Space Radiation Dosimetry at the Exposure Facility of the International Space Station for the Tanpopo Mission
Open accessAbstract
Radiation dosimetry was carried out at the exposure facility (EF) and the pressurized module (PM) of the Japanese Kibo module installed in the International Space Station as one study on environmental monitoring for the Tanpopo mission. Three exposure panels and three references including biological and organic samples and luminescence dosimeters were launched to obtain data for different exposure durations during 3 years from May 2015 to July 2018. The dosimeters were equipped with additional shielding materials (0.55, 2.95, and 6.23 g/cm 2 mass thickness). The relative dose variation, as a function of shielding mass thickness, was observed and compared with Monte Carlo simulations with respect to galactic cosmic rays (GCRs) and typical solar energetic particles (SEPs). The mean annual dose rates were D EF = 231 ± 5 mGy/year at the EF and D PM = 82 ± 1 mGy/year at the PM during the 3 years. The PM is well shielded, and the GCR simulation indicated that the measured mean dose reduction ratio inside the module ( D PM / D EF = 0.35) required ∼26 g/cm 2 additional shielding mass thickness. Observed points of the dose reduction tendency could be explained by the energy ranges of protons (10–100 MeV), where the protons passed through, or were absorbed in, the shielding materials of different mass thickness that surrounded dosimeters.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The average dose received by astronauts inside the ISS is around 0.5-1 mSv/day.
“For example, the average dose received by astronauts inside the ISS is around 0.5–1 mSv/day37”
From Towards sustainable human space exploration—priorities for radiation research to quantify and mitigate radiation risks (2023) · cites this paper as [37]
Cites
Measurements of energetic particle radiation in transit to Mars on the Mars Science Laboratory
Zeitlin, C., Hassler, D. M., Cucinotta, F. A., Ehresmann, B., Wimmer-Schweingruber, R. F., Brinza, D. E., Kang, S., Weigle, G., Böttcher, S., Böhm, E., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1235989 · Cited by 641 · cited 2× · see citing works
“On the planned Lunar Orbital Platform Gateway (Crusan et al., 2018) and on future missions to Mars and deep space, space crews will be exposed to much higher space radiation levels due to the longer flight durations and smaller shielding parameters.”
Space radiation protection: Destination Mars
Durante, M. (2014) · Life Sciences in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.lssr.2014.01.002 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
First measurements of the radiation dose on the lunar surface
Zhang, S., Wimmer-Schweingruber, R. F., Yu, J., Wang, C., Fu, Q., Zou, Y., Sun, Y., Wang, C., Hou, D., Böttcher, S. I., et al. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaz1334 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Reitz, G., Berger, T., Bilski, P., Facius, R., Hajek, M., Petrov, V., Puchalska, M., Zhou, D., Bossler, J., Akatov, Y., et al. (2009) · Radiation Research · doi:10.1667/rr1559.1 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Self-citationShavers, M. R., Zapp, N., Barber, R. E., Wilson, J. W., Qualls, G., Toupes, L., Ramsey, S., Vinci, V., Smith, G., & Cucinotta, F. A. (2004) · Advances in Space Research · doi:10.1016/j.asr.2003.10.051 · Cited by 116 · cited 1× · see citing works
“As countermeasures, shielding with hydrogen-enriched materials (Wilson et al., 1997; Shavers et al., 2004; Zeitlin et al., 2005; Durante, 2014; Kodaira et al., 2014) and carbon fiber composites for a spacecraft (Naito et al., 2020b) and utilization of lava tubes on the lunar surface (Naito et al.,…”
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fogtman, A., Baatout, S., Baselet, B., Berger, T., Hellweg, C. E., Jiggens, P., La Tessa, C., Narici, L., Nieminen, P., Sabatier, L., et al. (2023) · npj Microgravity · doi:10.1038/s41526-023-00262-7 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kodaira, S., Naito, M., Uchihori, Y., Hashimoto, H., Yano, H., & Yamagishi, A.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology (JP)
- Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JP)
- Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Kodaira, Satoshi
- Venue
- Astrobiology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-12
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1473-1478
- ISSN
- 1531-1074 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-8070
- OpenAlex
- W3189699347
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 3.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Astrobiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- QST-Repository (National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Spaceflight effects on biology
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
- Keywords
- space radiation dosimetry, International Space Station, Kibo module, Tanpopo mission, pressurized modules, galactic cosmic rays, solar energetic particles, Monte Carlo simulation, annual dose rate, organic samples
- MeSH terms
- Cosmic Radiation, Radiation Dosage, Radiometry, Space Flight, Spacecraft
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review