Cited by 2,748Psychometric Methodologies and TestingHealth Education and ValidationPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): Conceptualizing and Measuring Activation in Patients and Consumers

Open access
Hibbard, Judith H., Stockard, Jean, Mahoney, Eldon R., Tusler, Martin·2004·Health Services Research

Abstract

Background. Controlling costs and achieving health care quality improvements require the participation of activated and informed consumers and patients. Objectives. We describe a process for conceptualizing and operationalizing what it means to be “activated” and delineate the process we used to develop a measure for assessing “activation,” and the psychometric properties of that measure. Methods. We used the convergence of the findings from a national expert consensus panel and patient focus groups to define the concept and identify the domains of activation. These domains were operationalized by constructing a large item pool. Items were pilot‐tested and initial psychometric analysis performed using Rasch methodology. The third stage refined and extended the measure. The fourth stage used a national probability sample to assess the measure's psychometric performance overall and within different subpopulations. Study Sample. Convenience samples of patients with and without chronic illness, and a national probability sample ( N =1,515) are included at different stages in the research. Conclusions. The Patient Activation Measure is a valid, highly reliable, unidimensional, probabilistic Guttman‐like scale that reflects a developmental model of activation. Activation appears to involve four stages: (1) believing the patient role is important, (2) having the confidence and knowledge necessary to take action, (3) actually taking action to maintain and improve one's health, and (4) staying the course even under stress. The measure has good psychometric properties indicating that it can be used at the individual patient level to tailor intervention and assess changes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00269.x

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Patient Activation Measure (PAM) is a validated measure of patient activation that includes a person's beliefs, motivation, and actions for self-care.

    “Participants also completed the 10-question Patient Activation Measure (PAM), a validated measure of patient activation that includes person’s beliefs, motivation, and actions for self-care at these visits [9,23,24].”

    From Effectiveness of Digital Medicines to Improve Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Uncontrolled Hypertension and Type 2 Diabetes: Prospective, Open-Label, Cluster-Randomized Pilot Clinical Trial (2017) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Conclusions describe PAM as a valid measure of activation encompassing beliefs, confidence, and action to manage health. However, the Methods report validation of a 22-item PAM, not the 10-question version participants completed; this source does not establish that version’s validity. The indexed passages do not provide page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Bandura A. Self-efficacy Mechanism in Physiological Activation and Health-Promoting Behavior. In: Madden J, Matthysse S, Barchas J, editors. Adaption, Learning and Affect. New York: Raven Press; 1991. pp. 226–69. [Google Scholar]
  2. Glasgow RE. Seattle, Washington: Paper present at the Congress on Improving Chronic Care: Innovations in Research and Practice; 2002. Technology and Chronic Care; pp. 8–10. September. [Google Scholar]
  3. Linacre JM. Winsteps Manual. Chicago: Winsteps; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  4. Smith RM. Polytomous Mean-Square Fit Statistics. Rasch Measurement Transactions. 1996;10(3):516–7. [Google Scholar]
  5. Winsteps. Winsteps: Rasch Model Statistical Software. Chicago: Winsteps; 2002. [Google Scholar]
  6. Wright BD, Stone MH. Best Test Design. Chicago: Mesa Press; 1979. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hibbard, J. H., Stockard, J., Mahoney, E. R., & Tusler, M.
Affiliations
University of Oregon (US)
Corresponding author
Hibbard, Judith H.
Venue
Health Services Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-06-28
Volume
39
Issue
4p1
Pages
1005-1026
ISSN
  • 0017-9124 (ISSN-L)
  • 1475-6773
OpenAlex
W1926404136
Cited by
2,748
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 136 · 2025: 217 · 2024: 227 · 2023: 203 · 2022: 233 · 2021: 235 · 2020: 184 · 2019: 182 · 2018: 186 · 2017: 172 · 2016: 172 · 2015: 147 · 2014: 114 · 2013: 88 · 2012: 65
FWCI
18.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Services Research (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scholars' Bank (University of Oregon) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Education › Health Education and Validation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
Patient Activation Measure, patient activation, psychometric validation, Rasch analysis, scale development, chronic disease, health behavior change, healthcare quality improvement
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Patient Education as Topic, Patient Participation, Pilot Projects, Primary Prevention, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Time Factors, United States, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review