, despite severe paralysis, produce neural activity that reflects intended hand movements.
- Findingown data
Temporal-lobe electrodes that contributed to decoding were not strongly activated during auditory perception (r < 0.1, P > 0.01, Pearson correlation permutation test).
“temporal-lobe electrodes contributing to decoding were not strongly activated during auditory perception (r < 0.1, P > 0.01, Pearson correlation permutation test; Supplementary Fig. 16)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Intelligible speech can be synthesized from the brain activity of a person with paralysis.
“We also showed that intelligible speech can be synthesized from the brain activity of a person with paralysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The participant's silent-speech attempts engage the same articulatory representations as natural speech production.
- Findingown data
The participant's SMC contained phonetic tunings clustered by place of articulation.
“and phonetic tunings clustered by POA.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The participant's silent-speech attempts engage the same articulatory representations as natural speech production.
- Interpretationown data
Multimodal communication brain-computer interfaces have the potential to restore the ability to express meaningful orofacial gestures.
“illustrating the potential of multimodal communication BCIs to restore the ability to express meaningful orofacial gestures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
High-density cortical recording provides a benefit for decoding performance.
“further highlighting the benefit of high-density cortical recording.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
It is possible to synthesize intelligible speech from the brain activity of a person with paralysis.
“Together, these results demonstrate that it is possible to synthesize intelligible speech from the brain activity of a person with paralysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The avatar reasonably approximated expected articulatory trajectories relative to natural variance between healthy speakers.
“illustrating that the avatar reasonably approximated the expected articulatory trajectories relative to natural variances between healthy”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The articulatory trajectories recorded from healthy speakers represent the expected natural articulatory trajectories.
- Premiseown data
A major difficulty in learning mappings between ECoG features and phone or speech-sound sequences was the lack of clear timing information for words and phonemes in silently attempted speech.
“A major difficulty in learning statistical mappings between the ECoG features and the sequences of phones and speech-sound features in the sentences was caused by the absence of clear timing information of words and phonemes in the silently attempted speech.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The primary contributor to phone-decoding performance was the neural-decoding RNN model, not the CTC beam search or language model.
“demonstrating that the primary contributor to phone-decoding performance was the neural-decoding RNN model and not the CTC beam search or language model (P < 0.0001 for all comparisons to chance and to the full model, two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with five-way Holm–Bonferroni correction; Extended Data Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The adjacency of many important electrodes suggests that useful, non-redundant cortical information is sampled despite the electrodes' close spacing.
“suggesting sampling of useful, non-redundant information from the cortex despite the electrodes’ close proximity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Speech-decoding performance is driven by broad coverage of articulatory representations distributed throughout the sensorimotor cortex that persisted after years of paralysis.
“Additionally, we show that decoder performance is driven by broad coverage of articulatory representations distributed throughout the SMC that have persisted after years of paralysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The 50-phrase-AAC and 529-phrase-AAC sentence sets closely mirror corpora preloaded on commercial AAC devices that are designed for expressing basic concepts and caregiving needs.
“The first two sets closely mirror corpora preloaded on commercially available augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) devices, designed to let patients express basic concepts and caregiving needs4.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
The avatar conveyed perceptually meaningful speech-related facial movements.
“demonstrating that the avatar conveyed perceptually meaningful speech-related facial movements (Fig. 4b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
A speech neuroprosthesis that decodes articulatory cortical activity in real time into text, speech audio synchronized with a facial avatar, and facial expressions can address all of those communication needs.
“Here we have demonstrated that all of these needs can be addressed with a speech-neuroprosthetic system that decodes articulatory cortical activity into multiple output modalities in real time, including text, speech audio synchronized with a facial avatar, and facial expressions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The participant's silent-speech attempts engage the same articulatory representations as natural speech production.
- Study design and conductown data
The present proof-of-concept study's results come from only one participant, which is a limitation.
“A limitation of the present proof-of-concept study is that the results shown are from only one participant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The participant's SMC showed persistent articulatory encoding consistent with previous intact-speech characterizations despite more than 18 years of anarthria.
“persistent articulatory encoding in the SMC of our participant that is consistent with previous intact-speech characterizations despite more than 18 years of anarthria”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The participant's silent-speech attempts engage the same articulatory representations as natural speech production.
- Interpretationreasoning
BCIs can restore this ability to patients through highly personalizable audio-visual synthesis that restores aspects of personhood and identity.
“We show here that BCIs can give this ability back to patients through highly personalizable audio-visual synthesis capable of restoring aspects of their personhood and identity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The participant's silent-speech attempts engage the same articulatory representations as natural speech production.
- May combine two claims. 47
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 27
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSpeech neuroprostheses could restore communication for people with paralysis, but naturalistic speed and expressivity have not yet been achieved.
“Speech neuroprostheses have the potential to restore communication to people living with paralysis, but naturalistic speed and expressivity are elusive1.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] source
The Background says decoding words and sentences from cortical activity could restore communication for paralyzed people who cannot speak. The Results report a median decoding rate of 15.2 words per minute, and the Methods describe a restricted 50-word set, supporting the point that this system had not achieved naturalistic communication. The paper does not assess speech expressivity or establish that expressivity remains elusive across speech neuroprostheses. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPrior work has decoded speech from the brain activity of a person with paralysis, but only as text and with limited speed and vocabulary.
“Previous demonstrations have shown that it is possible to decode speech from the brain activity of a person with paralysis, but only in the form of text and with limited speed and vocabulary1,3.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe median real-time text-decoding rate exceeded the participant's typical assistive-device communication rate of 14.2 words per minute and was closer to naturalistic speaking rates than previously reported communication neuroprostheses.
“This decoding rate exceeds our participant’s typical communication rate using her assistive device (14.2 WPM; Supplementary Note 2) and is closer to naturalistic speaking rates than has been previously reported with communication neuroprostheses1,3,7–9.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim5 of 5 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe mel-cepstral distortion values are comparable to those of text-to-speech synthesizers and better than those in previous neural-decoding work with participants who could speak naturally.
“Furthermore, these MCDs are comparable to those observed with text-to-speech synthesizers16 and better than those in previous neural-decoding work with participants that were able to speak naturally11.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataFunctional speech-decoding performance can be achieved after a relatively short period of data collection compared with previous work and is likely to improve with more data.
“These results show that functional speech-decoding performance can be achieved after a relatively short period of data collection compared to that of our previous work1,3 and is likely to continue to improve with more data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [1] source
- cites [3] source
The Decoding performance section reports real-time sentence decoding, and the Discussion describes the system as viable for general-purpose assistive communication. But the passages found do not establish that this performance followed a shorter data-collection period than the citing authors’ previous work or that it would improve with more data. The latter is the citing authors’ prediction, not a finding established by this source. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationAnimating a facial avatar to accompany synthesized speech is a promising route to naturalistic communication and may be achievable by decoding articulatory and orofacial representations in speech-motor cortex.
“Therefore, animation of a facial avatar to accompany synthesized speech and further embody the user is a promising means towards naturalistic communication, and it may be possible via decoding of articulatory and orofacial representations in the speech-motor cortex22–25.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 4 sources checked- cites [22] source
- cites [23] source
The Abstract and Discussion (page unavailable) report articulator and orofacial representations in ventral sensorimotor cortex during speech, supporting the proposed neural target. The paper does not report decoding those representations to animate a facial avatar or establish that this application is feasible; that remains the citing authors’ proposal. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [24] source
The Abstract (page unavailable) reports neural representations of vocal-tract parameters during speech imitation, including in somatomotor regions. That supports the premise that articulatory information is represented in speech-motor cortex, but the paper does not address decoding those representations to animate a facial avatar or accompany synthesized speech. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [25]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPrior work has synthesized intelligible speech from neural activity during vocalized or mimed speech in speakers with intact speech, but not in a paralysed person.
“Previous work in speakers with intact speech has demonstrated that intelligible speech can be synthesized from neural activity during vocalized or mimed speech10,11, but this has not been shown with someone who is paralysed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [10] source
The Discussion (page unavailable) says the study reconstructed high-quality speech from neural recordings during overt speech in motor-intact participants and that speech representations in paralysed patients need further research. The Results (page unavailable) say intelligibility was evaluated with STOI, but the available text does not establish that the synthesized speech was intelligible. This paper studied vocalized speech, not mimed speech. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [11] source
The Abstract reports intelligible neurally synthesized speech from participants who spoke aloud, and the Methods identify them as people undergoing epilepsy monitoring rather than people with paralysis. The “Synthesizing mimed speech” section reports synthesis from silent mime, but assesses spectral similarity rather than listener intelligibility; the claim’s intelligibility qualifier is therefore not established for mimed speech. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationHuBERT is a speech-representation learning model that predicts acoustic k-means-cluster identities for masked time points from unlabelled input waveforms.
“HuBERT is a speech-representation learning model that is trained to predict acoustic k-means-cluster identities corresponding to masked time points from unlabelled input waveforms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationThe sequence over time of discrete speech units derived by HuBERT captures the content of the original speech waveform.
“We refer to these cluster identities as discrete speech units, and the temporal sequence of these speech units represents the content of the original waveform.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThose temporal-lobe electrodes may record activity from the sub-central gyrus or from production-specific sites within the temporal lobe.
“suggesting that they may record cortical activity from the sub-central gyrus36 or production-specific sites within the temporal lobe37.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [36] source
The Introduction says the subcentral gyrus is involved in speech-related movements, and the Discussion reports subcentral activity during vocalization. Those passages support the proposed source of cortical activity, but the paper does not examine whether temporal-lobe electrodes record it. The separate claim about production-specific temporal-lobe sites is attached to citation 37, not this source. (LLM, conf=0.79)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [37] source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe study demonstrated intelligible and rapid speech synthesis and personalization to the participant's pre-injury voice.
“For speech audio, we demonstrate intelligible and rapid speech synthesis and personalization to the participant’s pre-injury voice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataMel-cepstral distortion performance on the participant's personalized voice was similar to that on the non-personalized voice.
“We observed similar MCD performance on the participant’s personalized voice (Extended Data Fig. 5 and Supplementary Table 1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataError rates steadily declined over 13 days of training-data collection, during which 9,506 sentence trials were collected, corresponding to about 1.6 hours of training data per day.
“We observed steadily declining error rates over the course of 13 days of training-data collection (Fig. 2f), during which we collected 9,506 sentence trials corresponding to about 1.6 h of training data per day.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMost electrodes were selective for either lip or tongue movements, while some responded to both.
“Although most electrodes were selective to either lip or tongue movements, others were activated by both (Fig. 5i).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The participant's silent-speech attempts engage the same articulatory representations as natural speech production.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCorrelations for both the avatar-healthy speaker and healthy speaker-healthy speaker distributions were significantly above chance.
