Cited by 71Astro and Planetary ScienceSpace Satellite Systems and ControlStellar, planetary, and galactic studies

PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND NON-KEPLERIAN ORBITAL MOTION OF “PROPELLER” MOONS EMBEDDED IN SATURN’S RINGS

Open access
Tiscareno, Matthew S., Burns, Joseph A., Sremčević, Miodrag, Beurle, Kevin, Hedman, Matthew M., Cooper, Nicholas J., Milano, Anthony J., Evans, Michael W. +3 more·2010·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We report the discovery of several large "propeller" moons in the outer part of Saturn's A ring, objects large enough to be followed over the 5 year duration of the Cassini mission. These are the first objects ever discovered that can be tracked as individual moons, but do not orbit in empty space. We infer sizes up to 1–2 km for the unseen moonlets at the center of the propeller-shaped structures, though many structural and photometric properties of propeller structures remain unclear. Finally, we demonstrate that some propellers undergo sustained non-Keplerian orbit motion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/2041-8205/718/2/l92

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous theoretical analyses of migration in Saturn's rings have concentrated on the non-Keplerian, radial motion of propeller moonlets within the A ring.

    “Previous theoretical analyses of migration in Saturn's rings have concentrated on the non-Keplerian, radial motion of propeller moonlets within the A ring (Tiscareno et al. 2010).”

    From MIGRATION OF SMALL MOONS IN SATURN's RINGS (2013) · cites this paper as Tiscareno et al. 2010

  • The rings contain many 0.1-1 km moonlets that could easily migrate through the disk.

    “Aside from countless centimeter-to meter-sized particles (e.g., Cuzzi et al. 2009), the rings contain many 0.1-1 km moonlets that could easily migrate through the disk (Tiscareno et al. 2010).”

    From MIGRATION OF SMALL MOONS IN SATURN's RINGS (2013) · cites this paper as Tiscareno et al. 2010

  • This motion may complicate interpretations of non-Keplerian motion of moonlets within the ring.

    “Aside from complicating the measurement of a moonlet's orbital elements within our simulations, this motion may complicate interpretations of non-Keplerian motion of moonlets within the ring (e.g., Blériot, Tiscareno et al. 2010).”

    From MIGRATION OF SMALL MOONS IN SATURN's RINGS (2013) · cites this paper as Tiscareno et al. 2010

  • At least one larger moonlet, Blériot, shows non-Keplerian motion, with a drift rate that varies in time.

    “At least one larger moonlet, Blériot, shows non-Keplerian motion (Tiscareno et al. 2010), with a drift rate that varies in time.”

    From MIGRATION OF SMALL MOONS IN SATURN's RINGS (2013) · cites this paper as Tiscareno et al. 2010

  • Moonlets have a range of sizes up to about r_H ∼ 1.5 km.

    “Moonlets have a range of sizes up to about r H ∼ 1.5 km (Tiscareno et al. 2008(Tiscareno et al. , 2010)).”

    From MIGRATION OF SMALL MOONS IN SATURN's RINGS (2013) · cites this paper as Tiscareno et al. 2010

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tiscareno, M. S., Burns, J. A., Sremčević, M., Beurle, K., Hedman, M. M., Cooper, N. J., Milano, A. J., Evans, M. W., Porco, C. C., Spitale, J. N., & Weiss, J. W.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • Queen Mary University of London (GB)
  • Space Science Institute (US)
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2010-07-08
Volume
718
Issue
2
Pages
L92-L96
ISSN
  • 2041-8205 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-8213
OpenAlex
W1995248533
Cited by
71
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal Letters (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX10AG67G, NNX08AQ72G)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Keywords
Saturn rings, moonlets, ring-moon interactions, ring structure, Cassini observations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review