The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electrospun PCL nanofibers with anisotropic mechanical properties as a biomedical scaffold
Open accessAbstract
To design an ideal scaffold, various factors should be considered, such as pore size and morphology, mechanical properties versus porosity, surface properties and appropriate biodegradability. Of these factors, the importance of mechanical properties on cell growth is particularly obvious in tissues such as bone, cartilage, blood vessels, tendons and muscles. Although electrospun nanofibers provide easily applicable nano-sized structures which could be used as biomedical scaffolds, the mechanical properties are poor since an increased pore size and porosity are generally accompanied by a decrease in mechanical properties. In addition, the general electrospinning has been limited to the fabrication of a variety of anisotropic mechanical properties, which are extremely important parameters for designing a musculoskeletal system. In this study, scaffolds consisting of variously oriented nanofibers were produced using an electrospinning process modified with an auxiliary electrode and a two-axis robot collecting system. Using an auxiliary electrode, a stable Taylor cone and initial spun jets were obtained. The influence of the electrode was evaluated with electric field simulation. Using the modified electrospinning process, various directions of orientation of electrospun fibers could be acquired and the fabricated oriented nanofiber webs showed a mechanically anisotropic behavior and a higher hydrophilic property compared to randomly distributed fibrous mats.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vaz, C. M., van Tuijl, S., Bouten, C. V. C., & Baaijens, F. P. T. (2005) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2005.06.006 · Cited by 459
Cited by
Technological advances in electrospinning of nanofibers
Teo, W.-E., Inai, R., & Ramakrishna, S. (2011) · Science and Technology of Advanced Materials · doi:10.1088/1468-6996/12/1/013002 · Cited by 361
Luo, C. J., Stride, E., & Edirisinghe, M. (2012) · Macromolecules · doi:10.1021/ma300656u · Cited by 262
Schoenenberger, A. D., Tempfer, H., Lehner, C., Egloff, J., Mauracher, M., Bird, A., Widmer, J., Maniura-Weber, K., Fucentese, S. F., Traweger, A., et al. (2020) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120034 · Cited by 130
Synthetic biodegradable medical polyesters
Cama, G., Mogosanu, D. E., Houben, A., & Dubruel, P. (2017) · Science and Principles of Biodegradable and Bioresorbable Medical Polymers · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-100372-5.00003-9 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, G. H.
- Venue
- Biomedical Materials
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2008-04-29
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 025010
- ISSN
- 1748-6041 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-605X
- OpenAlex
- W1969464368
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Electrospun PCL nanofibers with anisotropic mechanical properties as a biomedical scaffold. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1748-6041/3/2/025010
- The paper
- Kim, G. H. (2008). Electrospun PCL nanofibers with anisotropic mechanical properties as a biomedical scaffold. Biomedical Materials. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/3/2/025010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.