The DOI matches its Crossref record; 91 of the 93 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain–computer interfaces
Open accessAbstract
In this paper we review classification algorithms used to design brain-computer interface (BCI) systems based on electroencephalography (EEG). We briefly present the commonly employed algorithms and describe their critical properties. Based on the literature, we compare them in terms of performance and provide guidelines to choose the suitable classification algorithm(s) for a specific BCI.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“each paradigm relies on manual specification of signal processing [7], feature extraction [8] and classification methods [9], a process which often requires significant subject-matter expertise and/or a priori knowledge about the expected EEG signal.”
From EEGNet: a compact convolutional neural network for EEG-based brain-computer interfaces (2018) · cites this paper as [9]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Third, SVM is known to have good generalization properties and to be insensitive to overtraining and to the curse-of-dimensionality, especially in the small data set [25].”
From Fusion of Facial Expressions and EEG for Multimodal Emotion Recognition (2017) · cites this paper as [25]
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“The continuous development of EEG-BCI applications puts forward higher requirements for the processes of BCI, where the reliance on human expertise is a necessary problem to be solved [16].”
From IENet: a robust convolutional neural network for EEG based brain-computer interfaces (2022) · cites this paper as [16]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1205
(1999) · Industrial Robot the international journal of robotics research and application · doi:10.1108/ir.1999.04926fae.001 · Cited by 39,228
A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition
Rabiner, L. R. (1989) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.18626 · Cited by 22,743
Neural networks for pattern recognition
Bishop, C. (1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-5500 · Cited by 18,537
A Tutorial on Support Vector Machines for Pattern Recognition
Burges, C. J. C. (1998) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1023/a:1009715923555 · Cited by 16,616
Kohonen, T. (1990) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.58325 · Cited by 8,414
Wolpert, D. H. (1992) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/s0893-6080(05)80023-1 · Cited by 7,951
Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control
Wolpaw, J. R., Birbaumer, N., McFarland, D. J., Pfurtscheller, G., & Vaughan, T. M. (2002) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00057-3 · Cited by 7,927
Statistical pattern recognition: a review
Jain, A. K., Duin, P., & Mao, J. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.824819 · Cited by 6,898
An overview of statistical learning theory
Vapnik, V. N. (1999) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/72.788640 · Cited by 6,420
Electroencephalography—Basic principles, clinical applications and related fields
(1982) · Journal of the Autonomic Nervous System · doi:10.1016/0165-1838(82)90067-4 · Cited by 3,449
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- Duda R O, 2001, Pattern Recognition
- Rakotomamonjy A Guigue V Mallet G Alvarado V, 2005, Int. Conf. on Artificial Neural Networks
- Penny W D Roberts S J, 1999, Proc. Int. Joint Conf. on Neural Networks
- Ng A Jordan M, 2002, Proc. Advances in Neural Information Processing
- Rubinstein Y D Hastie T, 1997, Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining
- Jain A K, 1982, Handbook of Statistics, 2
- Blankertz B, 2002, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. (NIPS 01), 14, 157
- Anderson C W Sijercic Z, 1996, Solving Engineering Problems with Neural Networks: Proc. Int. Conf. on Engineering Applications of Neural Networks (EANN'96)
- Palaniappan R, 2005, Proc. 2nd Int. IEEE EMBS Conf. on Neural Engineering
- Balakrishnan D Puthusserypady S, 2005, Proc. IEEE 31st Annual Northeast Bioengineering Conference
- Millán J R Mouriño J Cincotti F Babiloni F Varsta M Heikkonen J, 2000, IEEE-INNS-ENNS Int. Joint Conf. on Neural Networks
- Solhjoo S Moradi M H, 2004, BIOSIGNAL 2004 Int. EURASIP Conference
- Cincotti F Scipione A Tiniperi A Mattia D Marciani M G Millán J del R Salinari S Bianchi L Babiloni F, 2003, Proc. 1st Int. IEEE EMBS Conf. on Neural Engineering
- Barreto A B Taberner A M Vicente L M, 1996, Southeastcon '96. ‘Bringing Together Education, Science and Technology’, Proc. IEEE
- Hoya T Hori G Bakardjian H Nishimura T Suzuki T Miyawaki Y Funase A Cao J, 2003, Proc. ICA2003, 197
- Tavakolian K Rezaei S, 2004, Proc. IEEE Int. Workshop on Biomedical Circuits and Systems
- Barreto G A Frota R A de Medeiros F N S, 2004, Proc. IEEE Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing
- Solhjoo S Nasrabadi A M Golpayegani M R H, 2005, Proc. European Signal Processing Conference
- Hoffmann U Garcia G Vesin J-M Diserens K Ebrahimi T, 2005, Conference Proc. 2nd Int. IEEE EMBS Conf. Neural Engineering
- Lee H Choi S, 2003, Proc. 7th Int. Symp. on Signal Processing and its Applications
- Lotte F, 2006, Proc. 3rd Int. Brain-Computer Interface Workshop and Training Course, 12
- Xu W Guan C Siong C E Ranganatha S Thulasidas M Wu J, 2004, 17th Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition (ICPR'04), 2, 391
- Tavakolian K Vasefi F Naziripour K Rezaei S, 2006, Proc. Canadian Student Conf. on Biomedical Computing
- Arrouët C, 2004, J. Neurother.
