The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Predicting CNS Permeability of Drug Molecules: Comparison of Neural Network and Support Vector Machine Algorithms
Abstract
Two different machine-learning algorithms have been used to predict the blood-brain barrier permeability of different classes of molecules, to develop a method to predict the ability of drug compounds to penetrate the CNS. The first algorithm is based on a multilayer perceptron neural network and the second algorithm uses a support vector machine. Both algorithms are trained on an identical data set consisting of 179 CNS active molecules and 145 CNS inactive molecules. The training parameters include molecular weight, lipophilicity, hydrogen bonding, and other variables that govern the ability of a molecule to diffuse through a membrane. The results show that the support vector machine outperforms the neural network. Based on over 30 different validation sets, the SVM can predict up to 96% of the molecules correctly, averaging 81.5% over 30 test sets, which comprised of equal numbers of CNS positive and negative molecules. This is quite favorable when compared with the neural network's average performance of 75.7% with the same 30 test sets. The results of the SVM algorithm are very encouraging and suggest that a classification tool like this one will prove to be a valuable prediction approach.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Can We Learn To Distinguish between “Drug-like” and “Nondrug-like” Molecules?
Ajay, Walters, W. P., & Murcko, M. A. (1998) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm970666c · Cited by 484
Cited by
Ancelin, M. L., Artero, S., Portet, F., Dupuy, A.-M., Touchon, J., & Ritchie, K. (2006) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38740.439664.de · Cited by 589
How not to develop a quantitative structure–activity or structure–property relationship (QSAR/QSPR)
Dearden, J. C., Cronin, M. T. D., & Kaiser, K. L. E. (2009) · SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research · doi:10.1080/10629360902949567 · Cited by 468
Vatansever, S., Schlessinger, A., Wacker, D., Kaniskan, H. Ü., Jin, J., Zhou, M., & Zhang, B. (2021) · Medicinal Research Reviews · doi:10.1002/med.21764 · Cited by 429
A microarray analysis of sexual dimorphism of adipose tissues in high-fat-diet-induced obese mice
Grove, K. L., Fried, S. K., Greenberg, A. S., Xiao, X. Q., & Clegg, D. J. (2010) · International Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1038/ijo.2010.12 · Cited by 208
Improved Classification of Blood-Brain-Barrier Drugs Using Deep Learning
Miao, R., Xia, L.-Y., Chen, H.-H., Huang, H.-H., & Liang, Y. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-44773-4 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Doniger, S., Hofmann, T., & Yeh, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Computational Biology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-12
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 849-864
- ISSN
- 1066-5277 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-8666
- OpenAlex
- W1987202142
- Cited by
- 161
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting CNS Permeability of Drug Molecules: Comparison of Neural Network and Support Vector Machine Algorithms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/10665270260518317
- The paper
- Doniger, S., Hofmann, T., & Yeh, J. (2002). Predicting CNS Permeability of Drug Molecules: Comparison of Neural Network and Support Vector Machine Algorithms. Journal of Computational Biology. https://doi.org/10.1089/10665270260518317
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.