The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Use of Multiple Assay Endpoints to Investigate the Effects of Incubation Time, Dose of Toxin, and Plating Density in Cell-Based Cytotoxicity Assays
Abstract
Here we show the results of comparing cell viability, cytotoxicity, and apoptosis assays for measuring the time- and dose-dependent toxic effects of tamoxifen on HepG2 cells. The quantitation of adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP), 5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4,5- dimethylthiazolyl)-3-(4-sulfophenyl) tetrazolium, inner salt (MTS) tetrazolium reduction, and resazurin reduction methods used to estimate the number of viable cells all showed a similar trend of decreased cell viability after longer periods of tamoxifen exposure to HepG2 cells. The release of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) as a marker for cells with a compromised membrane and the increase in caspase-3/7 activity as a marker for apoptosis were both shown to increase using the same tamoxifen exposure conditions that caused a decrease in HepG2 cell viability. The longer the duration of exposure of tamoxifen, the lower the concentration required to kill or induce apoptosis in HepG2 cells. In contrast, there was no change in LDH release from HL-60 cells using conditions of vinblastine treatment that caused an increase in caspase activity and a decrease in ATP content, suggesting a difference in the mechanism of cell death between the two model systems. Both the density of parent stock cultures used as a source of cells to prepare assay plates and the density of cells per well in the assay plates were demonstrated to be factors than can influence the apparent potency of a toxin in viability, toxicity, and apoptosis assays. These results illustrate the importance of understanding the kinetics and mechanism of cell death of each in vitro model system as prerequisites for choosing the most appropriate assay method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Benachour, N., & Séralini, G.-E. (2009) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/tx800218n · Cited by 428
The xCELLigence System for Real-Time and Label-Free Monitoring of Cell Viability
Ke, N., Wang, X., Xu, X., & Abassi, Y. A. (2011) · Methods in Molecular Biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-61779-108-6_6 · Cited by 411
Biocompatibility of nanomaterials and their immunological properties
Kyriakides, T. R., Raj, A., Tseng, T. H., Xiao, H., Nguyen, R., Mohammed, F. S., Halder, S., Xu, M., Wu, M. J., Bao, S., et al. (2021) · Biomedical Materials · doi:10.1088/1748-605x/abe5fa · Cited by 389
Organs-on-chips: breaking the in vitro impasse
Meer, A. D. V. D., & Berg, A. V. D. (2012) · Integrative Biology · doi:10.1039/c2ib00176d · Cited by 314
Fey, S. J., & Wrzesinski, K. (2012) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfs122 · Cited by 188
Metadata
- Authors
- Riss, T. L., & Moravec, R. A.
- Venue
- ASSAY and Drug Development Technologies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-02
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-62
- ISSN
- 1540-658X (ISSN-L)
- 1557-8127
- OpenAlex
- W2129046210
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of Multiple Assay Endpoints to Investigate the Effects of Incubation Time, Dose of Toxin, and Plating Density in Cell-Based Cytotoxicity Assays. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/154065804322966315
- The paper
- Riss, T. L., & Moravec, R. A. (2004). Use of Multiple Assay Endpoints to Investigate the Effects of Incubation Time, Dose of Toxin, and Plating Density in Cell-Based Cytotoxicity Assays. ASSAY and Drug Development Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1089/154065804322966315
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.