Macromechanics and polycaprolactone fiber organization drive macrophage polarization and regulate inflammatory activation of tendon In Vitro and In Vivo
Open accessAbstract
Appropriate macrophage response to an implanted biomaterial is crucial for successful tissue healing outcomes. In this work we investigated how intrinsic topological cues from electrospun biomaterials and extrinsic mechanical loads cooperate to guide macrophage activation and macrophage-tendon fibroblast cross-talk. We performed a series of in vitro and in vivo experiments using aligned or randomly oriented polycaprolactone nanofiber substrates in both mechanically loaded and unloaded conditions. Across all experiments a disorganized biomaterial fiber topography was alone sufficient to promote a pro-inflammatory signature in macrophages, tendon fibroblasts, and tendon tissue. Extrinsic mechanical loading was found to strongly regulate the character of this signature by reducing pro-inflammatory markers both in vitro and in vivo. We observed that macrophages generally displayed a stronger response to biophysical cues than tendon fibroblasts, with dominant effects of cross-talk between these cell types observed in mechanical co-culture models. Collectively our data suggest that macrophages play a potentially important role as mechanosensory cells in tendon repair, and provide insight into how biological response might be therapeutically modulated by rational biomaterial designs that address the biomechanical niche of recruited cells.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Results suggested that aligned fibers with bigger diameter sizes were more favorable for M2 polarization.
“Results suggested that aligned fibers with bigger diameter sizes were more favorable for M2 polarization.”
From Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review (2023) · cites this paper as [211]
The Discussion reports that aligned fibers produced elongated macrophages, a shape previously associated with M2-like polarization, while random fibers increased M1-like activation. But section 2.1 found similar levels of the M2 marker MRC1 on both orientations, and the substrates had similar fiber diameters; the paper does not show that larger diameters favor M2 polarization. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSeveral studies demonstrated that fiber diameter and organization within the scaffold structure influence macrophage polarization and the degree of the inflammatory response.
“For example, several studies demonstrated that fiber diameter and organization within the scaffold structure influence macrophage polarization and the degree of the inflammatory response [211,212,213].”
From Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review (2023) · cites this paper as [211]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Brown, B. N., Ratner, B. D., Goodman, S. B., Amar, S., & Badylak, S. F. (2012) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.02.034 · Cited by 926 · see citing works
Characterization of topographical effects on macrophage behavior in a foreign body response model
Chen, S., Jones, J. A., Xu, Y., Low, H.-Y., Anderson, J. M., & Leong, K. W. (2010) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.01.074 · Cited by 389 · see citing works
Macrophage reaction against biomaterials in the mouse model–phenotypes, functions and markers
Klopfleisch, R. (2016) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2016.07.003 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
Spatial confinement downsizes the inflammatory response of macrophages
Jain, N., & Vogel, V. (2018) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/s41563-018-0190-6 · Cited by 271 · see citing works
Bota, P. C. S., Collie, A. M. B., Puolakkainen, P., Vernon, R. B., Sage, E. H., Ratner, B. D., & Stayton, P. S. (2010) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A · doi:10.1002/jbm.a.32893 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Basic Techniques in Mammalian Cell Tissue Culture
Phelan, M. C. (2007) · Current Protocols in Cell Biology · doi:10.1002/0471143030.cb0101s36 · Cited by 87 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Human tendon fibroblasts (hTFs) were isolated from the tissues following a previously described protocol [71].”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 68
