Cited by 170HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsMedication Adherence and ComplianceHIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk

Positive Provider Interactions, Adherence Self-Efficacy, and Adherence to Antiretroviral Medications Among HIV-Infected Adults: A Mediation Model

Open access
Johnson, Mallory O., Chesney, Margaret A., Goldstein, Rise B., Remien, Robert H., Catz, Sheryl, Gore-Felton, Cheryl, Charlebois, Edwin, Morin, Stephen F. +1 more·2006·AIDS Patient Care and STDs

Abstract

Adherence to antiretroviral (ARV) therapy for HIV infection is critical for maximum benefit from treatment and for the prevention of HIV-related complications. There is evidence that many factors determine medication adherence, including adherence self-efficacy (confidence in one's ability to adhere) and relations with health care providers. However, there are no studies that examine how these two factors relate to each other and their subsequent influence on HIV medication adherence. The goal of the current analysis was to explore a model of medication adherence in which the relationship between positive provider interactions and adherence is mediated by adherence self-efficacy. Computerized self-administered and interviewer-administered self reported measures of medication adherence, demographic and treatment variables, provider interactions, and adherence self-efficacy were administered to 2765 HIV-infected adults on ARV. Criteria for mediation were met, supporting a model in which adherence self-efficacy is the mechanism for the relationship between positive provider interactions and adherence. The finding was consistent when the sample was stratified by gender, race, injection drug use history, and whether the participant reported receipt of HIV specialty care. Positive provider interactions may foster greater adherence self-efficacy, which is associated with better adherence to medications. Results suggest implications for improving provider interactions in clinical care, and future directions for clarifying interrelationships among provider interactions, adherence self-efficacy, and medication adherence are supported.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/apc.2006.20.258

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [1]Chesney MA, et al. Adherence: a necessity for successful HIV combination therapy. AIDS. 1999;13(Suppl A3):S271–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. [14]Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. xiii. Prentice-Hall, Inc; Englewood Cliffs, NJ, US: 1986. p. 617. [Google Scholar]
  3. [44]Wilson IB, Kaplan S. Physician-patient communication in HIV disease: the importance of patient, physician, and visit characteristics. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2000;25:417–25. doi: 10.1097/00042560-200012150-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] · DOI
  4. [48]CDC HIV/AIDS surveillance report: Midyear 2001 edition. MMWR CDC Surveillance Summaries. 2001;13(1) [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnson, M. O., Chesney, M. A., Goldstein, R. B., Remien, R. H., Catz, S., Gore-Felton, C., Charlebois, E., Morin, S. F., & NIMH Healthy Living Project Team
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Center for Community Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
  • New York State Psychiatric Institute (US)
  • Group Health Cooperative (US)
  • Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
Venue
AIDS Patient Care and STDs
Published
2006-04
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
258-268
ISSN
  • 1087-2914 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7449
OpenAlex
W1988785595
Cited by
170
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 12
FWCI
6.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AIDS Patient Care and STDs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (P30-MH43520, P30 MH57226, K08-MH01995, U10MH057615, U10MH057636, U10MH057616, U10 MH 57615, K08MH001995, U10-MH57616, U10MH057631, U10- MH57631, U10-MH57636, P30MH058107, P30MH062246, P30MH043520)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
Keywords
HIV, antiretroviral therapy, medication adherence, adherence self-efficacy, provider-patient interaction, mediation model, intravenous drug use, gender differences, racial differences
MeSH terms
Adult, Communication, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Physician-Patient Relations, HIV Infections, Negotiating, Anti-HIV Agents, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review