Empathic AI for Patient-Centered Cancer Care: A Scoping Review of Patient Navigation, Support, and Clinical Practice
Open accessAbstract
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly reshaping oncology, offering advancements in clinical care and patient support. A growing area of interest is the integration of empathic AI: systems integrating clinical precision with emotional intelligence to support medical decision-making and the emotional and psychosocial well-being of patients and caregivers. Objective: This review aimed to explore the role of empathic AI in cancer care, with a focus on its applications in patient education, clinician support, and emotional care. It also evaluated the ethical, cultural, and implementation challenges associated with its integration into clinical practice in oncology. Methods: A systematic search of literature was conducted in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 guidelines. Peer-reviewed papers published between January 2018 and January 2025 were identified through a search of PubMed, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore, and citation tracking. Eligible studies focused on applications of empathic AI in oncology. A total of 44 studies were included and analyzed thematically across 3 core clinical domains: tailored communication and education, diagnostics and care plan optimization, and emotional and psychosocial support. Results: Empathic AI demonstrates the potential to improve cancer care by enhancing patient education, clinical decision-making, and emotional support. Common applications include personalized education for patients and providers, support for diagnostic and therapeutic decisions, and tools designed to recognize and respond to patient distress. Several studies noted improved patient engagement and reduced clinician burden. However, concerns were identified regarding overreliance on AI systems, cultural insensitivity, and patient privacy. Conclusions: Empathic AI represents a promising advancement in patient-centered oncology, integrating emotional intelligence into clinical care. Its successful implementation will require careful attention to ethical, cultural, and clinical considerations to ensure health equity, trust, and safety in AI-assisted cancer care.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This scoping review synthesizes 44 studies on empathic AI in oncology, finding applications across tailored communication and education, diagnostics and treatment planning, and emotional and psychosocial support. It concludes that empathic AI may enhance patient-centered cancer care but requires ethical, cultural, and implementation safeguards.
Key findings
- Across 44 included studies, 91% (40/44) addressed patient or caregiver emotional and psychosocial support, 86% (38/44) addressed tailored patient education, 70% (31/44) addressed diagnostics and treatment planning, and 30% (13/44) addressed palliative and end-of-life care.
- Specific applications included chatbots and large language models for patient education, clinician communication support, distress detection, caregiver support, and virtual reality interventions; one study found AI chatbot replies were preferred 78.6% of the time over physician responses, and another reported ChatGPT-assisted breast cancer screening interpretation at 80% accuracy with 70% reduced clinician workload.
- The review identifies concerns about overreliance on AI, misinformation, cultural insensitivity, privacy, bias, and erosion of clinical empathy or trust, and calls for clinician oversight, algorithmic guardrails, validation, and hybrid human-AI care models.
Methods
- PRISMA 2020 scoping review of peer-reviewed English-language studies published January 2018 to January 2025; initial PubMed search on January 6, 2025, later expanded to Scopus and IEEE Xplore on January 1, 2026, with citation tracking and snowballing.
- The initial search yielded 78 results; 64 were excluded after abstract and full-text screening, snowballing added 15 studies, and 44 studies were included. Two reviewers screened studies, a third verified decisions, and findings were analyzed thematically across three clinical domains.
Limitations
- Stated: English-only inclusion limits generalizability; reliance on PubMed and indexed peer-reviewed literature may exclude interdisciplinary journals, conference proceedings, or gray literature; rapid AI evolution may make included models outdated; methodological heterogeneity and no standardized metric for AI empathy limit direct comparison across studies.
- Evident from the text: the updated Scopus and IEEE Xplore search was conducted on January 1, 2026, while eligibility was limited to studies published through January 2025, and Table 1 contains malformed reference lists, which may affect reproducibility.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
47 of 77 cited sources checked · 14 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Integration of AI into emotionally sensitive domains such as oncology introduces a new set of unresolved ethical, relational, and epistemological challenges.
“However, despite these advances, the integration of AI into emotionally sensitive domains such as oncology introduces a new set of unresolved ethical, relational, and epistemological challenges [12].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [12] Farhud, Ethical issues of artificial intelligence in medicine and healthcare, Iran J Public Health source
The Introduction identifies ethical challenges in healthcare AI, and its “Medical Consultation, Empathy, and Sympathy” section discusses difficulties with empathy and patient–clinician relationships. The paper does not specifically address oncology or identify epistemological challenges, so those parts of the attributed claim are not supported by our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
AI-generated responses, particularly those from Claude AI, outperformed those from oncologists in terms of empathy, clarity, and emotional resonance.
“The study found that AI-generated responses, particularly those from Claude AI, outperformed those from oncologists in terms of empathy, clarity, and emotional resonance”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] Chen, Physician and artificial intelligence chatbot responses to cancer questions from social media, JAMA Oncol source
- Findingcitation
Recent studies demonstrated that generative AI tools tailor educational content based on patient demographics, clinical context, and informational needs, including evaluations of ChatGPT and other LLMs responding to cancer-related questions and decision-making scenarios.
“Recent studies further extend this work by demonstrating how generative AI tools tailor educational content based on patient demographics, clinical context, and informational needs, including evaluations of ChatGPT and other large language models (LLMs) responding to cancer-related questions and decision-making scenarios [22-25].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 4 sources checked- cites [22] Jo, Communicative competence of generative artificial intelligence in responding to patient queries about colorectal cancer surgery, Int J Colorectal Dis source
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [23] Clerici, Being diagnosed with a rhabdomyosarcoma in the era of artificial intelligence: whom can we trust?, Pediatr Blood Cancer source
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [24] Alanezi, Factors influencing patients’ engagement with ChatGPT for accessing health-related information, Crit Public Health source
- cites [25] Xu, Chatbot for health care and oncology applications using artificial intelligence and machine learning: systematic review, JMIR Cancer source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Beyond imaging, AI supports personalized oncology through predictive models that generate tailored treatment recommendations based on individual patient demographics, genomics, and clinical profiles.
“Beyond imaging, AI supports personalized oncology through predictive models that generate tailored treatment recommendations based on individual patient demographics, genomics, and clinical profiles [10].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] Auf, The use of AI in mental health services to support decision-making: scoping review, J Med Internet Res source
The Introduction (Background) describes personalized AI-supported decision-making, and the Discussion (Principal Findings) identifies treatment-selection AI in mental health care. Neither passage supports the claim about oncology or recommendations based on patient demographics, genomics, and clinical profiles. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
The unique emotional needs of teen and young adult patients with cancer were addressed by the delivery of positive psychology skills via the Vivibot chatbot.
“the unique emotional needs of teen and young adult patients with cancer were addressed by the delivery of positive psychology skills via the Vivibot chatbot [14].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [14] Greer, Use of the chatbot “Vivibot” to deliver positive psychology skills and promote well-being among young people after cancer treatment: randomized controlled feasibility trial, JMIR Mhealth Uhealth source
The Methods (Intervention Conditions) say Vivibot’s content was tailored with input from adolescents and young adults treated for cancer, and the Abstract (Methods) says it delivered positive psychology skills. But the trial enrolled only adults aged 18–29 who had completed treatment; it does not show that the chatbot addressed the needs of teen patients or patients undergoing treatment. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
AI-powered notes written by OpenAI's ChatGPT 3.5 and GPT 4.0 have been found to be more personalized and empathetic.
“When it comes to clinical documentation, AI-powered notes written by OpenAI’s ChatGPT 3.5 and GPT 4.0 have been found to be more personalized and empathetic [42].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [42] Kharko, Generative artificial intelligence writing open notes: a mixed methods assessment of the functionality of GPT 3.5 and GPT 4.0, Digit Health source
The Abstract (Conclusions) reports improved empathy metrics in notes generated by ChatGPT 3.5 and 4.0, and the Discussion (Main findings) describes substantially more empathy-signaling language than in the original notes. A GP quoted in Results (Medical fidelity) said one note picked out what interested the patient, but the paper does not establish that the generated notes were more personalized than the originals. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
AI can be used to detect distress and other emotions.
“AI can, therefore, be used to detect distress and other emotions as shown by the results of using an AI-based therapy group cofacilitator [16]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] Leung, Therapist feedback and implications on adoption of an artificial intelligence-based co-facilitator for online cancer support groups: mixed methods single-arm usability study, JMIR Cancer source
- Findingcitation
AI-driven insights could help clinicians better understand behaviors, decisions, side effects, and emotional cues within support groups to derive actionable insights for patient-centered care.
“The findings highlighted how AI-driven insights could help clinicians better understand behaviors, decisions, side effects, and emotional cues within support groups to derive actionable insights for patient-centered care.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] De Silva, Machine learning to support social media empowered patients in cancer care and cancer treatment decisions, PLoS One source
- Findingcitation
Concerns about misinformation, cultural insensitivity, and overreliance on AI-generated outputs were raised across multiple studies.
“However, concerns about misinformation, cultural insensitivity, and overreliance on AI-generated outputs were raised across multiple studies [26-28].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [26] Goumas, Chatbots in cancer applications, advantages and disadvantages: all that glitters is not gold, J Pers Med source
Section 4 warns that chatbots can provide inaccurate medical advice, and Section 5 says they should supplement rather than replace healthcare workers, supporting concerns about misinformation and overreliance. Section 5 discusses bias and fairness across demographic groups, but does not specifically raise cultural insensitivity. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [27] Turner, Triangle of Trust in Cancer Care? The physician, the patient, and artificial intelligence chatbot, Cancer Biother Radiopharm source
- cites [28] Alanzi, Public awareness of obesity as a risk factor for cancer in central Saudi Arabia: feasibility of ChatGPT as an educational intervention, Cureus source
The Results report participants’ concerns about inaccurate information and overreliance on ChatGPT for health advice. They also report that some Arabic responses lacked emotional appeal, but do not report cultural insensitivity as a concern; the Discussion’s references to cultural nuances and culturally sensitive information do not establish that participants raised it. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
By identifying patient-reported behaviors, emotions, and treatment decisions, AI tools provided valuable insights into patient decision-making, emotional dynamics, and care preferences.
“By identifying patient-reported behaviors, emotions, and treatment decisions, AI tools provided valuable insights into patient decision-making, emotional dynamics, and care preferences.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] De Silva, Machine learning to support social media empowered patients in cancer care and cancer treatment decisions, PLoS One source
- Findingcitation
AI platforms foster stronger patient-provider relationships in the clinical landscape.
“Through these functions, AI platforms foster stronger patient-provider relationships in the clinical landscape [43].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [43] Alowais, Revolutionizing healthcare: the role of artificial intelligence in clinical practice, BMC Med Educ source
The AI-powered patient care sections discuss patient education, reduced provider workload, and the importance of trust, but do not say that AI strengthens relationships between patients and human providers. Searches for stronger patient-provider relationships and improved communication found no passage making that claim. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
AI models such as the Vik chatbot can personalize conversations and treatment recommendations based on a patient's literacy level and personal context.
“For example, AI models such as the Vik chatbot, designed to support patients with breast cancer[17], can personalize conversations and treatment recommendations based on a patient’s literacy level and personal context.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] Chaix, When chatbots meet patients: one-year prospective study of conversations between patients with breast cancer and a chatbot, JMIR Cancer source
- Findingcitation
One study comparing physician and AI chatbot responses with patient inquiries on social media found that AI replies were preferred 78.6% of the time.
“One study comparing physician and AI chatbot responses with patient inquiries on social media found that AI replies were preferred 78.6% of the time [32].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] Ayers, Comparing physician and artificial intelligence chatbot responses to patient questions posted to a public social media forum, JAMA Intern Med source
- Findingcitation
AI-based cofacilitators for online cancer support groups provide targeted emotional support for both patients and their caregivers in response to the detection of emotional distress.
