Cited by 6Paranormal Experiences and BeliefsBiofield Effects and BiophysicsPhilosophy and Theoretical Science

Comment on: ‘Experimental indications of non-classical brain function’ 2022 Journal of Physics Communications 6 105001

Open access
Warren, Warren S·2023·Journal of Physics Communications

Abstract

Abstract A recent paper in this journal presents magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data on humans which are asserted to ‘suggest that we may have witnessed entanglement mediated by consciousness-related brain functions. Those brain functions must then operate non-classically, which would mean that consciousness is non-classical.’ Unfortunately, the article provides no evidence to justify this claim. In fact, the paper only provides evidence for what we already knew: the brain (and any other living tissue) is complex, multicompartmental, and imprecisely characterized by MRI.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/2399-6528/acc4a8

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Warren, W. S.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Warren, Warren S
Venue
Journal of Physics Communications
Published
2023-03-01
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
038001
ISSN
2399-6528 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4360874959
Cited by
5
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Physics Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biofield Effects and Biophysics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Keywords
consciousness, quantum entanglement, magnetic resonance imaging, brain complexity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review