Adverse Events in Medication Treatment-Naïve Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Results from a Small, Controlled Trial of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the type, frequency, duration, and severity of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of the prodrug lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) in children with and without previous exposure to stimulant medication in the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHODS: This single-blind, modified laboratory school study used open-label, dose optimization of children aged 6-12 years. LDX, initiated at 30 mg, was dose titrated in 20 mg increments to a possible 70 mg over 4-5 weeks. Safety was assessed using adverse effects and LDX levels. RESULTS: Twenty-eight subjects enrolled in the study, with 27 safety protocol completers (n=14 previous stimulant exposure; n=13 stimulant naïve). The stimulant-naïve group reported more trouble sleeping, stomach pain, and hyperfocus, but only previous-exposure subjects experienced dizziness. Previous-exposure subjects showed trends of more decreased appetite, less talkativeness, and less lip sucking. There were no differences in the mean duration of TEAEs. The epidemiological method of percent person-weeks applied to ADHD treatment offers a novel approach to interpreting the pattern of TEAEs. CONCLUSION: LDX reduced the core symptoms of ADHD with more severe adverse events in stimulant-naïve than previous-exposure subjects. Future controlled studies with larger samples should address the impact of previous stimulant exposure on other ADHD treatments.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In Wigal et al small 4-week open-label trial, the duration of treatment emergent adverse events was similar between stimulant-naïve and stimulant-exposed children, but the stimulant-naïve group reported more adverse events including difficulty sleeping, abdominal pain, and hyperfocus.
“While the duration of the treatment emergent adverse events experienced in both groups was similar, the stimulant-naïve group reported more adverse events, including difficulty sleeping, abdominal pain, and “hyperfocus”.”
From Update on optimal use of lisdexamfetamine in the treatment of ADHD (2013) · cites this paper as [23]
Cites
Pliszka, S. (2007) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/chi.0b013e318054e724 · Cited by 1,765 · see citing works
Effects of Stimulant Medication on Growth Rates Across 3 Years in the MTA Follow-up
SWANSON, J. M., ELLIOTT, G. R., GREENHILL, L. L., WIGAL, T., ARNOLD, L. E., VITIELLO, B., HECHTMAN, L., EPSTEIN, J. N., PELHAM, W. E., ABIKOFF, H. B., et al. (2007) · Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/chi.0b013e3180686d7e · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Self-citationAbsorption of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate and its enzymatic conversion to d-amphetamine
Pennick (2010) · Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment · doi:10.2147/ndt.s9749 · Cited by 170 · cited 1× · see citing works
“1), which provides its therapeutic effect (Pennick 2010).”
the 311 Study Group, Wigal, S. B., Kollins, S. H., Childress, A. C., & Squires, L. (2009) · Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health · doi:10.1186/1753-2000-3-17 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Self-citationWigal, S. B., Kollins, S. H., Childress, A. C., & Adeyi, B. (2010) · Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health · doi:10.1186/1753-2000-4-32 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
ADHD Treatments, Sleep, and Sleep Problems: Complex Associations
Stein, M. A., Weiss, M., & Hlavaty, L. (2012) · Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1007/s13311-012-0130-0 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Stimulant medications and sleep for youth with ADHD: a meta-analysis
Kidwell, K. M., Van Dyk, T. R., Lundahl, A., & Nelson, T. D. (2015) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2015-1708 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Update on optimal use of lisdexamfetamine in the treatment of ADHD
Madaan, V., Kolli, V., Bestha, D., & Shah, M. (2013) · Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment · doi:10.2147/ndt.s34092 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wigal, S. B., Wong, A. A., Jun, A., Stehli, A., Steinberg-Epstein, R., & Lerner, M. A.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-04
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 149-156
- ISSN
- 1044-5463 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-8992
- OpenAlex
- W2030534188
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Food and Drug Administration
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Pharmaceutical studies and practices
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
- Keywords
- lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, children, treatment-emergent adverse events, stimulant medication, dose titration, sleep disorders, hyperfocus, drug safety
- MeSH terms
- Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Dextroamphetamine, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Humans, Male, Single-Blind Method
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review