“AI-based cofacilitators for online cancer support groups were shown to provide targeted emotional support for both patients and their caregivers in response to the detection of emotional distress [16].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] Leung, Therapist feedback and implications on adoption of an artificial intelligence-based co-facilitator for online cancer support groups: mixed methods single-arm usability study, JMIR Cancer source
The Introduction describes an AI co-facilitator that detects distress, alerts therapists, and suggests tailored resources. The Results (Focus Group Findings; page unavailable) say therapists used its warnings to provide timely support to distressed patients. The study does not show the AI itself providing emotional support, and its evaluated participants were patients, not caregivers. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
Simulated VR travel to memorable places boosted physiological and mental health outcomes, particularly depression and anxiety, for patients with terminal cancer.
“Simulated VR travel to memorable places was another unique application of empathic AI that boosted physiological and mental health outcomes, particularly depression and anxiety, for patients with terminal cancer[51].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [51] O’Gara, SafeSpace: what is the feasibility and acceptability of a codesigned virtual reality intervention, incorporating compassionate mind training, to support people undergoing cancer treatment in a clinical setting?, BMJ Open source
The Results/findings (Multivariate analyses; page not provided) report improved mental well-being, reduced stress, and some changes in physiological measures after the VR intervention. They do not report significant improvements in depression or anxiety scores. The intervention used beach, mountain, and forest environments, not simulated travel to memorable places; the paper does not identify the participants as having terminal cancer or describe the intervention as empathic AI. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
Implementation success depends as much on sociotechnical context as on model performance.
“This highlights implementation success dependent as much on sociotechnical context as on model performance [25].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Xu, Chatbot for health care and oncology applications using artificial intelligence and machine learning: systematic review, JMIR Cancer source
- Findingcitation
Patients are receptive to receiving education, treatment planning, and emotional support from AI systems.
“Moreover, the high levels of user satisfaction reported in interventions such as Vivibot [14], Vik [17], Rosa [18], and social media–based studies [193257] underscore that patients are receptive to receiving education, treatment planning, and emotional support from AI systems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [14] Greer, Use of the chatbot “Vivibot” to deliver positive psychology skills and promote well-being among young people after cancer treatment: randomized controlled feasibility trial, JMIR Mhealth Uhealth source
The Results (Perceived Helpfulness and Open-Ended Feedback; page not provided) report that young people after cancer treatment found Vivibot helpful and valued its nonjudgmental support. The Methods (Intervention Conditions; page not provided) describe lessons in positive psychology skills, but not education about cancer care or treatment planning. The findings therefore support receptivity to this form of emotional support, not the full range of AI services claimed. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [17] Chaix, When chatbots meet patients: one-year prospective study of conversations between patients with breast cancer and a chatbot, JMIR Cancer source
The Results (The Way Patients Used Vik; page unavailable) report 93.95% satisfaction and say patients found support and help following treatment. The Introduction (Objectives) says Vik provides information about treatments, supporting receptiveness to education. The paper does not show that patients received or were receptive to treatment planning from Vik; its Discussion describes decision-making support for physicians instead. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [18] Siglen, Ask Rosa—the making of a digital genetic conversation tool, a chatbot, about hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, Patient Educ Couns source
The Abstract (page unavailable) reports that Rosa’s testers liked the chatbot and would use it if recommended by health care personnel; the Conclusions describe its potential to help patients educate themselves before genetic counseling. This supports receptiveness to AI-delivered education, but the paper does not establish receptiveness to treatment planning. The Introduction (page unavailable) expressly says that chatbots cannot offer psychosocial support with today’s technology, contrary to the emotional-support part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Empathic AI operates through pattern recognition, affective cue detection, and response optimization.
“empathic AI operates through pattern recognition, affective cue detection, and response optimization [58].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [58] Ajeesh, The compassion illusion: can artificial empathy ever be emotionally authentic?, Front Psychol source
- Findingown data
In included studies, tailored communication and education applications of empathic AI enhanced clinician ability to convey complex or difficult information empathetically.
“Enhanced clinician ability to convey complex or difficult information empathetically”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
In included studies, empathic AI applications for enhanced diagnostics and treatment planning increased diagnostic accuracy and efficiency.
“Increased diagnostic accuracy and efficiency”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Other studies highlighted the role of empathic AI in expanding access to reliable, emotionally attuned health information among historically underserved or low-literacy populations.
“Other studies specifically highlighted the role of empathic AI in expanding access to reliable, emotionally attuned health information among historically underserved or low-literacy populations [2021].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2021]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingnone given
Empathic AI applications for enhanced diagnostics and treatment planning include integration of clinical and emotional data for diagnostics and care planning.
“Integration of clinical and emotional data for diagnostics and care planning”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the included studies, NLP and affective computing were used to detect distress and offer emotional responses as part of emotional and psychosocial support.
“NLP and affective computing to detect distress and offer emotional responses”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Empathic AI systems supporting personalized patient education were reported in 86% (38/44) of studies.
“Empathic AI systems supporting personalized patient education were reported in 86% (38/44) of studies”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
In included studies, empathic AI applications for enhanced diagnostics and treatment planning produced more personalized and emotionally attuned treatment plans.
“More personalized and emotionally attuned treatment plans”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Leung et al evaluated AI cofacilitators that adapted group-based educational content in real time based on participant mood and interaction dynamics, enhancing cohesion and engagement.
“Studies by Leung et al [1516] evaluated AI cofacilitators that adapted group-based educational content in real time based on participant mood and interaction dynamics, enhancing cohesion and engagement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1516]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingnone given
In the included studies, LLMs and cofacilitators offered caregiver guidance.
“LLMs and cofacilitators offering caregiver guidance”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Empathic AI applications for tailored communication and education include chatbots delivering emotionally calibrated, context-aware patient education.
“Chatbots delivering emotionally calibrated, context-aware patient education”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
These tools tailor educational content to individual patient contexts, including diagnosis, treatment phase, emotional state, and cognitive load.
“These tools tailor educational content to individual patient contexts, including diagnosis, treatment phase, emotional state, and cognitive load.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
By modifying tone, language, and complexity in real time, AI tools improved patient comprehension and engagement.
“By modifying tone, language, and complexity in real time, AI tools improved patient comprehension and engagement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
In included studies, tailored communication and education applications of empathic AI reduced provider burnout and communication fatigue.
“Reduced provider burnout and communication fatigue”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Empathic AI applications for tailored communication and education include LLM and NLP tools supporting empathic provider communication.
“LLMsa and NLPb tools supporting empathic provider communication”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the included studies, chatbots and support tools applying positive psychology principles were used for emotional and psychosocial support.
“Chatbots and support tools applying positive psychology principles”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Empathic AI applications for enhanced diagnostics and treatment planning include tailored treatment strategies based on emotional state, literacy, preferences, and trust.
“Tailored treatment strategies based on emotional state, literacy, preferences, and trust”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Tailored communication and educational interventions emerged as a central theme across the majority of included studies.
“Tailored communication and educational interventions emerged as a central theme across the majority of included studies”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Empathic AI interventions enhanced emotional support and resilience for caregivers.
“Enhanced emotional support and resilience for caregivers”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
By using NLP and affective computing, AI systems were able to recognize and respond to emotional cues, providing timely encouragement or referrals to professional counseling services.
“By using NLP and affective computing, AI systems were able to recognize and respond to emotional cues, providing timely encouragement or referrals to professional counseling services [5354].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5354]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
Empathic AI was used to support tailored provider education in 52% (23/44) of studies.
“Empathic AI was also used to support tailored provider education in 52% (23/44) of studies”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
91% (40/44) of studies reviewed highlighted the use of empathic AI in the service of patient emotional support.
“A large majority of studies reviewed (40/44, 91%) highlighted the use of empathic AI in the service of patient emotional support.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Among the studies reviewed, 43% (19/44) discussed how AI is being used to aid in diagnostic reasoning and clinical interpretation.
“Among the studies reviewed, 43% (19/44) discussed how AI is being used to aid in diagnostic reasoning and clinical interpretation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In total, 61% (27/44) of studies addressed how AI enhances patient-centered decisions and care.
“In total, 61% (27/44) of studies addressed how AI enhances patient-centered decisions and care.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
91% (40/44) of studies alluded to applications of the technology involving patient or caregiver emotional support.
“the vast majority of studies (40/44, 91%) alluded to applications of the technology involving patient or caregiver emotional support.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
Patients are capable of trusting machines.
“multiple studies examining chatbots showed that patients are capable of trusting machines [27]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] Turner, Triangle of Trust in Cancer Care? The physician, the patient, and artificial intelligence chatbot, Cancer Biother Radiopharm source
- Findingown data
AI systems are increasingly seen as tools for alleviating stress, providing reassurance, and offering emotional guidance during challenging cancer journeys.
“These AI systems are increasingly seen as tools for alleviating stress, providing reassurance, and offering emotional guidance during challenging cancer journeys.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
The evaluation of the ability of various recently released AI chatbots to produce easily understandable, medically relevant, culturally appropriate, and empathetic responses to oncology patient queries was a key focus of many included studies.
“The evaluation of the ability of various recently released AI chatbots to produce easily understandable, medically relevant, culturally appropriate, and empathetic responses to oncology patient queries was a key focus of many of the included studies [19324546].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19324546]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
AI-driven virtual reality (VR) therapy for anxiety and depression is an application of empathic AI.
“including AI-driven virtual reality (VR) therapy for anxiety and depression [4748]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4748]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
A prominent theme in the studies was the emotional and psychosocial support that empathic AI can offer to both patients and caregivers.
“Another prominent theme in the studies was the emotional and psychosocial support that empathic AI can offer to both patients and caregivers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
By integrating emotional intelligence with clinical data, these tools help enhance the accuracy of patient assessments, considering both clinical factors and the emotional context of the patient's situation.
“By integrating emotional intelligence with clinical data, these tools help enhance the accuracy of patient assessments, considering both clinical factors and the emotional context of the patient’s situation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
AI-generated patient-facing responses were rated significantly higher in quality, clarity, and empathy than those written by clinicians under time pressure.
“Others found that AI-generated patient-facing responses were rated significantly higher in quality, clarity, and empathy than those written by clinicians under time pressure”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [212832]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
Several studies examined the use of LLMs to help clinicians better understand caregiver perspectives, enabling the cocreation of more responsive group interventions.
“Several studies examined the use of LLMs to help clinicians better understand caregiver perspectives, enabling the cocreation of more responsive group interventions [3031].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3031]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingreasoning
AI tools assist in tailoring treatment regimens that account for individual patient preferences and emotional well-being.
“Specifically, these AI tools assist in tailoring treatment regimens that account for individual patient preferences and emotional well-being, ensuring a more holistic approach to cancer care.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
52% (23/44) of studies were concerned with addressing aspects of caregiver emotional support.
“Unsurprisingly, 52% (23/44) of studies were also concerned with addressing aspects of caregiver emotional support.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Empathic AI systems have been shown to support clinicians in making more accurate diagnoses and treatment decisions.
“Empathic AI systems have been shown to support clinicians in making more accurate diagnoses and treatment decisions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
30% (13/44) of studies explored applications in palliative and end-of-life care.
“palliative and end-of-life care (13/44, 30%)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
43% (19/44) of studies explored applications in diagnostics and decision-making support.
“a subset of studies also explored applications in diagnostics and decision-making support (19/44, 43%)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
Included studies were methodologically heterogeneous, encompassing diverse designs, populations, interventions, and outcome measures.
“It is also important to note that included studies were methodologically heterogeneous, encompassing diverse designs, populations, interventions, and outcome measures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingcitation
AI-supported environments indirectly or explicitly assist caregivers through shared decision-making and emotional scaffolding, particularly in advanced cancer contexts.
