Cited by 8Statistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceStatistical Distribution Estimation and ApplicationsProbability and Statistical Research

Detecting overdispersion in count data: A zero-inflated Poisson regression analysis

Open access
Muhamad Jamil, Siti Afiqah, Abdullah, M. Asrul Affendi, Kek, Sie Long, Nor, Maria Elena, Mohamed, Maryati, Ismail, Norradihah·2017·Journal of Physics: Conference Series

Abstract

This study focusing on analysing count data of butterflies communities in Jasin, Melaka. In analysing count dependent variable, the Poisson regression model has been known as a benchmark model for regression analysis. Continuing from the previous literature that used Poisson regression analysis, this study comprising the used of zero-inflated Poisson (ZIP) regression analysis to gain acute precision on analysing the count data of butterfly communities in Jasin, Melaka. On the other hands, Poisson regression should be abandoned in the favour of count data models, which are capable of taking into account the extra zeros explicitly. By far, one of the most popular models include ZIP regression model. The data of butterfly communities which had been called as the number of subjects in this study had been taken in Jasin, Melaka and consisted of 131 number of subjects visits Jasin, Melaka. Since the researchers are considering the number of subjects, this data set consists of five families of butterfly and represent the five variables involve in the analysis which are the types of subjects. Besides, the analysis of ZIP used the SAS procedure of overdispersion in analysing zeros value and the main purpose of continuing the previous study is to compare which models would be better than when exists zero values for the observation of the count data. The analysis used AIC, BIC and Voung test of 5% level significance in order to achieve the objectives. The finding indicates that there is a presence of over-dispersion in analysing zero value. The ZIP regression model is better than Poisson regression model when zero values exist.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1742-6596/890/1/012170

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muhamad Jamil, S. A., Abdullah, M. A. A., Kek, S. L., Nor, M. E., Mohamed, M., & Ismail, N.
Affiliations
Tun Hussein Onn University of Malaysia (MY)
Venue
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
Published
2017-09
Volume
890
Pages
012170
ISSN
  • 1742-6588 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-6596
OpenAlex
W2759839044
Cited by
8
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.57
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Physics Conference Series (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Distribution Estimation and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
Keywords
overdispersion, count data, zero-inflated Poisson regression, Poisson regression, butterfly communities, model comparison, AIC and BIC

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review