“Correlations for both distributions were significantly above chance, which was calculated by temporally shuffling the human trajectories and then recomputing correlations with dynamic time warping (all P < 0.0001, two-sided Mann–Whitney U-test with nine-way Holm–Bonferroni correction; Supplementary Table 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn qualitative task blocks, the participant could control the avatar BCI to portray articulatory movements and strong-intensity emotional expressions.
“In separate, qualitative task blocks, we showed that the participant could control the avatar BCI to portray the articulatory movements (Supplementary Video 8) and strong-intensity emotional expressions (Supplementary Video 9)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSpeech-synthesis performance improved as the number of unique words and sentences in the set decreased, and was always better than chance.
“Performance increased as the number of unique words and sentences in the sentence set decreased but was always better than chance (all P < 0.0001, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum tests with 19-way Holm–Bonferroni correction; chance MCDs were measured using waveforms generated by passing temporally shuffled ECoG features through the synthesis pipeline).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe implanted array was positioned over cortical areas relevant for orofacial movements, and simple movement tasks showed differentiable activations for attempted movements of the lips, tongue and jaw.
“The array was positioned over cortical areas relevant for orofacial movements, and simple movement tasks demonstrated differentiable activations associated with attempted movements of the lips, tongue and jaw (Fig. 1d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMany of the highest-contributing electrodes also showed substantial articulatory-feature encoding and were similarly important across all three decoding modalities.
“many of the highest-contributing electrodes also exhibited substantial articulatory-feature encoding defined in Fig. 5 (Supplementary Figs. 12 and 13) and were similarly important for all three modalities (Extended Data Fig. 7e–g).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataElectrodes showed a variety of phonetic tunings, with some tuned to a single place-of-articulation category and others to multiple categories.
“We observed a variety of tunings across the electrodes, with some electrodes exhibiting tuning to single POA categories and others to multiple categories (such as both front-tongue and back-tongue phones or both labial and vocalic phones; Fig. 5c and Supplementary”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataVisualizing phonetic tunings in two dimensions revealed separability between labial and non-labial consonants and between lip-rounded and non-lip-rounded vowels.
“We visualized the phonetic tunings in a 2D space, revealing separability between labial and non-labial consonants (Fig. 5d) and between lip-rounded and non-lip-rounded vowels (Fig. 5e).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAcross 19 sessions after freezing the classifier, mean classification accuracy for NATO code words was 96.8% (99% CI 94.5 to 98.6), with 100% accuracy on eight sessions.
“Across 19 sessions after freezing the classifier, we observed a mean classification accuracy of 96.8% (99% CI [94.5, 98.6]), with accuracies of 100% obtained on eight of these sessions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe participant can vocalize a small set of monosyllabic sounds but cannot articulate intelligible words.
“She can vocalize a small set of monosyllabic sounds, such as ‘ah’ or ‘ooh’, but she is unable to articulate intelligible words (Supplementary Note 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe participant's feedback describes how a multimodal BCI would improve her daily life by increasing expressivity, independence, and productivity.
“This is further supported by our participant’s feedback on the technology, in which she describes how a multimodal BCI would improve her daily life by increasing expressivity, independence and productivity (Supplementary Table 9).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt enrolment evaluation, the participant scored 29/30 on the Mini Mental State Exam and missed the final point only because paralysis prevented her from drawing a figure.
“During enrolment evaluation, she scored 29/30 on the Mini Mental State Exam and was unable to achieve the final point only because she could not physically draw a figure due to her paralysis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA visual-speech-recognition model gave a median WER of 95.8% for the participant's silently attempted speech, much higher than the 50.0% median WER from healthy speakers' videos.
“We found a median WER of 95.8% (99% CI [90.0, 125.0]) for silently attempted speech, which was far higher than the median WER from videos of volunteer healthy speakers, which was 50.0% (99% CI [37.5, 62.5]; Supplementary Fig. 17).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA speech-language pathologist measured the participant's intelligibility as 5% for prompted words, 0% for prompted sentences, and 0% for open-ended responses.
“the speech–language pathologist measured her intelligibility to be 5% for the prompted words, 0% for the prompted sentences and 0% for the open-ended responses.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe participant had a large pontine infarct with left vertebral artery dissection and basilar artery occlusion.
“She was found to have a large pontine infarct with left vertebral artery dissection and basilar artery occlusion.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationFunctionally, the participant cannot use speech to communicate and instead relies on a transparent letter board and a Tobii Dynavox.
“Functionally, she cannot use speech to communicate. Instead, she relies on a transparent letter board and a Tobii Dynavox for communication (Supplementary Note 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenRecordings from non-penetrating cortical-surface electrodes were highly stable, allowing training and testing across days and weeks without retraining on the test day.
“highly stable recordings from non-penetrating cortical-surface electrodes, enabling training and testing across days and weeks without requiring retraining on the day of testing”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe participant was 47 years old at enrolment and had been diagnosed with quadriplegia and anarthria by neurologists and a speech-language pathologist.
“The participant, who was 47 years old at time of enrolment into the study, was diagnosed with quadriplegia and anarthria by neurologists and a speech–language pathologist.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe participant cannot speak or vocalize speech sounds because of severe orofacial and vocal muscle weakness, and cannot type because of arm and hand weakness.
“our 47-year-old participant cannot speak or vocalize speech sounds given the severe weakness of her orofacial and vocal muscles (anarthria; see Supplementary Note 1) and cannot type given the weakness in her arms and hands (quadriplegia).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Supplementary Note 1
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataBecause the average word error rate is below the 30% threshold at which speech-recognition applications generally become useful and the vocabulary exceeds 1,000 words, the approach may be viable in clinical applications.
“The average WER passes the 30% threshold below which speech-recognition applications generally become useful6 while providing access to a large vocabulary of over 1,000 words, indicating that our approach may be viable in clinical applications.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] source
- Rests on an assumption: A vocabulary of 1,024 words is large enough to support general-purpose communication.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe system achieved extremely rapid and accurate decoding for finite, predefined sentences that could be used frequently by users.
“These results illustrate extremely rapid and accurate decoding for finite, predefined sentences that could be used frequently by users.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe speech-synthesis neural decoder performed strongly with the speech-to-gesture rendering system, but the acoustic approach cannot generate meaningful facial gestures without a decoded speech waveform.
“These findings emphasize the strong performance of the speech-synthesis neural decoder when used with the speech-to-gesture rendering system, although this approach cannot be used to generate meaningful facial gestures in the absence of a decoded speech waveform.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationHuman-transcription assessments are a standard method for quantifying the perceptual accuracy of synthesized speech.
“Human-transcription assessments are a standard method to quantify the perceptual accuracy of synthesized speech17.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [17]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataAfter 18 years of paralysis, the participant's SMC retains general-purpose articulatory encoding that is not specific to speech and includes representations of non-verbal emotional expressions and articulatory movements.
“Together, these findings suggest that, after 18 years of paralysis, our participant’s SMC maintains general-purpose articulatory encoding that is not speech specific and contains representations of non-verbal emotional expressions and articulatory movements (see Fig. 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The participant's silent-speech attempts engage the same articulatory representations as natural speech production.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNon-verbal facial gestures often account for a substantial portion of a speaker's perceived feeling and attitude, and face-to-face communication enhances social connectivity and intelligibility.
“Previous studies show that non-verbal facial gestures often account for a substantial portion of the perceived feeling and attitude of a speaker18,19 and that face-to-face communication enhances social connectivity20 and intelligibility21.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationConnectionist temporal classification loss is commonly used in automatic speech recognition to infer sub-word unit sequences from speech waveforms when precise time alignment is unknown.
“which is commonly used in automatic speech recognition to infer sequences of sub-word units (such as phones or letters) from speech waveforms when precise time alignment between the units and the waveforms is unknown5.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe cortical-surface neural interface was stable without recalibration, and high performance can be achieved with relatively few training trials.
“These results illustrate the stability of the cortical-surface neural interface without requiring recalibration and demonstrate that high performance can be achieved with relatively few training trials.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe 249 final test sentences for text decoding were randomly selected from the 1024-word-General set, and no training data used these sentences as targets.
“We randomly selected 249 sentences from the 1024-word-General set to use as the final test sentences for text decoding (Method 1 in Supplementary Methods). We did not collect training data with these sentences as targets.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe expression classifier was assessed with 15-fold cross-validation; inside each training fold, ten separate models were trained and their predictions were ensembled on the held-out test set.
“We evaluated the expression classifier using 15-fold cross-validation.”
- Also stated in: § Avatar · plain
“Within the training set of each cross-validation fold, we fitted ten unique models to ensemble predictions on the held-out test set.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Avatar · plain
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataElectrodes lacking significant modulation during silent-speech attempts were removed from the articulatory-encoding analysis; significance was assessed with one-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank tests at an alpha of 0.00001 following a 253-way Holm-Bonferroni correction.
“If an electrode did not have significantly increased HGA after the go cue compared to before, it was excluded from the remainder of this analysis (significant modulation determined using one-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank tests with an alpha level of 0.00001 after applying 253-way Holm–Bonferroni correction).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe device was implanted in September 2022 at UCSF Medical Center without surgical complications.
“The device was implanted in September 2022 at UCSF Medical Center with no surgical complications.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataFor the perceptual evaluation of decoded speech, every trial received ratings from 12 evaluators (with 3 of 500 trials having 11), and the median word and character error rates across evaluators served as the final accuracy measure to mitigate outlier evaluator behavior.
“each test trial was assessed by 12 evaluators (except for 3 of the 500 trials, in which only 11 workers completed their evaluations).”
- Also stated in: § Speech synthesis · plain
“To control for outlier evaluator performance, for each trial, we used the median WER and CER across evaluators as the final accuracy metric for the decoded waveform.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Speech synthesis · plain
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataFor audio-visual synthesis and avatar evaluation, 200 sentences were randomly selected that were not used in training and were not among the 249 text-decoding test sentences.
“For evaluation of audio-visual synthesis and the avatar, we randomly selected 200 sentences that were not used during training and were not included in the 249 sentences used for text-decoding evaluation (Method 1 in Supplementary Methods).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningTen of the 200 1024-word-General avatar videos were withheld from final evaluation because they had been used to tune parameters for automatic trimming of dlib traces to speech onset and offset.
“We held out 10 of 200 1024-word-General avatar videos from final evaluation as they were used to select parameters to automatically trim the dlib traces to speech onset and offset.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe data presented here are part of an ongoing exploratory clinical trial and do not contribute to conclusions about the trial's primary safety endpoints.