- Garcia G Ebrahimi T Vesin J-M, 2002, 14th Int. Conf. on Digital Signal Processing (DSP2002)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–500 of 1,001
Rodríguez-Bermúdez, G., García-Laencina, P. J., & Roca‐Dorda, J. (2013) · International Journal of Neural Systems · doi:10.1142/s0129065713500159 · Cited by 57
Quantitative Evaluation of a Low-Cost Noninvasive Hybrid Interface Based on EEG and Eye Movement
Kim, M., Kim, B. H., & Jo, S. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2014.2365834 · Cited by 59
Mayaud, L., Congedo, M., Laghenhove, A. V., Orlikowski, D., Figère, M., Azabou, É., & Cheliout-Heraut, F. (2013) · Neurophysiologie Clinique · doi:10.1016/j.neucli.2013.06.002 · Cited by 59
Self-citationStahl, D. R., Pickles, A. R., Elsabbagh, M., Johnson, M. H., & The BASIS Team (2012) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/87565641.2011.650808 · Cited by 58
A Prior Neurophysiologic Knowledge Free Tensor-Based Scheme for Single Trial EEG Classification
Li, J., Zhang, L., Tao, D., Sun, H., & Zhao, Q. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2008.2008394 · Cited by 60
Development of a ternary hybrid fNIRS-EEG brain–computer interface based on imagined speech
Sereshkeh, A. R., Yousefi, R., Wong, A. T., Rudzicz, F., & Chau, T. T. (2019) · Brain-Computer Interfaces · doi:10.1080/2326263x.2019.1698928 · Cited by 59
“While the curse of dimensionality and overfitting are very common problems in BCI classification [30], a large number of these studies did not regularize their LDA models [30–32].”
BackgroundBrain–machine interfaces using functional near-infrared spectroscopy: a review
Hong, K., Ghafoor, U., & Khan, M. J. (2020) · Artificial Life and Robotics · doi:10.1007/s10015-020-00592-9 · Cited by 60
Evaluating Classifiers to Detect Arm Movement Intention from EEG Signals
Planelles, D., Hortal, E., Costa, Á., Úbeda, A., Iáñez, E., & Azorín, J. (2014) · Italian National Conference on Sensors · doi:10.3390/s141018172 · Cited by 54
Zhang, Y., Prasad, S., Kilicarslan, A., & Contreras-Vidal, J. L. (2017) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2017.00170 · Cited by 58
A Review of Performance Variations in SMR-Based Brain−Computer Interfaces (BCIs)
Grosse‐Wentrup, M., & Schölkopf, B. (2013) · Springer briefs in electrical and computer engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-36083-1_5 · Cited by 57
Acqualagna, L., Bosse, S., Porbadnigk, A. K., Curio, G., Müller, K., Wiegand, T., & Blankertz, B. (2015) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/12/2/026012 · Cited by 57
Lotte, F., Lécuyer, A., & Arnaldi, B. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2009.2020752 · Cited by 57
Self-citationBanville, H. J., & Falk, T. H. (2016) · Brain-Computer Interfaces · doi:10.1080/2326263x.2015.1134958 · Cited by 60
Targeting EEG/LFP Synchrony with Neural Nets
Li, Y., Murias, M., Major, S. T., Dawson, G., Dzirasa, K., Carin, L., & Carlson, D. (2017) · neural information processing systems · Cited by 57
Belakhdar, I., Kaaniche, W., Djemal, R., & Ouni, B. (2018) · Microprocessors and Microsystems · doi:10.1016/j.micpro.2018.02.004 · Cited by 57
Brain computer interface: A comprehensive survey
Tiwari, N., Edla, D. R., Dodia, S. J., & Bablani, A. (2018) · Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures · doi:10.1016/j.bica.2018.10.005 · Cited by 60
Multimodal mild depression recognition based on EEG-EM synchronization acquisition network
Zhu, J., Wang, Y., La, R., Zhan, J., Niu, J., Zeng, S., & Hu, X. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2901950 · Cited by 56
EEG-based assessment of driver trust in automated vehicles
Zhang, T., Yang, J., Chen, M., Li, Z., Zang, J., & Qu, X. (2024) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2024.123196 · Cited by 56
Bhattacharyya, S., Sengupta, A., Chakraborti, T., Konar, A., & Tibarewala, D. N. (2013) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/s11517-013-1123-9 · Cited by 56
Towards ambulatory brain-computer interfaces
Lotte, F., Fujisawa, J., Touyama, H., Ito, R., Hirose, M., & Lécuyer, A. (2009) · International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (ACE) · doi:10.1145/1690388.1690452 · Cited by 56
