Beyond spatial bias: understanding the colonial legacies and contemporary social forces shaping biodiversity data
Open accessAbstract
With over 2 billion observations of species from across the earth, the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) has become an influential repository of information for not only ecologists, but also conservation scientists and policy makers. Yet biodiversity data reveal more than species distributions. They reflect colonial histories, economic inequities, and cultural differences. This article argues for moving beyond ideas of ‘spatial bias’ in conservation science to highlight the colonial legacies and contemporary social forces that shape biodiversity data. Drawing on interviews with the GBIF staff and data publishers as well as critical mapping of GBIF data patterns, we visualize and analyze how and why colonial patterns persist and shift in this global biodiversity data. To explain diverse trajectories of postcolonial production of data, we identify three social forces–colonial legacies of collecting, infrastructures of international development, and contemporary data cultures–that structure biodiversity observation distributions and data ownership and availability. Together, these findings demonstrate how, even in the age of open access, colonial and postcolonial practices and politics continue to shape what we know about the natural world.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
"Data colonialism" is a real concern: researchers from well-resourced institutions can too easily extract recordings from tropical regions without equitable collaboration or local benefit-sharing.
““Data colonialism” is a real concern: researchers from well-resourced institutions can too easily extract recordings from tropical regions without equitable collaboration or local benefit-sharing (Faxon and Chapman 2025).”
From Listening forward: emerging roles of bioacoustics in ecology, evolution, and conservation (2026) · cites this paper as Faxon and Chapman 2025
Cites
Taxonomic bias in biodiversity data and societal preferences
Troudet, J., Grandcolas, P., Blin, A., Vignes‐Lebbe, R., & Legendre, F. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-09084-6 · Cited by 902 · see citing works
Sampling biases shape our view of the natural world
Hughes, A. C., Orr, M. C., Ma, K., Costello, M. J., Waller, J., Provoost, P., Yang, Q., Zhu, C., & Qiao, H. (2021) · Ecography · doi:10.1111/ecog.05926 · Cited by 648 · see citing works
Geographical sampling bias and its implications for conservation priorities in Africa
Reddy, S., & Dávalos, L. M. (2003) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00946.x · Cited by 454 · see citing works
What do conservation biologists publish?
Fazey, I., Fischer, J., & Lindenmayer, D. B. (2005) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.01.013 · Cited by 378 · see citing works
The tropical biodiversity data gap: addressing disparity in global monitoring
Collen, B., Ram, M., Zamin, T., & McRae, L. (2008) · Tropical Conservation Science · doi:10.1177/194008290800100202 · Cited by 327 · see citing works
Interoperability of Biodiversity Databases: Biodiversity Information on Every Desktop
Edwards, J. L., Lane, M. A., & Nielsen, E. S. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.289.5488.2312 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Colonial history and global economics distort our understanding of deep-time biodiversity
Raja, N. B., Dunne, E. M., Matiwane, A., Khan, T. M., Nätscher, P., Ghilardi, A. M., & Chattopadhyay, D. (2021) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-021-01608-8 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Amano, T., & Sutherland, W. J. (2013) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.2649 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
The Quiet Revolution: Biodiversity Informatics and the Internet
Bisby, F. A. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.289.5488.2309 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Smart forests and data practices: From the Internet of Trees to planetary governance
Gabrys, J. (2020) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951720904871 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Geographies of conservation II: Technology, surveillance and conservation by algorithm
Adams, W. M. (2017) · Progress in Human Geography · doi:10.1177/0309132517740220 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
The data void in modeling current and future distributions of tropical species
Feeley, K. J., & Silman, M. R. (2010) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02239.x · Cited by 172 · see citing works
A global biodiversity observing system to unite monitoring and guide action
Gonzalez, A., Vihervaara, P., Balvanera, P., Bates, A. E., Bayraktarov, E., Bellingham, P. J., Bruder, A., Campbell, J., Catchen, M., Cavender-Bares, J. M., et al. (2023) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-023-02171-0 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
al., M. C. E. (2023) · Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project · doi:10.23696/vdemds23 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
Is research effort allocated efficiently for conservation? Felidae as a global case study
