The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Testing for Differentially-Expressed Genes by Maximum-Likelihood Analysis of Microarray Data
Abstract
Although two-color fluorescent DNA microarrays are now standard equipment in many molecular biology laboratories, methods for identifying differentially expressed genes in microarray data are still evolving. Here, we report a refined test for differentially expressed genes which does not rely on gene expression ratios but directly compares a series of repeated measurements of the two dye intensities for each gene. This test uses a statistical model to describe multiplicative and additive errors influencing an array experiment, where model parameters are estimated from observed intensities for all genes using the method of maximum likelihood. A generalized likelihood ratio test is performed for each gene to determine whether, under the model, these intensities are significantly different. We use this method to identify significant differences in gene expression among yeast cells growing in galactose-stimulating versus non-stimulating conditions and compare our results with current approaches for identifying differentially-expressed genes. The effect of sample size on parameter optimization is also explored, as is the use of the error model to compare the within- and between-slide intensity variation intrinsic to an array experiment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A N EW A PPROACH TO D ECODING L IFE : Systems Biology
Ideker, T., Galitski, T., & Hood, L. (2001) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genom.2.1.343 · Cited by 1,664
Self-citation
Cited by
A distinct lineage of CD4 T cells regulates tissue inflammation by producing interleukin 17
Park, H., Li, Z., Yang, X. O., Chang, S. H., Nurieva, R., Wang, Y.-H., Wang, Y., Hood, L., Zhu, Z., Tian, Q., et al. (2005) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni1261 · Cited by 4,265
Self-citationIntegrated Genomic and Proteomic Analyses of a Systematically Perturbed Metabolic Network
Ideker, T., Thorsson, V., Ranish, J. A., Christmas, R., Buhler, J., Eng, J. K., Bumgarner, R., Goodlett, D. R., Aebersold, R., & Hood, L. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.292.5518.929 · Cited by 2,050
Self-citationMicroarray data normalization and transformation
Quackenbush, J. (2002) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1032 · Cited by 1,975
A N EW A PPROACH TO D ECODING L IFE : Systems Biology
Ideker, T., Galitski, T., & Hood, L. (2001) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genom.2.1.343 · Cited by 1,664
Self-citationDiscovering regulatory and signalling circuits in molecular interaction networks
Ideker, T., Ozier, O., Schwikowski, B., & Siegel, A. F. (2002) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/18.suppl_1.s233 · Cited by 1,197
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ideker, T., Thorsson, V., Siegel, A. F., & Hood, L. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Computational Biology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 805-817
- ISSN
- 1066-5277 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-8666
- OpenAlex
- W2019655981
- Cited by
- 327
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Testing for Differentially-Expressed Genes by Maximum-Likelihood Analysis of Microarray Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/10665270050514945
- The paper
- Ideker, T., Thorsson, V., Siegel, A. F., & Hood, L. E. (2000). Testing for Differentially-Expressed Genes by Maximum-Likelihood Analysis of Microarray Data. Journal of Computational Biology. https://doi.org/10.1089/10665270050514945
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.