“All data presented here are part of the ongoing exploratory clinical trial and do not contribute towards any conclusions regarding the primary safety endpoints of the trial.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataNATO code-word classification accuracy was computed exclusively from trials whose target was a NATO code word; a code-word attempt that was misclassified as a hand-motor attempt was treated as incorrect.
“here we measured performance only on trials in which the target was a NATO code word, and we deemed incorrect any such trial in which a code-word attempt was misclassified as a hand-motor attempt.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataFor model training, 95% of the data was used for training and 5% was held out to evaluate performance and choose hyperparameters before real-time testing.
“We used 95% of this data to train the models and 5% as a held-out development set to evaluate performance and choose hyperparameters before real-time testing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe linear receptive-field encoding model was fitted with tenfold cross-validation; a held-out tuning set comprising 10% of the data was used to choose the optimal ridge-regression alpha, after which another tenfold cross-validation on the remaining 90% evaluated performance.
“We used tenfold cross-validation to select the optimal alpha ridge-regression parameter by sweeping over the values [1 × 10−1, 1 × 100, 1 × 101, … 1 × 105], using 10% of our total data as a held-out tuning set.”
- Also stated in: § Articulatory-encoding assessments · plain
“We then conducted another round of tenfold cross-validation on the remaining 90% of our total data to evaluate performance with the optimized alpha parameter.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Articulatory-encoding assessments · plain
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenSentences employed in the 1024-word-General evaluations were omitted from VQ-VAE training.
“We excluded from VQ-VAE training any sentence that was used during the evaluations with the 1024-word-General set.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenFor comparisons where the underlying neural data were not independent, the Holm-Bonferroni method corrected for multiple comparisons.
“When the underlying neural data were not independent across comparisons, we used the Holm–Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataFor the speech-related animation assessment, six distinct evaluators rated each decoded animation, and the median evaluator accuracy was taken as the trial's accuracy.
“Each decoded animation was assessed by six unique evaluators.”
- Also stated in: § Avatar · plain
“We computed the median accuracy of the evaluations across evaluators for each sentence and treated that as the accuracy for a given trial”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Avatar · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataElectrodes whose encoding values (r) were 0.2 or lower were excluded from the articulatory-encoding analysis.
“We then applied a second pruning step to exclude any electrodes that had encoding values (r) less than or equal to 0.2”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe participant gave informed consent after multiple conversations in which study enrolment details and device risks were thoroughly explained.
“The participant gave her informed consent to participate in this trial following multiple conversations with study investigators in which the details of study enrolment, including risks related to the study device, were thoroughly explained to her.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe study was conducted within the BCI Restoration of Arm and Voice clinical trial (NCT03698149).
“This study was completed within the BCI Restoration of Arm and Voice clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03698149).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe participant used her transparent letter board to give informed consent and to permit her image in demonstration videos.
“She used her transparent letter board to provide informed consent to participate in this study and to allow her image to appear in demonstration videos.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe avatar-movement classifier was assessed with tenfold cross-validation.
“We evaluated the network using tenfold cross-validation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe study protocol was approved by the University of California, San Francisco Institutional Review Board.
“the study protocol was approved by the University of California, San Francisco Institutional Review Board.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Spoken communication carries prosodic, expressive and identity-related information that can improve embodied communication beyond what text alone can convey.
“Although text outputs are good for basic messages, speaking has rich prosody, expressiveness and identity that can enhance embodied communication beyond what can be conveyed in text alone.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Text-based communication is an important modality for messaging and interaction with technology.
“Text-based communication is an important modality for facilitating messaging and interaction with technology.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A vocabulary of 1,024 words is large enough to support general-purpose communication.
“with a vocabulary size large enough to facilitate general-purpose communication”
The paper relies on this without support.
The articulatory trajectories recorded from healthy speakers represent the expected natural articulatory trajectories.
“illustrating that the avatar reasonably approximated the expected articulatory trajectories relative to natural variances between healthy”
The paper relies on this without support.
The participant's attempted silent speech engaged her articulators to the best of her ability despite her orofacial weakness.
“she was trying to engage her articulators to the best of her ability, although substantial orofacial weakness prevents her from naturally mouthing words.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The participant's attempted hand movements, despite severe paralysis, produce neural activity that reflects intended hand movements.
“We instructed the participant to attempt to carry out the hand-motor movements to the best of her ability despite her severe paralysis.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The participant's silent-speech attempts engage the same articulatory representations as natural speech production.
“After the final dot disappeared, the text turned green to indicate the go cue, and the participant attempted to silently say that target or carry out the corresponding action.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prior speech neuroprosthesis studies required approximately 17 hours of recording to collect sufficient training data to obtain that level of performance.
“and required approximately 17 hours of recording to collect sufficient training data to obtain that level of performance.”
From An Accurate and Rapidly Calibrating Speech Neuroprosthesis (2024) · cites this paper as [19]
The Text decoding section reports about 1.6 hours of training data per day over 13 days—approximately 21 hours for this study—and describes that as a shorter collection period than its previous work. It does not support the claim that prior studies required approximately 17 hours; its comparison points in the opposite direction. Page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.81)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredWhen an individual with anarthria silently attempted to speak, select neural populations in the STG contributed to decoding performance.
“Furthermore, when an individual with anarthria silently attempted to speak — that is, was asked to attempt to ‘mime’ with no audible output from that attempt — select neural populations in the STG contributed to decoding performance14.”
From The speech neuroprosthesis (2024) · cites this paper as [14]
The Overview of multimodal speech-decoding system says the participant had anarthria, silently attempted speech without vocalizing, and had electrodes over the superior temporal gyrus (STG). Articulatory representations drive decoding says temporal-lobe electrodes contributed to decoding, but cautions that they may have recorded activity from the sub-central gyrus rather than temporal-lobe sites. It therefore does not establish that neural populations in the STG itself contributed. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredUsing CTC loss, recent work has achieved large-vocabulary decoding while keeping decoding speeds closer to natural speech.
“Recent works have achieved large-vocabulary decoding while maintaining decoding speeds closer to natural speech, by using CTC loss.”
From The speech neuroprosthesis (2024) · cites this paper as Metzger et al. 2023
The Overview and Methods > Text decoding describe training the decoders with CTC loss, and Text decoding reports real-time decoding with a 1,024-word vocabulary. However, the 39,378-word result was evaluated offline, while the reported rates of 89.9 and 101 words per minute were for smaller, predefined phrase sets. The passages do not establish that the largest-vocabulary decoding maintained speeds close to natural speech. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredMetzger et al. demonstrated that decoded articulatory features can animate a digital avatar face personalized to resemble the individual.
“Metzger et al. demonstrated that it is possible to use these decoded articulatory features to animate a digital avatar face, which was personalized to resemble the likeness of the individual14 (Fig. 3d).”
From The speech neuroprosthesis (2024) · cites this paper as [14]
The Facial-avatar decoding section says decoded articulatory gestures were used to animate the avatar face, and the Discussion calls it a personalized avatar. However, our copy does not say the avatar’s face was personalized to resemble the participant; the explicit resemblance claim in Methods > Speech synthesis concerns her synthetic voice. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThis aligns with previous speech BCI studies in which the middle precentral gyrus and most ventral precentral gyrus demonstrated the greatest signal contributions to speech decoding.
“This aligns with previous speech BCI studies in which the middle precentral gyrus3 and most ventral precentral gyrus1,2 demonstrated the greatest signal contributions to speech decoding.”
From Inner speech in motor cortex and implications for speech neuroprostheses (2025) · cites this paper as [3]
In “Articulatory representations drive decoding” (page unavailable), the paper reports that the sensorimotor cortex, which includes the precentral and postcentral gyri, was most critical to decoding in leave-one-area-out analyses. It does not identify the most ventral precentral gyrus specifically as making the greatest signal contribution—the part of the citing sentence to which this citation is attached. (LLM, conf=0.80)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Communication with brain-computer interfaces has been restricted by extensive training requirements and limited accuracy.
“Communication with brain-computer interfaces has been restricted by extensive training requirements and limited accuracy.”
From An Accurate and Rapidly Calibrating Speech Neuroprosthesis (2024) · cites this paper as [19]
The Abstract says previous speech BCIs had limited speed and vocabulary, and Text decoding says this study required a shorter period of training-data collection than the authors’ previous work. Those passages support a claim about prior training demands, but the paper does not identify limited accuracy as a restriction on earlier BCI communication; it describes the earlier limits as speed and vocabulary. (LLM, conf=0.80)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredAnother previous speech neuroprosthesis required 17.7 hours of training data collected over 13 days to reach a word error rate of 25.5%.
“Another previous speech neuroprosthesis required 17.7 hours of training data collected over 13 days, to reach a word error rate of 25.5% 19 .”
From An Accurate and Rapidly Calibrating Speech Neuroprosthesis (2024) · cites this paper as [19]
The Text decoding section reports a median word error rate of 25.5% and describes 13 days of training-data collection. It does not report 17.7 hours or establish that this precise amount was required; instead, it describes about 1.6 hours of training data per day. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredCurrent ECoG grids are limited to a few hundred surface electrodes.
“Current ECoG grids are also limited to a few hundred surface electrodes [15].”
From Ethical considerations for the use of brain–computer interfaces for cognitive enhancement (2024) · cites this paper as [15]
The Methods section (‘Neural implant’; page unavailable) describes an ECoG array with 253 electrodes implanted on the brain’s surface. That supports ‘a few hundred surface electrodes’ for this grid, but the paper does not establish that current ECoG grids generally are limited to that number. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredCurrent speech-decoding applications from brain activity are primarily aimed at restoring communication to individuals with both limb and vocal-tract paralysis.
“Current speech-decoding applications from brain activity are primarily aimed at restoring communication to individuals with both limb and vocal-tract paralysis14–16.”
From The speech neuroprosthesis (2024) · cites this paper as [14]
Subsequent work expanded the initial demonstration by directly decoding cortical activity into audible speech and allowing more generalizable and rapid text decoding in individuals with vocal-tract paralysis.
“Subsequent work has expanded this initial demonstration by directly decoding cortical activity into audible speech13,14 and allowing more generalizable and rapid text decoding14–16 in individuals with vocal-tract paralysis (Fig. 1).”
From The speech neuroprosthesis (2024) · cites this paper as [14]
A 253-electrode ECoG array with increased channel count and density led to substantial gains towards high-performance speech decoding.
“Furthermore, a 253-electrode ECoG array with increased channel count and density led to substantial gains towards high-performance speech decoding14.”
From The speech neuroprosthesis (2024) · cites this paper as [14]
Durable stability has enabled ECoG-based neuroprostheses without the need for daily calibration by the user.