“Additional evidence highlights AI-supported environments that indirectly or explicitly assist caregivers through shared decision-making and emotional scaffolding, particularly in advanced cancer contexts [2234].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2234]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
Empathic performance in digital oncology settings is not solely a function of model sophistication but of interactional design and workflow integration.
“Evidence from this review further suggests that empathic performance in digital oncology settings is not solely a function of model sophistication but of interactional design and workflow integration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Across studies, LLMs and chatbot technologies were used to adapt educational content to user-specific contexts, including cancer type, treatment stage, emotional state, and cultural or linguistic preferences.
“Across studies, LLMs and chatbot technologies were used to adapt educational content to user-specific contexts, including cancer type, treatment stage, emotional state, and cultural or linguistic preferences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
91% (40/44) of studies addressed patient emotional and psychosocial support.
“91% (40/44) addressing patient emotional and psychosocial support.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
There was no standardized metric for evaluating "empathy" in AI-generated interactions across studies.
“Additionally, there was no standardized metric for evaluating “empathy” in AI-generated interactions across studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
30% (13/44) of studies referenced the use of AI in palliative and end-of-life care contexts.
“with 30% (13/44) of studies referencing the use of AI in these contexts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Other researchers have used NLP approaches, such as analyzing emotion intensity or identifying psychosocial challenges, to address end-of-life discussions with patients with cancer and provide them with targeted resources specific to their stage of the cancer journey.
“Other researchers have used NLP approaches, such as analyzing emotion intensity or identifying psychosocial challenges, to address end-of-life discussions with patients with cancer and provide them with targeted resources specific to their stage of the cancer journey [222435364156].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [222435364156]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingcitation
Patients may sometimes prefer AI-generated responses over those from physicians when it comes to clarity, empathy, and accessibility.
“Notably, findings from this review suggest that patients may sometimes prefer AI-generated responses over those from physicians when it comes to clarity, empathy, and accessibility [192932].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [192932]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Findingown data
85% (38/44) of studies addressed tailored patient education.
“with 85% (38/44) addressing tailored patient education”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
Patient engagement with empathic AI tools is strongly shaped by trust, digital literacy, perceived usefulness, privacy concerns, and the extent to which AI systems are meaningfully connected to clinicians and care pathways.
“However, emerging evidence indicates that patient engagement with empathic AI tools is strongly shaped by trust, digital literacy, perceived usefulness, privacy concerns, and the extent to which AI systems are meaningfully connected to clinicians and care pathways.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Empathic AI has the potential to deliver information that is clinically relevant and dynamically attuned to the emotional and cognitive needs of both patients and providers.
“underscoring the potential of empathic AI to deliver information that is both clinically relevant and dynamically attuned to the emotional and cognitive needs of both patients and providers”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
AI can enhance patient education equity, particularly in contexts where human resources are limited, or in settings where patients may be hesitant to ask questions directly.
“These findings position AI as a tool to enhance patient education equity, particularly in contexts where human resources are limited, or in settings where patients may be hesitant to ask questions directly.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
AI chatbots can serve as effective tools for enhancing patient education and communication.
“suggesting that AI chatbots can serve as effective tools for enhancing patient education and communication”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The use of empathic AI chatbots can be at the center of an integrated and holistic approach to support.
“the use of empathic AI chatbots can be at the center of an integrated and holistic approach to support [264350].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [264350]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Teen and young adult patients with cancer typically experience heightened anxiety and depression posttreatment completion.
“As this age group typically experiences heightened anxiety and depression posttreatment completion”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [55] Bandaragoda, The Patient-Reported Information Multidimensional Exploration (PRIME) framework for investigating emotions and other factors of prostate cancer patients with low intermediate risk based on online cancer support group discussions, Ann Surg Oncol source
- Interpretationreasoning
Empathic AI plays a critical role in supporting caregivers.
“Empathic AI also plays a critical role in supporting caregivers”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Caregivers often experience high levels of stress and burnout.
- Interpretationreasoning
These findings underscore the potential of AI to cultivate emotionally intelligent clinician communication.
“These findings underscore the potential of AI to cultivate emotionally intelligent clinician communication.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
This kind of intervention fills a previously unmet need.
“this kind of intervention fills a previously unmet need [55].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [55] Bandaragoda, The Patient-Reported Information Multidimensional Exploration (PRIME) framework for investigating emotions and other factors of prostate cancer patients with low intermediate risk based on online cancer support group discussions, Ann Surg Oncol source
- Interpretationcitation
AI has the potential to support consistency in emotionally attuned communication.
“pointing to the potential of AI to support consistency in emotionally attuned communication [212832]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [212832]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationcitation
Hybrid clinical care models, wherein humans and machines complement each other (human-AI symbiosis), are valuable.
“The findings of this review underscore the value of hybrid clinical care models, wherein humans and machines complement each other, termed human-AI symbiosis [39].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] Turner, Human-artificial intelligence symbiotic reporting for theranostic cancer care, Cancer Biother Radiopharm source
- Study design and conductreasoning
Reliance on peer-reviewed literature indexed in PubMed may have excluded relevant studies published in interdisciplinary journals, conference proceedings, or gray literature.
“Furthermore, although a snowballing technique was used to enhance inclusivity, the reliance on peer-reviewed literature indexed in PubMed may have excluded relevant studies published in interdisciplinary journals, conference proceedings, or gray literature, particularly those from fields such as human-computer interaction or behavioral science.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
AI cofacilitators can personalize group therapy or education sessions in real time by responding to emotional cues.
“AI cofacilitators can personalize group therapy or education sessions in real time by responding to emotional cues.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
AI systems are increasingly being used to address long-standing gaps in cancer care delivery.
“Across domains, evidence illustrates that AI systems are increasingly being used to address long-standing gaps in cancer care delivery.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
This review included studies available only in English language.
“First, this review included studies available only in English language, which may limit the generalizability of findings to global health care contexts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Cultural variations in emotional expression, communication styles, and attitudes toward AI are likely to influence both the development and reception of empathic AI systems.
- Interpretationreasoning
This inconsistency complicates efforts to compare effectiveness across interventions.
“This inconsistency complicates efforts to compare effectiveness across interventions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
AI can serve as a buffer or bridge between emotionally overwhelmed patients and time-constrained providers.
“AI can serve as a buffer, or even a bridge, between emotionally overwhelmed patients and time-constrained providers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
These technologies are reconfiguring traditional models of care into more adaptive, responsive, and patient-centered frameworks.
“These technologies are reconfiguring traditional models of care into more adaptive, responsive, and patient-centered frameworks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The absence of standardized metrics for evaluating empathic performance limits direct comparison across studies.
“The absence of standardized metrics for evaluating empathic performance limits direct comparison across studies, although this heterogeneity reflects the early and exploratory nature of the field.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Empathic AI can help scale patient-centered care by offering timely, emotionally calibrated support, especially where time constraints or emotional fatigue limit provider capacity.
“Rather than merely mimicking human interaction, empathic AI can help scale patient-centered care by offering timely, emotionally calibrated support, especially in scenarios where time constraints or emotional fatigue may limit provider capacity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
These systems do not "feel" empathy but rather approximate empathic behaviors through language, timing, and contextual sensitivity.
“These systems do not “feel” empathy but rather approximate empathic behaviors through language, timing, and contextual sensitivity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Without safeguards, empathic AI may inadvertently exacerbate existing health disparities among marginalized populations already facing barriers to emotionally supportive care.
“Without these safeguards, empathic AI may inadvertently exacerbate existing health disparities among marginalized populations already facing barriers to emotionally supportive care.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Concepts of empathy, emotional expression, and caregiving may vary considerably across cultures; what is perceived as compassionate in one context may be viewed as intrusive or inappropriate in another.
- Interpretationown data
In palliative and end-of-life care settings, empathic AI has been particularly effective in providing compassionate communication and emotional support.
“In palliative and end-of-life care settings, empathic AI has been particularly effective in providing compassionate communication and emotional support”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 69
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 42
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn oncology, AI models are being developed to standardize and improve the consistency and quality of care and to support clinicians and patients in navigating complex diagnostic and treatment pathways.
“In oncology, AI models are being developed to standardize and improve the consistency and quality of care, offering new ways to support both clinicians and patients in navigating complex diagnostic and treatment pathways [5].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] Kolla, Uses and limitations of artificial intelligence for oncology, Cancer source
The Introduction says AI can improve cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment decisions, while the Chatbots section describes potential support for patients and clinicians. The paper does not establish that AI models are being developed to standardize care or improve its consistency; its Discussion instead calls for standardized data collection and reliable algorithms. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAI technologies provide timely, accurate, and accessible information that can empower patients and caregivers, supporting engagement, comprehension, and autonomy throughout the cancer care continuum.
“These technologies provide timely, accurate, and accessible information that can empower patients and caregivers, supporting engagement, comprehension, and autonomy throughout the cancer care continuum [6-8].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [6] Cè, Exploring the role of ChatGPT in oncology: providing information and support for cancer patients, BioMedInformatics source
Sections 3.1.2 and 3.1.3 describe ChatGPT as making information easier and faster to obtain and understand, including for patients and caregivers, with potential to improve participation and shared decision-making. The Conclusions say it can offer accurate, accessible support throughout patients’ cancer journey, but also warn that its information can be inaccurate or unreliable. The claim overstates accuracy as an unqualified property of AI technologies generally. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [7] Li, The impact of Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) on oncology: application, expectations, and future prospects, Cureus source
The Review’s “ChatGPT in cancer patient education” section describes the potential for accessible explanations that improve patients’ comprehension, and its discussion of treatment decisions says such information can support engagement. It does not establish the same benefits for caregivers or throughout the cancer care continuum. Its “Rigorous Fact-Checking” section also cautions that responses may be outdated or erroneous, so timely, accurate information cannot be assumed. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [8] Goel, Role of AI in empowering and redefining the oncology care landscape: perspective from a developing nation, Front Digit Health source
The ‘AI in telemedicine/remote monitoring’ section (page unavailable) describes apps that give cancer patients individualized treatment information, advice, reminders, and access to support; the oncology-care table also describes improved access to services. Our copy does not establish that this information is consistently accurate or that these tools improve caregivers’ comprehension, engagement, or autonomy throughout the cancer care continuum. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAI has become increasingly embedded in medical practice over the past decade, enhancing care capabilities from personalized health libraries and patient education to disease screening, diagnostics, and treatment planning.
“Artificial intelligence (AI) has become increasingly embedded in medical practice over the past decade, enhancing care capabilities from the development of personalized health libraries and innovative patient education strategies to disease screening, diagnostics, and treatment planning [1-4].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 4 sources checked- cites [1] Khosravi, Artificial intelligence and decision-making in healthcare: a thematic analysis of a systematic review of reviews, Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol source
The Introduction describes AI applications in diagnosis and treatment planning, and the Discussion > Shared Decision-Making describes personalized information and patient education (page numbers unavailable). The copy does not establish the specific development of personalized health libraries or that AI became increasingly embedded in medical practice over the past decade. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [2] Shaban-Nejad, Health intelligence: how artificial intelligence transforms population and personalized health, NPJ Digit Med source
The Abstract (page unavailable) describes AI applications in patient education, medical imaging, and decision support; Personalized health intelligence describes tailoring therapy plans and connecting patients with information. The copy does not establish a trend specifically over the past decade or describe the development of personalized health libraries. It discusses diagnosis and surveillance, but does not clearly identify disease screening as an application. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [3] Ammar, Using a personal health library-enabled mHealth recommender system for self-management of diabetes among underserved populations: use case for knowledge graphs and linked data, JMIR Form Res source
The Introduction (Overview; page unavailable) describes personal health libraries that can generate intelligent personalized interventions, and the Discussion (page unavailable) proposes AI-based personalized resource suggestions. The Review of Relevant Literature also mentions a tool for cancer staging and identifying treatment options. The paper does not establish a decade-long increase in AI use across medical practice or support the full range of screening and diagnostic capabilities attributed to the citation group. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [4] Shaban-Nejad A Michalowski M Bianco S . Multimodal AI in Healthcare: A Paradigm Shift in Health Intelligence. Springer; 2023. [doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-14771-5] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBy integrating psychosocial considerations into clinical decision-making, AI holds promise for improving treatment efficacy and enhancing overall quality of life.