Self-citationP300-Based Asynchronous Brain Computer Interface for Environmental Control System
Aydın, E. A., Bay, Ö. F., & Güler, İ. (2017) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2017.2690801 · Cited by 57
“Because of low computational requirement and successful results, LDA is suitable especially for the online BCI systems [39].”
BackgroundData Augmentation for EEG-Based Emotion Recognition Using Generative Adversarial Networks
Bao, G., Yan, B., Tong, L., Shu, J., Wang, L., Yang, K., & Zeng, Y. (2021) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2021.723843 · Cited by 55
USING BRAIN–COMPUTER INTERFACES TO DETECT HUMAN SATISFACTION IN HUMAN–ROBOT INTERACTION
Esfahani, E. T., & Sundararajan, V. (2011) · International Journal of Humanoid Robotics · doi:10.1142/s0219843611002356 · Cited by 55
Hortal, E., Planelles, D., Resquín, F., Climent, J. M., Azorín, J. M., & Pons, J. L. (2015) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s12984-015-0082-9 · Cited by 55
Íngar, J., Huertas, E., Mezarina, F., Gutiérrez, G., & Ordemar, P. (2007) · Cited by 55
Gaume, A., Dreyfus, G., & Vialatte, F. (2019) · Cognitive Neurodynamics · doi:10.1007/s11571-019-09521-4 · Cited by 58
“This classifier is simple to use, and has been used with success in a great number of BCI (Lotte et al. 2007).”
MethodMulticlass covert speech classification using extreme learning machine
Pawar, D., & Dhage, S. (2020) · Biomedical Engineering Letters · doi:10.1007/s13534-020-00152-x · Cited by 55
Predicting Motor Imagery Performance From Resting-State EEG Using Dynamic Causal Modeling
Lee, M., Yoon, J.-G., & Lee, S.-W. (2020) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2020.00321 · Cited by 56
“Therefore, understanding this phenomenon and performance variations is considered an important issue in MI-BCI (Lotte and Jeunet, 2018).”
BackgroundAn Introductory Tutorial on Brain–Computer Interfaces and Their Applications
Bonci, A., Fiori, S., Higashi, H., Tanaka, T., & Verdini, F. (2021) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics10050560 · Cited by 56
CES-513 Stages for Developing Control Systems using EMG and EEG Signals: A survey
Rechy-Ramirez, E. J., & Hu, H. (2011) · Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) · Cited by 54
Pour, P. A., Gulrez, T., AlZoubi, O., Gargiulo, G. D., & Calvo, R. A. (2008) · IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games (CIG) · doi:10.1109/cig.2008.5035647 · Cited by 54
Peterson, V., Wyser, D., Lambercy, O., Spies, R. D., & Gassert, R. (2019) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/aaf046 · Cited by 54
Identification of motor imagery movements from EEG signals using Dual Tree Complex Wavelet Transform
Bashar, S. K., Hassan, A. R., & Bhuiyan, M. I. H. (2015) · International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI) · doi:10.1109/icacci.2015.7275623 · Cited by 53
Kashihara, K. (2014) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2014.00244 · Cited by 55
Nahar, J., Imam, T., Tickle, K. S., Ali, A. B. M. S., & Chen, Y. P. (2012) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.04.045 · Cited by 53
Wissel, T., Pfeiffer, T., Frysch, R., Knight, R. T., Chang, E. F., Hinrichs, H., Rieger, J. W., & Rose, G. (2013) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/10/5/056020 · Cited by 53
A PCA aided cross-covariance scheme for discriminative feature extraction from EEG signals
Zarei, R., He, J., Siuly, S., & Zhang, Y. (2017) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.05.009 · Cited by 53
An application of pre-trained CNN for image classification
Abdullah, & Hasan, M. S. (2017) · International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT) · doi:10.1109/iccitechn.2017.8281779 · Cited by 53
Guan, C., Yuen, K. K. F., & Coenen, F. (2018) · Swarm and Evolutionary Computation · doi:10.1016/j.swevo.2018.09.008 · Cited by 53
“The corresponding supervised procedure is known as Classification, where a classifier predictor is learnt from training data of correctly identified observations [2].”
