The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Scaffold Design and in Vitro Study of Osteochondral Coculture in a Three-Dimensional Porous Polycaprolactone Scaffold Fabricated by Fused Deposition Modeling
Abstract
Tissue engineering offers an alternative method that can overcome some of the existing drawbacks of current articular defect repair methods because articular cartilage has a limited capacity to respond to injury. The solution may lie in the design of a three-dimensional load-bearing scaffold. Here we describe the tissue engineering of an osteochondral construct by coculturing osteogenic cells and chondrogenic cells on a three-dimensional load-bearing bioresorbable polymer scaffold. Porous polycaprolactone scaffolds were designed and fabricated via fused deposition modeling. Osteogenic cells were seeded and precultured in one-half of the partitioned scaffolds. Chondrogenic cells were later seeded into the other half. The cell-seeded scaffolds were cultured in a coculture medium. Both cell types proliferated, migrated, linked in their scaffold compartments, and integrated at the interface. Osteoblasts and chondrocytes produced different extracellular matrices in each scaffold compartment. Mineralized nodules deposited in the osteogenic cell seeded compartment. High osteocalcin was detected in precultured osteogenic cell supernatant and high alkaline phosphatase was detected in the coculture supernatant of osteochondral constructs. This study suggests that a tissue-engineered osteochondral construct with a three-dimensional polycaprolactone scaffold has the potential for osteochondral defect repair.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
3D printing of ceramics: A review
Chen, Z., Li, Z., Li, J., Liu, C., Lao, C., Fu, Y., Liu, C., Li, Y., Wang, P., & He, Y. (2019) · Journal of the European Ceramic Society · doi:10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2018.11.013 · Cited by 2,109
Three-Dimensional Cell Culture Matrices: State of the Art
Lee, J., Cuddihy, M. J., & Kotov, N. A. (2008) · Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews · doi:10.1089/teb.2007.0150 · Cited by 1,047
Current trends in the design of scaffolds for computer-aided tissue engineering
Giannitelli, S. M., Accoto, D., Trombetta, M., & Rainer, A. (2014) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2013.10.024 · Cited by 451
Spoerk, M., Holzer, C., & Gonzalez‐Gutierrez, J. (2020) · Journal of Applied Polymer Science · doi:10.1002/app.48545 · Cited by 317
Design of artificial extracellular matrices for tissue engineering
Kim, B.-S., Park, I.-K., Hoshiba, T., Jiang, H.-L., Choi, Y.-J., Akaike, T., & Cho, C.-S. (2011) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.10.001 · Cited by 296
Metadata
- Authors
- Cao, T., Ho, K.-H., & Teoh, S.-H.
- Venue
- Tissue Engineering
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-08-30
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- supplement 1
- Pages
- 103-112
- ISSN
- 1076-3279 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-8690
- OpenAlex
- W2005022866
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Scaffold Design and in Vitro Study of Osteochondral Coculture in a Three-Dimensional Porous Polycaprolactone Scaffold Fabricated by Fused Deposition Modeling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/10763270360697012
- The paper
- Cao, T., Ho, K.-H., & Teoh, S.-H. (2003). Scaffold Design and in Vitro Study of Osteochondral Coculture in a Three-Dimensional Porous Polycaprolactone Scaffold Fabricated by Fused Deposition Modeling. Tissue Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1089/10763270360697012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.