Potential fatty acid composition of Hermetia illucens oil reared on different substrates.
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Hermetia illucens larvae (HiL) has been studied because of its capability to break down organic waste. HiL can convert waste biomass efficiently, that can be used as future feedstuffs. This study aimed to evaluate the fatty acids composition from HiL oil (HiLO) which reared on the different substrates. The experimental was compared of (1) HiL reared on palm kernel meal and (2) HiL reared on 80% industrial waste mix with 20% organic waste. The chemical composition of HiL measured base on the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC). The Hermetia illucens larvae oil (HiLO) was extracted according to the modification of the Soxhlet extraction procedure. Fatty acid compositions were analyzed using gas chromatography (GC). The data collected and analyzed as descriptive. The results of this study ether extract content of HiL (1) 51.46% higher than HiL (2), this is due to substrate types. Fatty acids of both are almost the same and the most dominant are lauric acid 40.54% and 46.72%, oleic acid 17.48% and 15.98%, palmitic acid 14.55% and 12.12% and myristic acid 15.57 and 11.13 %, respectively for each HiLO (1) and (2). The conclusion of this study is the HiL reared on different substrates affect lipid content but the fatty acid composition is similar.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Lauric acid concentration and synthesis in Hermetia illucens may undergo small variations according to substrate, development stage, extraction methods, killing method, and storage.
“LA concentration and synthesis may, however, undergo small variations according to the substrate used, to the shift from lipogenesis to glycogenesis related to the development stage, to the extraction methods, and the killing method and storage (Alifian et al., 2019; Caligiani et al., 2019; Rabani et al., 2019; Ewald et al., 2020; Kierończyk et al., 2020).”
From Insect Derived Lauric Acid as Promising Alternative Strategy to Antibiotics in the Antimicrobial Resistance Scenario (2021) · cites this paper as Alifian et al., 2019
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 9 · Cited by 24
- Authors
- Alifian, M. D., Sholikin, M. M., Evvyernie, D., & Nahrowi
- Affiliations
- IPB University (ID)
- Corresponding author
- Alifian, M D
- Venue
- IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2019-06-01
- Volume
- 546
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 062002
- ISSN
- 1757-8981 (ISSN-L)
- 1757-899X
- OpenAlex
- W2954053397
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 13.25
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Kementerian Riset, Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect Utilization and Effects
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Edible Oils Quality and Analysis
- Keywords
- Hermetia illucens, black soldier fly larvae, fatty acid composition, substrate type, palm kernel meal, industrial waste, organic waste, lauric acid, oleic acid, palmitic acid, myristic acid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