- M.H. Amini, E.T. Ricchetti, J.P. Iannotti, K.A. Derwin, An update on scaffold devices for rotator cuff repair, Tech. Shoulder Elbow Surg. (2017), https://doi.org/10. 1097/BTE.0000000000000122. · DOI
- O. Hakimi, P.A. Mouthuy, A. Carr, Synthetic and degradable patches: an emerging solution for rotator cuff repair, Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 94 (2013) 287-292, https://doi. org/10.1111/iep.12030. · DOI
- D. Kovacevic, S.A. Rodeo, Biological augmentation of rotator cuff tendon repair, Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. (2008), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-007-0112-4. · DOI
- G. Deprés-tremblay, A. Chevrier, M. Snow, M.B. Hurtig, S. Rodeo, M.D. Buschmann, Rotator cuff repair: a review of surgical techniques, animal models, and new technologies under development, J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. (2016), https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jse.2016.06.009. · DOI
- K. a Derwin, A.R. Baker, R.K. Spragg, D.R. Leigh, J.P. Iannotti, Commercial extra- cellular matrix scaffolds for rotator cuff tendon repair, J Bone Jt. Surg Am. 88 (2006) 2665-2672, https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.E.01307. · DOI
- E.T. Stace, S. Tiberwel, A.J. Carr, N.S. Nagra, W. Khan, The use of electrospun scaffolds in musculoskeletal tissue engineering: a focus on tendon and the rotator cuff, Curr. Stem Cell Res. Ther. (2018), https://doi.org/10.2174/ 1574888x13666180129105707. · DOI
- E.M. Christenson, K.S. Anseth, J.J.J.P. Van den Beucken, C.K. Chan, B. Ercan, J.A. Jansen, C.T. Laurencin, W.J. Li, R. Murugan, L.S. Nair, S. Ramakrishna, R.S. Tuan, T.J. Webster, A.G. Mikos, Nanobiomaterial applications in orthopedics, J. Orthop. Res. (2007), https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.20305. · DOI
- W.J. Li, R.L. Mauck, J.A. Cooper, X. Yuan, R.S. Tuan, Engineering controllable anisotropy in electrospun biodegradable nanofibrous scaffolds for musculoskeletal tissue engineering, J. Biomech. (2007), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006. 09.004. · DOI
- Z. Ma, M. Kotaki, R. Inai, S. Ramakrishna, Potential of nanofiber matrix as tissue- engineering scaffolds, Tissue Eng. (2005), https://doi.org/10.1089/ten.2005.11. 101. · DOI
- S.B. Orr, A. Chainani, K.J. Hippensteel, A. Kishan, C. Gilchrist, N.W. Garrigues, D.S. Ruch, F. Guilak, D. Little, Aligned multilayered electrospun scaffolds for rotator cuff tendon tissue engineering, Acta Biomater. (2015), https://doi.org/10.1016/j. actbio.2015.06.010. · DOI
- Y.Z. Zhang, J. Venugopal, Z.M. Huang, C.T. Lim, S. Ramakrishna, Characterization of the surface biocompatibility of the electrospun PCL-Collagen nanofibers using fibroblasts, Biomacromolecules (2005), https://doi.org/10.1021/bm050314k. · DOI
- G.H. Kim, Electrospun PCL nanofibers with anisotropic mechanical properties as a biomedical scaffold, Biomed. Mater. 3 (2008) 25010, https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1748-6041/3/2/025010. · DOI
- M.A. Woodruff, D.W. Hutmacher, The return of a forgotten polymer -poly- caprolactone in the 21st century, Prog. Polym. Sci. (2010), https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.04.002. · DOI · Paper page
- R.R. Duling, Mechanical characterization of electrospun polycaprolactone (PCL): a potential scaffold for tissue engineering, J. Biomech. Eng. 130 (2008) 011006, , https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2838033. · DOI
- A.J. Engler, S. Sen, H.L. Sweeney, D.E. Discher, Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification, Cell 126 (2006) 677-689, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell. 2006.06.044. · DOI · Paper page
- R.I. Sharma, J.G. Snedeker, Biochemical and biomechanical gradients for directed bone marrow stromal cell differentiation toward tendon and bone, Biomaterials 31 (2010) 7695-7704, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.06.046. · DOI
- T. Razafiarison, C.N. Holenstein, T. Stauber, M. Jovic, E. Vertudes, M. Loparic, M. Kawecki, L. Bernard, U. Silvan, J.G. Snedeker, Biomaterial surface energy-driven ligand assembly strongly regulates stem cell mechanosensitivity and fate on very soft substrates, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Unit. States Am. 115 (2018) 4631, https://doi. org/10.1073/pnas.1704543115 LP -4636. · DOI
