Cited by 580Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesRelativity and Gravitational TheoryAdvanced Operator Algebra Research

Quantum theory of geometry II: Volume operators

Open access
Ashtekar, Abhay, Lewandowski, Jerzy·1997·Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics

Abstract

A functional calculus on the space of (generalized) connections was recently introduced without any reference to a background metric.It is used to continue the exploration of the quantum Riemannian geometry.Operators corresponding to volume of three-dimensional regions are introduced rigorously.It is shown that there are two natural regularization schemes, each of which leads to a well-defined operator.Both operators can be completely specified by giving their action on states labelled by graphs.The two final results are closely related but differ from one another in that one of the operators is sensitive to the differential structure of graphs at their vertices while the second is sensitive only to the topological characteristics.(The second operator was first introduced by Rovelli and Smolin and De Pietri and Rovelli using a somewhat different framework.)The difference between the two operators can be attributed directly to the standard quantization ambiguity.Underlying assumptions and subtleties of regularization procedures are discussed in detail in both cases because volume operators play an important role in the current discussions of quantum dynamics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4310/atmp.1997.v1.n2.a8

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Symmetric states can be defined as generalized states of quantum geometry and used for reduction to minisuperspace models.

    “But symmetric states can be defined as generalized states of quantum geometry [8] which can be used for a reduction to minisuperspace models [9].”

    From Absence of a Singularity in Loop Quantum Cosmology (2001) · cites this paper as [8]

  • The spectrum of the volume operator is discrete.

    “The spectrum of the volume operator is also discrete [344, 329, 258, 34].”

    From The Spin-Foam Approach to Quantum Gravity (2013) · cites this paper as [34]

  • In loop quantum gravity, the kinematic framework has led to physical predictions associated with a polymer-like structure of quantum spacetime.

    “This kinematic framework is widely accepted throughout various formulations of the theory, and has led to several physical predictions associated with the 'polymer-like' structure of quantum space-time [4].”

    From Nonstandard optics from quantum space-time (1999) · cites this paper as [4]

  • The Barrett-Crane theory is the best studied model in the 4d euclidean context, based on the vertex amplitude introduced by Barrett and Crane.

    “The best studied model in the 4d euclidean context is the Barrett-Crane (BC) theory [8], which is based on the vertex amplitude introduced by Barrett and Crane [7].”

    From Flipped spinfoam vertex and loop gravity (2008) · cites this paper as [7]

  • Most derivations of spinfoam models involve peculiar procedures or intuitive and ad hoc steps.

    “Indeed, although spinfoam models have been derived in a number of different manners [6, 7, 8, 21], most derivations involve peculiar procedures or intuitive and ad hoc steps.”

    From Flipped spinfoam vertex and loop gravity (2008) · cites this paper as [7]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. A. Ashtekar and J. Lewandowski, "Representation theory of analytic holonomy C* algebras", in "Knots and quantum gravity", J. Baez, ed, Oxford University Press 1994.
  2. J. Baez, Lett. Math. Phys. 31 (1994) 213; "Diffeomorpiism invariant generalized measures on the space of connections modulo gauge trans- formations", in "Proceedings of the conference on quantum topology", D. Yetter, ed, World Scientific 1994.
  3. L. Smolin, "Recent Developments in Non-Pertuhative Quantum Grav- ity", in "Quantum Gravity and Cosmology", J. Mercader, J. Sola and R. Verdaguer, eds, World Scientific 1992.
  4. T. Thiemann, "Closed formula for the matrix elements of the volume operator in canonical quantum gravity", gr-qc/9606091. · arXiv
  5. T. Thiemann, "QSD V : Quantum gravity as the natural regulator of matter quantum fieid", gr-qc/9705017. · arXiv
  6. J. Lewandowski and D. Marolf, "Loop constraints: A habitat and their algebra", gr-qc/9710016. · arXiv
  7. R. De Pietri, Nud. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 57 (1997) 251; Class. Quantum Grav. 14 1997 14.
  8. G. Immirzi, Nud. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 57 (1997) 65;
  9. C. Rovelli and T. Thiemann, "The Immirzi parameter in quantum general relativity", gr-qc/9705059. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ashtekar, A., & Lewandowski, J.
Affiliations
Max Planck Society (DE)
Venue
Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics
Published
1997
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
388-429
ISSN
  • 1095-0753 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-0761
OpenAlex
W2122380701
Cited by
580
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 25
FWCI
18.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (9514240)
  • Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Pennsylvania State University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Advanced Operator Algebra Research
Keywords
volume operator, background-independent quantum gravity, regularization schemes, graph states, topological invariants, quantization ambiguity, quantum dynamics, three-dimensional domains

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review