The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The experimental measurement of the thermal emissivity of a black coating from 50 K to 300 K
Abstract
High-emissivity coatings are commonly applied in satellite detectors and large-scale cryogenic systems. Accurate and quick measurement of emissivity is in high demand for practical applications at cryogenic temperatures. In this paper, a method for the measurement of the total hemispherical emissivity from 50 K to 300 K was presented based on the static calorimetric method. A two-stage GM cryocooler was used as a cooling source in the measuring device without assumption of cryogenic liquids. The thermal emissivity of a black carbon coating was measured by monitoring temperatures timely in the device. The tested results exhibited good accordance with previous reports. This cryogenic measurement device has made it a strong candidate for the radiative heat dissipation at cryogenic temperatures. Design details of the experiment and measurement results will be presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The shift from liquid-cryogen baths to refrigeration-based cooling systems extends the lower limit of the measurable temperature range, enabling continuous emissivity testing across a broad temperature range.
“This transition not only eliminates the operational challenges and resource consumption associated with continuous cryogen replenishment but also extends the lower limit of the measurable temperature range, enabling continuous emissivity testing across a broad temperature range [59].”
From Thermal Radiation Testing Methods at Cryogenic Temperatures: A Review (2026) · cites this paper as [59]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Alekseev, 2019, Fusion Eng. Des., 146, 144, 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2018.12.002 · DOI
- Hanzelka, 2008, Cryogenics, 48, 455, 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2008.03.021 · DOI
- Králík, 2016, Metrologia, 53, 743, 10.1088/0026-1394/53/2/743 · DOI · Paper page
- Kralik, 2012, Phys. Rev. Lett., 109, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.224302 · DOI
- Tuttle, 2014, Cryogenics, 64, 240, 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2014.04.024 · DOI
- Tuttle, 2016, Cryogenics, 74, 166, 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2015.09.003 · DOI
- Wang, 2015, Nanoscale, 7, 7101, 10.1039/C5NR00719D · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thermal Radiation Testing Methods at Cryogenic Temperatures: A Review
Li, B., & Shen, F. (2026) · Cryo · doi:10.3390/cryo2010004 · Cited by 1
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, S. Y., Shen, F. Z., Liu, H. M., Huang, C. J., & Li, L. F.
- Venue
- IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2022-05-01
- Volume
- 1241
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 012053
- ISSN
- 1757-8981
- 1757-899X
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
