Cited by 70Quantum Mechanics and ApplicationsQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture

Geometry of Quantum Statistical Inference

Brody, Dorje C., Hughston, Lane P.·1996·Physical Review Letters

Abstract

An efficient geometric formulation of the problem of parameter estimation is developed, based on Hilbert space geometry. This theory, which allows for a transparent transition between classical and quantum statistical inference, is then applied to the analysis of exponential families of distributions (of relevance to statistical mechanics) and quantum mechanical evolutions. The extension to quantum theory is achieved by the introduction of a complex structure on the given real Hilbert space. We find a set of higher order corrections to the parameter estimation variance lower bound, which are potentially important in quantum mechanics, where these corrections appear as modifications to Heisenberg uncertainty relations for the determination of the parameter.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1103/physrevlett.77.2851

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The analytical formulas of the fidelity F(ρ0,ρτ) and the affinity A(ρ0,ρτ) for any pair of one-qubit states are given by Eqs. (A12) and (A13).

    “where the analytical formulas of the fidelity Fðρ 0 ; ρ τ Þ and the affinity Aðρ 0 ; ρ τ Þ for any pair of one-qubit states ρ 0 and ρ τ are the following [29,73,74]:”

    From Generalized Geometric Quantum Speed Limits (2016) · cites this paper as [73]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [7]L. P. Hughston, in Twistor Theory, edited by S. Huggett ( Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1995); Proc. R. Soc. London 452 , 953 (1996); J. Anandan and Y. Aharonov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 , 1697 (1990); A. Ashtekar and T. A. Schilling, in CAM-94 Physics Meeting, edited by A. Zepeda, AIP Conf. Proc. No. 342 (AIP Press, Woodbury, NY, 1995).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brody, D. C., & Hughston, L. P.
Affiliations
Imperial College London (GB)
Venue
Physical Review Letters
Published
1996-09-30
Volume
77
Issue
14
Pages
2851-2854
ISSN
  • 0031-9007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1079-7114
OpenAlex
W1977587840
Cited by
70
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physical Review Letters (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Goldsmiths (University of London) (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Keywords
quantum statistical inference, parameter estimation, Hilbert space geometry, exponential family, complex structure, Cramer-Rao lower bound, higher-order corrections, uncertainty principle, quantum-to-classical transition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review