Cited by 193Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstrophysics and Star Formation StudiesAstronomy and Astrophysical Research

ON THE AGE AND BINARITY OF FOMALHAUT

Open access
Mamajek, Eric E.·2012·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

The nearby ( d = 7.7 pc) A3V star Fomalhaut is orbited by a resolved dusty debris disk and a controversial candidate extrasolar planet. The commonly cited age for the system (200 ± 100 Myr) from Barrado y Navascues et al. relied on a combination of isochronal age plus youth indicators for the K4V common proper-motion system TW PsA. TW PsA is 1 96 away from Fomalhaut and was first proposed as a companion by Luyten, but the physicality of the binarity is worth testing with modern data. I demonstrate that TW PsA is unequivocally a physical stellar companion to Fomalhaut, with true separation 0.280 +0.019 − 0.012 pc (57.4 +3.9 − 2.5 kAU) and sharing velocities within 0.1 ± 0.5 km s −1 —consistent with being a bound system. Hence, TW PsA should be considered "Fomalhaut B." Combining modern H-R diagram constraints with four sets of evolutionary tracks, and assuming the star was born with protosolar composition, I estimate a new isochronal age for Fomalhaut of 450 ± 40 Myr and mass of 1.92 ± 0.02 M ☉ . Various stellar youth diagnostics are re-examined for TW PsA. The star's rotation, X-ray emission, and Li abundances are consistent with approximate ages of 410, 380, and 360 Myr, respectively, yielding a weighted mean age of 400 ± 70 Myr. Combining the independent ages, I estimate a mean age for the Fomalhaut–TW PsA binary of 440 ± 40 Myr. The older age implies that substellar companions of a given mass are approximately 1 mag fainter at IR wavelengths than previously assumed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/2041-8205/754/2/l20

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mamajek, E. E.
Affiliations
Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory (CL)
Corresponding author
Mamajek, Eric E.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2012-07-10
Volume
754
Issue
2
Pages
L20
ISSN
  • 2041-8205 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-8213
OpenAlex
W2073535101
Cited by
193
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 2
FWCI
10.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal Letters (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
Keywords
Fomalhaut, stellar ages, binary stars, stellar companions, debris disks, isochronal ages, lithium abundance, X-ray emission, stellar rotation, evolutionary tracks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review