Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder in a Community Mental Health Clinic: Prevalence, Comorbidity and Correlates
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: The revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed. (DSM-5) added a new diagnosis of disruptive mood dysregulation disorder (DMDD) to depressive disorders. This study examines the prevalence, comorbidity, and correlates of the new disorder, with a particular focus on its overlap with oppositional defiant disorder (ODD), with which DMDD shares core symptoms. METHODS: Data were obtained from 597 youth 6-18 years of age who participated in a systematic assessment of symptoms offered to all intakes at a community mental health center (sample accrued from July 2003 to March 2008). Assessment included diagnostic, symptomatic, and functional measures. DMDD was diagnosed using a post-hoc definition from item-level ratings on the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children that closely matches the DSM-5 definition. Caregivers rated youth on the Child Behavior Checklist. RESULTS: Approximately 31% of youth met the operational definition of DMDD, and 40% had Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed. (DSM-IV) diagnoses of ODD. Youth with DMDD almost always had ODD (odds ratio [OR] = 53.84) and displayed higher rates of comorbidity with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and conduct disorder than youth without DMDD. Caregivers of youth with DMDD reported more symptoms of aggressive behavior, rule-breaking, social problems, anxiety/depression, attention problems, and thought problems than all other youth without DMDD. Compared with youth with ODD, youth with DMDD were not significantly different in terms of categorical or dimensional approaches to comorbidity and impairment. CONCLUSIONS: The new diagnosis of DMDD might be common in community mental health clinics. Youth with DMDD displayed more severe symptoms and poorer functioning than youth without DMDD. However, DMDD almost entirely overlaps with ODD and youth with DMDD were not significantly different than youth with ODD. These findings raise concerns about the potentially confusing effects of using DMDD in clinical settings, particularly given that DSM-5 groups DMDD with depressive disorders, but ODD remains a disruptive behavior disorder, potentially changing the decision-making framework that clinicians use to select treatments.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies in clinical and community samples have found that 70-100% of children with DMDD have symptoms that meet the diagnostic requirements for ODD.
“Studies in clinical and community samples have found that 70-100% of children with DMDD have symptoms that meet the diagnostic requirements for ODD 77,79-82 , suggesting that the irritability and behavioural symptom dimensions of ODD are not separable into different disorders 31,78 .”
From An organization‐ and category‐level comparison of diagnostic requirements for mental disorders in <scp>ICD</scp> ‐11 and <scp>DSM</scp> ‐5 (2021) · cites this paper as [82]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
A Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS)
Shaffer, D. (1983) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1983.01790100074010 · Cited by 3,716 · see citing works
Establishment of Diagnostic Validity in Psychiatric Illness: Its Application to Schizophrenia
ROBINS, E., & GUZE, S. B. (1970) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.126.7.983 · Cited by 2,243 · see citing works
Regier, D. A., Narrow, W. E., Clarke, D. E., Kraemer, H. C., Kuramoto, S. J., Kuhl, E. A., & Kupfer, D. J. (2013) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12070999 · Cited by 1,163 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The lack of a robust definition might have contributed to only chance levels of agreement for a youth being diagnosed with DMDD by outpatient clinicians during the DSM-5 field trial (Regier et al. 2013).”
BackgroundPrevalence, Comorbidity, and Correlates of DSM-5 Proposed Disruptive Mood Dysregulation Disorder
Copeland, W. E., Angold, A., Costello, E. J., & Egger, H. (2013) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2012.12010132 · Cited by 391 · see citing works
Axelson, D. A., Birmaher, B., Findling, R. L., Fristad, M. A., Kowatch, R. A., Youngstrom, E. A., Arnold, L. E., Goldstein, B. I., Goldstein, T. R., Chang, K. D., et al. (2011) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.4088/jcp.10com06220 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Taylor E: Diagnostic classification: Current dilemmas and possible solutions In: Skuse D, Burce H, Dowdney L, Mrazek D, eds, Child Psychology and Psychiatry: Frameworks for Practice (2nd Ed). Hoboken, NJ, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2011; pp. 223-228.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
First, M. B., Gaebel, W., Maj, M., Stein, D. J., Kogan, C. S., Saunders, J. B., Poznyak, V. B., Gureje, O., Lewis‐Fernández, R., Maercker, A., et al. (2021) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20825 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
- Authors
- Freeman, A. J., Youngstrom, E. A., Youngstrom, J. K., & Findling, R. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Freeman, Andrew J.
- Venue
- Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-03
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 123-130
- ISSN
- 1044-5463 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-8992
- PMC
- PMC4800380
- OpenAlex
- W2273697863
- Cited by
- 84
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 5
- FWCI
- 13.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Keywords
- disruptive mood dysregulation disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, DSM-5, comorbidities, prevalence, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, conduct disorder, aggression, rule violations, social problems, anxiety and depression, functional disability, youth, community mental health centers
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Community Mental Health Centers, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Irritable Mood, Male, Comorbidity, Prevalence, Conduct Disorder, Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders, Mood Disorders, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Checklist
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review