“Despite this, durable stability has enabled ECoG-based neuroprostheses without the need for daily calibration by the user12,14,94,95.”
From The speech neuroprosthesis (2024) · cites this paper as [14]
A personalized voice reflecting the user's likeness may increase embodiment when using a speech neuroprosthesis.
“Finally, an individual may feel greater embodiment when using a speech neuroprosthesis with a personalized voice that reflects their likeness14.”
From The speech neuroprosthesis (2024) · cites this paper as [14]
Metzger et al. used CTC loss to decode silent speech attempts from a participant with anarthria into synthesized speech by decoding discrete acoustic-speech units rather than regressing the mel-spectrogram.
“Metzger et al. used this approach to decode neural activity during silent speech attempts from a participant with anarthria into synthesized speech; however, rather than regressing the mel-spectrogram, they decoded input sequences of neural activity into output sequences of discrete acoustic-speech units14.”
From The speech neuroprosthesis (2024) · cites this paper as [14]
Metzger et al. first used voice conversion to personalize synthesized speech for an individual with vocal-tract paralysis using pre-injury speech samples.
“Metzger et al.14 first used this voice-conversion approach to personalize synthesized speech for an individual with vocal-tract paralysis using speech samples recorded before the injury.”
From The speech neuroprosthesis (2024) · cites this paper as [14]
Three studies in individuals with vocal-tract paralysis used RNN models trained with CTC loss to map neural activity sequences to phoneme sequences without needing alignment.
“Three studies (each in a different individual with vocal-tract paralysis: two with MEAs15,16 and one with ECoG14) leveraged RNN models trained to map an input sequence of neural activity to an output sequence of phonemes without the need for alignment between the neural activity and ground-truth sequence of phonemes”
From The speech neuroprosthesis (2024) · cites this paper as [14]
Lexicon size may be increased without substantially limiting performance.
“the latter of which may be increased without substantially limiting performance14,15.”
From The speech neuroprosthesis (2024) · cites this paper as [14]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredProxy waveforms generated from TTS or recorded by able speakers can be used as references in MCD computations.
“To resolve this, proxy waveforms, such as waveforms generated from TTS or recorded by able speakers and used during model training, can be used as references in MCD computations14.”
From The speech neuroprosthesis (2024) · cites this paper as [14]
Studies with ECoG and MEAs in individuals with paralysis demonstrated feasibility of decoding articulatory features.
“Studies with both ECoG14 and MEAs15,16,52 in individuals with paralysis have demonstrated the feasibility of decoding articulatory features”
From The speech neuroprosthesis (2024) · cites this paper as [14]
Most early studies in individuals with vocal-tract paralysis involve only single participants.
“Given that most early studies in individuals with vocal-tract paralysis involve only single participants12–16,64,95,120, great care is needed when comparing results, as the broad spectrum of disease presentations is not sampled”
From The speech neuroprosthesis (2024) · cites this paper as [14]
Articulatory features may be useful as a standalone output space for speech and non-speech orofacial gestures.
“In addition, articulatory features may be useful as a standalone output space for both speech and non-speech orofacial gestures14,52,113,114 (Fig. 3d).”
From The speech neuroprosthesis (2024) · cites this paper as [14]
Higher-density cortical sampling via increased surface or penetrating electrodes has been shown to increase decoding model performance.
“For example, higher-density cortical sampling — via an increased number of surface or penetrating electrodes — has been shown to increase the performance of decoding models14–16,175,176.”
From The speech neuroprosthesis (2024) · cites this paper as [14]
Speech brain-computer interfaces show promise in restoring communication to people with paralysis.
“Speech brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) show promise in restoring communication to people with paralysis1–3”
From Inner speech in motor cortex and implications for speech neuroprostheses (2025) · cites this paper as [3]
The left precentral gyrus is an important cortical region for coordinating motor activities related to speech.
“We implanted four microelectrode arrays (NeuroPort Array, Blackrock Neurotech, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA) into the left precentral gyrus, an important cortical region for coordinating motor activities related to speech 17,19,21 .”
From An Accurate and Rapidly Calibrating Speech Neuroprosthesis (2024) · cites this paper as [19]
Prior speech neuroprosthesis achieved 25.5% word error rate with a 1,024-word vocabulary.
“These studies achieved communication performance, quantified by word error rates, of 25.5% with a 1,024-word vocabulary 19”
From An Accurate and Rapidly Calibrating Speech Neuroprosthesis (2024) · cites this paper as [19]
Several groups have performed real-time brain-computer interface studies to restore lost speech using implanted electrocorticography (ECoG) or intracortical multielectrode arrays.
“Several groups have performed real-time braincomputer interface studies to restore lost speech using implanted electrocorticography (ECoG) 17-20 , including a report published in the Journal 17 , or intracortical multielectrode arrays 21 .”
From An Accurate and Rapidly Calibrating Speech Neuroprosthesis (2024) · cites this paper as [19]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
The stated low-frequency range conflicts with its processing description
MajorThe overview specifies low-frequency signals between 0.3 and 17 Hz, whereas the methods say these signals receive only a 100-Hz low-pass filter before downsampling. That procedure does not establish the stated frequency range.
“low-frequency signals (between 0.3 and 17 Hz)3.”
“For LFSs, we apply only a low-pass anti-aliasing filter with a cutoff frequency of 100 Hz, and then downsample signals to 200 Hz.”
A 500-phrase set appears in place of the defined 529-phrase set
MinorThe methods name a 500-phrase-AAC set for this simulation, but the paper defines and reports results for a 529-phrase-AAC set, not a 500-phrase set.
“To simulate text-decoding results on the 50-phrase-AAC and 500-phrase-AAC sentence sets”
“We used three different sentence sets in this work: 50-phrase-AAC, 529-phrase-AAC and 1024-word-General.”
Cites
Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Müller, A., Nothman, J., Louppe, G., et al. (2012) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1201.0490 · Cited by 71,016 · see citing works
SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python
Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., Haberland, M., Reddy, T., Cournapeau, D., Burovski, E., Peterson, P., Weckesser, W., Bright, J., et al. (2020) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 · Cited by 38,430 · see citing works
PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library
Paszke, A., Gross, S., Massa, F., Lerer, A., Bradbury, J., Chanan, G., Killeen, T., Lin, Z., Gimelshein, N., Antiga, L., et al. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.01703 · Cited by 31,473 · see citing works
SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python
Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., Haberland, M., Reddy, T., Cournapeau, D., Burovski, E., Peterson, P., Weckesser, W., Bright, J., et al. (2019) · Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository · doi:10.17863/cam.64134 · Cited by 10,460 · see citing works
Speech recognition with deep recurrent neural networks
Graves, A., Mohamed, A.-R., & Hinton, G. (2013) · 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.2013.6638947 · Cited by 8,893 · see citing works
seaborn: statistical data visualization
Waskom, M. (2021) · Journal of Open Source Software · doi:10.21105/joss.03021 · Cited by 7,310 · see citing works
Statsmodels: Econometric and Statistical Modeling with Python
Seabold, S., & Perktold, J. (2010) · Proceedings of the Python in Science Conferences · doi:10.25080/majora-92bf1922-011 · Cited by 6,673 · see citing works
“Librispeech: an ASR corpus based on public domain audio books,”
Panayotov, V., Chen, G., Povey, D., & Khudanpur, S. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) · doi:10.1109/icassp.2015.7178964 · Cited by 6,072 · see citing works
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (2019) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t27734-000 · Cited by 6,019 · see citing works
Graves, A., Fernández, S., Gomez, F., & Schmidhuber, J. (2006) · Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Machine learning - ICML '06 · doi:10.1145/1143844.1143891 · Cited by 5,370 · see citing works
WaveNet: a generative model for raw audio
Oord, A. V. D., Dieleman, S., Zen, H., Simonyan, K., Vinyals, O., Graves, A., Kalchbrenner, N., Senior, A., & Kavukcuoglu, K. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1609.03499 · Cited by 4,911 · see citing works
MEG and EEG data analysis with MNE-Python
Gramfort, A. (2013) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2013.00267 · Cited by 3,879 · see citing works
SpecAugment: A Simple Data Augmentation Method for Automatic Speech Recognition
Park, D. S., Chan, W., Zhang, Y., Chiu, C.-C., Zoph, B., Cubuk, E. D., & Le, Q. V. (2019) · Interspeech 2019 · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2019-2680 · Cited by 3,558 · see citing works
fairseq: A Fast, Extensible Toolkit for Sequence Modeling
Ott, M., Edunov, S., Baevski, A., Fan, A., Gross, S., Ng, N., Grangier, D., & Auli, M. (2019) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-4009 · Cited by 3,538 · see citing works
HuBERT: Self-Supervised Speech Representation Learning by Masked Prediction of Hidden Units
Hsu, W.-N., Bolte, B., Tsai, Y.-H. H., Lakhotia, K., Salakhutdinov, R., & Mohamed, A. (2021) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslp.2021.3122291 · Cited by 2,983 · see citing works
Visual Contribution to Speech Intelligibility in Noise
Sumby, W. H., & Pollack, I. (1954) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1907309 · Cited by 2,583 · see citing works
Improved backing-off for M-gram language modeling
Kneser, R., & Ney, H. (2002) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.1995.479394 · Cited by 1,471 · see citing works
“Waveglow: a flow-based generative network for speech synthesis,”
Prenger, R., Valle, R., & Catanzaro, B. (2019) · ICASSP 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) · doi:10.1109/icassp.2019.8683143 · Cited by 1,004 · see citing works
High-performance brain-to-text communication via handwriting
Willett, F. R., Avansino, D. T., Hochberg, L. R., Henderson, J. M., & Shenoy, K. V. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03506-2 · Cited by 969 · see citing works
Speech synthesis from neural decoding of spoken sentences
Anumanchipalli, G. K., Chartier, J., & Chang, E. F. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1119-1 · Cited by 883 · see citing works
Self-citationNeural constraints on learning
Sadtler, P. T., Quick, K. M., Golub, M. D., Chase, S. M., Ryu, S. I., Tyler-Kabara, E. C., Yu, B. M., & Batista, A. P. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13665 · Cited by 713 · see citing works
Functional organization of human sensorimotor cortex for speech articulation
Bouchard, K. E., Mesgarani, N., Johnson, K., & Chang, E. F. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11911 · Cited by 686 · see citing works
Self-citationNeuroprosthesis for Decoding Speech in a Paralyzed Person with Anarthria
Moses, D. A., Metzger, S. L., Liu, J. R., Anumanchipalli, G. K., Makin, J. G., Sun, P. F., Chartier, J., Dougherty, M. E., Liu, P. M., Abrams, G. M., et al. (2021) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2027540 · Cited by 582 · see citing works
Self-citationFully Implanted Brain–Computer Interface in a Locked-In Patient with ALS
