The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Method for measurement of emissivity and absorptivity of highly reflective surfaces from 20 K to room temperatures
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Kralik et al. reported that for chemically polished pure aluminum sheets (99.5% purity), emissivity at 20 K is less than one-quarter of its value at 320 K.
“For example, Kralik et al. [6] investigated the radiative characteristics of chemically polished pure aluminum sheets (99.5% purity) over the temperature range 20 K ≤ T ≤ 320 K, reporting that the emissivity at T = 20 K is less than one-quarter of its value at T = 320 K.”
From Thermal Radiation Testing Methods at Cryogenic Temperatures: A Review (2026) · cites this paper as [6]
Under cryogenic temperatures and high vacuum, convection and conduction are greatly suppressed or eliminated, leaving thermal radiation as the dominant heat exchange pathway.
“Under conditions of cryogenic temperatures and high vacuum, conventional heat transfer mechanisms such as convection and conduction are greatly suppressed or even completely eliminated, leaving thermal radiation as the dominant pathway for heat exchange [6,7].”
From Thermal Radiation Testing Methods at Cryogenic Temperatures: A Review (2026) · cites this paper as [6]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- 10.1007/978-1-4757-0244-6_57 · DOI
- Lienhard J H, 2005, A Heat Transfer Textbook
- 10.1007/BF00632430 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2004.11.010 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2007.02.001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2008.07.007 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0011-2275(82)90007-8 · DOI
- Woods S I, 2012, Metrologia, 49, 737, 10.1088/0026-1394/49/6/737 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2014.01.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1364/JOSA.67.000039 · DOI
- Giulietti D, 1981, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 14, 877, 10.1088/0022-3727/14/5/019 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4757-0489-1_32 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4684-3102-5_16 · DOI
- Ramanathan K G, 1952, Proc. Phys. Soc., 65, 532, 10.1088/0370-1298/65/7/308 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00628187 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2010.01.007 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4757-0489-1_31 · DOI
- Kralik T, 2004, Proc. 8th Cryogenics 2004 IIR Int. Conf., 23
- 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2008.03.021 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.3585985 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.224302 · DOI
- Siegel R, 2001, Thermal Radiation Heat Transfer
- 10.1007/978-1-4757-0549-2_29 · DOI
- 10.1364/AO.34.004755 · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-0-08-054721-3.50018-6 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thermal Radiation Testing Methods at Cryogenic Temperatures: A Review
Li, B., & Shen, F. (2026) · Cryo · doi:10.3390/cryo2010004 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Králík, T., Musilová, V., Hanzelka, P., & Frolec, J.
- Venue
- Metrologia
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2016-02-02
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 743-753
- ISSN
- 0026-1394
- 1681-7575
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 0
- Licence
- Funders
- Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports (MEYS) of the Czech Republic (LO1212)
- Czech Science Foundation (GA CR) (GA14-07397S)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