MethodHow Can Physiological Computing Benefit Human-Robot Interaction?
Roy, R. N., Drougard, N., Gateau, T., Dehais, F., & Chanel, C. P. C. (2020) · Robotics · doi:10.3390/robotics9040100 · Cited by 58
“The presented machine learning techniques are rather classical algorithms, and their use in BCI are presented in more detail in the review of Reference [109].”
MethodInfluentialBrain–computer interfacing: more than the sum of its parts
Scherer, R., Faller, J., Balderas, D., Friedrich, E. V. C., Pröll, M., Allison, B. Z., & Muller-Putz, G. R. (2012) · Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/s00500-012-0895-4 · Cited by 52
A comparison between ANN and SVM classifier for drowsiness detection based on single EEG channel
Belakhdar, I., Kaaniche, W., Djmel, R., & Ouni, B. (2016) · International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Signal and Image Processing · doi:10.1109/atsip.2016.7523132 · Cited by 52
Detection of primary RGB colors projected on a screen using fNIRS
Liu, X., & Hong, K. (2017) · Journal of Innovative Optical Health Sciences · doi:10.1142/s1793545817500067 · Cited by 52
Stacked Autoencoders for the P300 Component Detection
Vařeka, L., & Mautner, P. (2017) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2017.00302 · Cited by 52
Motor Imagery EEG Signal Processing and Classification Using Machine Learning Approach
Sreeja, S. R., Rabha, J., Nagarjuna, K., Samanta, D., Mitra, P., & Sarma, M. (2017) · International Conference on New Trends in Computing Sciences (ICTCS) · doi:10.1109/ictcs.2017.15 · Cited by 52
Peng, C.-J., Chen, Y., Chen, C., Chen, S.-J., Cagneau, B., & Chassagne, L. (2019) · Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering · doi:10.1007/s40846-019-00500-y · Cited by 52
Neural signal recording and processing in somatic neuroprosthetic applications. A review
Raspopović, S., Cimolato, A., Panarese, A., Vallone, F., del Valle, J., Micera, S., & Navarro, X. (2020) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2020.108653 · Cited by 53
“Broad comments about classifiers applied in neural signals can be found in previous reports (Lotte et al., 2007; Scheme and Englehart, 2011; Zecca et al., 2002).”
ResultBrain-Computer Interface and Motor Imagery Training: The Role of Visual Feedback and Embodiment
Alimardani, M., Nishio, S., & Ishiguro, H. (2018) · Evolving BCI Therapy - Engaging Brain State Dynamics · doi:10.5772/intechopen.78695 · Cited by 49
“Many BCI researchers have made it a quest of their life to develop systems and algorithms that can decode EEG activity with high accuracy [7 ].”