- Z. Yin, X. Chen, J.L. Chen, W.L. Shen, T.M. Hieu Nguyen, L. Gao, H.W. Ouyang, The regulation of tendon stem cell differentiation by the alignment of nanofibers, Biomaterials (2010), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.11.083. · DOI
- Z. Yin, X. Chen, H. xin Song, J. jie Hu, Q. mei Tang, T. Zhu, W. liang Shen, J. lin Chen, H. Liu, B.C. Heng, H.W. Ouyang, Electrospun scaffolds for multiple tissues regeneration invivo through topography dependent induction of lineage specific differentiation, Biomaterials 44 (2015) 173-185, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. biomaterials.2014.12.027. · DOI
- W. Wang, J. He, B. Feng, Z. Zhang, W. Zhang, G. Zhou, Y. Cao, W. Fu, W. Liu, Aligned nanofibers direct human dermal fibroblasts to tenogenic phenotype in vitro and enhance tendon regeneration in vivo, Nanomedicine (2016), https://doi.org/ 10.2217/nnm.16.24. · DOI
- T. Popielarczyk, A. Nain, J. Barrett, Aligned nanofiber topography directs the te- nogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells, Appl. Sci. 7 (2017) 59, https:// doi.org/10.3390/app7010059. · DOI
- K. Zhou, B. Feng, W. Wang, Y. Jiang, W. Zhang, G. Zhou, T. Jiang, Y. Cao, W. Liu, Nanoscaled and microscaled parallel topography promotes tenogenic differentia- tion of asc and neotendon formation in vitro, Int. J. Nanomed. 13 (2018) 3867-3881, https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S161423. · DOI
- K.K. Zhang, C. Liu, Y.L. Sun, Aligned collagen scaffolds enhance tenogenic differ- entiation of bone marrow-derived stem cells, Key Eng. Mater. 773 (2018) 333-337 https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.773.333. · DOI
- J. Huang, Y. Chen, C. Tang, Y. Fei, H. Wu, D. Ruan, M.E. Paul, X. Chen, Z. Yin, B.C. Heng, W. Chen, W. Shen, The relationship between substrate topography and stem cell differentiation in the musculoskeletal system, Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 76 (2019) 505-521, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-018-2945-2. · DOI
- N.M. Lee, C. Erisken, T. Iskratsch, M. Sheetz, W.N. Levine, H.H. Lu, Polymer fiber- based models of connective tissue repair and healing, Biomaterials 112 (2017) 303-312, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.10.013. · DOI
- A.D. Schoenenberger, J. Foolen, P. Moor, U. Silvan, J.G. Snedeker, Substrate fiber alignment mediates tendon cell response to inflammatory signaling, Acta Biomater. 71 (2018) 306-317, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2018.03.004. · DOI · Paper page
- C. Rinoldi, M. Costantini, E. Kijeńska-Gawrońska, S. Testa, E. Fornetti, M. Heljak, M. Ćwiklińska, R. Buda, J. Baldi, S. Cannata, J. Guzowski, C. Gargioli, A. Khademhosseini, W. Swieszkowski, Tendon tissue engineering: effects of me- chanical and biochemical stimulation on stem cell alignment on cell-laden hydrogel yarns, Adv. Healthc. Mater. (2019) 1-10, https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm. 201801218 1801218. · DOI
- A. Scott, J.L. Cook, D.A. Hart, D.C. Walker, V. Duronio, K.M. Khan, Tenocyte re- sponses to mechanical loading in vivo: a role for local insulin-like growth factor 1 signaling in early tendinosis in rats, Arthritis Rheum. (2007), https://doi.org/10. 1002/art.22426. · DOI
- J. Zhang, J.H.C. Wang, Mechanobiological response of tendon stem cells: implica- tions of tendon homeostasis and pathogenesis of tendinopathy, J. Orthop. Res. 28 (2010) 639-643, https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.21046. · DOI
- J.G. Snedeker, J. Foolen, Tendon injury and repair -a perspective on the basic mechanisms of tendon disease and future clinical therapy, Acta Biomater. (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.08.032. · DOI
- P.J. Murray, J.E. Allen, S.K. Biswas, E.A. Fisher, D.W. Gilroy, S. Goerdt, S. Gordon, J.A. Hamilton, L.B. Ivashkiv, T. Lawrence, M. Locati, A. Mantovani, F.O. Martinez, J.L. Mege, D.M. Mosser, G. Natoli, J.P. Saeij, J.L. Schultze, K. Shirey, A. Sica, J. Suttles, I. Udalova, J.A. vanGinderachter, S.N. Vogel, T.A. Wynn, Macrophage activation and polarization: nomenclature and experimental guidelines, Immunity 41 (2014) 14-20, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.008. · DOI · Paper page
