The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identification of a Novel Family of Sequence Repeats among Prokaryotes
Abstract
The rapid increase in genomic sequences provides new opportunities for comparative genomics. In this report, we describe a novel family of repeat sequences that is present in Bacteria and Archaea but not in Eukarya . The repeat loci typically consisted of repetitive stretches of nucleotides with a length of 25 to 37 bp alternated by nonrepetitive DNA spacers of approximately equal size as the repeats. The nucleotide sequences and the size of the repeats were highly conserved within a species, but between species the sequences showed no similarity. Due to their characteristic structure, we have designated this family of repeat loci as SPacers Interspersed Direct Repeats (SPIDR). The SPIDR loci were identified in more than forty different prokaryotic species. Individual species such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis contain one SPIDR locus, while other species such as Methanococcus jannaschii contained up to 20 different loci. The number of repeats in a locus varies greatly from two repeats to several dozens of repeats. The SPIDR loci were flanked by a common 300-500-bp leader sequence, which appeared to be conserved within a species but not between species. The SPIDR locus of M. tuberculosis is extensively used for strain typing. The finding of SPIDR loci in other prokaryotes, including the pathogens Salmonella , Campylobacter , and Pasteurella may extend this surveillance to other species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Short-sequence DNA repeats in prokaryotic genomes
van Belkum, A., Scherer, S., van Alphen, L., & Verbrugh, H. (1998) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.62.2.275-293.1998 · Cited by 737
Cited by
CRISPRFinder: a web tool to identify clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats
Grissa, I., Vergnaud, G., & Pourcel, C. (2007) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkm360 · Cited by 1,875
CRISPR-Cas Systems in Bacteria and Archaea: Versatile Small RNAs for Adaptive Defense and Regulation
Bhaya, D., Davison, M., & Barrangou, R. (2011) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev-genet-110410-132430 · Cited by 914
Sorek, R., Kunin, V., & Hugenholtz, P. (2008) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1793 · Cited by 907
Grissa, I., Vergnaud, G., & Pourcel, C. (2007) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-8-172 · Cited by 888
Semenova, E., Jore, M. M., Datsenko, K. A., Semenova, A., Westra, E. R., Wanner, B., van der Oost, J., Brouns, S. J. J., & Severinov, K. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1104144108 · Cited by 726
Metadata
- Authors
- Jansen, R., van Embden, J. D. A., Gaastra, W., & Schouls, L. M.
- Venue
- OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 23-33
- ISSN
- 1536-2310 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-8100
- OpenAlex
- W1495583714
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of a Novel Family of Sequence Repeats among Prokaryotes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/15362310252780816
- The paper
- Jansen, R., van Embden, J. D. A., Gaastra, W., & Schouls, L. M. (2002). Identification of a Novel Family of Sequence Repeats among Prokaryotes. OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology. https://doi.org/10.1089/15362310252780816
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.