“By integrating psychosocial considerations into clinical decision-making, AI holds promise not only for improving treatment efficacy but also for enhancing overall quality of life [10].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] Auf, The use of AI in mental health services to support decision-making: scoping review, J Med Internet Res source
The Introduction (Background; page unavailable) describes AI’s potential for personalized clinical decision-making, and the Results (Evaluation of Implementation and Use; page unavailable) describe its potential to support treatment selection and communication. Those passages do not link the integration of psychosocial considerations to improved treatment efficacy or overall quality of life; searches for those terms found no such account in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationGreer's Vivibot chatbot leveraged a positive psychology framework to support emotional regulation in young adult cancer survivors, resulting in reduced anxiety and high user satisfaction.
“Greer’s Vivibot chatbot leveraged a positive psychology framework to support emotional regulation in young adult cancer survivors, resulting in reduced anxiety and high user satisfaction [14].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [14] Greer, Use of the chatbot “Vivibot” to deliver positive psychology skills and promote well-being among young people after cancer treatment: randomized controlled feasibility trial, JMIR Mhealth Uhealth source
The Methods (Intervention Conditions) describe Vivibot’s positive-psychology skills, and the Results report helpfulness ratings and an average reduction in anxiety in the intervention group. However, the between-group anxiety finding was only a nonsignificant trend (P=.09), so “resulting in reduced anxiety” implies a firmer causal finding than this feasibility trial establishes. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAI has become a critical adjunct for medical image analytics, with computer models achieving state-of-the-art tumor detection, segmentation, extraction, and classification across a wide range of cancer types.
“For example, AI has rapidly become a critical adjunct for medical image analytics, demonstrating that computer models can achieve state-of-the-art tumor detection, segmentation, extraction, and classification across a wide range of cancer types [9].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] Debelee, Deep learning in selected cancers’ image analysis—a survey, J Imaging source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationRecent advancements suggest that AI systems may approximate emotional attunement, recognize distress, and respond in ways perceived as empathic and compassionate.
“Yet recent advancements suggest that AI systems may approximate emotional attunement, recognize distress, and respond in ways perceived as empathic and compassionate [13].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] Rubin, Considering the role of human empathy in AI-driven therapy, JMIR Ment Health source
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationChaix et al and Siglen et al reported that chatbot-delivered education improved adherence to treatment regimens and facilitated greater engagement in shared decision-making.
“Similarly, Chaix et al [17] and Siglen et al [18] reported that chatbot-delivered education improved adherence to treatment regimens and facilitated greater engagement in shared decision-making.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [17] Chaix, When chatbots meet patients: one-year prospective study of conversations between patients with breast cancer and a chatbot, JMIR Cancer source
The Discussion (Conclusions; page unavailable) says Vik improved medication adherence through reminders and educational content, and the Results report improved compliance among patients using the reminder feature. The paper does not report greater engagement in shared decision-making, so that part of the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [18] Siglen, Ask Rosa—the making of a digital genetic conversation tool, a chatbot, about hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, Patient Educ Couns source
The Introduction and Conclusions describe Ask Rosa as a source of genetic information and suggest it may help patients prepare for counseling. Our copy does not report improved treatment adherence or greater engagement in shared decision-making; searches for both outcomes found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationProgress on interpersonal-type communications is being made, despite challenges noted on the algorithmic development side.
“progress on interpersonal-type communications is being made, despite challenges noted on the algorithmic development side [45].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [45] Chow, Ethical considerations in human-centered AI: advancing oncology chatbots through large language models, JMIR Bioinform Biotechnol source
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationChatGPT has been used to assist in the interpretation of personalized breast cancer screening studies with 80% accuracy while reducing clinician workload by 70%.
“For example, ChatGPT has been used to assist in the interpretation of personalized breast cancer screening studies with 80% accuracy while reducing clinician workload by 70% [38].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [38] Mundinger, Artificial intelligence in senology—where do we stand and what are the future horizons?, Eur J Breast Health source
The section ‘Have These Possibilities Already Touched the Field of Breast Healthcare?’ (page not supplied) reports that ChatGPT recommendations, including radiology-screening recommendations, were at least 80% in line with human judgement. It does not report 80% accuracy in interpreting personalized breast cancer screening studies. The ‘AI in Breast Cancer Screening’ section reports a 44.3% reduction in screen-reading workload with AI-assisted mammography, not a 70% reduction attributable to ChatGPT. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationRecent work explored hybrid and simulation-based approaches, including live-chat models emphasizing digital clinical empathy and virtual patient systems designed to train clinicians in empathic and end-of-life communication.
“Recent work has also explored hybrid and simulation-based approaches, including live-chat models emphasizing digital clinical empathy [34] and virtual patient systems designed to train clinicians in empathic and end-of-life communication [3536].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [34] Luetke Lanfer, Digital clinical empathy in a live chat: multiple findings from a formative qualitative study and usability tests, BMC Health Serv Res source
- cites [3536]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationSocially intelligent agents can address nonmedical needs in pediatric populations by reducing feelings of isolation, supporting coping, and facilitating participation in daily activities.
“Mårell-Olsson et al [44] demonstrated that socially intelligent agents can address nonmedical needs in pediatric populations by reducing feelings of isolation, supporting coping, and facilitating participation in daily activities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [44] Mårell-Olsson, Opportunities and challenges of using socially intelligent agents: increasing interaction and school participation for children suffering from a long-term illness, IJILT source
The Introduction and Discussion and conclusions identify isolation and school participation as nonmedical concerns for children with long-term illness. The paper also proposes SIAs as possible support for interaction and healthy coping. But its evidence comes from expert interviews, not a demonstration that SIAs reduced isolation or improved coping and daily participation in children; the Discussion says the small study cannot support generalizations. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationOne social media-based study found that nonhuman responses were rated higher on every measure by expert health care evaluators, including empathy and quality, and greatly preferred to the clinician responses.
“one social media–based study found that nonhuman responses were rated higher on every measure by expert health care evaluators, including empathy and quality, and greatly preferred to the clinician responses [32].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] Ayers, Comparing physician and artificial intelligence chatbot responses to patient questions posted to a public social media forum, JAMA Intern Med source
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationAI personalized conversations and treatment recommendations help patients make informed decisions and improve treatment adherence.
“This helps patients make informed decisions and improves treatment adherence [57].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [57] Klotz, ChatGPT vs. surgeons on pancreatic cancer queries: accuracy & empathy evaluated by patients and experts, HPB (Oxford) source
The Discussion reports that ChatGPT’s answers to general pancreatic-cancer surgery questions were understandable and showed promise for patient education. It does not establish that personalized conversations or treatment recommendations helped patients make informed decisions, and it did not assess treatment adherence. (LLM, conf=0.80)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationSentiment-aware conversational agents are designed to detect and respond to emotional distress.
“sentiment-aware conversational agents designed to detect and respond to emotional distress [49].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [49] Hamza-Cherif, Improving healthcare communication: AI-driven emotion classification in imbalanced patient text data with explainable models, Adv Technol Innov source
The Introduction describes AI models that detect patients’ feelings from text, and Additional information discusses identifying negative thoughts. Neither passage describes a conversational agent or says the system responds to emotional distress; the supported part is detection, not response. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDigital clinical empathy requires intentional strategies (timely acknowledgment, authenticity, appropriate boundary setting, contextual responsiveness) and may be best sustained through hybrid models combining AI-enabled support with human oversight.
“Studies measuring cancer-related live chat environments and simulation-based systems highlight that digital clinical empathy requires intentional strategies (ie, timely acknowledgment, authenticity, appropriate boundary setting, and contextual responsiveness) and may be best sustained through hybrid models that combine AI-enabled support with human oversight [34-36].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [34] Luetke Lanfer, Digital clinical empathy in a live chat: multiple findings from a formative qualitative study and usability tests, BMC Health Serv Res source
- cites [35] Kane, Managing emotional dialogue for a virtual cancer patient: a schema-guided approach, IEEE Trans Affective Comput source
- cites [36] Ali, Novel computational linguistic measures, dialogue system and the development of SOPHIE: standardized online patient for healthcare interaction education, IEEE Trans Affective Comput source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationLLMs have the potential to provide real-time, individually customized, and up-to-date medical information, with concomitant risks and benefits, to allow for informed, complex, and empathic decision-making among caregivers for oncology patients.
“Of particular interest is the potential of LLMs as providers of real-time, individually customized, and up-to-date medical information, with their concomitant risks and benefits, to allow for informed, complex, and empathic decision-making among caregivers for oncology patients [30].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] Sezgin, Can large language models aid caregivers of pediatric cancer patients in information seeking? A cross-sectional investigation, Cancer Med source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationStatistically significant improvements were found in the psychological measures of mood and emotional well-being, with overall reductions in stress levels demonstrated due to the safe and soothing environment simulated by the intervention.
“Statistically significant improvements were found in the psychological measures of mood and emotional well-being, with overall reductions in stress levels demonstrated due to the safe and soothing environment simulated by the intervention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [51] O’Gara, SafeSpace: what is the feasibility and acceptability of a codesigned virtual reality intervention, incorporating compassionate mind training, to support people undergoing cancer treatment in a clinical setting?, BMJ Open source
The Results/findings > Multivariate analyses section (page unavailable) reports statistically significant improvements in mood after the first session, mental well-being, and stress from baseline to after session 3; mood improvement after the second session was not statistically significant. The Discussion (page unavailable) says participants valued the simulated ‘safe space,’ but proposes a future trial to determine whether VR, compassionate mind training, or both produced the effects. The claim’s attribution of the stress reduction specifically to the safe and soothing environment is therefore not established. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenEmpathic AI interventions improved mood, stress reduction, and support in palliative and end-of-life contexts.
“Improved mood, stress reduction, and support in palliative and end-of-life contexts”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenEmpathic AI applications for enhanced diagnostics and treatment planning include AI-assisted screening, documentation, and decision-making.
“AIc-assisted screening, documentation, and decision-making”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenConcerns were identified regarding overreliance on AI systems, cultural insensitivity, and patient privacy.
“However, concerns were identified regarding overreliance on AI systems, cultural insensitivity, and patient privacy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataChatbots and AI cofacilitators were most often used to simplify complex medical concepts, offer condition-specific coping strategies, and reduce distress through emotionally calibrated messaging.
“Chatbots and AI cofacilitators were most often used to simplify complex medical concepts, offer condition-specific coping strategies, and reduce distress through emotionally calibrated messaging.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe initial electronic database search yielded 78 results.
“The initial electronic database search yielded 78 results”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenCommon applications of empathic AI include personalized education for patients and providers, support for diagnostic and therapeutic decisions, and tools designed to recognize and respond to patient distress.
“Common applications include personalized education for patients and providers, support for diagnostic and therapeutic decisions, and tools designed to recognize and respond to patient distress.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenEmpathic AI applications for tailored communication and education include real-time summary tools and simulation-based training.
“Real-time summary tools and simulation-based training”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataA snowballing technique identified 15 additional studies.
