The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THE LESSER ROLE OF STARBURSTS IN STAR FORMATION AT z = 2
Open accessAbstract
Two main modes of star formation are know to control the growth of galaxies: a relatively steady one in disk-like galaxies, defining a tight star formation rate (SFR)–stellar mass sequence, and a starburst mode in outliers to such a sequence which is generally interpreted as driven by merging. Such starburst galaxies are rare but have much higher SFRs, and it is of interest to establish the relative importance of these two modes. PACS/ Herschel observations over the whole COSMOS and GOODS-South fields, in conjunction with previous optical/near-IR data, have allowed us to accurately quantify for the first time the relative contribution of the two modes to the global SFR density in the redshift interval 1.5 < z < 2.5, i.e., at the cosmic peak of the star formation activity. The logarithmic distributions of galaxy SFRs at fixed stellar mass are well described by Gaussians, with starburst galaxies representing only a relatively minor deviation that becomes apparent for SFRs more than four times higher than on the main sequence. Such starburst galaxies represent only 2% of mass-selected star-forming galaxies and account for only 10% of the cosmic SFR density at z ∼ 2. Only when limited to SFR > 1000 M ☉ yr −1 , off-sequence sources significantly contribute to the SFR density (46% ± 20%). We conclude that merger-driven starbursts play a relatively minor role in the formation of stars in galaxies, whereas they may represent a critical phase toward the quenching of star formation and morphological transformation in galaxies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A HIGHLY CONSISTENT FRAMEWORK FOR THE EVOLUTION OF THE STAR-FORMING “MAIN SEQUENCE” FROM z ∼ 0-6
Speagle, J. S., Steinhardt, C. L., Capak, P. L., & Silverman, J. D. (2014) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/214/2/15 · Cited by 1,646
Physical Models of Galaxy Formation in a Cosmological Framework
Somerville, R. S., & Davé, R. (2015) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140951 · Cited by 1,442
Cool Gas in High-Redshift Galaxies
Carilli, C. L., & Walter, F. (2013) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140953 · Cited by 1,107
Lilly, S. J., Carollo, C. M., Pipino, A., Renzini, A., & Peng, Y. (2013) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/772/2/119 · Cited by 870
Self-citationDusty star-forming galaxies at high redshift
Casey, C. M., Narayanan, D., & Cooray, A. (2014) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.02.009 · Cited by 800
Metadata
- Authors
- Rodighiero, G., Daddi, E., Baronchelli, I., Cimatti, A., Renzini, A., Aussel, H., Popesso, P., Lutz, D., Andreani, P., Berta, S., Cava, A., Elbaz, D., Feltre, A., Fontana, A., Förster Schreiber, N. M., Franceschini, A., Genzel, R., Grazian, A., Gruppioni, C., Ilbert, O., Le Floch, E., Magdis, G., Magliocchetti, M., Magnelli, B., Maiolino, R., McCracken, H., Nordon, R., Poglitsch, A., Santini, P., Pozzi, F., Riguccini, L., Tacconi, L. J., Wuyts, S., & Zamorani, G.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2011-09-02
- Volume
- 739
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- L40
- ISSN
- 2041-8205 (ISSN-L)
- 2041-8213
- OpenAlex
- W1997662069
- Cited by
- 861
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 34.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE LESSER ROLE OF STARBURSTS IN STAR FORMATION AT z = 2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/2041-8205/739/2/l40
- The paper
- Rodighiero, G., Daddi, E., Baronchelli, I., Cimatti, A., Renzini, A., Aussel, H., Popesso, P., Lutz, D., Andreani, P., Berta, S., Cava, A., Elbaz, D., Feltre, A., Fontana, A., Förster Schreiber, N. M., Franceschini, A., Genzel, R., Grazian, A., Gruppioni, C., . . . Zamorani, G. (2011). THE LESSER ROLE OF STARBURSTS IN STAR FORMATION AT z = 2. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/739/2/l40
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.