The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mechanical Properties and Cellular Proliferation of Electrospun Collagen Type II
Abstract
A suitable technique for articular cartilage repair and replacement is necessitated by inadequacies of current methods. Electrospinning has potential in cartilage repair by producing scaffolds with fiber diameters in the range of native extracellular matrix. Chondrocytes seeded onto such scaffolds may prefer this environment for differentiation and proliferation, thus approaching functional cartilage replacement tissue. Scaffolds of collagen type II were created by an electrospinning technique. Individual scaffold specimens were prepared and evaluated as uncross-linked, cross-linked, or crosslinked/seeded. Uncross-linked scaffolds contained a minimum and average fiber diameter of 70 and 496 nm, respectively, whereas cross-linked scaffolds possessed diameters of 140 nm and 1.46 microm. The average thickness for uncross-linked scaffolds was 0.20 +/- 0.02 mm and 0.52 +/- 0.07 mm for cross-linked scaffolds. Uniaxial tensile tests of uncross-linked scaffolds revealed an average tangent modulus, ultimate tensile strength, and ultimate strain of 172.5 +/- 36.1 MPa, 3.3 +/- 0.3 MPa, and 0.026 +/- 0.005 mm/mm, respectively. Scanning electron microscopy of cross-linked scaffolds cultured with chondrocytes demonstrated the ability of the cells to infiltrate the scaffold surface and interior. Electrospun collagen type II scaffolds produce a suitable environment for chondrocyte growth, which potentially establishes the foundation for the development of articular cartilage repair.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
How does the extracellular matrix direct gene expression?
Bissell, M. J., Hall, H. G., & Parry, G. (1982) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(82)90388-5 · Cited by 1,522
Cited by
Nanofibers and their applications in tissue engineering
Vasita, R., & Katti, D. S. (2006) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/nano.2006.1.1.15 · Cited by 988
Application of Collagen Scaffold in Tissue Engineering: Recent Advances and New Perspectives
Dong, C., & Lv, Y. (2016) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym8020042 · Cited by 851
Lowery, J. L., Datta, N., & Rutledge, G. C. (2010) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.09.072 · Cited by 448
Design Challenges in Polymeric Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering
Echeverria Molina, M. I., Malollari, K. G., & Komvopoulos, K. (2021) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2021.617141 · Cited by 397
A review on fabrication of nanofibers via electrospinning and their applications
Islam, M. S., Ang, B. C., Andriyana, A., & Afifi, A. M. (2019) · SN Applied Sciences · doi:10.1007/s42452-019-1288-4 · Cited by 386
Metadata
- Authors
- Shields, K. J., Beckman, M. J., Bowlin, G. L., & Wayne, J. S.
- Venue
- Tissue Engineering
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-09-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1510-1517
- ISSN
- 1076-3279 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992424154
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mechanical Properties and Cellular Proliferation of Electrospun Collagen Type II. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/1076327042500373
- The paper
- Shields, K. J., Beckman, M. J., Bowlin, G. L., & Wayne, J. S. (2004). Mechanical Properties and Cellular Proliferation of Electrospun Collagen Type II. Tissue Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1089/1076327042500373
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.