Vansteensel, M. J., Pels, E. G. M., Bleichner, M. G., Branco, M. P., Denison, T., Freudenburg, Z. V., Gosselaar, P., Leinders, S., Ottens, T. H., Van Den Boom, M. A., et al. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1608085 · Cited by 578 · see citing works
Pandarinath, C., Nuyujukian, P., Blabe, C. H., Sorice, B. L., Saab, J., Willett, F. R., Hochberg, L. R., Shenoy, K. V., & Henderson, J. M. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.18554 · Cited by 566 · cited 1× · see citing works
“To test this null hypothesis, we used the following steps: (1) compute the POA linkage distances by clustering the phones by Euclidean distance into F clusters, with F = 4 being the number of POA categories; (2) randomly shuffle the mapping between the phone labels and the phonetic encodings; (3) for each POA category…”
MethodMel-cepstral distance measure for objective speech quality assessment
Kubichek, R. (2002) · Proceedings of IEEE Pacific Rim Conference on Communications Computers and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/pacrim.1993.407206 · Cited by 534 · see citing works
Modern hierarchical, agglomerative clustering algorithms
Müllner, D. (2011) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1109.2378 · Cited by 529 · see citing works
Bird, S., & Loper, E. (2004) · doi:10.3115/1219044.1219075 · Cited by 404 · see citing works
Organization of corticospinal neurons in the monkey
Murray, E. A., & Coulter, J. D. (1981) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.901950212 · Cited by 344 · see citing works
Current Controversies on Wernicke’s Area and its Role in Language
Binder, J. R. (2017) · Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports · doi:10.1007/s11910-017-0764-8 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
Wav2Letter: an End-to-End ConvNet-based Speech Recognition SystemPreprint
Collobert, R., Puhrsch, C., & Synnaeve, G. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1609.03193 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Speech synthesis from ECoG using densely connected 3D convolutional neural networks
Angrick, M., Herff, C., Mugler, E., Tate, M. C., Slutzky, M. W., Krusienski, D. J., & Schultz, T. (2019) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ab0c59 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
The auditory representation of speech sounds in human motor cortex
Cheung, C., Hamilton, L. S., Johnson, K. A., & Chang, E. F. (2016) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.12577 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Self-citationHuggins, J. E., Wren, P. A., & Gruis, K. L. (2011) · Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis · doi:10.3109/17482968.2011.572978 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
On Generative Spoken Language Modeling from Raw Audio
Lakhotia, K., Kharitonov, E., Hsu, W.-N., Adi, Y., Polyak, A., Bolte, B., Nguyen, T.-A., Copet, J., Baevski, A., Mohamed, A., et al. (2021) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00430 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Chiang, C.-H., Won, S. M., Orsborn, A. L., Yu, K. J., Trumpis, M., Bent, B., Wang, C., Xue, Y., Min, S., Woods, V., et al. (2020) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aay4682 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Encoding of Articulatory Kinematic Trajectories in Human Speech Sensorimotor Cortex
Chartier, J., Anumanchipalli, G. K., Johnson, K., & Chang, E. F. (2018) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.04.031 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Self-citationYourTTS: Towards Zero-Shot Multi-Speaker TTS and Zero-Shot Voice Conversion for everyone
Casanova, E., Weber, J., Shulby, C., Junior, A. C., Gölge, E., & Ponti, M. A. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2112.02418 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Metzger, S. L., Liu, J. R., Moses, D. A., Dougherty, M. E., Seaton, M. P., Littlejohn, K. T., Chartier, J., Anumanchipalli, G. K., Tu-Chan, A., Ganguly, K., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-33611-3 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Self-citationThe somatosensory cortex receives information about motor output
Umeda, T., Isa, T., & Nishimura, Y. (2019) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaw5388 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Torchaudio: Building Blocks for Audio and Speech Processing
Yang, Y.-Y., Hira, M., Ni, Z., Astafurov, A., Chen, C., Puhrsch, C., Pollack, D., Genzel, D., Greenberg, D., Yang, E. Z., et al. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp43922.2022.9747236 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Direct Speech-to-Speech Translation With Discrete Units
Lee, A., Chen, P., Wang, C., Gu, J., Popuri, S., Ma, X., Polyak, A., Adi, Y., He, Q., Tang, Y., et al. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.235 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Hamilton, L. S., Chang, D. L., Lee, M. B., & Chang, E. F. (2017) · Frontiers in Neuroinformatics · doi:10.3389/fninf.2017.00062 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Self-citationAugmentative and Alternative Communication
Vanderheiden, G. C., Romich, B. A., & Hill, K. J. (1999) · The electrical engineering handbook/Electrical engineering handbook series/Electrical engineering handbook · doi:10.1201/9781420049510.ch144 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Mugler, E. M., Tate, M. C., Livescu, K., Templer, J. W., Goldrick, M. A., & Slutzky, M. W. (2018) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1206-18.2018 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Quality of life in patients with locked-in syndrome: Evolution over a 6-year period
Rousseau, M.-C., Baumstarck, K., Alessandrini, M., Blandin, V., Billette de Villemeur, T., & Auquier, P. (2015) · Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases · doi:10.1186/s13023-015-0304-z · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Mapping Human Laryngeal Motor Cortex during Vocalization
Eichert, N., Papp, D., Mars, R. B., & Watkins, K. E. (2020) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhaa182 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Verbal communication impacts quality of life in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Felgoise, S. H., Zaccheo, V., Duff, J., & Simmons, Z. (2016) · Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration · doi:10.3109/21678421.2015.1125499 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Yamagishi, J., Usabaev, B., King, S., Watts, O., Dines, J., Tian, J., Guan, Y., Hu, R., Oura, K., Wu, Y.-J., et al. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/tasl.2010.2045237 · Cited by 78 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The final 1D transpose convolution had the same number of kernels as the input signal (16).”
BackgroundPreservation of hand movement representation in the sensorimotor areas of amputees
Bruurmijn, M. L. C. M., Pereboom, I. P. L., Vansteensel, M. J., Raemaekers, M. A. H., & Ramsey, N. F. (2017) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awx274 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
A probabilistic map of the human ventral sensorimotor cortex using electrical stimulation
Breshears, J. D., Molinaro, A. M., & Chang, E. F. (2015) · Journal of neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/2014.11.jns14889 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Self-citationCarey, D., Krishnan, S., Callaghan, M. F., Sereno, M. I., & Dick, F. (2017) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhw393 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Morphological and functional variability in central and subcentral motor cortex of the human brain
Eichert, N., Watkins, K. E., Mars, R. B., & Petrides, M. (2021) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-020-02180-w · Cited by 58 · see citing works
New Era for Robust Speech Recognition
(2017) · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-64680-0 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Peters, B., Bieker, G., Heckman, S. M., Huggins, J. E., Wolf, C., Zeitlin, D., & Fried-Oken, M. (2015) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2014.03.037 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Real-time classification of auditory sentences using evoked cortical activity in humans
Moses, D. A., Leonard, M. K., & Chang, E. F. (2018) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/aaab6f · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Self-citationBrumberg, J. S., Pitt, K. M., & Burnison, J. D. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2018.2808425 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Directional information from neuronal ensembles in the primate orofacial sensorimotor cortex
Arce, F. I., Lee, J.-C., Ross, C. F., Sessle, B. J., & Hatsopoulos, N. G. (2013) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00144.2013 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Carey, D., Miquel, M. E., Evans, B. G., Adank, P., & McGettigan, C. (2017) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhx056 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Deep Speech Synthesis from Articulatory Representations
Wu, P., Watanabe, S., Goldstein, L., Black, A. W., & Anumanchipalli, G. K. (2022) · Interspeech 2022 · doi:10.21437/interspeech.2022-10892 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationEvidence of Vocal Tract Articulation in Self-Supervised Learning of Speech
Cho, C. J., Wu, P., Mohamed, A., & Anumanchipalli, G. K. (2023) · ICASSP 2023 - 2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) · doi:10.1109/icassp49357.2023.10094711 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationSadikaj, G., & Moskowitz, D. S. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.004 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Salari, E., Freudenburg, Z. V., Vansteensel, M. J., & Ramsey, N. F. (2020) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.25821 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Carnival—Combining Speech Technology and Computer Animation
Berger, M., Hofer, G., & Shimodaira, H. (2011) · IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications · doi:10.1109/mcg.2011.71 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Self-citation(2014) · doi:10.4230/oasics.slate.2021.16 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Beukelman, D. (1997) · Augmentative and Alternative Communication · doi:10.1080/07434619712331278038
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Wolters, M. K., Isaac, K. B. & Renals, S. Evaluating speech synthesis intelligibility using Amazon Mechanical Turk. In Proc. 7th ISCA Workshop Speech Synth. SSW-7 (eds Sagisaka, Y. & Tokuda, K.) 136–141 (2010).
- Jia, J., Wang, X., Wu, Z., Cai, L. & Meng, H. Modeling the correlation between modality semantics and facial expressions. In Proc. 2012 Asia Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (eds Lin, W. et al.) 1–10 (2012).
- van den Oord, A., Vinyals, O. & Kavukcuoglu, K. Neural discrete representation learning. In Proc. 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 6309–6318 (Curran Associates, 2017).
- King, D. E. Dlib-ml: a machine learning toolkit. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 10, 1755–1758 (2009).
- Simonyan, K., Vedaldi, A. & Zisserman, A. Deep inside convolutional networks: visualising image classification models and saliency maps. In Proc. Workshop at International Conference on Learning Representations (eds. Bengio, Y. & LeCun, Y.) (2014).
- Shi, B., Hsu, W.-N., Lakhotia, K. & Mohamed, A. Learning audio-visual speech representation by masked multimodal cluster prediction. In Proc. International Conference on Learning Representations (2022).
- Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, C. & Lee, L. Chameleons in imagined conversations: a new approach to understanding coordination of linguistic style in dialogs. In Proc. 2nd Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics (eds. Hovy, D. et al.) 76–87 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2011).
- Jurafsky, D. & Martin, J. H. Speech and Language Processing: an Introduction to Natural Language Processing, Computational Linguistics, and Speech Recognition (Pearson Education, 2009).
- Hanzo, L.) 181-184 (IEEE, 1995).