“This process led to the identification of 15 additional studies”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataThe included literature spans from June 2018 to January 2025.
“The included literature spans from June 2018 to January 2025”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationIn included studies, empathic AI applications for enhanced diagnostics and treatment planning improved adherence, patient satisfaction, and provider-patient trust.
“Improved adherence, patient satisfaction, and provider-patient trust”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenSeveral studies noted improved patient engagement and reduced clinician burden.
“Several studies noted improved patient engagement and reduced clinician burden.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn included studies, tailored communication and education applications of empathic AI were reported to improve patient comprehension, reduce distress, and increase engagement in care.
“Improved patient comprehension, reduced distress, and greater engagement in care”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenEmpathic AI interventions for emotional and psychosocial support reduced anxiety, isolation, and emotional distress in patients.
“Reduced anxiety, isolation, and emotional distress in patients”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataFollowing abstract and full-text screening, 64 studies were eliminated because they did not meet the inclusion criteria.
“Following the abstract and full-text screening, 64 studies were eliminated because they did not meet the inclusion criteria.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the included studies, VRd interventions and NLP tools were used for end-of-life discussions.
“VRd interventions and NLP tools for end-of-life discussions”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA total of 44 studies were included and analyzed thematically across 3 core clinical domains: tailored communication and education, diagnostics and care plan optimization, and emotional and psychosocial support.
“A total of 44 studies were included and analyzed thematically across 3 core clinical domains: tailored communication and education, diagnostics and care plan optimization, and emotional and psychosocial support.”
- Also stated in: § Overview · plain
“a total of 44 studies met the inclusion criteria for review.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Overview · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn total, 70% (31/44) of the included studies addressed the use of empathic AI in the clinical space, with approximately half examining both diagnostics and treatment planning.
“In total, 70% (31/44) of the included studies addressed the use of empathic AI in the clinical space, with approximately half examining both diagnostics and treatment planning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
FindingcitationSeveral studies raised concerns about how increasing reliance on AI may shift the balance between algorithmic input and clinical judgment, prompting debate about the potential erosion or recalibration of clinical intuition.
“Several studies raised concerns about how increasing reliance on AI may shift the balance between algorithmic input and clinical judgment, prompting debate about the potential erosion or recalibration of clinical intuition.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationAI-generated guidance influences treatment decision-making in advanced or complex cancer contexts, with variability in tone, content, and recommendations that may shape patient choices.
“Others emphasize the influence of AI-generated guidance on treatment decision-making in advanced or complex cancer contexts, including variability in tone, content, and recommendations that may shape patient choices [2252].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2252]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationOther studies explored the use of empathic AI for real-time feedback and simulation-based training, with AI tools positioned as companions in ethical and emotional reasoning.
“Other studies explored the use of empathic AI for real-time feedback and simulation-based training, with AI tools positioned not just as repositories of information but as companions in ethical and emotional reasoning [2627].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2627]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationNLP models have been used to analyze patients' decision-making behaviors and emotions, allowing clinicians to understand patients better and tailor their recommendations accordingly.
“Furthermore, NLP models have been used to analyze patients’ decision-making behaviors and emotions [3341], allowing clinicians to understand patients better and tailor their recommendations accordingly.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3341]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenAI enhances patient-provider communication and real-time emotional support, leading to optimized care plans.
“Studies included in this theme demonstrate that AI enhances patient-provider communication and real-time emotional support, leading to optimized care plans.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
FindingcitationOne study highlighted that empathic AI may be particularly important in high-stress oncology settings for reducing clinician burnout and compassion fatigue.
“As 1 study highlighted, this may be particularly important in high-stress oncology settings for reducing clinician burnout and compassion fatigue [29].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] Koranteng, Compassionate machines: the ethics of “artificial empathy” in cancer care, JAMA Oncol source
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenProviders received AI-generated conversation summaries or context-sensitive prompts, which improved their ability to convey difficult information with empathy and precision.
“Providers received AI-generated conversation summaries or context-sensitive prompts, which improved their ability to convey difficult information with empathy and precision.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSeveral studies focused on the ways empathic AI can provide emotional comfort to patients, offering them a sense of companionship and reducing feelings of isolation.
“Several studies focused on the ways empathic AI can provide emotional comfort to patients, offering them a sense of companionship and reducing feelings of isolation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenAlthough AI may reduce cognitive load and offer scalable training solutions, its ability to cultivate true empathic capacity remains contested.
“Although AI may reduce cognitive load and offer scalable training solutions, its ability to cultivate true empathic capacity remains contested”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataStudies in this theme revealed that AI systems are increasingly integrated into clinical decision-making, optimizing care goals and improving patient outcomes.
“Studies in this theme revealed how AI systems are increasingly integrated into clinical decision-making, optimizing care goals and improving patient outcomes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThese tools were positioned as cognitive extenders, offering context-specific recommendations on treatment protocols, synthesizing complex medical data, and facilitating more empathic responses during patient interactions.
“These tools were positioned as cognitive extenders, offering context-specific recommendations on treatment protocols, synthesizing complex medical data, and facilitating more empathic responses during patient interactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationAI applications offer tailored resources, emotional support, and coping strategies, helping caregivers manage their own well-being while supporting their loved ones through cancer care.
“AI applications were found to offer tailored resources, emotional support, and coping strategies, helping caregivers manage their own well-being while supporting their loved ones through cancer care.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Caregivers often experience high levels of stress and burnout.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationThese algorithms have supported individualized radiation therapy dosage planning, enhancing diagnostic efficiency and precision in a patient-centered manner.
“Similarly, these algorithms have supported individualized radiation therapy dosage planning [39], enhancing diagnostic efficiency and precision in a patient-centered manner.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] Turner, Human-artificial intelligence symbiotic reporting for theranostic cancer care, Cancer Biother Radiopharm source
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenEmpathic AI-generated responses may vary in tone, emotional sensitivity, or guidance depending on prompt structure, clinical framing, or patient demographics, potentially shaping patient perceptions, fostering overtrust or skepticism, and influencing clinical decision-making.
“Empathic AI-generated responses may vary in tone, emotional sensitivity, or guidance depending on prompt structure, clinical framing, or patient demographics, potentially shaping patient perceptions, fostering over trust or skepticism, and influencing clinical decision-making.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationEmerging work in sentiment modeling and empathic conversational agent development suggests early methodological movement toward quantifying affective signals, although approaches remain heterogeneous and not yet clinically standardized.
“At the same time, emerging work in sentiment modeling and empathic conversational agent development suggests early methodological movement toward quantifying affective signals, although approaches remain heterogeneous and not yet clinically standardized [495354].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [495354]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenThis review highlights early promise and high user receptivity.
“While this review highlights early promise and high user receptivity, clinical integration must be guided by rigorous validation, ethical oversight, and a deep understanding of real-world workflows and health system readiness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationGenerative AI responses to cancer-related decision-making scenarios may vary by patient demographics and clinical framing, with inconsistencies in tone, content, and guidance that could differentially influence patient perceptions and treatment decisions.
“Evidence suggests that generative AI responses to cancer-related decision-making scenarios may vary by patient demographics and clinical framing, with inconsistencies in tone, content, and guidance that could differentially influence patient perceptions and treatment decisions, underscoring the need for careful validation and health equity–focused oversight [2224].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2224]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenSome studies used patient satisfaction or emotional resonance as proxies, while others relied on subjective expert evaluation.
“Some studies used patient satisfaction or emotional resonance as proxies, while others relied on subjective expert evaluation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
FindingreasoningA consistent theme throughout the examined literature is the redefinition of what it means to deliver holistic care.
“A consistent theme throughout the examined literature is the redefinition of what it means to deliver holistic care.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAI technologies have ushered in a new era of precision health and medicine, specifically impacting oncology, informing care strategies from recurrence prediction and surgical planning to emotional assessment.
“These technologies have ushered in a new era of precision health and medicine [11], specifically impacting the field of oncology, informing care strategies that range from recurrence prediction and surgical planning to emotional assessment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] Shaban-Nejad A Michalowski M . Precision Health and Medicine: A Digital Revolution in Healthcare. Springer; 2020. [doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-24409-5] source
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningEmpathic AI demonstrates the potential to improve cancer care by enhancing patient education, clinical decision-making, and emotional support.
“Empathic AI demonstrates the potential to improve cancer care by enhancing patient education, clinical decision-making, and emotional support.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenA third reviewer verified the full set of included and excluded studies, cross-referencing decisions with the original criteria and extraction tables.
“A third reviewer (BW) verified the full set of included and excluded studies, cross-referencing decisions with the original criteria and extraction tables.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenA systematic search of literature was conducted in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines.
“A systematic search of literature was conducted in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 guidelines.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenStudy quality indicators (peer-review status, study design, and sample size) were collected during data extraction to contextualize findings and mitigate potential sources of bias.
“Study quality indicators (ie, peer-review status, study design, and sample size) were collected during data extraction to contextualize findings and mitigate potential sources of bias.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningThis progress may help address systemic gaps in access to emotional support and culturally responsive communication in cancer care.
“This progress may help address systemic gaps in access to emotional support and culturally responsive communication, which have been long-standing public health challenges in cancer care.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: There are systemic gaps in access to emotional support and culturally responsive communication in cancer care that are long-standing public health challenges.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningEmpathic AI represents a promising advancement in patient-centered oncology, integrating emotional intelligence into clinical care.
“Empathic AI represents a promising advancement in patient-centered oncology, integrating emotional intelligence into clinical care.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningWhile AI integration into the clinical realm is in its infancy, it has a definite role in enhancing patient care delivery and optimization.
“While AI integration into the clinical realm is in its infancy, it has a definite role in enhancing patient care delivery and optimization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationAI-based therapy group cofacilitator allows physicians to tailor patient-to-provider interactions, resulting in more patient-centered care.
“which allows physicians to tailor their patient-to-provider interactions accordingly, resulting in more patient-centered care.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningScalability and safety remain central to the integration of AI-mediated education in oncology as these tools move closer to frontline deployment.
“Scalability and safety remain central to the integration of AI-mediated education in oncology as these tools move closer to frontline deployment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTogether, these functions of AI platforms create not only a precise and tailored patient experience but also one that is more patient-specific.
“Together, these functions of AI platforms create not only a precise and tailored patient experience but also one that is more patient-specific.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningIn oncology, missteps from biased AI could carry particularly high stakes because communication must be attuned to cultural norms, family dynamics, and existential concerns.
“In oncology, where communication must be attuned to cultural norms, family dynamics, and existential concerns, these missteps could carry particularly high stakes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningOverreliance on AI-generated outputs risks erosion of clinicians' empathic instincts, raising concerns about long-term implications for professional development and patient trust.
“The risk of overreliance on AI-generated outputs and the potential erosion of clinicians’ empathic instincts raise critical concerns about long-term implications for professional development and patient trust.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningSome models and interventions included in this review may already be outdated or replaced by more sophisticated systems.
“Given the pace of advancement in the field, some of the models and interventions included in this review may already be outdated or replaced by more sophisticated systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: AI technologies are rapidly evolving.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningHistorically underserved populations or individuals with low health literacy may benefit most from scalable, emotionally attuned technologies.
“This is especially significant for historically underserved populations or individuals with low health literacy, who may benefit most from scalable, emotionally attuned technologies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningSuccessful integration of empathic AI into clinical workflows depends on careful design, robust training data, and a commitment to maintaining the human essence of medicine.
“Effective implementation will depend on careful design, robust training data, and a commitment to maintaining the human essence of medicine.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenPoorly integrated AI tools may increase cognitive load, disrupt clinical workflows, or generate alert fatigue, undermining adoption and trust.