Brodie, J. F. (2009) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10531-009-9617-3 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Correlates of Research Effort in Carnivores: Body Size, Range Size and Diet Matter
Brooke, Z. M., Bielby, J., Nambiar, K. Z., & Carbone, C. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093195 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Nost, E., & Goldstein, J. E. (2021) · Environment and Planning E Nature and Space · doi:10.1177/25148486211043503 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Biodiversity monitoring for a just planetary future
Chapman, M., Goldstein, B. R., Schell, C. J., Brashares, J. S., Carter, N., Ellis‐Soto, D., Faxon, H. O., Goldstein, J. E., Halpern, B. S., Longdon, J., et al. (2024) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adh8874 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Self-citationRestoring indigenous names in taxonomy
Gillman, L. N., & Wright, S. D. (2020) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-020-01344-y · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Data justice and biodiversity conservation
Pritchard, R., Sauls, L. A., Oldekop, J. A., Kiwango, W. A., & Brockington, D. (2022) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.13919 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
The colonial legacy of herbaria
Park, D., Feng, X., Akiyama, S., Ardiyani, M., Avendaño, N., Barina, Z., Bärtschi, B., Belgrano, M. J., Betancur, J., Bijmoer, R., et al. (2023) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01616-7 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Treating gaps and biases in biodiversity data as a missing data problem
Bowler, D. E., Boyd, R. J., Callaghan, C. T., Robinson, R. A., Isaac, N. J. B., & Pocock, M. J. O. (2024) · Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1111/brv.13127 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Ahrends, A., Burgess, N. D., Gereau, R. E., Marchant, R., Bulling, M. T., Lovett, J. C., Platts, P. J., Kindemba, V. W., Owen, N., Fanning, E., et al. (2011) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00737.x · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Effects of publication bias on conservation planning
Hickisch, R., Hodgetts, T., Johnson, P. J., Sillero‐Zubiri, C., Tockner, K., & Macdonald, D. W. (2019) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.13326 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Understanding sampling and taxonomic biases recorded by citizen scientists
Ward, D. F. (2014) · Journal of Insect Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10841-014-9676-y · Cited by 72 · see citing works
A framework for contextualizing social‐ecological biases in contributory science data
Carlen, E. J., Estien, C. O., Caspi, T., Perkins, D., Goldstein, B. R., Kreling, S. E. S., Hentati, Y., Williams, T. D., Stanton, L. A., Des Roches, S., et al. (2024) · People and Nature · doi:10.1002/pan3.10592 · Cited by 57 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Despite recent calls to contextualize socio-ecological bias and consider its consequences in contributory science (Carlen et al 2024), little scholarship in this field to date seeks to understand how these biases emerge and persist over time.”
Ellis-Soto, D., Chapman, M., & Locke, D. (2023) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01688-5 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Self-citationMaking global oceans governance in/visible with Smart Earth: The case of Global Fishing Watch
Drakopulos, L., Silver, J. J., Nost, E., Gray, N. J., & Hawkins, R. (2022) · Environment and Planning E Nature and Space · doi:10.1177/25148486221111786 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Goldstein, J. E., & Faxon, H. O. (2020) · Environment and Planning E Nature and Space · doi:10.1177/2514848620943892 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Self-citationRecognizing the equity implications of restoration priority maps
Schultz, B., Brockington, D., Coleman, E. A., Djenontin, I. N. S., Fischer, H. W., Fleischman, F. D., Kashwan, P., Marquardt, K., Pfeifer, M., Pritchard, R., et al. (2022) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ac9918 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Millner, N., Newport, B. J., Sandbrook, C. G., & Simlai, T. (2024) · Progress in Environmental Geography · doi:10.1177/27539687241229739 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Territorializing spatial data: Controlling land through One Map projects in Indonesia and Myanmar
Faxon, H. O., Goldstein, J. E., Fisher, M. R., & Hunt, G. (2022) · Political Geography · doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2022.102651 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Self-citationAlgorithmic conservation in a changing climate
Scoville, C., Chapman, M., Amironesei, R., & Boettiger, C. (2021) · Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2021.01.009 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citationMonitor biodiversity for action
Gonzalez, A., & Londoño, M. C. (2022) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adg1506 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Setting data free: The politics of open data for food and agriculture
