The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The formation of galactic discs
Open accessAbstract
We study the population of galactic discs expected in current hierarchical clustering models for structure formation. A rotationally supported disc with exponential surface density profile is assumed to form with a mass and angular momentum which are fixed fractions of those of its surrounding dark halo. We assume that haloes respond adiabatically to disc formation, and that only stable discs can correspond to real systems. With these assumptions the predicted population can match both present-day discs and the damped Lyα absorbers in QSO spectra. Good agreement is found provided that: (i) the masses of discs are a few per cent of those of their haloes; (ii) the specific angular momenta of discs are similar to those of their haloes; (iii) present-day discs were assembled recently (at z ≤ 1). In particular, the observed scatter in the size—rotation velocity plane is reproduced, as are the slope and scatter of the Tully—Fisher (TF) relation. The zero-point of the TF relation is matched for a stellar mass-to-light ratio of 1 to 2 h in the I-band, consistent with observational values derived from disc dynamics. High-redshift discs are predicted to be small and dense, and could plausibly merge together to form the observed population of elliptical galaxies. In many (but not all) currently popular cosmogonies, discs with rotation velocities exceeding 200 km s−1 can account for a third or more of the observed damped Lyα systems at z ∼ 2.5. Half of the lines of sight to such systems are predicted to intersect the absorber at r ≳ 3 h−1 kpc and about 10 per cent at r > 10 h−1 kpc. The cross-section for absorption is strongly weighted towards discs with large angular momentum and therefore large size for their mass. The galaxy population associated with damped absorbers should thus be biased towards low surface brightness systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Simulating galaxy formation with the IllustrisTNG model
Pillepich, A., Springel, V., Nelson, D., Genel, S., Naiman, J., Pakmor, R., Hernquist, L., Torrey, P., Vogelsberger, M., Weinberger, R., et al. (2018) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2656 · Cited by 2,007
Cole, S., Lacey, C. G., Baugh, C. M., & Frenk, C. S. (2002) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03879.x · Cited by 1,952
Galactic star formation and accretion histories from matching galaxies to dark matter haloes
Moster, B. P., Naab, T., & White, S. D. M. (2013) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/sts261 · Cited by 1,431
Self-citationClustering of galaxies in a hierarchical universe -- I. Methods and results at z = 0
Kauffmann, G., Colberg, J. M., Diaferio, A., & White, S. D. M. (1999) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02202.x · Cited by 965
Self-citationDutton, A. A., & Macciò, A. V. (2014) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu742 · Cited by 958
Metadata
- Authors
- Mo, H. J., Mao, S., & White, S. D. M.
- Venue
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-04-01
- Volume
- 295
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 319-336
- ISSN
- 0035-8711 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2966
- OpenAlex
- W2170924363
- Cited by
- 2,155
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 44.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The formation of galactic discs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01227.x
- The paper
- Mo, H. J., Mao, S., & White, S. D. M. (1998). The formation of galactic discs. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01227.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.