“Poorly integrated AI tools may increase cognitive load, disrupt clinical workflows, or generate alert fatigue, undermining adoption and trust.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe heterogeneity of included studies reflects the early and exploratory nature of the field.
“although this heterogeneity reflects the early and exploratory nature of the field.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningEmpathic AI has the potential to enhance not only the efficacy and accuracy of care but also its psychosocial dimensions.
“empathic AI has the potential to enhance not only the efficacy and accuracy of care but also its psychosocial dimensions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenAI expands access to personalized education and emotional support, democratizing information and empowering users to take an active role in their treatment.
“For patients, AI expands access to personalized education and emotional support, democratizing information and empowering users to take an active role in their treatment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationAI-generated conversation summaries, real-time feedback, and emotion-sensitive prompts can enhance provider-patient dialogues and reduce burnout by offloading cognitive and emotional labor.
“AI-generated conversation summaries, real-time feedback, and emotion-sensitive prompts can enhance provider-patient dialogues and reduce burnout by offloading cognitive and emotional labor, such as the analysis of patient decision-making and emotions provided by the PRIME-2 (Patient Reported Information Multidimensional Exploration version 2) framework [46].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] Ranasinghe, Robotic-assisted vs. open radical prostatectomy: a machine learning framework for intelligent analysis of patient-reported outcomes from online cancer support groups, Urol Oncol source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningLLMs can be embedded into electronic health record systems to generate on-demand phrasing suggestions for emotionally sensitive conversations, such as treatment failure or end-of-life planning.
“LLMs can be embedded into electronic health record systems to generate on-demand phrasing suggestions for emotionally sensitive conversations, such as treatment failure or end-of-life planning.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningOverreliance on AI in emotionally sensitive encounters could lead to depersonalization or erosion of therapeutic rapport, particularly if patients perceive machine-generated responses as inauthentic or misaligned with their values.
“Overreliance on AI in emotionally sensitive encounters could lead to depersonalization or erosion of therapeutic rapport between patient and provider, particularly if patients perceive machine-generated responses as inauthentic or misaligned with their values.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenGenerative AI systems may produce fluent, confident, but clinically incorrect or incomplete responses, which can be particularly harmful in oncology decision-making and end-of-life contexts.
“Generative AI systems may produce fluent, confident, but clinically incorrect or incomplete responses, which can be particularly harmful in oncology decision-making and end-of-life contexts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThis review demonstrates that empathic AI is emerging as a powerful and transformative force within oncology, with broad clinical applications from education to diagnostics and treatment planning to emotional support.
“This review demonstrates that empathic AI is emerging as a powerful and transformative force within oncology, with broad clinical applications from education to diagnostics and treatment planning to emotional support.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenSafety is further complicated by the risk of misinformation or emotionally manipulative outputs.
“Safety is further complicated by the risk of misinformation or emotionally manipulative outputs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningFrom a provider perspective, AI serves as both a diagnostic and treatment decision support system and a partner in empathic communication.
“From a provider perspective, AI serves as both a diagnostic and treatment decision support system and a partner in empathic communication.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningCurrent tools may not yet meet the usability, safety, or integration standards required for large-scale adoption.
“Current tools may not yet meet the usability, safety, or integration standards required for large-scale adoption, underscoring the need for ongoing evaluation in real-world settings.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenEmpathic AI systems often process highly sensitive emotional, psychosocial, and behavioral data, increasing risks related to privacy, consent, and secondary data use.
“Empathic AI systems often process highly sensitive emotional, psychosocial, and behavioral data, increasing risks related to privacy, consent, and secondary data use.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningAI's ability to contextualize medical information, detect distress, and respond with calibrated empathy suggests that these systems can complement and bolster human care, particularly in emotionally charged settings such as diagnosis disclosure, palliative care, and end-of-life decision-making.
“AI’s ability to contextualize medical information, detect distress, and respond with calibrated empathy suggests that these systems can complement and bolster human care, particularly in emotionally charged settings such as diagnosis disclosure, palliative care, and end-of-life decision-making.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningSociocultural dynamics shape both the reception and use of empathic AI.
“Moreover, sociocultural dynamics shape both the reception and use of empathic AI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Concepts of empathy, emotional expression, and caregiving may vary considerably across cultures; what is perceived as compassionate in one context may be viewed as intrusive or inappropriate in another.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningEmpathic AI systems show promise in extending the reach of clinicians, personalizing education, and offering emotional scaffolding for patients and caregivers.
“While empathic AI systems show promise in extending the reach of clinicians, personalizing education, and offering emotional scaffolding for patients and caregivers, their successful integration into clinical workflows remains dependent on several critical factors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenEmpathic AI systems simulate empathic behaviors through pattern recognition and affective cue detection but lack lived experience, moral reasoning, and relational accountability.
“Empathic AIa systems simulate empathic behaviors through pattern recognition and affective cue detection but lack lived experience, moral reasoning, and relational accountability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: True empathic understanding rooted in shared experience remains uniquely human.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTraining data may encode structural inequities or fail to account for cultural variation in emotional expression, caregiving norms, and communication styles, resulting in emotionally inappropriate or inequitable interactions.
“Training data may encode structural inequities or fail to account for cultural variation in emotional expression, caregiving norms, and communication styles, resulting in emotionally inappropriate or inequitable interactions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningSentiment analyses or AI-generated chat summaries can be used to brief providers ahead of visits, helping them tailor communication strategies to patient needs.
“sentiment analyses or AI-generated chat summaries can be used to brief providers ahead of visits, helping them tailor communication strategies to patient needs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningEmpathic AI-mediated tools may help close gaps in emotional availability, ensure message consistency, and reduce interpersonal strain in sensitive care discussions.
“Empathic AI-mediated tools may help close gaps in emotional availability, ensure message consistency, and reduce the interpersonal strain that often accompanies sensitive care discussions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningEmpathic AI enables care that integrates clinical precision with personalized emotional support, bridging a gap that has long challenged providers operating under time and resource constraints.
“Empathic AI enables care that integrates clinical precision with personalized emotional support, bridging a gap that has long challenged providers operating under time and resource constraints.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Patients with cancer face complex treatment pathways intertwined with profound emotional and existential burdens.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenThis review highlights the distinct value and complexity of applying empathic AI in oncology, where sensitivities differ markedly from other clinical contexts.
“This review highlights the distinct value and complexity of applying empathic AI in oncology, where sensitivities differ markedly from other clinical contexts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Oncology presents distinct emotional and ethical challenges, making it a uniquely high-stakes setting for the application of empathic AI.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningEmpathic AI holds potential to reshape the patient-to-provider relationship.
“Empathic AI also holds potential to reshape the patient-to-provider relationship.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningThe pace of innovation complicates assessments of clinical readiness.
“While this pace of innovation reflects momentum in the field, it also complicates assessments of clinical readiness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: AI technologies are rapidly evolving.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenModels trained on nonrepresentative data may risk reinforcing racial, cultural, and linguistic biases, leading to emotionally inappropriate or harmful interactions.
“Models trained on nonrepresentative data may also risk reinforcing racial, cultural, and linguistic biases, leading to emotionally inappropriate or even harmful interactions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningEmpathic AI is positioned not as a substitute for human connection but as a decision support and interaction support that may enhance communication, accessibility, and emotional scaffolding within clinician-led care.
“This positions empathic AI to be understood not as a substitute for human connection but as a decision support and interaction support that may enhance communication, accessibility, and emotional scaffolding within clinician-led care.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThese systems help both patients and health care providers navigate sensitive conversations, ensuring that care remains patient-centered and aligned with individual values during the final stages of life.
“These systems help both patients and health care providers navigate sensitive conversations, ensuring that care remains patient-centered and aligned with individual values during the final stages of life.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
The emotional toll of a cancer diagnosis creates a critical need for empathetic care.
“The emotional toll of a cancer diagnosis underscores the critical need for empathetic care.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Empathy has historically been difficult to replicate through technology.
“Empathy, long considered a distinctly human element of care, has historically been difficult to replicate through technology.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There are systemic gaps in access to emotional support and culturally responsive communication in cancer care that are long-standing public health challenges.
“This progress may help address systemic gaps in access to emotional support and culturally responsive communication, which have been long-standing public health challenges in cancer care.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Oncology has distinct emotional, ethical, and communicative demands that require a field-specific framework.
“Given the distinct emotional, ethical, and communicative demands of oncology, this review underscores the need for a field-specific framework to guide the safe, equitable, and meaningful integration of empathic AI into cancer care delivery.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Caregivers often experience high levels of stress and burnout.
“who often experience high levels of stress and burnout”
The paper relies on this without support.
Human empathy arises from lived experience, relational context, and moral judgment.
“human empathy arises from lived experience, relational context, and moral judgment”
The paper relies on this without support.
Patients with cancer face complex treatment pathways intertwined with profound emotional and existential burdens.
“patients face complex treatment pathways intertwined with profound emotional and existential burdens”
The paper relies on this without support.
True empathic understanding rooted in shared experience remains uniquely human.
“While AI can simulate or mimic affective responses and detect emotional cues, true empathic understanding rooted in shared experience remains uniquely human.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Trust remains the foundation of health care in sensitive and difficult situations and among vulnerable populations.
“Specifically, loss of trust in providers and institutions is detrimental to cancer care, as trust remains the foundation of health care in sensitive and difficult situations and among vulnerable populations.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Concepts of empathy, emotional expression, and caregiving may vary considerably across cultures; what is perceived as compassionate in one context may be viewed as intrusive or inappropriate in another.
“Concepts of empathy, emotional expression, and caregiving may vary considerably across cultures; what is perceived as compassionate in one context may be viewed as intrusive or inappropriate in another.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Cultural variations in emotional expression, communication styles, and attitudes toward AI are likely to influence both the development and reception of empathic AI systems.
“Cultural variations in emotional expression, communication styles, and attitudes toward AI are likely to influence both the development and reception of empathic AI systems.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Oncology presents distinct emotional and ethical challenges, making it a uniquely high-stakes setting for the application of empathic AI.
“Oncology presents distinct emotional and ethical challenges, making it a uniquely high-stakes setting for the application of empathic AI.”
The paper relies on this without support.
AI technologies are rapidly evolving.
“Another limitation relates to the rapidly evolving nature of AI technologies.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
38 of 44 studies is not 85%
MinorThe discussion reports 85% for 38 of 44 studies, whereas 38/44 is about 86.4%. The results section reports the same count as 86%.
Reported 85 · recomputed 86.363636
“with 85% (38/44) addressing tailored patient education”
An included study falls outside the stated date range
MinorThe paper says its included literature ends in January 2025 and identifies references 14-57 as included studies, but reference 57 was published in March 2025.
“Study characteristics are summarized in Table S1 in Multimedia Appendix 1 [14-57]. The included literature spans from June 2018 to January 2025”
“57. Klotz R Pausch TM Kaiser J et al ChatGPT vs. surgeons on pancreatic cancer queries: accuracy & empathy evaluated by patients and experts HPB (Oxford) Mar 2025 27 3 311 317”
Cites
Revolutionizing healthcare: the role of artificial intelligence in clinical practice
Alowais, S. A., Alghamdi, S. S., Alsuhebany, N., Alqahtani, T., Alshaya, A. I., Almohareb, S. N., Aldairem, A., Alrashed, M., Bin Saleh, K., Badreldin, H. A., et al. (2023) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-023-04698-z · Cited by 3,146 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Through these functions, AI platforms foster stronger patient-provider relationships in the clinical landscape [43].”
