The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Engineered Bone Development from a Pre-Osteoblast Cell Line on Three-Dimensional Scaffolds
Abstract
Bone regeneration is based on the hypothesis that healthy progenitor cells, either recruited or delivered to an injured site, can ultimately regenerate lost or damaged tissue. Three-dimensional porous polymer scaffolds may enhance bone regeneration by creating and maintaining a space that facilitates progenitor cell migration, proliferation, and differentiation. As an initial step to test this possibility, osteogenic cells were cultured on scaffolds fabricated from biodegradable polymers, and bone development on these scaffolds was evaluated. Porous polymer scaffolds were fabricated from biodegradable polymers of lactide and glycolide. MC3T3-E1 cells were statically seeded onto the polymer scaffolds and cultured in vitro in the presence of ascorbic acid and beta-glycerol phosphate. The cells proliferated during the first 4 weeks in culture and formed a space-filling tissue. Collagen messenger RNA levels remained high in these cells throughout the time in culture, which is consistent with an observed increase in collagen deposition on the polymer scaffold. Mineralization of the deposited collagen was initially observed at 4 weeks and subsequently increased. The onset of mineralization corresponded to increased mRNA levels for two osteoblast-specific genes: osteocalcin and bone sialoprotein. Culture of cell/polymer constructs for 12 weeks led to formation of a three-dimensional tissue with architecture similar to that of native bone. These studies demonstrate that osteoblasts within a three-dimensional engineered tissue follow the classic differentiation pathway described for two-dimensional culture. Polymer scaffolds such as these may ultimately be used clinically to enhance bone regeneration by delivering or recruiting progenitor cells to the wound site.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Collagen for bone tissue regeneration
Ferreira, A. M., Gentile, P., Chiono, V., & Ciardelli, G. (2012) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2012.06.014 · Cited by 938
Adipose-derived adult stromal cells heal critical-size mouse calvarial defects
Cowan, C. M., Shi, Y.-Y., Aalami, O. O., Chou, Y.-F., Mari, C., Thomas, R., Quarto, N., Contag, C. H., Wu, B., & Longaker, M. T. (2004) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt958 · Cited by 914
Bone Cell Proliferation on Carbon Nanotubes
Zanello, L. P., Zhao, B., Hu, H., & Haddon, R. C. (2006) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl051861e · Cited by 654
Cell-laden hydrogels for osteochondral and cartilage tissue engineering
Yang, J., Zhang, Y. S., Yue, K., & Khademhosseini, A. (2017) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2017.01.036 · Cited by 652
How smart do biomaterials need to be? A translational science and clinical point of view
Holzapfel, B. M., Reichert, J. C., Schantz, J.-T., Gbureck, U., Rackwitz, L., Nöth, U., Jakob, F., Rudert, M., Groll, J., & Hutmacher, D. W. (2013) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.07.009 · Cited by 552
Metadata
- Authors
- Shea, L. D., Wang, D., Franceschi, R. T., & Mooney, D. J.
- Venue
- Tissue Engineering
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 605-617
- ISSN
- 1076-3279 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-8690
- OpenAlex
- W2033391292
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Engineered Bone Development from a Pre-Osteoblast Cell Line on Three-Dimensional Scaffolds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/10763270050199550
- The paper
- Shea, L. D., Wang, D., Franceschi, R. T., & Mooney, D. J. (2000). Engineered Bone Development from a Pre-Osteoblast Cell Line on Three-Dimensional Scaffolds. Tissue Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1089/10763270050199550
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.