Cited by 27Radiation Therapy and DosimetrySpaceflight effects on biologySpacecraft Design and Technology

Space Radiation Dosimetry at the Exposure Facility of the International Space Station for the Tanpopo Mission

Open access
Kodaira, Satoshi, Naito, Masayuki, Uchihori, Yukio, Hashimoto, Hirofumi, Yano, Hajime, Yamagishi, Akihiko·2021·Astrobiology

Abstract

Radiation dosimetry was carried out at the exposure facility (EF) and the pressurized module (PM) of the Japanese Kibo module installed in the International Space Station as one study on environmental monitoring for the Tanpopo mission. Three exposure panels and three references including biological and organic samples and luminescence dosimeters were launched to obtain data for different exposure durations during 3 years from May 2015 to July 2018. The dosimeters were equipped with additional shielding materials (0.55, 2.95, and 6.23 g/cm 2 mass thickness). The relative dose variation, as a function of shielding mass thickness, was observed and compared with Monte Carlo simulations with respect to galactic cosmic rays (GCRs) and typical solar energetic particles (SEPs). The mean annual dose rates were D EF = 231 ± 5 mGy/year at the EF and D PM = 82 ± 1 mGy/year at the PM during the 3 years. The PM is well shielded, and the GCR simulation indicated that the measured mean dose reduction ratio inside the module ( D PM / D EF = 0.35) required ∼26 g/cm 2 additional shielding mass thickness. Observed points of the dose reduction tendency could be explained by the energy ranges of protons (10–100 MeV), where the protons passed through, or were absorbed in, the shielding materials of different mass thickness that surrounded dosimeters.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/ast.2020.2427

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kodaira, S., Naito, M., Uchihori, Y., Hashimoto, H., Yano, H., & Yamagishi, A.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology (JP)
  • Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JP)
  • Tokyo University of Pharmacy and Life Sciences (JP)
Corresponding author
Kodaira, Satoshi
Venue
Astrobiology
Published
2021-12
Volume
21
Issue
12
Pages
1473-1478
ISSN
  • 1531-1074 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8070
OpenAlex
W3189699347
Cited by
27
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
3.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Astrobiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • QST-Repository (National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Spaceflight effects on biology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
Keywords
space radiation dosimetry, International Space Station, Kibo module, Tanpopo mission, pressurized modules, galactic cosmic rays, solar energetic particles, Monte Carlo simulation, annual dose rate, organic samples
MeSH terms
Cosmic Radiation, Radiation Dosage, Radiometry, Space Flight, Spacecraft

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review