- A.D. Lynn, S.J. Bryant, Phenotypic changes in bone marrow-derived murine mac- rophages cultured on PEG-based hydrogels activated or not by lipopolysaccharide, Acta Biomater. 7 (2011) 123-132, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2010.07.033. · DOI · Paper page
- L.M. Chamberlain, D. Holt-Casper, M. Gonzalez-Juarrero, D.W. Grainger, Extended culture of macrophages from different sources and maturation results in a common M2 phenotype, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 103 (2015) 2864-2874, https://doi.org/10. 1002/jbm.a.35415. · DOI
- L. Chung, D.R. Maestas, F. Housseau, J.H. Elisseeff, Key players in the immune response to biomaterial scaffolds for regenerative medicine, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2017.07.006. · DOI
- Z. Julier, A.J. Park, P.S. Briquez, M.M. Martino, Promoting tissue regeneration by modulating the immune system, Acta Biomater. (2017), https://doi.org/10.1016/j. actbio.2017.01.056. · DOI · Paper page
- F.Y. McWhorter, C.T. Davis, W.F. Liu, Physical and mechanical regulation of mac- rophage phenotype and function, Cell. Mol. Life Sci. (2015), https://doi.org/10. 1007/s00018-014-1796-8. · DOI · Paper page
- E.T. Ricchetti, A. Aurora, J.P. Iannotti, K.A. Derwin, Scaffold devices for rotator cuff repair, J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 21 (2012) 251-265, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse. 2011.10.003. · DOI
- R. Sridharan, A.R. Cameron, D.J. Kelly, C.J. Kearney, F.J. O'Brien, Biomaterial based modulation of macrophage polarization: a review and suggested design principles, Mater. Today 18 (2015) 313-325, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod. 2015.01.019. · DOI · Paper page
- S.L. Wunderli, J. Widmer, N. Amrein, J. Foolen, U. Silvan, O. Leupin, J.G. Snedeker, Minimal mechanical load and tissue culture conditions preserve native cell phenotype and morphology in tendon-a novel ex vivo mouse explant model, J. Orthop. Res. 36 (2018) 1383-1390, https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.23769. · DOI
- F.Y. McWhorter, T. Wang, P. Nguyen, T. Chung, W.F. Liu, Modulation of macro- phage phenotype by cell shape, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Unit. States Am. (2013), https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1308887110. · DOI · Paper page
- S. Korntner, N. Kunkel, C. Lehner, R. Gehwolf, P. Augat, D. Stephan, V. Heu, H. Bauer, A high-glucose diet affects Achilles tendon healing in rats, Sci. Rep. (2017) 1-12, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-00700-z. · DOI
- V. Ballotta, A. Driessen-Mol, C.V.C. Bouten, F.P.T. Baaijens, Strain-dependent modulation of macrophage polarization within scaffolds, Biomaterials 35 (2014) 4919-4928, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.03.002. · DOI · Paper page
- J. Pugin, I. Dunn, P. Jolliet, D. Tassaux, J.L. Magnenat, L.P. Nicod, J.C. Chevrolet, Activation of human macrophages by mechanical ventilation in vitro, Am. J. Physiol. 275 (1998) L1040-L1050, https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.1998.275.6. L1040. · DOI
- L.A. Matheson, N.J. Fairbank, G.N. Maksym, J.P. Santerre, R.S. Labow, Characterization of the FlexcellTM UniflexTM cyclic strain culture system with U937 macrophage-like cells, Biomaterials (2006), https://doi.org/10.1016/j. biomaterials.2005.05.070. · DOI
- Z. Wang, W.J. Lee, B.T.H. Koh, M. Hong, W. Wang, P.N. Lim, J. Feng, L.S. Park, M. Kim, E.S. Thian, Functional regeneration of tendons using scaffolds with physical anisotropy engineered via microarchitectural manipulation, Sci. Adv. 4 (2018) eaat4537, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat4537. · DOI
- A. Vishwakarma, N.S. Bhise, M.B. Evangelista, J. Rouwkema, M.R. Dokmeci, A.M. Ghaemmaghami, N.E. Vrana, A. Khademhosseini, Engineering im- munomodulatory biomaterials to tune the inflammatory response, Trends Biotechnol. 34 (2016) 470-482, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.03.009. · DOI
- A. Curtis, C. Wilkinson, Topographical control of cells, Biomaterials (1997), https:// doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00144-0. · DOI
- H. Cao, K. Mchugh, S.Y. Chew, J.M. Anderson, The topographical effect of elec- trospun nanofibrous scaffolds on the in vivo and in vitro foreign body reaction, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 93 (2010) 1151-1159, https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.32609. · DOI · Paper page
