Human-artificial intelligence symbiotic reporting for theranostic cancer care
Abstract
Reporting of diagnostic nuclear images in clinical cancer management is generally qualitative. Theranostic treatment with 177 Lu radioligands for prostate cancer and neuroendocrine tumors is routinely given as the same arbitrary fixed administered activity to every patient. Nuclear oncology, as currently practiced with 177 Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen and 177 Lu peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, cannot, therefore, be characterized as personalized precision medicine. The evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) could change this "one-size-fits-all" approach to theranostics, through development of a symbiotic relationship with physicians. Combining quantitative data collection, collation, and analytic computing power of AI algorithms with the clinical expertise, empathy, and personal care of patients by their physician envisions a new paradigm in theranostic reporting for molecular imaging and radioligand treatment of cancer. Human-AI interaction will facilitate the compilation of a comprehensive, integrated nuclear medicine report. This holistic report would incorporate radiomics to quantitatively analyze diagnostic digital imaging and prospectively calculate the radiation absorbed dose to tumor and critical normal organs. The therapy activity could then be accurately prescribed to deliver a preordained, effective, tumoricidal radiation absorbed dose to tumor, while minimizing toxicity in the particular patient. Post-therapy quantitative imaging would then valid…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These algorithms have supported individualized radiation therapy dosage planning, enhancing diagnostic efficiency and precision in a patient-centered manner.
“Similarly, these algorithms have supported individualized radiation therapy dosage planning [39], enhancing diagnostic efficiency and precision in a patient-centered manner.”
From Empathic AI for Patient-Centered Cancer Care: A Scoping Review of Patient Navigation, Support, and Clinical Practice (2026) · cites this paper as [39]
Hybrid clinical care models, wherein humans and machines complement each other (human-AI symbiosis), are valuable.
“The findings of this review underscore the value of hybrid clinical care models, wherein humans and machines complement each other, termed human-AI symbiosis [39].”
From Empathic AI for Patient-Centered Cancer Care: A Scoping Review of Patient Navigation, Support, and Clinical Practice (2026) · cites this paper as [39]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 44 · Cited by 6
- Authors
- Turner, J. H.
- Affiliations
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Turner, J. Harvey
- ORCID
- Turner, J. Harvey
- Venue
- Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2025-03
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 89-95
- ISSN
- 1084-9785 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-8852
- OpenAlex
- W4404116587
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- theranostics, artificial intelligence, human-AI interaction, radiomics, dosimetry, 177Lu-DOTATATE, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, molecular imaging, personalized medicine, clinical outcome prediction, practical wisdom, physician accountability, cancer care
- MeSH terms
- Theranostic Nanomedicine, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Neoplasms, Nuclear Medicine, Radiopharmaceuticals, Precision Medicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review