Cited by 256Advanced Aircraft Design and TechnologiesClimate Change Policy and EconomicsMaritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency

Quantifying aviation’s contribution to global warming

Open access
Klöwer, M, Allen, M R, Lee, D S, Proud, S R, Gallagher, L, Skowron, A·2021·Environmental Research Letters

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Growth in aviation contributes more to global warming than is generally appreciated because of the mix of climate pollutants it generates. Here, we model the CO 2 and non-CO 2 effects like nitrogen oxide emissions and contrail formation to analyse aviation’s total warming footprint. Aviation contributed approximately 4% to observed human-induced global warming to date, despite being responsible for only 2.4% of global annual emissions of CO 2 . Aviation is projected to cause a total of about 0.1 °C of warming by 2050, half of it to date and the other half over the next three decades, should aviation’s pre-COVID growth resume. The industry would then contribute a 6%–17% share to the remaining 0.3 °C–0.8 °C to not exceed 1.5 °C–2 °C of global warming. Under this scenario, the reduction due to COVID-19 to date is small and is projected to only delay aviation’s warming contribution by about five years. But the leveraging impact of growth also represents an opportunity: aviation’s contribution to further warming would be immediately halted by either a sustained annual 2.5% decrease in air traffic under the existing fuel mix, or a transition to a 90% carbon-neutral fuel mix by 2050.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1748-9326/ac286e

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klöwer, M., Allen, M. R., Lee, D. S., Proud, S. R., Gallagher, L., & Skowron, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Manchester Metropolitan University (GB)
  • Rutherford Appleton Laboratory (GB)
Corresponding author
Klöwer, M
Venue
Environmental Research Letters
Published
2021-10-01
Volume
16
Issue
10
Pages
104027
ISSN
1748-9326 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3173384444
Cited by
256
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 64 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 2
FWCI
14.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Research Letters (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Science and Technology Facilities Council (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • ACACIA (875036)
  • European Union (Horizon 2020)
  • UK Research and Innovation COVID urgency grant scheme (NE/V00946X/1)
  • National Environmental Research Council (NE/L002612/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
Keywords
aviation emissions, global warming, aviation climate impact, CO2 emissions, NOx emissions, contrail formation, COVID-19 impact on aviation, climate change mitigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review