- T.B. Wissing, V. Bonito, E.E. van Haaften, M. van Doeselaar, M.M.C.P. Brugmans, H.M. Janssen, C.V.C. Bouten, A.I.P.M. Smits, Macrophage-driven biomaterial de- gradation depends on scaffold microarchitecture, Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 7 (2019) 87, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00087. · DOI
- N.L. Millar, G.A.C. Murrell, I.B. McInnes, Inflammatory mechanisms in tendino- pathy -towards translation, Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 13 (2017) 110-122, https://doi. org/10.1038/nrrheum.2016.213. · DOI
- B.N. Brown, R. Londono, S. Tottey, L. Zhang, K.A. Kukla, M.T. Wolf, K.A. Daly, J.E. Reing, S.F. Badylak, Macrophage phenotype as a predictor of constructive re- modeling following the implantation of biologically derived surgical mesh mate- rials, Acta Biomater. (2012), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.11.031. · DOI · Paper page
- D. Bayik, D. Tross, D.M. Klinman, Factors influencing the differentiation of human monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells into inflammatory macrophages, Front. Immunol. 9 (2018) 1-9, https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.00608. · DOI
- C.L. Mendias, J.P. Gumucio, K.I. Bakhurin, E.B. Lynch, S.V. Brooks, Physiological loading of tendons induces scleraxis expression in epitenon fibroblasts, J. Orthop. Res. 30 (2012) 606-612, https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.21550. · DOI
- J.E. Sero, H.Z. Sailem, R.C. Ardy, H. Almuttaqi, T. Zhang, C. Bakal, Cell shape and the microenvironment regulate nuclear translocation of NF-κB in breast epithelial and tumor cells, Mol. Syst. Biol. 11 (2015) 790, https://doi.org/10.15252/msb. 20145644. · DOI
- B. Chen, C. Co, C.C. Ho, Cell shape dependent regulation of nuclear morphology, Biomaterials 67 (2015) 129-136, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.07. 017. · DOI
- S.A. Wickström, C.M. Niessen, Cell adhesion and mechanics as drivers of tissue organization and differentiation: local cues for large scale organization, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 54 (2018) 89-97, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceb.2018.05.003. · DOI
- A. Elosegui-Artola, I. Andreu, A.E.M. Beedle, A. Lezamiz, M. Uroz, A.J. Kosmalska, R. Oria, J.Z. Kechagia, P. Rico-Lastres, A.L. Le Roux, C.M. Shanahan, X. Trepat, D. Navajas, S. Garcia-Manyes, P. Roca-Cusachs, Force triggers YAP nuclear entry by regulating transport across nuclear pores, Cell 171 (2017) 1397-1410, https://doi. org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.10.008 e14. · DOI · Paper page
- M. Stolk, F. Klatte-Schulz, A. Schmock, S. Minkwitz, B. Wildemann, M. Seifert, New insights into tenocyte-immune cell interplay in an in vitro model of inflammation, Sci. Rep. (2017), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09875-x. · DOI
- L.A. Ortiz, M. DuTreil, C. Fattman, A.C. Pandey, G. Torres, K. Go, D.G. Phinney, Interleukin 1 receptor antagonist mediates the antiinflammatory and antifibrotic effect of mesenchymal stem cells during lung injury, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Unit. States Am. 104 (2007) 11002-11007, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0704421104. · DOI · Paper page
- P. Chomarat, J. Banchereau, J. Davoust, A.K. Palucka, IL-6 switches the differ- entiation of monocytes from dendritic cells to macrophages, Nat. Immunol. 1 (2000) 510-514 http://www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/82763%0Afile:/// Files/08/0834F408-6077-45D8-9DB2-022477631918.pdf%0Apapers3:// publication/doi/10.1038/82763. · DOI
- A. Mantovani, A. Sica, S. Sozzani, P. Allavena, A. Vecchi, M. Locati, The chemokine system in diverse forms of macrophage activation and polarization, Trends Immunol. 25 (2004) 677-686, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2004.09.015. · DOI · Paper page
- C.N. Manning, C. Martel, S.E. Sakiyama-Elbert, M.J. Silva, S. Shah, R.H. Gelberman, S. Thomopoulos, Adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal cells modulate tendon fi- broblast responses to macrophage-induced inflammation in vitro, Stem Cell Res. Ther. 6 (2015), https://doi.org/10.1186/s13287-015-0059-4 1DUMMY. · DOI