Fairbairn, M., & Kish, Z. (2023) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/14614448231174520 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Zizka, A., Rydén, O., Edler, D., Klein, J. T., Perrigo, A., Silvestro, D., Jagers, S. C., Lindberg, S. I., & Antonelli, A. (2021) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/jbi.14256 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Re-centering social justice in conservation science: Progressive policies, methods, and practices
Montgomery, R. A., Kabra, A., Kepe, T., Garnett, S. T., & Merino, R. (2024) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110600 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Justice-oriented Design Listening: Participatory Ecoacoustics with a Ghanaian Forest Community
Longdon, J., Westerlaken, M., Blackwell, A. F., Gabrys, J., Ossom, B., Ashton‐Butt, A., & Acheampong, E. (2024) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3613904.3643044 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Colonial Dates Dataset (COLDAT)
Becker, B. (2019) · Harvard Dataverse · doi:10.7910/dvn/t9sdew · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Collective Science to Inform Global Ocean Protections
Oestreich, W. K., Czapanskiy, M. F., Katija, K., Record, N. R., & Chapman, M. (2025) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.70168 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationCapacity building needed to reap the benefits of access to biodiversity collections
Groom, Q., Meeus, S., Bárrios, S., Childs, C., Clubbe, C. P., Corbett, E., Francis, S., Gray, A. J., Harding, L., Jackman, A., et al. (2025) · Plants People Planet · doi:10.1002/ppp3.70029 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Capacity building needed to reap the benefits of access to biodiversity collectionsPreprint
Groom, Q., Meeus, S., Bárrios, S., et al. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.11.12.623213 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
GBIF Strategic Framework 2023-2027
Facility, G. B. I. (2021) · Global Biodiversity Information Facility · doi:10.35035/doc-0kkq-0t82 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Collective science to inform global ocean protectionsPreprint
Oestreich, W. K., Czapanskiy, M. F., Katija, K., et al. (2025) · doi:10.22541/au.174282888.81070415/v1 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
User, G. O. (2024) · Global Biodiversity Information Facility · doi:10.15468/dl.t4762c · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dasgupta, S., Blankespoor, B. A., & Wheeler, D. R. (2026) · Earth system science data · doi:10.5194/essd-18-2371-2026 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Yang, Y., Shrestha, N., Song, X.-J., Ni, M., Liu, X., Wu, J., Liu, J., & Svenning, J. (2025) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.70680 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Frateles, L. E. F., Ronquillo, C., Nakamura, G., Diniz‐Filho, J. A. F., Ladle, R. J., & Hortal, J. (2026) · Ecography · doi:10.1002/ecog.08589 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Subspecies taxonomy reflects social and geographic patterns of taxonomic effort in tetrapods
Guedes, J. J. M., Diniz‐Filho, J. A. F., Freitas, A. V. L., & Moura, M. R. (2026) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/cobi.70356 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Moura, M. R., da Silva, R. H. P., Pedrozo, M., Guedes, J. J. M., Uetz, P., & Moroti, M. D. T. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.06.23.734087 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Listening forward: emerging roles of bioacoustics in ecology, evolution, and conservation
Zsebők, S. (2026) · Biologia Futura · doi:10.1007/s42977-026-00322-5
Decolonizing biodiversity data: a call for equitable science
Mozol, A. G. (2025) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/adff9b
A systematic map of methods for assessing societal benefits of Earth science information
O’Hara, C. C., Báez, M. C., Chaplin‐Kramer, R., Cheng, S. H., Echeverri, A., Galford, G. L., Gould, R. K., Mancilla, C., Muldoon, M. C., Singh, G. G., et al. (2026) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2524370123
Kock, S., Llopis, J. C., Fernández, M., Mónica Moraes, R., & Fernández‐Llamazares, Á. (2026) · npj Biodiversity · doi:10.1038/s44185-026-00153-6
de Sousa, A. C. A., Santos, B. S., Parrinha, D., BARBOSA, M., Marques, M. P., Passos, P., & Ceríaco, L. M. P. (2026) · Natural History Collections and Museomics · doi:10.3897/nhcm.3.184711
- Authors
- Faxon, H., & Chapman, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Montana (US)
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- Venue
- Environmental Research Letters
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2025-05-30
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 064053
- ISSN
- 1748-9326 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4410221802
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 10.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Environmental Research Letters (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- ETH Zürich Research Collection (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Keywords
- GBIF, biodiversity data, colonial legacy, spatial bias, data ownership, data availability, data culture, conservation science, economic inequity, cultural differences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review