Invasive Brain Computer Interface for Motor Restoration in Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review
Levett, J. J., Elkaim, L. M., Niazi, F., Weber, M. H., Iorio‐Morin, C., Bonizzato, M., & Weil, A. G. (2023) · Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface · doi:10.1016/j.neurom.2023.10.006 · Cited by 56
López‐Larraz, E., Antelis, J. M., Montesano, L., Gil-Agudo, A. M., & Mínguez, J. (2012) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/embc.2012.6346299 · Cited by 51
Arora, A., Lin, J.-J., Gasperian, A., Maldjian, J. A., Stein, J. M., Kahana, M. J., & Lega, B. C. (2018) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/aae131 · Cited by 51
Brain Computer Interface: A Review
Pal, D., Palit, S., & Dey, A. (2021) · Lecture notes in electrical engineering · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-4035-3_3 · Cited by 53
du Bois, N., Bigirimana, A. D., Korik, A., Kéthina, L. G., Rutembesa, E., Mutabaruka, J., Mutesa, L., Prasad, G., Jansen, S., & Coyle, D. (2021) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2021.08.071 · Cited by 58
Emotion Detection from EEG Signals Using Machine Deep Learning Models
Fernandes, J. V. M. R., de Alexandria, A. R., Marques, J. A. L., de Assis, D. F., Motta, P. C., & Silva, B. R. D. S. (2024) · Bioengineering · doi:10.3390/bioengineering11080782 · Cited by 50
“Additionally, applying LDS requires a good understanding of the properties of the underlying dynamical system in EEG data, which can be a complex task and may require proper adjustments [36].”
MethodEEG Signal Processing: Theory and Applications
Thakor, N. V., & Sherman, D. L. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-5227-0_5 · Cited by 51
A predictive speller controlled by a brain-computer interface based on motor imagery
D’Albis, T., Blatt, R., Tedesco, R., Sbattella, L., & Matteucci, M. (2012) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/2362364.2362368 · Cited by 49
Language Model Applications to Spelling with Brain-Computer Interfaces
Mora-Cortes, A., Manyakov, N. V., Chumerin, N., & Hulle, M. M. V. (2014) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s140405967 · Cited by 50
Cabrera, A. F., Farina, D., & Dremstrup, K. (2009) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/s11517-009-0569-2 · Cited by 52
Sardouie, S. H., & Shamsollahi, M. B. (2012) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2012.00042 · Cited by 50
A Hybrid FPGA-Based System for EEG- and EMG-Based Online Movement Prediction
Wöhrle, H., Tabie, M., Kim, S. K., Kirchner, F., & Kirchner, E. A. (2017) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s17071552 · Cited by 53
Mohanty, R., Sinha, A. M., Remsik, A. B., Dodd, K. C., Young, B. M., Jacobson, T., McMillan, M., Thoma, J., Advani, H., Nair, V. A., et al. (2018) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2018.00353 · Cited by 50
“In the context of BCI systems, linear and non-linear machine learning classification algorithms (Muller et al., 2003; Lotte et al., 2007) including support vector machines (SVMs; Rakotomamonjy and Guigue, 2008), nearest neighbors (Mason”
BackgroundVavoulis, A., Figueiredo, P., & Vourvopoulos, A. (2023) · Signals · doi:10.3390/signals4010004 · Cited by 55
Salem, O., Naseem, A., & Mehaoua, A. (2014) · International Conference on Communications · doi:10.1109/icc.2014.6883868 · Cited by 49
Murugappan, M., Murugappan, S., & Zheng, B. S. (2013) · Journal of Physical Therapy Science · doi:10.1589/jpts.25.753 · Cited by 47
A EOG-based switch and its application for “start/stop” control of a wheelchair
Li, Y., He, S., Huang, Q., Gu, Z., & Yu, Z. L. (2017) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2017.09.085 · Cited by 49
EEG feature descriptors and discriminant analysis under Riemannian Manifold perspective
Nguyen, C. H., & Artemiadis, P. (2017) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2017.10.013 · Cited by 49
Comparison of EEG measurement of upper limb movement in motor imagery training system
Suwannarat, A., Pan-ngum, S., & Israsena, P. (2018) · BioMedical Engineering OnLine · doi:10.1186/s12938-018-0534-0 · Cited by 49
Delisle-Rodríguez, D., Cardoso, V. F., Gurve, D., Loterio, F. A., Romero-Laiseca, M. A., Krishnan, S., & Bastos-Filho, T. (2019) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ab08c8 · Cited by 49
“Addressing this aim, we proposed a recognition system based on low-pass filters of 2nd order for pre-processing, Riemannian geometry for feature extraction [47], FNCA for feature selection [48], and the fast LDA classifer [64] for pedaling motor imagery recognition, which achieved ACC > 85%, Kappa > 71%, and FPR < 11%…”
MethodResultUsing Brain Network Features to Increase the Classification Accuracy of MI-BCI Inefficiency Subject
Zhang, R., Li, X., Wang, Y., Liu, B., Shi, L., Chen, M., Zhang, L., & Hu, Y. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2917327 · Cited by 49
“In order to extract the motor imagery related features from background EEG, many kind of feature extraction algorithms have been proposed [16], [17].”
