Cited by 4Spacecraft and Cryogenic TechnologiesRocket and propulsion systems researchHeat transfer and supercritical fluids

Integrated refrigeration and storage of LNG for compositional stability

Open access
Rose, L, Swanger, A M, Notardonato, W U, Fesmire, J E, Gleeson, J, Carro, R·2020·IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering

Abstract

Growing interest in liquefied natural gas (LNG) as a rocket fuel necessitates a greater technical understanding of the compositional changes due to preferential boil-off (or weathering) that occurs during long duration storage. The purity of methane in LNG can range from 90 to 98%, and is subject to preferential boil-off due to its low boiling point compared to other constituents despite the use of high-performance thermal insulation systems. Active heat extraction (i.e. refrigeration) is required to completely eliminate weathering. For future operational safety and reliability, and to better understand the quality and efficiency of the LNG as a cryofuel, a 400-liter Cryostat vessel was designed and constructed to measure the composition and temperatures of the LNG at a number of different liquid levels over long durations. The vessel is the centerpiece of a custom-designed lab-scale integrated refrigeration and storage (IRaS) system employing a pulse tube cryocooler capable of roughly 50 W of lift at 100 K. Instrumentation includes ten temperature sensors mounted on a vertical rake and five liquid sample tubes corresponding to five liquid levels. Two modes of operation are studied. The first is without refrigeration in order to determine a baseline in the change in composition, and to study stratification of the LNG. The second is performed with the cryocooler active to determine the operational parameters of the IRaS system for eliminating the weathering as well as stratification effects in the bulk liquid. The apparatus design and test method, as well as preliminary test results are presented in this paper. As a bonus in cost-saving and operational efficiency, the capability of the IRaS system to provide zero-loss capabilities such as zero boil-off (ZBO) keeping of the LNG and zero-loss filling/transfer operations are also discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1757-899x/755/1/012003

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recently, the model's performance was compared against BOG data obtained for ternary mixtures of methane, ethane, and nitrogen using our apparatus and an LNG mixture used as rocket fuel conducted at Kennedy Space Centre (NASA).

    “Recently [86], the model's performance was compared against BOG data obtained for ternary mixtures of methane, ethane, and nitrogen using our apparatus [58] and an LNG mixture used as rocket fuel conducted at Kennedy Space Centre (NASA) [87].”

    From Modelling of Liquid Hydrogen Boil-Off (2022) · cites this paper as [87]

    The Introduction identifies a NASA Kennedy Space Center research program studying LNG as a potential rocket fuel. But the Discussion and future experimental investigations section says LNG had not yet been delivered and the first LNG boiloff test had not begun. This paper therefore does not provide the LNG boiloff data implied by the citation. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Swanger, A and Notardonato, W, 2019 Development of 400-L integrated refrigeration and storage Cryostat for LNG/LCH4 research, International Cryogenic Engineering Conf, Oxford UK
  2. Fesmire J, Johnson W, Meneghelli B and Coffman B 2015 Cylindrical boiloff calorimeters for testing of thermal insulations IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science & Engineering 101

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Modelling of Liquid Hydrogen Boil-Off

    Al Ghafri, S. Z. S., Swanger, A., Jusko, V., Siahvashi, A., Perez, F., Johns, M. L., & May, E. F. (2022) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en15031149 · Cited by 131 · see citing works

    “Comparison between the BoilFAST calculations (solid curves) and experimental data (symbols) obtained from a LH2 storage tank at NASA’s Glenn Research Centre.”
    MethodInfluentialSelf-citation

Authors
Rose, L., Swanger, A. M., Notardonato, W. U., Fesmire, J. E., Gleeson, J., & Carro, R.
Affiliations
Kennedy Space Center (US)
Corresponding author
Rose, L
Venue
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
Published
2020-03-01
Volume
755
Issue
1
Pages
012003
ISSN
  • 1757-8981 (ISSN-L)
  • 1757-899X
OpenAlex
W2965217107
Cited by
4
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.11
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Rocket and propulsion systems research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Heat transfer and supercritical fluids
Keywords
liquefied natural gas, rocket propellants, methane purity, cryostat, pulse tube refrigerator, zero boil-off, cryogenic storage

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review