Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 383

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predictors of Depression and Life Satisfaction Among Spousal Caregivers in Hospice: Application of a Stress Process Model

Haley, William E., LaMonde, Laurie A., Han, Beth, Burton, Allison M., Schonwetter, Ronald·2003·Journal of Palliative Medicine

Abstract

Using a stress process model, risk factors (caregiving stressors, caregiver health, and negative social interactions) and protective factors (caregiving appraisals and social resources) were examined as predictors of family caregiver well-being (depression and life satisfaction). Eighty spousal caregivers of hospice patients with dementia or lung cancer completed structured interviews and self-report measures assessing components of the stress process model. Results suggest that objective measures of patient impairment or amount of care provided are not strong predictors of caregiver depression or life satisfaction. Female gender, caregiver health problems, and negative social interactions were risk factors for poorer caregiver well-being. Caregivers who subjectively appraised caregiving tasks as less stressful, who found meaning and subjective benefits from caregiving, and with more social resources had lower depression and higher life satisfaction, even after controlling for patient impairment and caregiver appraisal variables. Regression models accounted for 42% of variance in caregiver depression and 52% of variance in caregiver life satisfaction. Counseling for hospice family caregivers could utilize the stress process framework, and pay particular attention to finding meaning or subjective benefits from caregiving, and remaining active in social roles. Further research providing evidence on caregiver risk and protective factors could improve the conceptual and empirical basis for psychosocial interventions for hospice family caregivers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/109662103764978461

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 48 references

Cited by

See all 383

Metadata

Authors
Haley, W. E., LaMonde, L. A., Han, B., Burton, A. M., & Schonwetter, R.
Venue
Journal of Palliative Medicine
Published
2003-04
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
215-224
ISSN
  • 1096-6218 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7740
OpenAlex
W2075413590
Cited by
383
References
48
FWCI
8.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predictors of Depression and Life Satisfaction Among Spousal Caregivers in Hospice: Application of a Stress Process Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/109662103764978461
The paper
Haley, W. E., LaMonde, L. A., Han, B., Burton, A. M., & Schonwetter, R. (2003). Predictors of Depression and Life Satisfaction Among Spousal Caregivers in Hospice: Application of a Stress Process Model. Journal of Palliative Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1089/109662103764978461

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.