- S. Franz, S. Rammelt, D. Scharnweber, J.C. Simon, Immune responses to implants - a review of the implications for the design of immunomodulatory biomaterials, Biomaterials (2011), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.05.078. · DOI · Paper page
- A.C. Abraham, S.A. Shah, M. Golman, L. Song, X. Li, I. Kurtaliaj, M. Akbar, N.L. Millar, Y. Abu-Amer, L.M. Galatz, S. Thomopoulos, Targeting the NF-κB sig- naling pathway in chronic tendon disease, Sci. Transl. Med. 11 (2019) eaav4319, , https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aav4319. · DOI
- N. Rajan, J. Habermehl, M.F. Coté, C.J. Doillon, D. Mantovani, Preparation of ready-to-use, storable and reconstituted type I collagen from rat tail tendon for tissue engineering applications, Nat. Protoc. 1 (2007) 2753-2758, https://doi.org/ 10.1038/nprot.2006.430. · DOI
- A.D. Schoenenberger, A. Schipanski, V. Malheiro, M. Kucki, J.G. Snedeker, P. Wick, K. Maniura-Weber, Macrophage polarization by titanium dioxide (TiO 2 ) particles: size matters, ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2 (2016) 908-919, https://doi.org/10.1021/ acsbiomaterials.6b00006. · DOI
- S. Tsuchiya, M. Yamabe, Y. Yamaguchi, Y. Kobayashi, T. Konno, K. Tada, Establishment and characterization of a human acute monocytic leukemia-cell line (Thp-1), Int. J. Canc. 26 (1980) 171-176, https://doi.org/10.1002/Ijc. 2910260208. · DOI
- J. Schindelin, I. Arganda-Carreras, E. Frise, V. Kaynig, M. Longair, T. Pietzsch, S. Preibisch, C. Rueden, S. Saalfeld, B. Schmid, J.-Y. Tinevez, D.J. White, V. Hartenstein, K. Eliceiri, P. Tomancak, A. Cardona, Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis, Nat. Methods 9 (2012) 676, https://doi.org/10.1038/ nmeth.2019. · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Niu, Y., Wang, Z., Shi, Y., Dong, L., & Wang, C. (2021) · Bioactive Materials · doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.08.012 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Control of innate immune response by biomaterial surface topography, energy, and stiffness
Abaricia, J. O., Farzad, N., Heath, T. J., Simmons, J., Morandini, L., & Olivares-Navarrete, R. (2021) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2021.04.021 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Foreign body response to synthetic polymer biomaterials and the role of adaptive immunity
Kyriakides, T. R., Kim, H.-J., Zheng, C., Harkins, L., Tao, W., & Deschenes, E. (2022) · Biomedical Materials · doi:10.1088/1748-605x/ac5574 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Resorbable Biomaterials Used for 3D Scaffolds in Tissue Engineering: A Review
Vach Agocsova, S., Culenova, M., Birova, I., Omanikova, L., Moncmanova, B., Danisovic, L., Ziaran, S., Bakos, D., & Alexy, P. (2023) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma16124267 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
- Authors
- Schoenenberger, A. D., Tempfer, H., Lehner, C., Egloff, J., Mauracher, M., Bird, A., Widmer, J., Maniura-Weber, K., Fucentese, S. F., Traweger, A., Silvan, U., & Snedeker, J. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Zurich (CH)
- Paracelsus Medical University (AT)
- Corresponding author
- Snedeker, Jess G.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Biomaterials
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-08
- Volume
- 249
- Pages
- 120034
- ISSN
- 0142-9612 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3015824084
- Cited by
- 130
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 17.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Biomaterials (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
- DORA Empa (Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (Empa)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
- ETH Zürich Research Collection (cc-by)
- Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
- Funders
- University of Zurich
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Tendon Structure and Treatment
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
- Keywords
- macrophage polarization, polycaprolactone nanofibers, fiber orientation, mechanical loading, tendon inflammation, tendon fibroblasts, mechanosensing, tendon repair, biophysical cues
- MeSH terms
- Macrophage Activation, Macrophages, Polyesters, Tendons
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review