An Improved kNN Classifier for Epilepsy Diagnosis
Wang, Z., Na, J., & Zheng, B. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2996946 · Cited by 49
Krol, L. R., Haselager, P., & Zander, T. O. (2019) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ab5bb5 · Cited by 48
“This had been demonstrated first in the 1970s (Vidal 1977), but resurfaced more prominently in the 2000s with the advent of machine learning in EEG research (Ramoser et al 2000, Blankertz et al 2002, Lotte et al 2007).”
BackgroundBrain-Computer Interface for Persons with Motor Disabilities - A Review
Anitha, T., Shanthi, N., Sathiyasheelan, R., Emayavaramban, G., & Rajendran, T. (2019) · The Open Biomedical Engineering Journal · doi:10.2174/1874120701913010127 · Cited by 47
Personalized Brain–Computer Interface and Its Applications
Ma, Y., Gong, A., Nan, W., Ding, P., Wang, F., & Fu, Y. (2022) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm13010046 · Cited by 52
“Designing a personalized BCI system includes a personalized BCI paradigm [15,18] for a specific BCI user, a specific brain signal acquisition scheme suitable for the user, and a personalized brain signal processing algorithm [19,31] (including a specific preprocessing model, personalized channel selection, personalize…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialYang, Y., Isabelle Bloch, A., Chevallier, S., & Wiart, J. (2016) · Cognitive Computation · doi:10.1007/s12559-015-9379-z · Cited by 48
Heunis, T.-M., Aldrich, C., & de Vries, P. J. (2016) · Pediatric Neurology · doi:10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2016.03.010 · Cited by 48
A Stimulus-Independent Hybrid BCI Based on Motor Imagery and Somatosensory Attentional Orientation
Yao, L., Sheng, X., Zhang, D., Jiang, N., Mrachacz‐Kersting, N., Zhu, X., & Farina, D. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2017.2684084 · Cited by 48
A conceptual space for EEG-based brain-computer interfaces
Kosmyna, N., & Lécuyer, A. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0210145 · Cited by 50
“Although some domains concerned by BCIs such as signal processing, propose the state of the art papers about the classification algorithms like [99, 100], no works exist to the general classification of BCI systems.”
BackgroundSelf-citationMental State Recognition via Wearable EEGPreprint
Bashivan, P., Rish, I., & Heisig, S. (2016) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1602.00985 · Cited by 48
Multi-Source Transfer Learning for EEG Classification Based on Domain Adversarial Neural Network
Liu, D., Zhang, J., Wu, H., Liu, S., & Long, J. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2022.3219418 · Cited by 50
“First, different subjects have different neural responses to the same stimulus, and even the same subject can have different neural responses to the same stimulus at different time/locations [7].”
BackgroundPark, S., Hwang, H., Lim, J., Choi, J., Jung, H.-K., & Im, C. (2013) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/s11517-012-1026-1 · Cited by 48
Predicting Targets of Human Reaching Motions Using Different Sensing Technologies
Novak, D., Omlin, X., Leins-Hess, R., & Riener, R. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2013.2262455 · Cited by 47
A Low Cost Eeg Based Bci Prosthetic Using Motor Imagery
Elstob, D., & Secco, E. L. (2016) · International Journal of Advanced Information Technology · doi:10.5121/ijitcs.2016.6103 · Cited by 48
Brain computer interface: A review
Prashant, P., Joshi, A. Y., & Gandhi, V. (2015) · Nirma University International Conference on Engineering · doi:10.1109/nuicone.2015.7449615 · Cited by 48
EEG-Based Detection of Starting and Stopping During Gait Cycle
Hortal, E., Úbeda, A., Iáñez, E., Azorín, J. M., & Fernández, E. (2016) · International Journal of Neural Systems · doi:10.1142/s0129065716500295 · Cited by 47
Liu, Y., Huang, S., & Huang, Y.-D. (2017) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s17071557 · Cited by 47
Kosch, T., Funk, M., Schmidt, A., & Chuang, L. L. (2018) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3229093 · Cited by 46
Using EEG to Distinguish Between Writing and Typing for the Same Cognitive Task
Qu, X., Mei, Q., Liu, P., & Hickey, T. J. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-60735-7_7 · Cited by 45
“Nearest Neighbour: k-Nearest Neighbour(kNN) [13, 14].”
