Cited by 32Quantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture

Information geometry of density matrices and state estimation

Open access
Brody, Dorje C·2011·Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical

Abstract

Given a pure state vector | x ⟩ and a density matrix , the function defines a probability density on the space of pure states parameterised by density matrices. The associated Fisher–Rao information measure is used to define a unitary invariant Riemannian metric on the space of density matrices. An alternative derivation of the metric, based on square-root density matrices and trace norms, is provided. This is applied to the problem of quantum-state estimation. In the simplest case of unitary parameter estimation, new higher-order corrections to the uncertainty relations, applicable to general mixed states, are derived.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1751-8113/44/25/252002

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The analytical formulas of the fidelity F(ρ0,ρτ) and the affinity A(ρ0,ρτ) for any pair of one-qubit states are given by Eqs. (A12) and (A13).

    “where the analytical formulas of the fidelity Fðρ 0 ; ρ τ Þ and the affinity Aðρ 0 ; ρ τ Þ for any pair of one-qubit states ρ 0 and ρ τ are the following [29,73,74]:”

    From Generalized Geometric Quantum Speed Limits (2016) · cites this paper as [74]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Bengtsson I, 2007, Geometry of Quantum States: An Introduction to Quantum Entanglement
  2. Rao C R, 1945, Bull. Calcutta Math. Soc., 37, 81
  3. Amari S, 2000, Methods of Information Geometry
  4. Holevo A S, 1982, Probabilistic and Statistical Aspects of Quantum Theory

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brody, D. C.
Affiliations
Brunel University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Brody, Dorje C
Venue
Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical
Published
2011-05-19
Volume
44
Issue
25
Pages
252002
ISSN
  • 1751-8113 (ISSN-L)
  • 1751-8121
OpenAlex
W2045278314
Cited by
32
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Keywords
information geometry, density matrix, Fisher information metric, Riemannian metrics, unitary invariance, trace norm, quantum state estimation, uncertainty relations, mixed states, pure states

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review