Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 650

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

OVERVIEW OF THE KEPLER SCIENCE PROCESSING PIPELINE

Open access
Jenkins, Jon M., Caldwell, Douglas A., Chandrasekaran, Hema, Twicken, Joseph D., Bryson, Stephen T., Quintana, Elisa V., Clarke, Bruce D., Li, Jie, Allen, Christopher, Tenenbaum, Peter, Wu, Hayley, Klaus, Todd C., Middour, Christopher K., Cote, Miles T., McCauliff, Sean, Girouard, Forrest R., Gunter, Jay P., Wohler, Bill, Sommers, Jeneen, Hall, Jennifer R., Uddin, AKM K., Wu, Michael S., Bhavsar, Paresh A., Van Cleve, Jeffrey, Pletcher, David L., Dotson, Jessie A., Haas, Michael R., Gilliland, Ronald L., Koch, David G., Borucki, William J.·2010·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

The Kepler Mission Science Operations Center (SOC) performs several critical functions including managing the ∼156,000 target stars, associated target tables, science data compression tables and parameters, as well as processing the raw photometric data downlinked from the spacecraft each month. The raw data are first calibrated at the pixel level to correct for bias, smear induced by a shutterless readout, and other detector and electronic effects. A background sky flux is estimated from ∼4500 pixels on each of the 84 CCD readout channels, and simple aperture photometry is performed on an optimal aperture for each star. Ancillary engineering data and diagnostic information extracted from the science data are used to remove systematic errors in the flux time series that are correlated with these data prior to searching for signatures of transiting planets with a wavelet-based, adaptive matched filter. Stars with signatures exceeding 7.1σ are subjected to a suite of statistical tests including an examination of each star's centroid motion to reject false positives caused by background eclipsing binaries. Physical parameters for each planetary candidate are fitted to the transit signature, and signatures of additional transiting planets are sought in the residual light curve. The pipeline is operational, finding planetary signatures and providing robust eliminations of false positives.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/2041-8205/713/2/l87

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 650

Metadata

Authors
Jenkins, J. M., Caldwell, D. A., Chandrasekaran, H., Twicken, J. D., Bryson, S. T., Quintana, E. V., Clarke, B. D., Li, J., Allen, C., Tenenbaum, P., Wu, H., Klaus, T. C., Middour, C. K., Cote, M. T., McCauliff, S., Girouard, F. R., Gunter, J. P., Wohler, B., Sommers, J., Hall, J. R., Uddin, A. K., Wu, M. S., Bhavsar, P. A., Van Cleve, J., Pletcher, D. L., Dotson, J. A., Haas, M. R., Gilliland, R. L., Koch, D. G., & Borucki, W. J.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2010-03-30
Volume
713
Issue
2
Pages
L87-L91
ISSN
  • 2041-8205 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-8213
OpenAlex
W1993271579
Cited by
650
References
0
FWCI
37.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: OVERVIEW OF THE KEPLER SCIENCE PROCESSING PIPELINE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/2041-8205/713/2/l87
The paper
Jenkins, J. M., Caldwell, D. A., Chandrasekaran, H., Twicken, J. D., Bryson, S. T., Quintana, E. V., Clarke, B. D., Li, J., Allen, C., Tenenbaum, P., Wu, H., Klaus, T. C., Middour, C. K., Cote, M. T., McCauliff, S., Girouard, F. R., Gunter, J. P., Wohler, B., Sommers, J., . . . Borucki, W. J. (2010). OVERVIEW OF THE KEPLER SCIENCE PROCESSING PIPELINE. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/713/2/l87

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.