- Heafield, K. KenLM: Faster and smaller language model queries. In Proc. Sixth Workshop on Statistical Machine Translation, 187–197 (Association for Computational Linguistics, 2011).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An Accurate and Rapidly Calibrating Speech Neuroprosthesis
Card, N. S., Wairagkar, M., Iacobacci, C., Hou, X., Singer-Clark, T., Willett, F. R., Kunz, E. M., Fan, C., Vahdati Nia, M., Deo, D. R., et al. (2024) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2314132 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Advanced Energy Harvesters and Energy Storage for Powering Wearable and Implantable Medical Devices
Gao, Z., Zhou, Y., Zhang, J., Foroughi, J., Peng, S., Baughman, R. H., Wang, Z. L., & Wang, C. (2024) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202404492 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Non-Invasive Brain-Computer Interfaces: State of the Art and Trends
Edelman, B., Zhang, S.-L., Schalk, G., Brunner, P., Müller-Putz, G., Guan, C.-T., & He, B. (2024) · IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/rbme.2024.3449790 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
“These arrays provide detailed multi-unit activity (MUA) from hundreds of recording sites and have enabled the control of robotic arms, patients’ own arms, and speech decoding [30], [31], [32], [33], [34].”
Bio-inspired electronics: Soft, biohybrid, and “living” neural interfaces
Boufidis, D., Garg, R., Angelopoulos, E., Cullen, D. K., & Vitale, F. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-57016-0 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Neuromorphic hardware for somatosensory neuroprostheses
Donati, E., & Valle, G. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-44723-3 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
The state of clinical trials of implantable brain–computer interfaces
Patrick-Krueger, K. M., Burkhart, I., & Contreras-Vidal, J. L. (2024) · Nature Reviews Bioengineering · doi:10.1038/s44222-024-00239-5 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
“The latter has mainly been driven by advances in signal processing and the application of new machine learning and deep learning algorithms, including large language models used in speech iBCIs 12,13 .”
Silva, A. B., Littlejohn, K. T., Liu, J. R., Moses, D. A., & Chang, E. F. (2024) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-024-00819-9 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Self-citationA memristor-based adaptive neuromorphic decoder for brain–computer interfaces
Liu, Z., Mei, J., Tang, J., Xu, M., Gao, B., Wang, K., Ding, S., Liu, Q., Qin, Q., Chen, W., et al. (2025) · Nature Electronics · doi:10.1038/s41928-025-01340-2 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
“Furthermore, rapid growth in brain–machine links 19–22 , commands 23,24 and decoding algorithm complexity 3,4 creates challenges for conventional silicon chips based on the von Neumann architecture 25 to decode the increasing volume of brain signals.”
Angrick, M., Luo, S., Rabbani, Q., Candrea, D. N., Shah, S., Milsap, G., Anderson, W. S., Gordon, C. R., Rosenblatt, K. R., Clawson, L., et al. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-60277-2 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
“…on offline analysis of ECoG signals that were previously recorded in subjects with normal speech, with the exception of the work by Metzger et al. 27 Here, a participant with impaired articulation and phonation was able to use a chronically implanted investigational device to produce acoustic…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialA movable long-term implantable soft microfibre for dynamic bioelectronics
Xie, R., Han, F., Yu, Q., Li, D., Xu, H., Xu, X., Yu, H., Huang, J., Zhou, X., Zhao, H., et al. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09344-w · Cited by 96 · see citing works
A neural speech decoding framework leveraging deep learning and speech synthesis
Chen, X., Wang, R., Khalilian-Gourtani, A., Yu, L., Dugan, P. C., Friedman, D. J., Doyle, W., Devinsky, O., Wang, Y., & Flinker, A. (2024) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-024-00824-8 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
“Specifically, two recent studies have provided robust speech decoding in a few chronic patients implanted with intracranial ECoG 19 or a Utah array 46 that leveraged a large amount of data available in one patient in each study.”
InfluentialSelf-citationA streaming brain-to-voice neuroprosthesis to restore naturalistic communication
Littlejohn, K. T., Cho, C. J., Liu, J. R., Silva, A. B., Yu, B., Anderson, V. R., Kurtz-Miott, C. M., Brosler, S., Kashyap, A., Hallinan, I. P., et al. (2025) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-025-01905-6 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
“Although our prior work circumvented this challenge 20 , it did not synchronously stream audible speech; instead, it relied on extracting the entire window of neural data before sending the data buffer to the decoder and outputting delayed synthesized speech.”
InfluentialSelf-citationRepresentation of internal speech by single neurons in human supramarginal gyrus
Wandelt, S. K., Bjånes, D. A., Pejsa, K., Lee, B., Liu, C., & Andersen, R. A. (2024) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-024-01867-y · Cited by 74 · see citing works
“While important advances in vocalized speech 16 , attempted speech 18 and mimed speech 17,22,24–26 decoding have been made, highly accurate internal speech decoding has not been achieved.”
BackgroundAn instantaneous voice-synthesis neuroprosthesis
Wairagkar, M., Card, N. S., Singer-Clark, T. S., Hou, X., Iacobacci, C., Miller, L. M., Hochberg, L. R., Brandman, D. M., & Stavisky, S. D. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09127-3 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Decoding the brain: From neural representations to mechanistic models
Mathis, M. W., Rotondo, A. P., Chang, E. F., Tolias, A. S., & Mathis, A. (2024) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2024.08.051 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Self-citationA generic non-invasive neuromotor interface for human-computer interaction
Kaifosh, P., Reardon, T. R., Labs, C.-L. A. R., Allen, B. D., Anderson, C., Arnoud, S., Arora, R., Atray, M., Awad, L., Ayerbe, F., et al. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09255-w · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Toward a Brain–Neuromorphics Interface
Wan, C., Pei, M., Shi, K., Cui, H., Long, H., Qiao, L., Xing, Q., & Wan, Q. C. (2024) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202311288 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
EEG-based brain-computer interface enables real-time robotic hand control at individual finger level
Ding, Y., Udompanyawit, C., Zhang, Y., & He, B. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-61064-x · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Ethical considerations for the use of brain–computer interfaces for cognitive enhancement
Gordon, E. C., & Seth, A. K. (2024) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002899 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Longevity of a Brain–Computer Interface for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Vansteensel, M. J., Leinders, S., Branco, M. P., Crone, N. E., Denison, T., Freudenburg, Z. V., Geukes, S. H., Gosselaar, P. H., Raemaekers, M. A. H., Schippers, A., et al. (2024) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2314598 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
“In addition, several reports have recently shown fast communication rates using implantable BCI technology 6,7 .”
BackgroundBrain control of bimanual movement enabled by recurrent neural networks
Deo, D. R., Willett, F. R., Avansino, D. T., Hochberg, L. R., Henderson, J. M., & Shenoy, K. V. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-51617-3 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Inner speech in motor cortex and implications for speech neuroprostheses
Kunz, E. M., Abramovich Krasa, B., Kamdar, F., Avansino, D. T., Hahn, N., Yoon, S., Singh, A., Nason-Tomaszewski, S. R., Card, N. S., Jude, J. J., et al. (2025) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2025.06.015 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
“Such an approach could be preferred by some BCI users with partial paralysis since attempted speech requires activation of orofacial muscles and breath control that can be fatiguing and produces distracting vocalizations.”
Silva, A. B., Liu, J. R., Metzger, S. L., Bhaya-Grossman, I., Dougherty, M. E., Seaton, M. P., Littlejohn, K. T., Tu-Chan, A., Ganguly, K., Moses, D. A., et al. (2024) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-024-01207-5 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
“These findings suggest that future multilingual speech BCIs may target shared sublexical units (for example, phonemes 14 ) to improve bilingual vocabulary sizes and decoding speeds, leveraging alternative approaches to fixed-window word decoding 8,15,66 .”
Self-citationSaway, B. F., Palmer, C., Hughes, C. L., Triano, M. J., Suresh, R. E., Gilmore, J., George, M. S., Kautz, S. A., & Rowland, N. C. (2024) · Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.neurot.2024.e00337 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
“Most recently, ECoG-based decoding in speech cortex reached rates of 78 words per minute, and 62 words per minute was achieved using microelectrode implantation in motor areas [72,73].”
MethodA generic noninvasive neuromotor interface for human-computer interactionPreprint
Labs, C.-L. A. R., Sussillo, D., Kaifosh, P., & Reardon, T. R. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.02.23.581779 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Natraj, N., Seko, S., Abiri, R., Miao, R., Yan, H., Graham, Y., Tu-Chan, A., Chang, E. F., & Ganguly, K. (2025) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2025.02.001 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Self-citationSeven technologies to watch in 2024
Eisenstein, M. S. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-024-00173-x · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Biohybrid neural interfaces: improving the biological integration of neural implants
Boulingre, M., Lara, R. P., & Green, R. A. (2023) · Chemical Communications · doi:10.1039/d3cc05006h · Cited by 39 · see citing works
From adaptive deep brain stimulation to adaptive circuit targeting
Horn, A., & Neumann, W. (2025) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/s41582-025-01131-5 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
“To achieve out-of-the-box utility without retraining, we might need to routinely implement ECoG strips for sensing 14,48 , or to develop high-resolution sensing arrays that can capture fine-grained activity 131 .”
Pan, H., Ding, P., Wang, F., Li, T., Zhao, L., Nan, W., Fu, Y., & Gong, A. (2024) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2024.1429130 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
The 2023 yearbook of Neurorestoratology
Huang, H.-Y., Bach, J. R., Sharma, H. S., Chen, L., Wu, P., Sarnowska, A., Otom, A., Xue, M.-Z., Saberi, H., He, X.-J., et al. (2024) · Journal of Neurorestoratology · doi:10.1016/j.jnrt.2024.100136 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“65 Another multimodal speech e neuroprosthetic approach showed substantialpromisetorestorefull,embodiedcommunicationafter2 weeks of training in patients with severe limb and vocal paralysis.”
BackgroundSelf-citationBrain-computer interface paradigms and neural coding
Tai, P., Ding, P., Wang, F., Gong, A., Li, T., Zhao, L., Su, L., & Fu, Y. (2024) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2023.1345961 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
The Layer 7 Cortical Interface: A Scalable and Minimally Invasive Brain–Computer Interface Platform
Hettick, M., Ho, E., Poole, A. J., Monge, M., Papageorgiou, D., Takahashi, K., LaMarca, M., Trietsch, D., Reed, K., Murphy, M., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.01.02.474656 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
“In practice, electrocorticography (ECoG) has already facilitated capture of high quality signals for effective use in brain–computer interfaces in several applications, including motor and speech neural prostheses 7,19,32,34,72,81–87 .”
