The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A systematic review of dynamics in climate risk and vulnerability assessments
Open accessAbstract
Understanding climate risk is crucial for effective adaptation action, and a number of assessment methodologies have emerged. We argue that the dynamics of the individual components in climate risk and vulnerability assessments has received little attention. In order to highlight this, we systematically reviewed 42 sub-national climate risk and vulnerability assessments. We analysed the assessments using an analytical framework with which we evaluated (1) the conceptual approaches to vulnerability and exposure used, (2) if current or future risks were assessed, and (3) if and how changes over time (i.e. dynamics) were considered. Of the reviewed assessments, over half addressed future risks or vulnerability; and of these future-oriented studies, less than 1/3 considered both vulnerability and exposure dynamics. While the number of studies that include dynamics is growing, and while all studies included socio-economic aspects, often only biophysical dynamics was taken into account. We discuss the challenges of assessing socio-economic and spatial dynamics, particularly the poor availability of data and methods. We suggest that future-oriented studies assessing risk dynamics would benefit from larger stakeholder involvement, discussion of the assessment purpose, the use of multiple methods, inclusion of uncertainty/sensitivity analyses and pathway approaches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis
Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732305276687 · Cited by 44,601
A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009) · Health Information & Libraries Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x · Cited by 10,817
Mackay, A. (2008) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2008.0015br · Cited by 5,591
Adger, W. N. (2006) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006 · Cited by 5,417
A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science
Turner, B. L., Kasperson, R. E., Matson, P. A., McCarthy, J. J., Corell, R. W., Christensen, L., Eckley, N., Kasperson, J. X., Luers, A., Martello, M. L., et al. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1231335100 · Cited by 4,358
Watson, R., Albritton, D. L., Barker, T., Baskmakov, I., Canziani, O. F., Christ, R., Ulrich Cubasch, B., Davidson, O., Gitay, H., Griggs, D., et al. (2001) · Cited by 3,473
Field, C. B., Barros, V. R., Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Dokken, D. J., Ebi, K. L., Mastrandrea, M. D., Mach, K. J., Plattner, G., Allen, S., et al. (2012) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · Cited by 3,037
Parry, M. L., Canziani, O. F., de Strihou, J.-P. V. Y., & Palutikof, J. P. (2007) · Cited by 2,783
Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change?
Adger, W. N., Dessai, S., Goulden, M., Hulme, M., Lorenzoni, I., Nelson, D. R., Naess, L. O., Wolf, J., & Wreford, A. (2009) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-008-9520-z · Cited by 2,501
More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy
Rotmans, J., Kemp, R., & van Asselt, M. (2001) · Foresight · doi:10.1108/14636680110803003 · Cited by 2,100
Cited by
A review of the global climate change impacts, adaptation, and sustainable mitigation measures
Abbass, K., Qasim, M. Z., Song, H., Murshed, M., Mahmood, H., & Younis, I. (2022) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-022-19718-6 · Cited by 2,359
Sea Level Rise and Implications for Low-Lying Islands, Coasts and Communities
(2022) · The Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate · doi:10.1017/9781009157964.012 · Cited by 831
Estoque, R. C., Ooba, M., Seposo, X. T., Togawa, T., Hijioka, Y., Takahashi, K., & Nakamura, S. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15218-8 · Cited by 346
An Analytical Framework for Assessing Context-Specific Rural Livelihood Vulnerability
Rahman, H. M. T., & Hickey, G. M. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12145654 · Cited by 52
Dhawale, R., Schuster-Wallace, C. J., & Pietroniro, A. (2024) · International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction · doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104764 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Jurgilevich, A., Räsänen, A., Groundstroem, F., & Juhola, S.
- Venue
- Environmental Research Letters
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2017-01-11
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 013002
- ISSN
- 1748-9326 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2575666531
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 70
- FWCI
- 2.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A systematic review of dynamics in climate risk and vulnerability assessments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1748-9326/aa5508
- The paper
- Jurgilevich, A., Räsänen, A., Groundstroem, F., & Juhola, S. (2017). A systematic review of dynamics in climate risk and vulnerability assessments. Environmental Research Letters. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa5508
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
