Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 437

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Derivation and Comparative Assessment of Retinal Pigment Epithelium from Human Embryonic Stem Cells Using Transcriptomics

Klimanskaya, Irina, Hipp, Jason, Rezai, Kourous A., West, Michael, Atala, Anthony, Lanza, Robert·2004·Cloning and Stem Cells

Abstract

Human stem-cell derivatives are likely to play an important role in the future of regenerative medicine. Evaluation and comparison to their in vivo counterparts is critical for assessment of their therapeutic potential. Transcriptomics was used to compare a new differentiation derivative of human embryonic stem (hES) cells--retinal pigment epithelium (RPE)--to human fetal RPE. Several hES cell lines were differentiated into putative RPE, which expressed RPEspecific molecular markers and was capable of phagocytosis, an important RPE function. Isolated hES cell-derived RPE was able to transdifferentiate into cells of neuronal lineage and redifferentiate into RPE-like cells through multiple passages (>30 Population doublings). Gene expression profiling demonstrated their higher similarity to primary RPE tissue than of existing human RPE cell lines D407 and ARPE-19, which has been shown to attenuate loss of visual function in animals. This is the first report of the isolation and characterization of putative RPE cells from hES cells, as well as the first application of transcriptomics to assess embryonic stem-cell derivatives and their in vivo counterparts--a "differentiomics" outlook. We describe for the first time, a differentiation system that does not require coculture with animal cells or factors, thus allowing the production of zoonoses-free RPE cells suitable for subretinal transplantation in patients with retinal degenerative diseases. With the further development of therapeutic cloning, or the creation of the banks of homozygous human leucocyte antigen (HLA) hES cells using parthenogenesis, RPE lines could be generated to overcome the problem of immune rejection and could be one of the nearest term applications of stem-cell technology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/clo.2004.6.217

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 437

Metadata

Authors
Klimanskaya, I., Hipp, J., Rezai, K. A., West, M., Atala, A., & Lanza, R.
Venue
Cloning and Stem Cells
Published
2004-09
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
217-245
ISSN
  • 1536-2302 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7457
OpenAlex
W1966300591
Cited by
437
References
2
FWCI
3.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Derivation and Comparative Assessment of Retinal Pigment Epithelium from Human Embryonic Stem Cells Using Transcriptomics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/clo.2004.6.217
The paper
Klimanskaya, I., Hipp, J., Rezai, K. A., West, M., Atala, A., & Lanza, R. (2004). Derivation and Comparative Assessment of Retinal Pigment Epithelium from Human Embryonic Stem Cells Using Transcriptomics. Cloning and Stem Cells. https://doi.org/10.1089/clo.2004.6.217

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.