Signal Generation, Acquisition, and Processing in Brain Machine Interfaces: A Unified Review
Salahuddin, U., & Gao, P. (2021) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2021.728178 · Cited by 50
Brain–Computer Interface Integrated With Augmented Reality for Human–Robot Interaction
Fang, B., Ding, W., Sun, F., Shan, J., Wang, X., Wang, C., & Zhang, X. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems · doi:10.1109/tcds.2022.3194603 · Cited by 47
Transfer learning promotes acquisition of individual BCI skills
Kumar, S., Alawieh, H., Rácz, F. S., Fakhreddine, R., & Millán, J. D. R. (2024) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae076 · Cited by 51
“Having demonstrated transfer learning with Riemannian MDM decoders, we also investigated the adaptability of the GR framework to common spatial pattern-based (CSP) classifiers, which is widely used in MI – BCIs (35, 36).”
MethodKasabov, N. K. (2012) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-30687-7_12 · Cited by 47
Human scalp EEG processing: Various soft computing approaches
Majumdar, K. (2011) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2011.07.004 · Cited by 46
A comparison of classification techniques for a gaze-independent P300-based brain–computer interface
Fabio Aloise, A., Schettini, F., Aricò, P., Salinari, S., Babiloni, F., & Febo Cincotti, A. (2012) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/9/4/045012 · Cited by 46
EEG in classroom: EMD features to detect situational interest of students during learning
Babiker, A., Faye, I., Mumtaz, W., Malik, A. S., & Sato, H. R. (2018) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-018-7016-z · Cited by 45
Feature subset and time segment selection for the classification of EEG data based motor imagery
Wang, J., Feng, Z., Ren, X., Lü, N., Luo, J., & Sun, L. (2020) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2020.102026 · Cited by 45
Robust learning from corrupted EEG with dynamic spatial filtering
Banville, H. J., Wood, S. U. N., Aimone, C., Engemann, D. A., & Gramfort, A. (2022) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.118994 · Cited by 45
Affective signal processing (ASP) : unraveling the mystery of emotions
van den Broek, E. L. (2011) · doi:10.3990/1.9789036532433 · Cited by 46
Tang, Z., Yu, H., Lu, C., Liu, P., & Jin, X. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2940034 · Cited by 46
“• Classification: We applied linear discriminant analysis (LDA) [40], multi-layer perceptron (MLP) [41], Gaussian support vector machine (Gaussian SVM) [40], and sparse Bayesian extreme learning machine (SBELM) [42] which were commonly used in previous studies for EEG classification.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEarly classification of motor tasks using dynamic functional connectivity graphs from EEG
Shamsi, F., Haddad, A., & Najafizadeh, L. (2020) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/abce70 · Cited by 45
“Among different types of BCIs, electroencephalography (EEG)-based BCIs have received considerable attention in the BCI research community due to their advantages including non-invasiveness, high temporal resolution, low-cost, and portability [1, 2].”
A Cross-Space CNN With Customized Characteristics for Motor Imagery EEG Classification
Hu, Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, S., Zhang, T., Dai, B., Peng, B., Yang, H., & Dai, Y. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2023.3249831 · Cited by 45
“In recent years, methods for signal classification by extracting the time, frequency, and space domain characteristics of multi-This channel MI-EEG have been developed to a certain extent [12].”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Lotte, F., Congedo, M., Lécuyer, A., Lamarche, F., & Arnaldi, B.
- Affiliations
- Institut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique (FR)
- Orange (France) (FR)
- Venue
- Journal of Neural Engineering
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2007-01-31
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- R1-R13
- ISSN
- 1741-2552 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-2560
- OpenAlex
- W2075647286
- Cited by
- 2,665
- References
- 93
- Citations by year
- 2026: 81 · 2025: 115 · 2024: 90 · 2023: 109 · 2022: 129 · 2021: 167 · 2020: 178 · 2019: 200 · 2018: 254 · 2017: 184 · 2016: 197 · 2015: 197 · 2014: 172 · 2013: 159 · 2012: 136
- FWCI
- 4.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Neural Engineering (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Keywords
- brain-computer interface, EEG, pattern classification, algorithm comparison
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Brain, Communication Devices for People with Disabilities, Communication Aids for Disabled, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Pattern Recognition, Automated, User-Computer Interface
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review