Cited by 59Robotics and Automated SystemsRobot Manipulation and LearningIndustrial Automation and Control Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Analyzing Human Robotic Interaction in the Food Industry

Open access
Grobbelaar, Wonda, Verma, Amit, Shukla, Vinod Kumar·2021·Journal of Physics: Conference Series

Abstract

The food chain from farmer to fork has grown into a very complex sector. Industrial robots are being integrated in every part of the food chain in order to increase production, create a higher quality product to exceed customer expectations. As the bar on quality standards raises higher year on year, food safety and hygiene becomes an even greater priority and customer’s demands value for money. Food manufacturing robots are used all aspects of the food chain. Although the food sector is slow to adapt robots, the Food sector is the fourth most automatable sector. Robots are used for farming, transport, food production, packaging and delivering. [1] Robots are especially convenient for packaging of food items, where speed, consistency or high levels of repetition are needed. Robots usually win over humans in terms of efficiency and accuracy. The latest robots are equipped with intelligent vision, can multi- task and understand verbal commands. More businesses see the value in automation especially robotics which plays a vital role in process improvement. A smaller minority is still hesitant, sees it as a threat to their business, and is reluctant to implement robots. They argue that it will reduce jobs and employees will lose their valuable skills. The purpose of this paper is to identify, analyze and understand robotics in one of the largest sectors, the food chain.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1742-6596/1714/1/012032

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Grobbelaar, W., Verma, A., & Shukla, V. K.
Affiliations
Amity University (AE)
Corresponding author
  • Grobbelaar, Wonda
  • Verma, Amit
  • Shukla, Vinod Kumar
Venue
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
Published
2021-01-01
Volume
1714
Issue
1
Pages
012032
ISSN
  • 1742-6588 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-6596
OpenAlex
W3120689270
Cited by
59
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5
FWCI
13.24
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Physics Conference Series (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robotics and Automated Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Industrial Automation and Control Systems
Keywords
human-robot interaction, industrial robots, food industry, food packaging automation, food safety, food chain, robot adoption, job displacement fears

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review