The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Singularity resolution in loop quantum cosmology: A brief overview
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“A further consequence is that there are no traversable wormholes [7]”
From The generalized second law implies a quantum singularity theorem (2013) · cites this paper as [7]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hartle, J. B., & Hawking, S. W. (1983) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.28.2960 · Cited by 3,027
Rovelli, C. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511755804 · Cited by 2,240
Modern Canonical Quantum General Relativity
Thiemann, T. (2007) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511755682 · Cited by 2,001
Discreteness of area and volume in quantum gravity
Rovelli, C., & Smolin, L. (1995) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00150-q · Cited by 1,365 · cited 1×
“One is thus led to build quantum gravity using quantum Riemannian geometry [5, 6, 7, 8].”
BackgroundQuantum nature of the big bang: Improved dynamics
Ashtekar, A., Pawlowski, T., & Singh, P. (2006) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.74.084003 · Cited by 1,147 · cited 2×
“The material I covered is discussed in greater detail in the original papers [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18] and in more comprehensive reviews [19, 20].”
BackgroundSelf-citationQuantum theory of geometry: I. Area operators
Ashtekar, A., & Lewandowski, J. (1997) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/14/1a/006 · Cited by 852
Self-citationAbsence of a Singularity in Loop Quantum Cosmology
Bojowald, M. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.5227 · Cited by 769
Mathematical structure of loop quantum cosmology
Ashtekar, A., Bojowald, M., & Lewandowski, J. (2003) · Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics · doi:10.4310/atmp.2003.v7.n2.a2 · Cited by 762
Self-citationQuantum nature of the big bang: An analytical and numerical investigation
Ashtekar, A., Pawlowski, T., & Singh, P. (2006) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.73.124038 · Cited by 609
Self-citationInflationary Spacetimes Are Incomplete in Past Directions
Borde, A., Guth, A. H., & Vilenkin, A. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.151301 · Cited by 582 · cited 3×
“What about the more recent singularity theorems that Borde, Guth and Vilenkin [34] proved in the context of inflation?”
BackgroundInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.36.1065 · DOI
- Ashtekar A, 2004, Class. Quant. Grav., 21, R53, 10.1088/0264-9381/21/15/R01 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1063/1.531252 · DOI · Paper page
- Ashtekar A, 1997, Adv. Theo. Math. Phys., 1, 388, 10.4310/ATMP.1997.v1.n2.a8 · DOI · Paper page
- Perez A, 2003, Class. Quant. Grav., 20, R43, 10.1088/0264-9381/20/6/202 · DOI · Paper page
- Bojowald M, 2005, Liv. Rev. Rel., 8, 11, 10.12942/lrr-2005-11 · DOI · Paper page
- Ashtekar A, 2006, Class. Quantum Grav., 23, 391, 10.1088/0264-9381/23/2/008 · DOI
- Boehmer C G, 2006, Phys. Rev., 76, 104030
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.211302 · DOI
- Ashtekar A, 2008, Minkowski Space-time: A Hundred Years Later
- Ashtekar A, 2005, Class. Quant. Grav., 22, 3349, 10.1088/0264-9381/22/16/014 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.103502 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00220-006-0100-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.141301 · DOI · Paper page
- Ashtekar A, 2006, Phys. Rev., 75, 0240035
- Szulc L, 2006, Class. Quant. Grav., 24, 2621, 10.1088/0264-9381/24/10/008 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.77.024046 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.77.124025 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.083516 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The generalized second law implies a quantum singularity theorem
Wall, A. C. (2013) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/30/16/165003 · Cited by 106
Metadata
- Authors
- Ashtekar, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Physics: Conference Series
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2009-10-01
- Volume
- 189
- Pages
- 012003
- ISSN
- 1742-6596
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 13
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
