CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 452Chronic Disease Management StrategiesPrimary Care and Health OutcomesPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Finding Common Ground: Patient-Centeredness and Evidence-Based Chronic Illness Care

Wagner, Edward H., Bennett, Susan M., Austin, Brian T., Greene, Sarah M., Schaefer, Judith K., Vonkorff, Michael·2005·The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine
DOI 10.1089/acm.2005.11.s-7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Health outcomes for patients with major chronic illnesses depend on the appropriate use of proven pharmaceuticals and other therapeutic technologies, and effective self-management by patients. Effective chronic illness care then bases clinical decisions on the best, rigorous scientific evidence, or evidence-based medicine. Effective support for patient self-management includes efforts to increase patient participation in care and collaborative goal-setting and planning of treatment. These interventions appear somewhat consistent with recent conceptualizations of patient-centered care. The consistent delivery of proven therapies and information and support for self-management requires practice systems organized for that purpose. The Chronic Care Model is a compilation of those practice system changes shown to improve chronic care. This paper explores the concept of patient-centeredness and its relationship to the Chronic Care Model. We conclude that the Model is both evidence-based and patient-centered and that these can be properties of health systems, and not just of individual practitioners.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/acm.2005.11.s-7

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 61 references

1 of the 61 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Wagner EH, 1996, Man Care Q, 4, 12
  2. Wagner EH, 1998, Eff Clin Pract, 1, 2
  3. McWhinney IR, 1995, CA: Sage Publications, 1
  4. Wagner E, 1999, Man Care Q, 7, 56
  5. Gibson PG, 2003, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 1, D001117
  6. Wagner EH, 2001, Jt Comm J Qual Improv, 27, 63
  7. Lynn J, 2000, Jt Comm J Qual Improv, 26, 254
  8. Stewart MA, 1995, CMAJ, 152, 1423
  9. Stewart M, 2000, J Fam Pract, 49, 796

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 452

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Wagner, E. H., Bennett, S. M., Austin, B. T., Greene, S. M., Schaefer, J. K., & Vonkorff, M.
Affiliations
Group Health Cooperative (US)
ORCID
Venue
The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2005-12
Volume
11
Issue
supplement 1
Pages
s-7-s-15
ISSN
  • 1075-5535 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7708
DOI
10.1089/acm.2005.11.s-7
OpenAlex
W2036006098
Cited by
452
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 39
FWCI
1.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
patient-centered care, Chronic Care Model, evidence-based medicine, chronic disease, self-management, patient participation, collaborative goal setting, health system organization
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Health Education, Health Promotion, Humans, Patient Care Planning, Patient Participation, Quality of Health Care, United States, Models, Organizational, Patient-Centered Care, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review