Cited by 87Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchNausea and vomiting managementPoisoning and overdose treatments

Cannabinoid Hyperemesis Syndrome: A Review of Potential Mechanisms

Open access
DeVuono, Marieka V., Parker, Linda A.·2020·Cannabis & Cannabinoid Research

Abstract

Introduction: Cannabinoids have long been known for their ability to treat nausea and vomiting. Recent reports, however, have highlighted the paradoxical proemetic effects of cannabinoids. Cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome (CHS) is characterized by cyclical episodes of nausea and vomiting, accompanied by abdominal pain following prolonged, high-dose cannabis use, which is alleviated by hot baths and showers. Little is known about the cause of this syndrome. Discussion: Cannabinoids produce a biphasic effect on nausea and vomiting, with low doses having an antiemetic effect and high doses producing emesis. Presentation and treatment of CHS are similar to cyclical vomiting syndrome as well as chemotherapy-related anticipatory nausea and vomiting, suggesting that these phenomena may share mechanisms. The prevalence of CHS is not known because of the symptomatic overlap with other disorders and the lack of knowledge of the syndrome by the public and physicians. Treatment with typical antiemetic drugs is ineffective for CHS, but anxiolytic and sedative drugs, along with hot showers, seem to be consistently effective at reducing symptoms. The only known way to permanently end CHS, however, is abstinence from cannabinoids. Case studies and limited pre-clinical data on CHS indicate that prolonged high doses of the main psychotropic compound in cannabis, Δ 9 -tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), result in changes to the endocannabinoid system by acting on the cannabinoid 1 (CB 1 ) receptor. These endocannabinoid system changes can dysregulate stress and anxiety responses, thermoregulation, the transient receptor potential vanilloid system, and several neurotransmitters systems, and are thus potential candidates for mediating the pathophysiology of CHS. Conclusions: Excessive cannabinoid administration disrupts the normal functioning of the endocannabinoid system, which may cause CHS. More clinical and pre-clinical research is needed to fully understand the underlying pathophysiology of this disorder and the negative consequences of prolonged high-dose cannabis use.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/can.2019.0059

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DeVuono, M. V., & Parker, L. A.
Affiliations
University of Guelph (CA)
Corresponding author
Parker, Linda A.
Venue
Cannabis & Cannabinoid Research
Published
2020-06-01
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
132-144
ISSN
  • 2378-8763 (ISSN-L)
  • 2578-5125
OpenAlex
W3006451015
Cited by
87
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4
FWCI
5.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nausea and vomiting management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Poisoning and overdose treatments
Keywords
cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome, cannabis use, tetrahydrocannabinol, endocannabinoid system, cannabinoid 1 receptor, nausea and vomiting, hot showers, anxiolytic treatment, cyclic vomiting syndrome, anticipatory nausea and vomiting, TRPV1, pathophysiology, cannabis abstinence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review