The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cost and time analysis on the selection of formwork installation method
Open accessAbstract
Formwork is a supporting tool for printing concrete of the desired size and shape. Choosing a certain type of formwork method will affect the time and cost of a project. There are two types of formwork method, the conventional method and the semi-system method. This research will compare the two methods on the cost, time and waste products on their application on beams, columns and slab of a construction building project. The aim of this research is to compare the cost, time and waste product of the two formwork method on a construction building project. A high rise construction building project with 24 floors will be used as a case study in this research. Based on this research it is found that the conventional system cost 12% more than the semi-system. It also needed 12 more days to finish and also produce 10% more waste than the semi-system.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Given these expenses, the overall cost of on-site concrete constructions indicates that the formwork system constitutes 50% to 60% of the total expenditure [13,14].”
From Assessment of Sustainable Hybrid Formwork Systems Using Life Cycle Assessment and the Wear-Out Coefficient—A Case Study (2025) · cites this paper as [13]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Tighnavard Balasbaneh, A., Sher, W., & Haziman Wan Ibrahim, M. (2024) · Ain Shams Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.asej.2023.102585 · Cited by 33
Baskaran, D., Chockkalingam, U., & Senthil Muthalvan, R. (2025) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings15101630 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Arumsari, P., & Xavier, C.
- Affiliations
- Binus University (ID)
- Corresponding author
- Arumsari, Putri
- ORCID
- Arumsari, Putri
- Venue
- IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2020-02-01
- Volume
- 426
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 012042
- ISSN
- 1755-1315 (ISSN-L)
- 1755-1307
- OpenAlex
- W3011344206
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 1.96
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Construction Engineering and Safety
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Construction Project Management and Performance
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › BIM and Construction Integration
- Keywords
- formwork installation, conventional formwork, construction cost analysis, construction time analysis, construction waste, high-rise building construction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
