Bioenergy: how much?
Open accessAbstract
The perspective by Haberl et al (2013 Environ. Res. Lett. 8 031004) entitled 'Bioenergy: how much can we expect for 2050?' is timely and valuable. It deals with an important subject since contrasting views on the subject make it very difficult for policy makers to adopt policies that would allow 'production and consumption of energy at sustainable levels', in the words of the authors. It is therefore very important to sort out from the abundant literature on the issue which are the facts and which are the biases and preferences.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The argument that solar photovoltaic cells are a better way to use solar energy than photosynthesis is very questionable.
“The argument that solar photovoltaic cells (PV) are a better way to use solar energy than photosynthesis is very questionable [51,67].”
From The effect of bioenergy expansion: food, energy, and environment (2014) · cites this paper as [67]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 11 · Cited by 4
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- FAO 2009 Global Agriculture Towards 2050. Paper Prepared by the High-Level Expert Forum for the Conf. How to Feed the World by 2050 (Rome: Food and Agricultural Organization)
- Authors
- Goldemberg, J., & Coelho, S. T.
- Affiliations
- Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
- Venue
- Environmental Research Letters
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2013-09-01
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 031005
- ISSN
- 1748-9326 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2105042296
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 3.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- es
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Environmental Research Letters (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Air Force Office of Scientific Research
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Global Energy and Sustainability Research
- Keywords
- bioenergy, bioenergy potential, sustainable energy, energy policy, energy sustainability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