Ayers, J. W., Poliak, A., Dredze, M., Leas, E. C., Zhu, Z., Kelley, J. B., Faix, D. J., Goodman, A. M., Longhurst, C. A., Hogarth, M., et al. (2023) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.1838 · Cited by 2,613 · cited 6× · see citing works
“Others found that AI-generated patient-facing responses were rated significantly higher in quality, clarity, and empathy than those written by clinicians under time pressure, pointing to the potential of AI to support consistency in emotionally attuned communication [21,28,32].”
InfluentialXu, L., Sanders, L., Li, K., & Chow, J. C. L. (2021) · JMIR Cancer · doi:10.2196/27850 · Cited by 571 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…work by demonstrating how generative AI tools tailor educational content based on patient demographics, clinical context, and informational needs, including evaluations of ChatGPT and other large language models (LLMs) responding to cancer-related questions and decision-making scenarios [22-25].”
Ethical Issues of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine and Healthcare
Farhud, D. D., & Zokaei, S. (2021) · Iranian Journal of Public Health · doi:10.18502/ijph.v50i11.7600 · Cited by 416 · cited 1× · see citing works
“However, despite these advances, the integration of AI into emotionally sensitive domains such as oncology introduces a new set of unresolved ethical, relational, and epistemological challenges [12].”
Khosravi, M., Zare, Z., Mojtabaeian, S. M., & Izadi, R. (2024) · Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology · doi:10.1177/23333928241234863 · Cited by 265 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Artificial intelligence (AI) has become increasingly embedded in medical practice over the past decade, enhancing care capabilities from the development of personalized health libraries and innovative patient education strategies to disease screening, diagnostics, and treatment planning [1-4].”
Greer, S., Ramo, D., Chang, Y.-J., Fu, M., Moskowitz, J., & Haritatos, J. (2019) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/15018 · Cited by 265 · cited 4× · see citing works
“In another notable example, the unique emotional needs of teen and young adult patients with cancer were addressed by the delivery of positive psychology skills via the Vivi-bot chatbot [14].”
InfluentialArtificial intelligence technologies and compassion in healthcare: A systematic scoping review
Morrow, E. M., Zidaru, T., Ross, F., Mason, C. L., Patel, K. D., Ream, M., & Stockley, R. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.971044 · Cited by 255 · cited 2× · see citing works
“A more speculative take on AI technologies in health care argues that the next step may well be social robots imbued with artificial empathy as the caregivers of the future [20].”
Health intelligence: how artificial intelligence transforms population and personalized health
Shaban-Nejad, A., Michalowski, M., & Buckeridge, D. L. (2018) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-018-0058-9 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Self-citationChaix, B., Bibault, J.-E., Pienkowski, A., Delamon, G., Guillemassé, A., Nectoux, P., & Brouard, B. (2019) · JMIR Cancer · doi:10.2196/12856 · Cited by 227 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Similarly, Chaix et al [17] and Siglen et al [18] reported that chatbot-delivered education improved adherence to treatment regimens and facilitated greater engagement in shared decision-making.”
Niki, K., Okamoto, Y., Maeda, I., Mori, I., Ishii, R., Matsuda, Y., Takagi, T., & Uejima, E. (2019) · Journal of Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1089/jpm.2018.0527 · Cited by 145 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Other researchers have used NLP approaches, such as analyzing emotion intensity or identifying psychosocial challenges, to address end-of-life discussions with patients with cancer and provide them with targeted resources specific to their stage of the cancer journey [22,24,35,36,41,56].”
Uses and Limitations of Artificial Intelligence for Oncology
Kolla, L., & Parikh, R. B. (2024) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.35307 · Cited by 126 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In oncology, AI models are being developed to standardize and improve the consistency and quality of care, offering new ways to support both clinicians and patients in navigating complex diagnostic and treatment pathways [5].”
Physician and artificial intelligence chatbot responses to cancer questions from social media
Chen, D., Parsa, R., Hope, A., Hannon, B., Mak, E., Eng, L., Liu, F.-F., Fallah-Rad, N., Heesters, A. M., & Raman, S. (2024) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0836 · Cited by 120 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Notably, findings from this review suggest that patients may sometimes prefer AI-generated responses over those from physicians when it comes to clarity, empathy, and accessibility [19,29,32].”
InfluentialEthics of AI in Radiology: A Review of Ethical and Societal Implications
Goisauf, M., & Abadía, M. C. (2022) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2022.850383 · Cited by 119 · cited 1× · see citing works
“While some view this shift as a loss, others argue that AI could enhance intuition by providing real-time feedback and mitigating cognitive biases [21,37].”
Considering the role of human empathy in AI-driven therapy
Rubin, M., Arnon, H., Huppert, J. D., & Perry, A. (2024) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/56529 · Cited by 111 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Yet recent advancements suggest that AI systems may approximate emotional attunement, recognize distress, and respond in ways perceived as empathic and compassionate [13].”
Siglen, E., Vetti, H. H., Lunde, A. B. F., Hatlebrekke, T. A., Strømsvik, N., Hamang, A., Hovland, S. T., Rettberg, J. W., Steen, V. M., & Bjorvatn, C. (2022) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2021.09.027 · Cited by 91 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Furthermore, multiple studies examining chatbots showed that patients are capable of trusting machines [27], including the Rosa chatbot focused on breast cancer gene testing embedded into an app for patients with breast and ovarian cancer [18].”
De Silva, D., Ranasinghe, W., Bandaragoda, T., Adikari, A., Mills, N., Iddamalgoda, L., Alahakoon, D., Lawrentschuk, N., Persad, R., Osipov, E., et al. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0205855 · Cited by 86 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Furthermore, NLP models have been used to analyze patients’ decision-making behaviors and emotions [33,41], allowing clinicians to understand patients better and tailor their recommendations accordingly.”
Chow, J. C. L., & Li, K. (2024) · JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology · doi:10.2196/64406 · Cited by 75 · cited 2× · see citing works
“While chatbots may be more easily applied to diagnostics, treatment, and monitoring [26], progress on interpersonal-type communications is being made, despite challenges noted on the algorithmic development side [45].”
Adikari, A., de Silva, D., Moraliyage, H., Alahakoon, D., Wong, J., Gancarz, M., Chackochan, S., Park, B., Heo, R., & Leung, Y. (2022) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2021.08.015 · Cited by 71 · cited 2× · see citing works
“At the same time, emerging work in sentiment modeling and empathic conversational agent development suggests early methodological movement toward quantifying affective signals, although approaches remain heterogeneous and not yet clinically standardized [49,53,54].”
Deep learning in selected cancers’ image analysis—a survey
Debelee, T. G., Kebede, S. R., Schwenker, F., & Shewarega, Z. M. (2020) · Journal of Imaging · doi:10.3390/jimaging6110121 · Cited by 70 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For example, AI has rapidly become a critical adjunct for medical image analytics, demonstrating that computer models can achieve state-of-the-art tumor detection, segmentation, extraction, and classification across a wide range of cancer types [9].”
Spiegel, B. M. R., Liran, O., Clark, A., Samaan, J. S., Khalil, C., Chernoff, R. A., Reddy, K., & Mehra, M. (2024) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-024-01011-0 · Cited by 60 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Others further illustrate these applications through immersive and affect-aware interventions, including AI-driven virtual reality (VR) therapy for anxiety and depression [47,48] and sentiment-aware conversational agents designed to detect and respond to emotional distress [49].”
ChatGPT: Can You Prepare My Patients for [18F]FDG PET/CT and Explain My Reports?
Rogasch, J. M. M., Metzger, G., Preisler, M., Galler, M., Thiele, F., Brenner, W., FELDHAUS, F. W., Wetz, C., Amthauer, H., Furth, C., et al. (2023) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.123.266114 · Cited by 59 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…oriented, the authors emphasize that “using AI and combining it with human wisdom, empathy, and affection will be the method of choice for further fruitful development of tomorrow’s senology” [38], highlighting the envisioned role of empathy even within data-driven clinical tools [40,52].”
The use of AI in mental health services to support decision-making: scoping review
Auf, H., Svedberg, P., Nygren, J., Nair, M., & Lundgren, L. E. (2025) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/63548 · Cited by 56 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Beyond imaging, AI supports personalized oncology through predictive models that generate tailored treatment recommendations based on individual patient demographics, genomics, and clinical profiles [10].”
Ammar, N., Bailey, J. E., Davis, R. L., & Shaban-Nejad, A. (2021) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/24738 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Self-citationAli, M. R., Sen, T., Kane, B., Bose, S., Carroll, T. M., Epstein, R., Schubert, L., & Hoque, E. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2021.3054717 · Cited by 40 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…systems highlight that digital clinical empathy requires intentional strategies (ie, timely acknowledgment, authenticity, appropriate boundary setting, and contextual responsiveness) and may be best sustained through hybrid models that combine AI-enabled support with human oversight [34-36].”
O'Gara, G., Murray, L., Georgopoulou, S., Anstiss, T., Macquarrie, A., Wheatstone, P., Bellman, B., Gilbert, P., Steed, A., & Wiseman, T. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047626 · Cited by 34 · cited 2× · see citing works
“For instance, the VR psychological support tool used in the SafeSpace study [51] sought to integrate guided relaxation exercises and compassionate mind training for oncology patients afflicted with a range of cancer types, including those under palliative care.”
Adikari, A., Silva, D. D., Ranasinghe, W. K. B., Bandaragoda, T., Alahakoon, O., Persad, R. A., Lawrentschuk, N., Alahakoon, D., & Bolton, D. M. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0229361 · Cited by 33 · cited 2× · see citing works
“At the same time, emerging work in sentiment modeling and empathic conversational agent development suggests early methodological movement toward quantifying affective signals, although approaches remain heterogeneous and not yet clinically standardized [49,53,54].”
Goel, I., Bhaskar, Y., Kumar, N., Singh, S., Amanullah, M., Dhar, R., & Karmakar, S. (2025) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1550407 · Cited by 31 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These technologies provide timely, accurate, and accessible information that can empower patients and caregivers, supporting engagement, comprehension, and autonomy throughout the cancer care continuum [6-8].”
Luetke Lanfer, H., Reifegerste, D., Weber, W., Memenga, P., Baumann, E., Geulen, J., Klein, S., Müller, A., Hahne, A., & Weg-Remers, S. (2024) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-024-10785-8 · Cited by 30 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…systems highlight that digital clinical empathy requires intentional strategies (ie, timely acknowledgment, authenticity, appropriate boundary setting, and contextual responsiveness) and may be best sustained through hybrid models that combine AI-enabled support with human oversight [34-36].”
Sezgin, E., Jackson, D. I., Kocaballi, A. B., Bibart, M., Zupanec, S., Landier, W., Audino, A., Ranalli, M., & Skeens, M. (2025) · Cancer Medicine · doi:10.1002/cam4.70554 · Cited by 30 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Of particular interest is the potential of LLMs as providers of real-time, individually customized, and up-to-date medical information, with their concomitant risks and benefits, to allow for informed, complex, and empathic decision-making among caregivers for oncology patients [30].”
Mao, W., Chen, W., & Wang, Y. (2024) · Technology and Health Care · doi:10.3233/thc-230735 · Cited by 29 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Others further illustrate these applications through immersive and affect-aware interventions, including AI-driven virtual reality (VR) therapy for anxiety and depression [47,48] and sentiment-aware conversational agents designed to detect and respond to emotional distress [49].”
Bandaragoda, T., Ranasinghe, W., Adikari, A., de Silva, D., Lawrentschuk, N., Alahakoon, D., Persad, R., & Bolton, D. (2018) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/s10434-018-6372-2 · Cited by 29 · cited 1× · see citing works
“As this age group typically experiences heightened anxiety and depression posttreatment completion, this kind of intervention fills a previously unmet need [55].”