BackgroundMethodBrain–computer interfaces in 2023–2024
Chen, S., Chen, M., Wang, X., Liu, X., Liu, B., & Ming, D. (2025) · Brain‐X · doi:10.1002/brx2.70024 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Restoring Speech Using Brain–Computer Interfaces
Stavisky, S. D. (2025) · Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1146/annurev-bioeng-110122-012818 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Chisco: An EEG-based BCI dataset for decoding of imagined speech
Zhang, Z., Ding, X., Bao, Y., Zhao, Y., Liang, X., Qin, B., & Liu, T. (2024) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-024-04114-1 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Canny, E., Vansteensel, M. J., van der Salm, S. M. A., Müller-Putz, G., & Berezutskaya, J. (2023) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s12984-023-01272-y · Cited by 35 · see citing works
“It has been previously shown that information about facial movements and facial expressions can be decoded from human brain activity for BCI purposes [38, 191, 255, 256].”
BackgroundScaled Elastic Hydrogel Interfaces for Brain Electrophysiology
Hu, M., Ren, J., Pan, Y., Cheng, L., Xu, X., Tan, C. L., Sun, H., Shi, Y., & Yan, S. (2024) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.202407926 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Large-scale foundation models and generative AI for BigData neuroscience
Wang, R., & Chen, Z. S. (2024) · Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1016/j.neures.2024.06.003 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Self-citationWu, X., Wellington, S., Fu, Z., & Zhang, D. (2024) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ad593a · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“More recently, two ECoG studies further demonstrated the ability to decode speech-related multiple modalities and tonal speech, and both claimed intel-ligible speech reconstruction [37, 38].”
BackgroundMethodWu, S., Bhadra, K., Giraud, A., & Marchesotti, S. (2024) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci14030196 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
“Such technical efforts might appear marginal as compared to recent advances in decoding attempted speech from intracranial implants, with rates approaching half of normal speech [4,6].”
BackgroundResultShao, Q., Fan, S., Zhang, Z., Liu, F., Fu, Z., Lv, P., & Mu, Z. (2025) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en18143662 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Yu, Q., Shen, X., Yi, L., Liang, M., Li, G., Guan, Z., Wu, X., Castel, H., Hu, B., Yin, P., et al. (2024) · ACS Sensors · doi:10.1021/acssensors.4c00149 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Wyse‐Sookoo, K., Luo, S., Candrea, D. N., Schippers, A., Tippett, D. C., Wester, B. A., Fifer, M. S., Vansteensel, M. J., Ramsey, N. F., & Crone, N. E. (2024) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ad5c02 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“Metzger et al were able to decode speech from ECoG signals at a remarkable rate from a subject with vocal tract paralysis by combining HG activity with information from lower frequency signals [8, 9].”
Materials and devices for high‐density, high‐throughput micro‐electrocorticography arrays
Xie, Y., Peng, Y., Guo, J., Liu, M., Zhang, B., Yin, L., Ding, H., & Sheng, X. (2024) · Fundamental Research · doi:10.1016/j.fmre.2024.01.016 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
“This capability is not only vital for unraveling complex neural circuits in the brain [88] , but also presents promising prospects in areas such as speech decoding and avatar control in the domain of brain-machine interfaces [13] .”
Shaeri, M., Shin, U., Yadav, A., et al. (2024) · Digest of technical papers/Digest of technical papers - IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference · doi:10.1109/isscc49657.2024.10454533 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
An instantaneous voice synthesis neuroprosthesisPreprint
Wairagkar, M., Card, N., Singer-Clark, T. S., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/2024.08.14.607690 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
“Unlike prior studies 3,17 , this brain-to-voice neuroprosthesis output sounds as soon as the participant tried to speak, without being restricted to a small number of words 17 and without a constrained intermediate representation of discrete speech units that were generated after completion of each…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialDisclosing Results of Tests for Covert Consciousness: A Framework for Ethical Translation
Young, M. J., Kazazian, K., Fischer, D. B., Lissak, I. A., Bodien, Y. G., & Edlow, B. L. (2024) · Neurocritical Care · doi:10.1007/s12028-023-01899-8 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
A wireless subdural-contained brain–computer interface with 65,536 electrodes and 1,024 channels
Jung, T., Zeng, N., Fabbri, J. D., Eichler, G., Li, Z., Zabeh, E., Das, A., Willeke, K. F., Wingel, K., Dubey, A., et al. (2025) · Nature Electronics · doi:10.1038/s41928-025-01509-9 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
“It is also timely, given recent advances in the performance of BCI systems for speech and motor control 65,66 .”
Brain–Computer Interface—A Brain-in-the-Loop Communication System
Gao, X., Wang, Y., Chen, X., Liu, B., & Gao, S. (2025) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2025.3600389 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Generative language reconstruction from brain recordings
Ye, Z., Ai, Q., Liu, Y., de Rijke, M., Zhang, M., Lioma, C., & Ruotsalo, T. (2025) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-025-07731-7 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“Forexample, BCIsbasedonmotorrepresentations 49 – 51 or attempted language production 52 have demonstrated a usable performance, but they require extensive user training and active engagement in the input system, demanding signi fi cant user effort 50,52 .”
Bhadra, K., Giraud, A., & Marchesotti, S. (2025) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-025-07464-7 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
“In the fi eld of speech-BCIs, previous studies show that it is possible to improve operating an intracranial BCI through attempted speech 3,4 but not yet via imagined speech.”
Innovating beyond electrophysiology through multimodal neural interfaces
Ramezani, M., Ren, Y., Cubukcu, E., & Kuzum, D. (2024) · Nature Reviews Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s44287-024-00121-x · Cited by 23 · see citing works
“Such multimodal experiments contribute to fundamental neuroscience research, addressing unresolved questions, and hold remarkable implications for brain–machine interfaces aimed at improving the quality of life for many 188 .”
A 2.46-mm2 Miniaturized Brain-Machine Interface (MiBMI) Enabling 31-Class Brain-to-Text Decoding
Shaeri, M., Shin, U., Yadav, A., Caramellino, R., Rainer, G., & Shoaran, M. (2024) · IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits · doi:10.1109/jssc.2024.3443254 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“This enhanced processing capacity ensures the decoder’s adaptability to accommodate higher channel counts, as required in recent BMI experiments [6], [10].”
BackgroundInfluentialde Borman, A., Wittevrongel, B., Dauwe, I., Carrette, E., Meurs, A., Roost, D. V., Boon, P., & Hulle, M. M. V. (2024) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-024-06518-6 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
“Studies relying on electrocortigraphy (ECoG) have reported impressive advances in decoding performed speech 3,4 , perceived speech 3,5 , attempted vocalized speech 6,7 , attempted articulated speech 7 – 9 , and mimed speech (articulation without phonation) 10,11 .”
Towards decoding individual words from non-invasive brain recordings
d’Ascoli, S., Bel, C., Rapin, J., Banville, H. J., Benchetrit, Y., Pallier, C., & King, J.-R. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-65499-0 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Brain and Cognitive Science Inspired Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Survey
Zhang, Z., Ding, X., Liang, X., Zhou, Y., Qin, B., & Liu, T. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2025.3527551 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“Studies have successfully demonstrated the ability to synthesize audible speech from cortical activity by leveraging kinematic and sound representations encoded in the human brain [125], [126], [127], [128].”
An accurate and rapidly calibrating speech neuroprosthesis
Card, N. S., Wairagkar, M., Iacobacci, C., Hou, X., Singer-Clark, T., Willett, F. R., Kunz, E. M., Fan, C., Vahdati Nia, M., Deo, D. R., et al. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.12.26.23300110 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
“Two recent studies have established the state-of-the-art for ‘brain-to-text’ speech BCIs 18,20 by decoding the neural underpinnings of attempted speech into phonemes (the building blocks of words), which are then assembled into words and sentences using a language model and displayed on a computer…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialReal-time decoding of full-spectrum Chinese using brain-computer interface
Qian, Y., Liu, C., Yu, P., Ran, X., Li, S., Yang, Q., Liu, Y., Xia, L., Wang, Y., Qi, J., et al. (2025) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adz9968 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Hettick, M., Ho, E., Poole, A. J., Monge, M., Papageorgiou, D., Takahashi, K., LaMarca, M., Trietsch, D., Reed, K., Murphy, M. E., et al. (2025) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-025-01501-w · Cited by 33 · see citing works
“In addition, in the context of brain–computer interfaces, neural decoding performance from penetrating electrodes has been shown to be less stable over time than neural decoding based on surface electrodes 19,20 .”
Qiu, Y., Liu, H., & Zhao, M. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15010392 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
A brain-to-text framework for decoding natural tonal sentences
Zhang, D., Wang, Z., Qian, Y., Zhao, Z., Liu, Y., Hao, X., Li, W., Lu, S., Zhu, H., Chen, L., et al. (2024) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114924 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence in Science and Society: The Vision of USERN
Dorigo, T., Brown, G. D., Casonato, C., Cerdà, A., Ciarrochi, J., Lio, M. D., D’Souza, N., Gauger, N. R., Hayes, S. C., Hofmann, S. G., et al. (2025) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2025.3529357 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Acoustic Inspired Brain-to-Sentence Decoder for Logosyllabic Language
Feng, C., Cao, L., Wu, D., Zhang, E., Wang, T., Jiang, X., Zhou, C., Chen, J., Wu, H., Lin, S., et al. (2025) · Cyborg and Bionic Systems · doi:10.34133/cbsystems.0257 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
“Most previous studies on language decoding use electrocor-ticography (ECoG) electrodes [ 3 , 9 , 11 , 14 , 19 – 21 ] or Utah array electrodes [ 1 , 7 , 22 ] to acquire cortical signals.”
Brain–Computer Interfaces for Restoring Communication
Chang, E. F. (2024) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejme2407363 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationMultiobjective Evolution of the Deep Fuzzy Rough Neural Network
Zhao, J., Chang, D., Cao, B., Liu, X., & Lv, Z. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2024.3397728 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Tang, G., Han, Y., Sun, X., et al. (2024) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.95709 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“Recent advances in neural decoding of speech Li et al., 2023 ; Metzger et al., 2023 and vision Schneider et al., 2023 ; Takagi and Nishimoto, 2023 have achieved incredible performance, but the accurate neural decoding of poses is still an existing problem.”
Applying the IEEE BRAIN neuroethics framework to intra-cortical brain-computer interfaces
Soldado-Magraner, J., Antonietti, A., French, J., Higgins, N., Young, M. J., Larrivee, D., & Monteleone, R. (2024) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ad3852 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“Finally, state-of-the-art iBCIs have been recently developed for communication via direct speech translation, achieving unprecedented levels of accuracy in mapping thought to speech [5, 30, 31].”
