The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE SIZE-VIRIAL RADIUS RELATION OF GALAXIES
Open accessAbstract
I use the abundance matching ansatz, which has proven to be successful in reproducing galaxy clustering and other statistics, to derive estimates of the virial radius, R 200 , for galaxies of different morphological types and a wide range of stellar masses. I show that over eight orders of magnitude in stellar mass galaxies of all morphological types follow an approximately linear relation between half-mass radius of their stellar distribution, r 1/2 , and virial radius, r 1/2 ≈ 0.015 R 200 , with scatter of ≈0.2 dex. Such scaling is in remarkable agreement with the expectation of models that assume that galaxy sizes are controlled by halo angular momentum, r 1/2 ∝λ R 200 , where λ is the spin of galaxy parent halo. The scatter about the relation is comparable with the scatter expected from the distribution of λ. Moreover, I show that when the stellar and gas surface density profiles of galaxies of different morphological types are rescaled by the radius r n = 0.015 R 200 , the rescaled profiles follow approximately universal exponential (for late types) and de Vaucouleurs (for early types) form with scatter of only ≈30%–50% at R ≈ 1–3 r n . Remarkably, both late- and early-type galaxies have similar mean stellar surface density profiles at R ≳ 1 r n . The main difference between their stellar distributions is thus at R < r n . The results of this study imply that galaxy sizes and radial distribution of baryons are shaped primarily by properties of their parent halos and that the sizes of both late-type disks and early-type spheroids are controlled by halo angular momentum.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Galactic Stellar and Substellar Initial Mass Function
Chabrier, G. (2003) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific · doi:10.1086/376392 · Cited by 9,071
SEVEN-YEAR WILKINSON MICROWAVE ANISOTROPY PROBE(WMAP) OBSERVATIONS: COSMOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION
Komatsu, E., Smith, K. M., Dunkley, J., Bennett, C. L., Gold, B., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Larson, D., Nolta, M. R., Page, L., et al. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/2/18 · Cited by 8,802
The formation of galactic discs
Mo, H. J., Mao, S., & White, S. D. M. (1998) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01227.x · Cited by 2,155
THE STAR FORMATION EFFICIENCY IN NEARBY GALAXIES: MEASURING WHERE GAS FORMS STARS EFFECTIVELY
Leroy, A. K., Walter, F., Brinks, E., Bigiel, F., de Blok, W. J. G., Madore, B., & Thornley, M. D. (2008) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2782 · Cited by 1,919
Toward a Halo Mass Function for Precision Cosmology: The Limits of Universality
Tinker, J., Kravtsov, A. V., Klypin, A., Abazajian, K., Warren, M., Yepes, G., Gottlöber, S., & Holz, D. E. (2008) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/591439 · Cited by 1,819
Self-citationFormation and rotation of disc galaxies with haloes
Fall, S. M., & Efstathiou, G. (1980) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/193.2.189 · Cited by 1,238
A COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS OF UNCERTAINTIES AFFECTING THE STELLAR MASS-HALO MASS RELATION FOR 0 <z< 4
Behroozi, P. S., Conroy, C., & Wechsler, R. H. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/717/1/379 · Cited by 1,002
DARK MATTER HALOS IN THE STANDARD COSMOLOGICAL MODEL: RESULTS FROM THE BOLSHOI SIMULATION
Klypin, A. A., Trujillo-Gomez, S., & Primack, J. (2011) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/740/2/102 · Cited by 953
The Dark Side of the Halo Occupation Distribution
Kravtsov, A. V., Berlind, A. A., Wechsler, R. H., Klypin, A. A., Gottlober, S., Allgood, B., & Primack, J. R. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/420959 · Cited by 927
Self-citationModeling Luminosity‐dependent Galaxy Clustering through Cosmic Time
Conroy, C., Wechsler, R. H., & Kravtsov, A. V. (2006) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/503602 · Cited by 793
Self-citation
Cited by
MORPHOLOGIES OF ∼190,000 GALAXIES AT z = 0–10 REVEALED WITH HST LEGACY DATA. I. SIZE EVOLUTION
Shibuya, T., Ouchi, M., & Harikane, Y. (2015) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1088/0067-0049/219/2/15 · Cited by 426
A unified model for galactic discs: star formation, turbulence driving, and mass transport
Krumholz, M. R., Burkhart, B., Forbes, J. C., & Crocker, R. M. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sty852 · Cited by 319
Dark matter cores all the way down
Read, J. I., Agertz, O., & Collins, M. L. M. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw713 · Cited by 318
Stellar Mass—Halo Mass Relation and Star Formation Efficiency in High-Mass Halos
Kravtsov, A. V., Vikhlinin, A. A., & Meshcheryakov, A. V. (2018) · Astronomy Letters · doi:10.1134/s1063773717120015 · Cited by 311
Self-citationA precise extragalactic test of General Relativity
Collett, T. E., Oldham, L. J., Smith, R. J., Auger, M. W., Westfall, K. B., Bacon, D., Nichol, R. C., Masters, K. L., Koyama, K., & van den Bosch, R. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aao2469 · Cited by 157
Metadata
- Authors
- Kravtsov, A. V.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2013-02-08
- Volume
- 764
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- L31
- ISSN
- 2041-8205 (ISSN-L)
- 2041-8213
- OpenAlex
- W2008953099
- Cited by
- 342
- References
- 37
- FWCI
- 12.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE SIZE-VIRIAL RADIUS RELATION OF GALAXIES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/2041-8205/764/2/l31
- The paper
- Kravtsov, A. V. (2013). THE SIZE-VIRIAL RADIUS RELATION OF GALAXIES. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/764/2/l31
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.