Leung, Y. W., Wouterloot, E., Adikari, A., Hirst, G., Silva, D. D., Wong, J., Bender, J. L., Gancarz, M., Gratzer, D., Alahakoon, D., et al. (2021) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/21453 · Cited by 29 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Several studies examined the use of LLMs to help clinicians better understand caregiver perspectives, enabling the cocreation of more responsive group interventions [30, 31].”
Kharko, A., McMillan, B., Hagström, J., Muli, I., Davidge, G., Hägglund, M., & Blease, C. (2024) · DIGITAL HEALTH · doi:10.1177/20552076241291384 · Cited by 27 · cited 1× · see citing works
“When it comes to clinical documentation, AI-powered notes written by OpenAI’s ChatGPT 3.5 and GPT 4.0 have been found to be more personalized and empathetic [42].”
InfluentialFactors influencing patients’ engagement with ChatGPT for accessing health-related information
Alanezi, F. (2024) · Critical Public Health · doi:10.1080/09581596.2024.2348164 · Cited by 26 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Other researchers have used NLP approaches, such as analyzing emotion intensity or identifying psychosocial challenges, to address end-of-life discussions with patients with cancer and provide them with targeted resources specific to their stage of the cancer journey [22,24,35,36,41,56].”
Exploring the role of ChatGPT in oncology: providing information and support for cancer patients
Cè, M., Chiarpenello, V., Bubba, A., Felisaz, P. F., Oliva, G., Irmici, G., & Cellina, M. (2024) · BioMedInformatics · doi:10.3390/biomedinformatics4020049 · Cited by 24 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These technologies provide timely, accurate, and accessible information that can empower patients and caregivers, supporting engagement, comprehension, and autonomy throughout the cancer care continuum [6-8].”
Chatbots in cancer applications, advantages and disadvantages: all that glitters is not gold
Goumas, G., Dardavesis, T. I., Syrigos, K., Syrigos, N., & Simou, E. (2024) · Journal of Personalized Medicine · doi:10.3390/jpm14080877 · Cited by 24 · cited 4× · see citing works
“While chatbots may be more easily applied to diagnostics, treatment, and monitoring [26], progress on interpersonal-type communications is being made, despite challenges noted on the algorithmic development side [45].”
InfluentialThe compassion illusion: can artificial empathy ever be emotionally authentic?
K. G., A., & Joseph, J. (2025) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1723149 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Leung, Y. W., Park, B., Heo, R., Adikari, A., Chackochan, S., Wong, J., Alie, E., Gancarz, M., Kacala, M., Hirst, G., et al. (2022) · JMIR Cancer · doi:10.2196/35893 · Cited by 23 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Also, as patient care is a complex endeavor involving an interconnected team of clinicians, patients, and caregivers, the use of empathic AI chatbots can be at the center of an integrated and holistic approach to support [26,43,50].”
Ranasinghe, W., de Silva, D., Bandaragoda, T., Adikari, A., Alahakoon, D., Persad, R., Lawrentschuk, N., & Bolton, D. (2018) · Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations · doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.08.012 · Cited by 21 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…emotion-sensitive prompts can enhance provider-patient dialogues and reduce burnout by offloading cognitive and emotional labor, such as the analysis of patient decision-making and emotions provided by the PRIME-2 (Patient Reported Information Multidimensional Exploration version 2) framework [46].”
Precision Health and Medicine: A Digital Revolution in Healthcare
(2020) · Studies in Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-24409-5 · Cited by 21 · cited 1× · see citing works
“These technologies have ushered in a new era of precision health and medicine [11], specifically impacting the field of oncology, informing care strategies that range from recurrence prediction and surgical planning to emotional assessment.”
Klotz, R., Pausch, T. M., Kaiser, J., Joos, M. C., Hecktor, R., Ahmed, A., Dörr-Harim, C., Mehrabi, A., Loos, M., Roth, S., et al. (2025) · HPB · doi:10.1016/j.hpb.2024.11.012 · Cited by 18 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Study characteristics are summarized in Table S1 in Multimedia Appendix 1 [ 14-57 14-57 ].”
Jo, M. H., Kim, M.-J., Oh, H.-K., Choi, M. J., Shin, H.-R., Lee, T.-G., Ahn, H.-M., Kim, D.-W., & Kang, S.-B. (2024) · International Journal of Colorectal Disease · doi:10.1007/s00384-024-04670-3 · Cited by 17 · cited 5× · see citing works
“Other researchers have used NLP approaches, such as analyzing emotion intensity or identifying psychosocial challenges, to address end-of-life discussions with patients with cancer and provide them with targeted resources specific to their stage of the cancer journey [22,24,35,36,41,56].”
InfluentialWei, G.-X., Zhou, Y., Li, Z., & Qiu, M. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29249 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Leung, Y. W., Ng, S., Duan, L., Lam, C., Chan, K., Gancarz, M., Rennie, H., Trachtenberg, L., Chan, K. P., Adikari, A., et al. (2023) · JMIR Cancer · doi:10.2196/40113 · Cited by 12 · cited 3× · see citing works
“For example, AI-based cofacilitators for online cancer support groups were shown to provide targeted emotional support for both patients and their caregivers in response to the detection of emotional distress [16].”
Li, Y., Gao, W., Luan, Z., Zhou, Z., & Li, J. (2023) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.48670 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence in senology—where do we stand and what are the future horizons?
Mundinger, A., & Mundinger, C. (2024) · European Journal of Breast Health · doi:10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2024.2023-12-13 · Cited by 9 · cited 3× · see citing works
“For example, ChatGPT has been used to assist in the interpretation of personalized breast cancer screening studies with 80% accuracy while reducing clinician workload by 70% [38].”
Mårell-Olsson, E., Mejtoft, T., Tovedal, S., & Söderström, U. (2021) · The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology · doi:10.1108/ijilt-11-2020-0199 · Cited by 8 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Likewise, Mårell-Olsson et al [44] demonstrated that socially intelligent agents can address nonmedical needs in pediatric populations by reducing feelings of isolation, supporting coping, and facilitating participation in daily activities.”
Being diagnosed with a rhabdomyosarcoma in the era of artificial intelligence: whom can we trust?
Clerici, C. A., Bernasconi, A., Lasalvia, P., Bisogno, G., Milano, G. M., Trama, A., Chiaravalli, S., Bergamaschi, L., Casanova, M., Massimino, M., et al. (2024) · Pediatric Blood & Cancer · doi:10.1002/pbc.31256 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Multimodal AI in Healthcare: A Paradigm Shift in Health Intelligence
(2023) · Studies in Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-14771-5 · Cited by 7 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Artificial intelligence (AI) has become increasingly embedded in medical practice over the past decade, enhancing care capabilities from the development of personalized health libraries and innovative patient education strategies to disease screening, diagnostics, and treatment planning [1-4].”
Self-citationHuman-artificial intelligence symbiotic reporting for theranostic cancer care
Turner, J. H. (2025) · Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals · doi:10.1089/cbr.2024.0216 · Cited by 6 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The findings of this review underscore the value of hybrid clinical care models, wherein humans and machines complement each other, termed human-AI symbiosis [39].”
Triangle of Trust in Cancer Care? The physician, the patient, and artificial intelligence chatbot
Turner, J. H. (2023) · Cancer Biotherapy and Radiopharmaceuticals · doi:10.1089/cbr.2023.0112 · Cited by 5 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Furthermore, multiple studies examining chatbots showed that patients are capable of trusting machines [27], including the Rosa chatbot focused on breast cancer gene testing embedded into an app for patients with breast and ovarian cancer [18].”
Managing emotional dialogue for a virtual cancer patient: a schema-guided approach
Kane, B., Giugno, C., Schubert, L., Haut, K., Wohn, C., & Hoque, E. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2023.3317805 · Cited by 5 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Other researchers have used NLP approaches, such as analyzing emotion intensity or identifying psychosocial challenges, to address end-of-life discussions with patients with cancer and provide them with targeted resources specific to their stage of the cancer journey [22,24,35,36,41,56].”
Compassionate Machines: The Ethics of “Artificial Empathy” in Cancer Care
Koranteng, E., Lewis, A. C. F., & Abel, G. A. (2024) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0824 · Cited by 5 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Notably, findings from this review suggest that patients may sometimes prefer AI-generated responses over those from physicians when it comes to clarity, empathy, and accessibility [19,29,32].”
Alanzi, T. M., Alzahrani, W., Albalawi, N. S., Allahyani, T., Alghamdi, A., Al-Zahrani, ., Almutairi, ., Alzahrani, H., Almulhem, L., Alanzi, N., et al. (2023) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.50781 · Cited by 4 · cited 2× · see citing works
“However, concerns about misinformation, cultural insensitivity, and overreliance on AI-generated outputs were raised across multiple studies [26-28].”
Gliwska, E., Barańska, K., Maćkowska, S., Różańska, A., Sobol, A., & Spińczyk, D. (2023) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers15225437 · Cited by 3 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Furthermore, NLP models have been used to analyze patients’ decision-making behaviors and emotions [33,41], allowing clinicians to understand patients better and tailor their recommendations accordingly.”
Leung, Y. W., Wouterloot, E., Adikari, A., Hong, J., Asokan, V., Duan, L., Lam, C., Kim, C., Chan, K. P., Silva, D. D., et al. (2024) · JMIR Cancer · doi:10.2196/43070 · Cited by 3 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Studies by Leung et al [15,16] evaluated AI cofacilitators that adapted group-based educational content in real time based on participant mood and interaction dynamics, enhancing cohesion and engagement.”
Hamza-Cherif, S., Tani, L. F. K., & Settouti, N. (2024) · Advances in Technology Innovation · doi:10.46604/aiti.2024.13523 · Cited by 3 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Others further illustrate these applications through immersive and affect-aware interventions, including AI-driven virtual reality (VR) therapy for anxiety and depression [47,48] and sentiment-aware conversational agents designed to detect and respond to emotional distress [49].”
McDarby, M., Mroz, E. L., Hahne, J., Malling, C. D., Carpenter, B. D., & Parker, P. A. (2024) · Journal of Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1089/jpm.2024.0256 · Cited by 3 · cited 3× · see citing works
“While some view this shift as a loss, others argue that AI could enhance intuition by providing real-time feedback and mitigating cognitive biases [21,37].”
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Alemdar, M., & Bozcuk, H. (2026) · Current Oncology · doi:10.3390/curroncol33070400
“…systems combining clinical precision with emotional intelligence hold considerable promise for distress recognition and psychosocial support, while cautioning that responsible integration must address the risks of overreliance on automated tools, cultural insensitivity, and patient privacy [35].”
Gao, J., Omowale, S. S., Aguilera, J., Griffin, B. C., Zhang, Y., Radford, B. J., & Windett, J. H. (2026) · doi:10.2196/preprints.109097
- Authors
- White, B. M., Aitken, G. L., Zink, J. A., Kheirkhah Rahimabad, P., Kumsa, F. A., Hashtarkhani, S., Rashid, R., Kheirinejad, S., Girdwood, T., Brett, C. L., Davis, R. L., Schwartz, D. L., & Shaban-Nejad, A.
- Affiliations
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
- University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
- University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- JMIR Cancer
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2026-04-09
- Volume
- 12
- Pages
- e82336-e82336
- ISSN
- 2369-1999 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC13065233
- OpenAlex
- W7152751944
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2
- FWCI
- 3.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- JMIR Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Keywords
- empathic AI, patient navigation, cancer care, patient education, emotional support, psychosocial well-being, clinical decision-making, patient-centered care, patient engagement, clinician burden, AI ethics, cultural insensitivity, patient privacy, health equity, implementation barriers
- MeSH terms
- Artificial Intelligence, Empathy, Humans, Medical Oncology, Neoplasms, Patient-Centered Care, Patient Navigation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-23.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-23.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review