Cited by 665Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstro and Planetary ScienceSpace Science and Extraterrestrial Life

THE MASS-RADIUS RELATION FOR 65 EXOPLANETS SMALLER THAN 4 EARTH RADII

Open access
Weiss, Lauren M., Marcy, Geoffrey W.·2014·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We study the masses and radii of 65 exoplanets smaller than 4 R ⊕ with orbital periods shorter than 100 days. We calculate the weighted mean densities of planets in bins of 0.5 R ⊕ and identify a density maximum of 7.6 g cm −3 at 1.4 R ⊕ . On average, planets with radii up to R P = 1.5 R ⊕ increase in density with increasing radius. Above 1.5 R ⊕ , the average planet density rapidly decreases with increasing radius, indicating that these planets have a large fraction of volatiles by volume overlying a rocky core. Including the solar system terrestrial planets with the exoplanets below 1.5 R ⊕ , we find ρ P = 2.43 + 3.39( R P / R ⊕ ) g cm −3 for R P < 1.5 R ⊕ , which is consistent with rocky compositions. For 1.5 ⩽ R P / R ⊕ < 4, we find M P / M ⊕ = 2.69( R P / R ⊕ ) 0.93 . The rms of planet masses to the fit between 1.5 and 4 R ⊕ is 4.3 M ⊕ with reduced χ 2 = 6.2. The large scatter indicates a diversity in planet composition at a given radius. The compositional diversity can be due to planets of a given volume (as determined by their large H/He envelopes) containing rocky cores of different masses or compositions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/2041-8205/783/1/l6

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For a mass range between 5 and 10 M, exoplanets follow an approximate power law R ∝ (M/M)^0.55, suggesting radii of 2.4 and 3.5 R, respectively.

    “For a mass range between 5 and 10 M , exoplanets follow an approximate power law where R R ( M = M ) 0 : 55 , suggesting radii of 2 : 4 and 3 : 5 R , respectively (Weiss and Marcy, 2014).”

    From The planet nine hypothesis (2019) · cites this paper as Weiss and Marcy, 2014

  • Analyses of mass-radius relationships suggest a break point around 1.7 Earth radii (~5 Earth masses); above that size, increasingly larger planets have a composition increasingly dominated by H2/He gas.

    “The analyses of these relationships suggest a “break point” around 1.7 Earth radii (∼5 Earth masses); above that size, increasingly larger planets have a composition that is increasingly dominated by H2/He gas.”

    From The Astrobiology Primer v2.0 (2016) · cites this paper as Weiss and Marcy, 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weiss, L. M., & Marcy, G. W.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2014-02-13
Volume
783
Issue
1
Pages
L6
ISSN
  • 2041-8205 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-8213
OpenAlex
W1967414563
Cited by
665
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 114 · 2017: 81 · 2016: 72 · 2015: 54 · 2014: 35
FWCI
43.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal Letters (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
Keywords
mass-radius relation, exoplanets, super-Earths, planet density, planetary composition, rocky core, terrestrial planets, compositional diversity, hot Jupiters

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review