The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An optimal state estimation model of sensory integration in human postural balance
Open accessAbstract
We propose a model for human postural balance, combining state feedback control with optimal state estimation. State estimation uses an internal model of body and sensor dynamics to process sensor information and determine body orientation. Three sensory modalities are modeled: joint proprioception, vestibular organs in the inner ear, and vision. These are mated with a two degree-of-freedom model of body dynamics in the sagittal plane. Linear quadratic optimal control is used to design state feedback and estimation gains. Nine free parameters define the control objective and the signal-to-noise ratios of the sensors. The model predicts statistical properties of human sway in terms of covariance of ankle and hip motion. These predictions are compared with normal human responses to alterations in sensory conditions. With a single parameter set, the model successfully reproduces the general nature of postural motion as a function of sensory environment. Parameter variations reveal that the model is highly robust under normal sensory conditions, but not when two or more sensors are inaccurate. This behavior is similar to that of normal human subjects. We propose that age-related sensory changes may be modeled with decreased signal-to-noise ratios, and compare the model's behavior with degraded sensors against experimental measurements from older adults. We also examine removal of the model's vestibular sense, which leads to instability similar to that observed in bilateral vestibular loss subjects. The model may be useful for predicting which sensors are most critical for balance, and how much they can deteriorate before posture becomes unstable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Calabrese, V. P. (1992) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1992.03490230111048 · Cited by 2,501
Postural Orientation and Equilibrium
Horak, F. B., & Macpherson, J. M. (1996) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.cp120107 · Cited by 1,006
Fernandez, C., & Goldberg, J. M. (1971) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1971.34.4.661 · Cited by 898
Fixed patterns of rapid postural responses among leg muscles during stance
Nashner, L. M. (1977) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/bf00237855 · Cited by 752
An optimal control model for analyzing human postural balance
Kuo, A. D. (1995) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/10.362914 · Cited by 528
Self-citationRobinson, D. A. (1981) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/cphy.cp010228 · Cited by 476
Postural Control in Older Adults
Alexander, N. B. (1994) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb06081.x · Cited by 401
Postural feedback responses scale with biomechanical constraints in human standing
Park, S., Horak, F. B., & Kuo, A. D. (2004) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-003-1674-3 · Cited by 324
Self-citationThe Relative Roles of Feedforward and Feedback in the Control of Rhythmic Movements
Kuo, A. D. (2002) · Motor Control · doi:10.1123/mcj.6.2.129 · Cited by 272
Self-citationFeedback gains for correcting small perturbations to standing posture
He, J., Levine, W. S., & Loeb, G. E. (1991) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/9.73565 · Cited by 256
Cited by
Neuromechanics of muscle synergies for posture and movement
Ting, L. H., & McKay, J. L. (2007) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2008.01.002 · Cited by 514
Dynamic Principles of Gait and Their Clinical Implications
Kuo, A. D., & Donelan, J. M. (2010) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.2522/ptj.20090125 · Cited by 485
Self-citationDirection-dependent control of balance during walking and standing
O'Connor, S. M., & Kuo, A. D. (2009) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00131.2009 · Cited by 393
Self-citationSensory reweighting dynamics in human postural control
Assländer, L., & Peterka, R. J. (2014) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00669.2013 · Cited by 310
Feidl, F., Garbellini, S., Luna, M. F., Vogg, S., Souquet, J., Broly, H., Morbidelli, M., & Butté, A. (2019) · Processes · doi:10.3390/pr7100683 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuo, A. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Neural Engineering
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2005-08-31
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- S235-S249
- ISSN
- 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-2560
- OpenAlex
- W2128118213
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 30.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An optimal state estimation model of sensory integration in human postural balance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1741-2560/2/3/s07
- The paper
- Kuo, A. D. (2005). An optimal state estimation model of sensory integration in human postural balance. Journal of Neural Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/2/3/s07
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.