Londoño‐Ramírez, H., Huang, X., Cools, J., Chrzanowska, A., Brunner, C., Ballini, M., Hoffman, L., Steudel, S., Rolin, C., López, C. M., et al. (2023) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202308507 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Harnessing electroencephalography connectomes for cognitive and clinical neuroscience
Zhang, Y., & Chen, Z. S. (2025) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-025-01442-4 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“…higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), millisecond temporal resolution and moderate spatial resolution (approximately 1–5 mm), the iEEG connectome provides unique opportunities to investigate fundamental cognitive functions or dysfunctions such as memory, speech and language processing 7–9 .”
Dohle, E., Swanson, E., Jovanović, L., Yusuf, S., Thompson, L., Horsfall, H. L., Muirhead, W. R., Bashford, L., & Brannigan, J. (2025) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202501912 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Brain‐Controlled Augmented Hearing for Spatially Moving Conversations in Multi‐Talker Environments
Choudhari, V., Han, C., Bickel, S., et al. (2024) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202401379 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Right to mental integrity and neurotechnologies: implications of the extended mind thesis
Tesink, V., Douglas, T., Forsberg, L., et al. (2024) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/jme-2023-109645 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“35 36 The capacity of technological systems to perform functions traditionally performed by biological systems renders it increasingly plausible for some that the mind can also be partly realised by physical entities external to the brain.”
BackgroundMind-Controlled Optical Manipulation
Peng, L., Yao, J., Bai, Y., Sun, Y., Zeng, J., Ren, Y., Xie, J., Hu, Z., Zhang, Q., & Yang, Y. (2024) · ACS Photonics · doi:10.1021/acsphotonics.3c01732 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
The rise of brain-reading technology: what you need to know
Drew, L. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-023-03423-6 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Joint modelling of brain and behaviour dynamics with artificial intelligence
Mathis, M. W., & Mathis, A. (2025) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-025-00996-1 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“Indeed, transformer architectures are making impressive gains for decoding 28,29,32,33 .”
Advances in flexible high-density microelectrode arrays for brain-computer interfaces
Ban, S., Chong, D., Kwon, J., Lee, S., Huang, Y., Yoo, S., & Yeo, W. (2025) · Biosensors and Bioelectronics · doi:10.1016/j.bios.2025.118102 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Invasive Brain–Computer Interface for Communication: A Scoping Review
Khan, S., Kallis, L., Mee, H., Hadwe, S. E., Barone, D. G., Hutchinson, P., & Kolias, A. G. (2025) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci15040336 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“…cortical processing supports human speech production [19] 2023 USA A high-performance neuroprosthesis for speech decoding and avatar control [20] 2023 USA A high-performance speech neuroprosthesis [21] 2023 USA Direct speech reconstruction from sensorimotor brain activity with optimized…”
InfluentialChaotic recurrent neural networks for brain modelling: A review
Mattera, A., Alfieri, V., Granato, G., & Baldassarre, G. (2024) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2024.107079 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Intelligent Neural Interfaces: An Emerging Era in Neurotechnology
Shoaran, M., Shin, U., & Shaeri, M. (2024) · Custom Integrated Circuits Conference · doi:10.1109/cicc60959.2024.10529099 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
“Empowered by advanced AI algorithms, recent BMIs have demonstrated the decoding of brain activity associated with various movements and actions, including gait, reach-and-grasp, cursor control, typing, handwriting, and speech [15-18, 23, 24, 67-70].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialVisual tracking brain-computer interface
Huang, C., Shi, N., Miao, Y., Chen, X., Wang, Y., & Gao, X. (2024) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2024.109376 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Zhou, E., Wang, X., Liang, J., Liu, Y., Yang, Q., Ran, X., Xia, L., Zou, X., Liu, C., Sun, L., et al. (2025) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202506663 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Speech motor cortex enables BCI cursor control and click
Singer-Clark, T. S., Hou, X., Card, N. S., Wairagkar, M., Iacobacci, C., Peracha, H., Hochberg, L. R., Stavisky, S. D., & Brandman, D. M. (2025) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/add0e5 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
“…to hand-based BCIs, speech BCIs have typically been driven by neural activity in sensorimotor cortical areas further ventral such as middle precentral gyrus (midPCG) and ventral precentral gyrus (vPCG) which are most often associated with production of orofacial movements and speech [18, 20–22].”
Kacker, K., Chetty, N., Feldman, A. K., Bennett, J. D., Yoo, P. E., Fry, A., Lacomis, D., Harel, N. Y., Nogueira, R. G., Majidi, S., et al. (2025) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/adbd78 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“Recently, researchers have explored ECoG-based BCI in people with paralysis (Moses et al 2021, Metzger et al 2023).”
Semantic language decoding across participants and stimulus modalities
Tang, J., & Huth, A. G. (2025) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2025.01.024 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Transformer-based neural speech decoding from surface and depth electrode signals
Chen, J., Chen, X., Wang, R., Le, C., Khalilian-Gourtani, A., Jensen, E., Dugan, P. C., Doyle, W., Devinsky, O., Friedman, D. J., et al. (2025) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/adab21 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“Another recent study in one patient with implanted high-density ECoG electrodes [32] was successful in decoding naturalistic speech with high word decoding accuracy by leveraging the quantized HuBERT features [18] as an intermediate representation space and a pre-trained speech synthesizer which…”
Self-citationBrain implants that enable speech pass performance milestones
Ramsey, N. F., & Crone, N. E. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-023-02546-0 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Whole-brain dynamics of articulatory, acoustic and semantic speech representations
Verwoert, M., Amigó-Vega, J., Gao, Y., Ottenhoff, M. C., Kubben, P., & Herff, C. (2025) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-025-07862-x · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Decoding reveals the neural representation of perceived and imagined musical sounds
Quiroga‐Martinez, D. R., Fernández‐Rubio, G., Bonetti, L., Achyutuni, K. G., Tzovara, A., Knight, R. T., & Vuust, P. (2024) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002858 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Tankus, A., Stern, E., Klein, G., Kaptzon, N., Nash, L., Marziano, T., Shamia, O., Gurevitch, G., Bergman, L., Goldstein, L., et al. (2024) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1227/neu.0000000000003068 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“10,11 Nevertheless, information about speech production is distributed among multiple brain regions.”
InfluentialJung, T., Zeng, N., Fabbri, J. D., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.05.17.594333 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
A flexible intracortical brain-computer interface for typing using finger movementsPreprint
Shah, N. P., Willsey, M. S., Hahn, N. V., Kamdar, F. B., Avansino, D. T., Fan, C., Hochberg, L. R., Willett, F. R., & Henderson, J. M. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.04.22.590630 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“The second paradigm involves decoding a rapid sequence of discrete movements with no immediate visual feedback (i.e., in open-loop), such as handwriting (Willett et al. 2021) or speech (Willett et al. 2023; Metzger et al. 2023).”
BackgroundPadmanabha, A., Gupta, J., Chen, C., Yang, J., Nguyễn, V., Weber, D. J., Majidi, C., & Erickson, Z. (2024) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/3610977.3634964 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“Case studies (N=1) are a proven research methodology in the felds of medicine, human computer interaction, and human robot interaction, that can provide in-depth analysis in a particular process or technology [9, 18, 37, 40, 58].”
BackgroundMokienko, O. A. (2024) · Современные технологии в медицине · doi:10.17691/stm2024.16.1.08 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Wearable intelligent throat enables natural speech in stroke patients with dysarthria
Tang, C., Gao, S., Li, C., et al. (2026) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-68228-9 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“The sentence expansion agent (SEA) intelligently expands the TSA-generated sentence, incorporating personalized emotion labels and objective contextual background data to produce a re fi ned, emotionally expressive, and logically coherent sentence that captures the user ’ s intended meaning (Fig.”
The emergence of NeuroAI: bridging neuroscience and artificial intelligence
Sadeh, S., & Claudia Clopath, A. (2025) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-025-00954-x · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Chen, Y., Wang, F., Li, T., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2024.1391550 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“There’s a compelling need to innovate and develop more intuitive and effective interactive BCI paradigms (Willett et al., 2021, 2023; Metzger et al., 2023).”
BackgroundHahn, N. V., Stein, E. A., Donoghue, J. P., Simeral, J. D., Hochberg, L. R., & Willett, F. R. (2025) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.07.02.25330310 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“…2013; Benabid et al. 2019), functional electrical stimulation (Ajiboye et al. 2017), typing (Willett et al. 2021; Vansteensel et al. 2016, 2024; Shah et al. 2024; Jude et al. 2025), and speech (Moses et al. 2021; Willett et al. 2023; Metzger et al. 2023; Card et al. 2024; Wairagkar et al. 2025).”
Akhoundi, A., Landbrug, Y., Yan, P., Chichilnisky, E. J., Murmann, B., & Muratore, D. G. (2025) · Digest of technical papers/Digest of technical papers - IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference · doi:10.1109/isscc49661.2025.10904780 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
The ethical significance of user-control in AI-driven speech-BCIs: a narrative review
van Stuijvenberg, O. C., Samlal, D. P. S., Vansteensel, M. J., Broekman, M. L. D., & Jongsma, K. R. (2024) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2024.1420334 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
“…is characterized by a loss of voluntary muscle control, resulting in quadriplegia and anarthria, yet patients retain normal cognitive function (American vocabulary (Metzger et al., 2023), and of 62 words per minute with a 23.8% word error rate using a 125,000 word vocabulary (Willett et al., 2023).”
MethodInfluential
- Authors
- Metzger, S. L., Littlejohn, K. T., Silva, A. B., Moses, D. A., Seaton, M. P., Wang, R., Dougherty, M. E., Liu, J. R., Wu, P., Berger, M. A., Zhuravleva, I., Tu-Chan, A., Ganguly, K., Anumanchipalli, G. K., & Chang, E. F.
- Affiliations
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- Chang, Edward F.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2023-08-23
- Volume
- 620
- Issue
- 7976
- Pages
- 1037-1046
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC10826467
- OpenAlex
- W4386100600
- Cited by
- 522
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 160 · 2025: 196 · 2024: 145 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 77.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2024-07-04)
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion, public-domain)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (T32GM007618)
- Noyce Foundation
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (U01DC018671)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007618)
- National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Keywords
- brain-computer interface, speech decoding, text generation, speech synthesis, avatar control, facial animation, orofacial movements, limb paralysis, deep learning, real-time decoding, communication restoration
- MeSH terms
- Deep Learning, Cerebral Cortex, Clinical Trials as Topic, Communication, Face, Gestures, Humans, Movement, Paralysis, Speech, Vocabulary, Voice, Neural Prostheses
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review